Laughing at "Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week"

Posted October 8, 2007 | 12:25 PM (EST)



stumbleupon :Laughing at "Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week"   digg: Laughing at "Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week"   reddit: Laughing at "Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week"   del.icio.us: Laughing at "Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week"

An ex-senator that opposes individual rights of women; a pundit that calls people "faggots" and considers Islam a "cult"; a Christian scholar who is considered a "polemicist" and an "Islamophobe" by conservative Christians themselves; and an intellectual who has received millions from "far right" organizations since 2001, are rising up for the rights of women, gays, and religious minorities in the Muslim world. This laughable spectacle is called the Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week. It will be coming to a university near you on October 22 - 26.

Why are they going to universities? Why not these people go to Saudi Arabia or Pakistan and tackle extremism directly? Simple: They consider the university "the institutional base of the left." The same left which "is the enabler and abettor of the terrorist jihad."

In order, thus, to attack the left, these crusaders will be seeking to purposefully trap and target Muslim student groups at various universities. Mathrew Yglesias describes their tactics as follows: "In short, the main goal of the 'David Horowitz Freedom Center' here is to write up a petition deliberately designed to be unlikely for Muslim groups to sign and then to use Muslim groups' failure to sign the petition as evidence that they're on the side of 'our terrorist adversaries.'" The Petition has rightly been described in the blogosphere as akin to The Great Loyalty Oath from the novel Catch-22.

These compassionate crusaders plan on making "the oppression of women in Islam" a "major theme of the week."

Yet, the reality is that the American universities are some of the staunchest supporters of the rights of Muslim women. It was at a university where I met Riffat Hassan, the well-known anti-honor killing activist from the University of Louisville. It was at a university where I met Amina Wadud, the Quran scholar, who was the first woman to lead a mixed-congregation prayer in recent Muslim history and quite courageously challenged Muslim patriarchy. It was at a university where I met Abdullahi An-Naim, the Sudanese Islamic scholar whose message calls for the equality of men and women in and whose teacher was executed in 1983 for such ideas. It was a university where I met Rafia Zakaria, the feminist activist whose commentary on issues affecting Muslim women is published in Pakistan and India. It was at a university where I heard of Laleh Bakhtiar who has now published a feminist translation of the Quran (and we know how important translations of the Quran are in the fight against extremism). It was at a university where I encountered the work of Ziba Mir-Hosseini, the Iranian activist whose speciality is Muslim divorce law, with a focus on women's rights.

It is these universities that the organizers of this initiative are calling "enablers and abettors" of terrorism.

In fact, the universities have been on the forefront of supporting many Muslim reform projects, and the area of Muslim women is not the only one they have supported.

It was at a university where Iranian dissenter and Nobel Prize Winner Shirin Ebadi went to make her speeches (where she extolled not attacking her country). It was at a university where Akbar Ganji, the Iranian dissenter, went to consult with leading left wing philosopher Richard Rorty. It was at a university where a Jewish Studies professor Deborah Lipstadt started to translate anti-holocaust-denial books into Arabic and Farsi. It was a university that gave shelter to Muslim scholars from South Africa whose homes were firebombed.

So, the question to be posed to the organizers of Islamofascism Awareness Week is this: what have they done to support any of the aforementioned academics and activists? By calling the universities "abettors of terrorism", they reveal their contempt of the aforementioned efforts, not support. With the amount of hooting and hollering they have done about women's rights in Islam, I would imagine the next step would be take some of their millions and donate the money to these activists, or better yet, to Muslim women around the world, such as this initiative belonging to Mukhtaran Mai, the survivor of gang-rape and leading feminist activist in Pakistan.

Yet, I suspect that is quite unlikely, because this "awareness" week is not about awareness at all, but using anti-Muslim animus to achieve political ends. The primary political end is to continue the war in Iraq. For example Santorum, one of the featured speakers of the week has previously urged Bush, for "public relations" reasons, to depict the war in Iraq as a greater war against "Islamic Fascism."

Further, one has to wonder what someone like Ann Coulter will be able to accomplish while discussing feminism in the Muslim world when it appears she doesn't find women intellectually capable of having the right to vote. While on the subject of Coulter I find it quite interesting that in the span of a year she has gone from calling Muslims "ragheads" to turning into a Mother Theresa for Muslim women.

Just the other day at one of our universities, a woman-hating, fundamentalist, gay-bashing, religious-supremacist, made a fool of himself, providing a hearty chuckle at his expense. In the last days of October, there will be more opportunities for such amusements. This time from some of our own. I encourage our universities to welcome these speakers.

Comments for this post are now closed

 

Comments
76
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

Hint sample
View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

I have several subjects to hit on ---
I have heard HORROR-WITZ speak. Seems he became controversial to become better known. No one heard of him before.

