More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Ali Noorani

Ali Noorani

GET UPDATES FROM Ali Noorani

Pro-Immigration GOP Presidential Hopefuls?

Posted: 02/ 2/11 04:39 PM ET

Below the radar screen of the tumult in Egypt, the Affordable Care Act, and the economy, GOP presidential kingmakers are starting to frame themselves as pro-immigration. Who'da thunk it?

On ABC News' Top Line, Senator Norm Coleman, Chair of the American Action Network said:

Let me be very clear: It's not just a tone issue it's a substance issue. We have to be very clear in rejecting [former Republican congressman and gubernatorial candidate] Tom Tancredo, saying he's not the voice of the Republican Party, on issues dealing with Hispanics, immigration. What we have to do is simply have a pro-active agenda.


All this after Senator John Cornyn performed rhetorical pirouettes at a recent Action Network-organized Hispanic Leadership Network meeting, trying to explain to a conservative Latino audience that he was for the DREAM Act, even though he voted against allowing it to be debated in the Senate. This was also the gathering where Jeb Bush said it would be "incredibly stupid" for Republicans to ignore Hispanic voters. (Maybe Cornyn read a different memo.)

Meanwhile, Ambassador John Huntsman -- former Governor of Utah -- is resigning to rumors he may enter the presidential fray. Curiously, DC press consistently describes him as a moderate on immigration--making him an unlikely, but competitive candidate.

While it is well before the crazy comes out in the GOP primary, it is interesting to see Republicans starting now by leaning to the nation's fastest growing electorate while the administration continues to pursue expensive, discriminatory enforcement programs like 287g. As our friends at America's Voice put it:

Just as the Administration expects Latino voters to deliver for the President's re-election, so do Latino voters expect the President and his Administration to deliver on their promises--to focus enforcement resources on those committing serious crimes and to spend political capital fighting for immigration reform.


All to say that it seems one of the first signs of presidential politicking is budding competition for Latino, Asian and immigrant voters.

To the victor who places a comprehensive immigration solution on the table should go the spoils.

Crossposted at ImmPolitic.

 

Follow Ali Noorani on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ImmPolitic

 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jubo
Celestianish
11:00 AM on 02/03/2011
What's next... Guns? Abortion? Pot? Freedom?

I see, cynically, why some might 'cave in' to Immigration.
09:53 AM on 02/07/2011
Who knows eventually we might civilize the GOP through cynicism
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matthew Kolken
Immigration Lawyer
09:30 AM on 02/03/2011
If the GOP produces a pro-immigration reform candidate President Obama will have ZERO chance at reelection. He certainly can't run on his record.

In the first two years of Obama's presidency felony immigration prosecutions have skyrocketed, and Obama has officially deported 779,000. This number doesn't include the number of people who have been forced to leave the U.S. under voluntary departure (voluntary deportation). If you add the voluntary deportations to the 779,000 you are probably closer to two million immigrants being expelled from this country since Obama unpacked his bags in the White House. Not exactly "Change" you can believe in.

What is even more stinging is that the President failed to exert political pressure on members of his own party who didn't vote for cloture on the DREAM Act during the lame duck. What it really comes down to is that President Obama says all the right things to immigration reform activists to placate them, but his policies, which are the most anti-immigrant of any President since Eisenhower, tell the real story. We can only hope that the GOP sees the light and makes immigration reform a cornerstone issue. If they do, Obama will be a one-termer.
04:41 PM on 02/03/2011
Keep dreaming. The GOP will not knowingly nominate a candidate that is pro-amnesty. What may happen is a candidate moves to the Left on the issue somewhat after their nomination is secure.

The American people have consistently supported enforcement over amnesty. It doesn't make sense for the GOP to pander to Hispanics at the risk of losing the support of their base, considering that Hispanics currently make up less of a proportion of the voting public than Blacks.
03:04 PM on 02/04/2011
One question, where would the GOP base go if there was a pro-immigration candidate? The fact that you label all "Hispanics" as supporters of immigration proves that the minorities will become the majorities in the next 10 years and that the GOP and the DEMS need to support this issue if they want to be in power.
05:28 PM on 02/02/2011
I would hope all GOP hopefuls would be pro-immigration. Immigration is what made this country and will continue to do so. However I would also hope they were anti-illegal immigration and wouldn't stand a chance of being elected if they were. I would also hope the DEM hopefuls (Obama) would be for pro-immigration and anti-llegal immigration also since we have immigration laws in place that need to be enforced.
08:46 PM on 02/02/2011
Pro-immigration and anti-"illegal"-immigration. This combination simply doesn't exist. In theory I suppose it is possible, but it never happens in reality.

The prefix "pro" implies you support something and that you are in favor of it. Pro-Immigration would certainly mean making legal immigration easier and more frequent. It would mean you support the concerns of immigrants. Being pro-immigrant means supporting more family visas, and making easier for even legal immigrants to go to school or be successful in the workforce.

I challenge you to find me a single anti-"illegal"-immigrant politician who supports legal immigrants-- meaning policies to make legal immigration easier and support the lives of legal immigrants.

Anti-Immigrant means Anti-immigrant.

This idea there is a difference between anti-illegal-immigrant and anti-immigrant is a convenient myth.
03:08 PM on 02/03/2011
I have not heard anyone asking for less legal immigration. I have not heard anyone anyone denouncing legal immigrants. I have not heard anyone wanting to cut family visas. To me that is pro-immigration. Now could there be more done, absolutly, they could streamline the process, make it less expensive, allow more to come over here legally, but them not doing those things does not make them anti-immigration. It is hard to justify doing any of those things with 11-12 million people here illegally.
FoundersFan
right = correct
04:58 PM on 02/02/2011
Comprehensive Immigration Reform means AMNESTY. No thank you. And it's interesting that the only "candidate" mentioned is John Huntsman who no one has ever heard and who has an equal chance of being the Republican nominee as I do--and I'm not even running.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Viper1st
multi quasi faceted
11:02 AM on 02/03/2011
Agreed ~ John Huntsman name is being thrown out by liberal "Journolists," knowing Mr. Huntsman is from the pro-illegal state of Utah ~

A state which grants drivers licenses to illegals, grants in-state post-secondary tuitition to illegals, grants welfare servces to llegals

The tide of U.S. Taxpayer opinion has changed ~ no longer tolerant of 11 million illegals, while 14.2 million voting Americans are out of work