Know thy enemy may have helped those in DC decide it wasn't worth it to invade IRAQ.

Professors are educated and intelligent and mostly then chose to be democrats.

Religion in our generation has done more harm than good.



favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:19 PM on 10/11/2007

Muslim students who are concerned about "Islamofascism Awareness Week" at various universities need to publicly address the substance of the allegations being made against Islam. I don't mean events that say "Islam means peace." I mean serious discussions about the Quranic verses and Hadith that the other side is questioning.

These are the sorts of discussions that we promote through Muslims For A Safe America. For example, in the Religion/Identity area, we've put together "debate" handouts (one page, double-sided) on the following issues:
DEBATES ABOUT RELIGION AND IDENTITY
Why Should American Muslims Talk About American National Security?
Should American Muslims Be Loyal To America?
When Are Muslims Required to Fight, And Against Whom?
Should American Muslims Join the American Armed Forces?
Are Western Civilians Legitimate Targets in War?
Should American Muslims Work As Government Informants?
(All these handouts are available at
http://muslimsforasafeamerica.org/?page_id=49 )

Our approach is unique, because we don't present our opinions on these issues. Instead, we just present arguments on both sides of the issues, so that each Muslim can make an informed decision.

Muslim students can use such material to organize "fair and balanced" discussions about these issues. These events would actually begin to answer the real questions that many Americans have about Islam. These discussions would be a great response to the "Islamofascism Awareness Week" events that Muslim students are concerned about.

Of course, I don't expect Muslim students to actually put on these kinds of discussions in the near future, because many young Muslims have generally bought into the mentality that there is no need for us to answer people's questions as long as we say "Islam means peace." Our community"s refusal to answer questions makes others suspicious, and it allows others to dominate the discussion about Islam.

Kamran Memon, Esq.
Muslims For A Safe America
200 S. Michigan Avenue
Suite 1240
Chicago, IL 60604
(312) 961-2354
http://muslimsforasafeamerica.org/

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 PM on 10/10/2007

all you had to say was Santorum and Coulter.
case closed

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:13 PM on 10/10/2007

Fascism is a loosely defined with a whole series of shades of meaning.
Historical examples of fascism: Germany, Italy, Spain, Hungary, Hussein's Iraq, current Iran, Baathist Syria are but examples of how fascist ideology can be utilized to control and inspire population.

Fascist governments often are based on a particular ideology( Islam) that attempts to dominate and define the national discourse on some exclusive set of Islamic beliefs and place those beliefs above all other loyalties as well create a mobilized community to serve the dominant ideology.

Certainly, Iran fits this description and so do futile fantasies by Islamic radicals. They consider hyper-strict adherence to Islam in all aspects of life: cultural, political, scientific,racial etc as the defining ideology
of the society.
Also these fantasy-states have little resemblance to the actual historical Caliphates. The Caliphates were successful because of their flexibility and relative tolerance and practical
adoptation.
Osama, Hamas' type of ideology is quite different and imply a brutal oppression of any dissent
Hence: Islamo-fascism.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:04 AM on 10/10/2007

Having the mispleasure of living and working in the Middle East (the pleasure was all the Arab countries with hospitality that puts US southern hospitality to shame, in Lebanon, Egypt, Jordan, Qatar, and Syria. Saudi always sucked!). The mispleasure part was the Israel portion.

And JudyGee is in la-la land. The death ratio is 8 to 1 Palestinian children killed to israelis. Even one is horrid, but I don't hear a lot of lamenting of US weapons and tax dollars to kill those children. The overal ratio is 4.5 to 1, Palestinian to israeli.
http://www.ifamericansknew.org/

JudyGee wrote a comic book far above this post. The homes from which Jewish folks were driven inside Arab countries has long been known to be terrorized, not by the local Arab populace, but but the israeli intel and military. Ask any of the former Iraqi Jews inside israel what it was like to find out their own people a couple countries over bombed their neighborhoods to scare them out of Iraq (and other countries).

Sabra and Shatilla were real enough for the fat big aerial the brain-dead (how can they tell?) sharon to driven COMPLETELY out of the IDF. But alas, the hard-liners wanted more Palestinian blood, so they brought the varmint back.

Bottom line: israel has NEVER been attacked unless it attacked firstly. ALL former PM biographies stated this unequivocally, with pride even. This includes repeatedly crossing into Lebanon until the Lebanese finally took action, took 2 soldiers who were illegally inside Lebanon, and the rest is, just as JudyGee spouts, complete fiction from the so-called main-stream media, owned by......ta-da! The same blokes who stroke themselves and each other while vilifying anything Arabic (and Arabs are semites, BTW, while 100 percent of Ashkenazim Jews, that is, 90 percent of all world Jewry, are Ashkenazim and are NOT semites. So it's a ruse to call someone an anti-semite unless they talking about Sephardi Jews, who, by the way, are also considered 2nd class citizens inside that great bastian of democracy, israel).

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:32 PM on 10/09/2007

The mandates of radical Islam;
1. Convert
2. Submit
3. Die

It's your choice.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:32 PM on 10/09/2007

The David Horowitz Freedom Center .....
This is the best laugh I've had in a long time.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:01 PM on 10/09/2007

Let's see: A group of desert nomads wrote a book which said that they had spoken with a god and he gave them eternal rights to a certain piece of property. The nomads then claimed this deed to property was inviolable because the same god declared the nomads were "chosen" by him. Good circular argument here! This would all be dismissable as nonsensical and wishful-thinking mythology, as it had been by most of the world for centuries, except the UN bought it and acted upon it. Thus began 60 years of more violence and global unrest.
So those of us who do not believe the mythology or accept the "sacredness" of the book it is written in (a book written by mortal men and then recopied by other men for thousands of years), must refute the nonsense whenever we can. However we can. And not fight wars to preserve nonsense.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 AM on 10/09/2007

This is all very nice and probably very true and yes, Ann Coulter's brain should some day, preferably sooner than later, be preserved and displayed in the "Totally Whacked and Beyond Evil Brains of Our Time" exhibit in The Science Wing at the Smithsonian.

But I've heard it all, or similar, before. What I haven't heard ... what I am still NOT hearing, is any LOUD NOISE ... any mass protest or attention getting display of disgust from Muslims or the Muslim leaders of the world condemning terrorism and savagry in the name of Islam.

Where is the jihad against the jihadists?

Where is the fatwah against bin Laden, et al?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 AM on 10/09/2007

St. Petersberg Declaration:

"We are secular Muslims, and secular persons of Muslim societies. We are believers, doubters, and unbelievers, brought together by a great struggle, not between the West and Islam, but between the free and the unfree.

We affirm the inviolable freedom of the individual conscience. We believe in the equality of all human persons.

We insist upon the separation of religion from state and the observance of universal human rights.

We find traditions of liberty, rationality, and tolerance in the rich histories of pre-Islamic and Islamic societies. These values do not belong to the West or the East; they are the common moral heritage of humankind.

We see no colonialism, racism, or so-called "Islamaphobia" in submitting Islamic practices to criticism or condemnation when they violate human reason or rights.

We call on the governments of the world to reject Sharia law, fatwa courts, clerical rule, and state-sanctioned religion in all their forms; oppose all penalties for blasphemy and apostasy, in accordance with Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human rights; eliminate practices, such as female circumcision, honor killing, forced veiling, and forced marriage, that further the oppression of women; protect sexual and gender minorities from persecution and violence; reform sectarian education that teaches intolerance and bigotry towards non-Muslims; and foster an open public sphere in which all matters may be discussed without coercion or intimidation.

We demand the release of Islam from its captivity to the totalitarian ambitions of power-hungry men and the rigid structures of orthodoxy.

We enjoin academics and thinkers everywhere to embark on a fearless examination of the origins and sources of Islam, and to promulgate the ideals of free scientific and spiritual inquiry through cross-cultural translation, publishing, and the mass media.

We say to Muslim believers: there is a noble future for Islam as a personal faith, not a political doctrine; to Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus, Baha"is, and all members of non-Muslim faith communities: we stand with you as free and equal citizens; and to nonbelievers: we defend your unqualified liberty to question and dissent."

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:16 PM on 10/09/2007

Sir,

Thank you for those words and thoughts.

You can add me to your We. Not religiously but as a fellow thinking, compassionate human being stuck on this planet.

Such a shame we are such a minority.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:48 PM on 10/09/2007

Gary,

When the west starts pulling its influence out of the Middle East, then your question might begin to have some legitimacy. But as long as we are there, in their face with extraordinary political and military presence in places like Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iraq, Pakistan, and Afghanistan - Arab and Persian extremists will always have a solid argument to justify their war against us. Having a need for their oil doesn't justify invasion, subversion of governments, or the support of ruthless dictators - period.
Your comment is a familiar and tired tactic used by the Israeli appeasers. Muslim clerics have no basis with which to argue against the jihadists even if they wanted to. America has no inherent right to occupy Saudi Arabia and give support to its ruthless dictatorship. Neither did we ever have a right to interfere with the government of Iraq or Iran. Jihadists can only be marginalized or silenced if we stop fueling their animosity by cutting our support of inhumane governments and pulling our mercenaries...ahem....I mean soldiers out of their countries.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:24 AM on 10/09/2007

"When the west starts pulling its influence out of the Middle East, then your question might begin to have some legitimacy."

I agree. And when pigs fly we'll all be swimming peacefully in Blissful Bay.

I don't pretend to have nor see any solution to the greed or ruthlessness or idiocy of it all.

I don't even know what an Israeli appeaser is.

I'm just saying I'm not hearing any messages to Muslims in general from influential Muslims who aren't terrorists.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 PM on 10/09/2007

"I'm just saying I'm not hearing any messages to Muslims in general from influential Muslims who aren't terrorists."

No your right. These other comments about wait till were out of the Middle East and then you'll hear some noise from moderate Muslims don't hold up. The moderates, what little there are of them, are afraid of being killed by their Muslims brothers if they speak up.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:30 PM on 10/09/2007

"The moderates, what little there are of them, are afraid of being killed by their Muslims brothers if they speak up."

Thanks. You know, that crossed my mind, and I said to myself, "Jeez, I hope that's not true."

That, if true, ironically, would make non-radical Islam a male dominated religion with no balls.

(Just a joke, hold the fatwah)

As opposed to the Bush administration which is all balls with no brains, heart or compassion.

Maybe I'm even more naive than I thought, but (assuming there are way more moderates than radicals), I wonder, if all the most powerful and most respected moderate Muslim clerics in the world united, formed a consensus and made a stand and tried to convince these radicals that they're blaspheming the Koran, it might have some positive and peaceful results.

But my best guess is, "Naaah".



favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:31 PM on 10/09/2007

"Where is the fatwah against bin Laden, et al?"

It went missing the day we invaded Iraq. It's a bit of a tough sell to say to a Middle Easterner "Hey, will you help us stop the killing while we're killing your family? We want to stop the killing, you see, and we need you help us stop the killing while we're busy killing."

Like I said, a bit of a Tough Sell

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:52 AM on 10/09/2007

Granted, okay fine and okey dokey, a tough sell in those terms, and maybe naive on my part and certainly impossible until we get the war criminals out of the White House.

The actions of my own government disgust me. In the last seven years I've developed an almost Pavlovian middle finger response to the mere image of George Bush. The sound of his voice makes me ambidextrous.

The fact that this government, any government, doesn't understand and accept the clear fact that terrorism can never be defeated by force boggles my mind.

But I still hear nothing. Nothing from Muslims, nothing even about Muslims killing Muslims. This is not a Sunni vs Shiite football game. This is religious civil war. Muslim children are being slaughtered at the hands of Muslims. Where are the Muslim voices of reason at least regarding that?

The only Muslim voices I hear, the only video messages I see, are those of the terrorists. Where are the rational peace loving Muslims and why are they so quiet?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 PM on 10/09/2007

Gary, its because there are no peace loving Muslims that want to stand up and say anything because they know what real Muslims do to them when they do. They kill and terrorize them. They said nothing when OBL was blowing up the towers the first time, the USS Kole, the Kobar towers. They are absent and the left thinks W is the devil and pure evil and somehow thinks OBL is just miss-understood. Get off oil and out of the middle east and that part of the world can just turn into another Africa. No one will care, no one will go there and they will have all the oil they want to burn their lamps.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:50 PM on 10/09/2007


Sorry, no.

Peace-loving Muslims ARE the "real" Muslims
- you stating the opposite betrays your prejudice, hatred, and ignorance of Islam - composing some 99% of that population, and in fact, they DID speak up, and have continued to do so. (And as we learned shortly thereafter, Muslims
dancing in the streets after 9/11 were not
"celebrating" the attacks, but were told they
would be given candy if they danced for the cameras without being told why, in other words, it was a totally fabricated event.)
As for 'the left' thinking Bush is pure evil,
what would YOU call a man who lied us into a war,
insisted on torture, and killed hundreds of thousands of innocent men, women,
and children simply in order to increase the
wealth, power, and influence of himself and his
cronies? And as for Osama Bin Laden, it was (and is) the left who kept insisting that he be hunted down and brought to trial for his crimes, but not only did Bush stop looking for him after only ONE MONTH, and not only has the right never objected to this fact even once, but actually supports Bush
in his diverting of our resources elsewhere (i.e. to Iraq).

SR

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:49 PM on 10/09/2007

Working in the field of Muslim Women's Studies, when I first heard that the "theme" of the week was "Women's Rights in the Muslim World" I almost fell out of my chair. You have to be absolutely joking???

I'm absolutely loving the West's top-down approach to "global feminism", and of course, singling out Muslim women as the poster children for the "cause" is so counterproductive and archaic, not to mention xenophobic, Orientalist, and racist, but really, who's counting the ways?

Having these "scholars" talk about Islamo-fascism and Muslim Women's rights is like having an historian give a keynote address on quantum physics.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:22 AM on 10/09/2007
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in


Bloggers Index›
Read All Posts by
Ali Eteraz›
 

 Site  Web ask.com