iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Allen Frances

GET UPDATES FROM Allen Frances
 

Psychiatric Mislabeling Is Bad for Your Mental Health

Posted: 05/09/2012 8:06 pm

An accurate diagnosis is a wonderful thing -- a giant step toward explaining what previously seemed unexplainable and starting what is very likely to be an effective treatment. An inaccurate diagnosis can be a disaster -- leading not only to inappropriate medication but also to stigma, ruined self confidence, reduced ambition, needless worries, despair about the future, and a deeply injured sense of self.

Every week, I receive one or two emails describing the pain inflicted by careless diagnosis. And when I give talks, almost invariably someone in the audience (often a mental health professional) will come up afterwards to describe their own personal ordeal -- being misdiagnosed, mistreated, and given up as too ill to be productive.

The diagnoses that are most often harmfully misapplied, in my opinion, are schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, ADHD, and autism. The most frequent cause of overdiagnosis is a clinician jumping to a rash conclusion based on insufficient evidence. Risk factors for mislabeling on the patient side are youth, a short track record of symptom evolution, an atypical presentation, drug use, and family or environmental stress. Risk factors on the system side are evaluator inexperience, diagnostic exuberance, and external pressures (e.g., whether insurance, disability, or needed school services depend on having the diagnosis).

The best way for therapists to avoid mislabeling is to take more time before arriving at a diagnosis -- more time in each session and using many sessions whenever things are unclear. When in doubt, clinicians should use the appropriate Not Otherwise Specified category rather than prematurely applying an incorrect and stigmatizing label. It is almost always better to underdiagnose than to overdiagnose. Once a mislabel is given, it takes on a life of its own -- it is much easier to step up to a needed diagnosis than to step down from an inaccurate one.

I have heard many heartbreaking (but also heartwarming) stories of young kids who were burdened by the weight of a gloomy diagnosis, told they would require lifelong treatment, warned that they shouldn't expect too much of themselves or from life -- who ignore and belie the grim prognostication and go on to help themselves and others. Needless to say, their lives would have been a lot less complicated if more time, care, and caution had gone into the initial diagnosis.

How can you tell if you (or a loved one) has been accurately diagnosed? First off -- don't be too cynical. It is a mistake to try to go it alone with self-diagnosis. Most often your diagnosis is accurate and you are probably in the right treatment. But always be an informed consumer -- ask questions and expect straight answers. When in doubt or if things aren't working out well, get a second opinion (and sometimes a third and fourth). An accurate diagnosis is a collaborative effort that is arrived at after a joint and thoughtful process and is constantly revisited as the course evolves and more information becomes available.

Unfortunately, DSM-5 will make the current problems with mislabeling much worse. Its new proposals (with the possible exception of autism) all cast a wider diagnostic net that will lead to much looser and less accurate diagnosis. Add to this the fact that DSM-5 has badly failed its own reliability testing because its writing is so imprecise that clinicians can't agree on how to use it. In its current form, DSM-5 is not safe and its publication should be delayed to allow sufficient time for independent review, for careful editing of its imprecise language, and for retesting to ensure adequate reliability. Anything less will cause mislabeling, result in unnecessary treatment, and make things more difficult and less promising for people who deserve better.

Allen Frances is a professor emeritus at Duke University and was the chairman of the DSM-IV task force.

 
 
 
FOLLOW SCIENCE
 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:42 AM on 05/16/2012
Hear, Hear, the self proclaimed prophet of psychiatry has released a new sermon... and, yet, again, without ANY scientific citations.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:29 PM on 05/15/2012
You put your finger on a very important point.....the correct diagnosis is everything. Without it there can be no accurate course of treatment. If in doubt, better not to diagnose...just address visible symptoms and take the time to get it right.
01:44 AM on 05/16/2012
You did, of course, notice that Dr. Frances can not produce any evidence, that his DSM IV was any better at diagnosis than the suggestions of the DSM 5.

Or did you?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:31 AM on 05/16/2012
Point taken, but regardless, the problem with correct diagnosis has existed since the first printing of the DSM and is not something I pointed out because of the DSM-V
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:50 PM on 05/17/2012
Misdiagnosis has always been a problem, beginning with the printing of the first DSM to present day. My comments were not based on a comparison of the DSM-IV to the DSM-V.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tendril
imperfect at best and proud of it
08:11 PM on 05/13/2012
The DSM with few exceptions is not a reliable treatise. If it were, it would not require constant revision. Sure, some will say that is precisely WHY it is being revised, but human behavior is just too complex to compartmentalize. Good luck with the next forty revisions.
01:46 AM on 05/16/2012
Reliable compared to WHAT? That is the question, isn't it?

And once the most ardent critics of the DSM 5, who, by the way, were the authors of the DSM IV, are willing to answer that question, we will be a great deal smarter...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tendril
imperfect at best and proud of it
06:07 AM on 05/16/2012
When I say reliable, it is a technical term. I should have explained it. In the mental health arena the standards for quality are "reliability" and "validity." Reliable means consistency over time. Validity, a somewhat more complicated term is measured by whether something is a measure of what it purports to measure. What my comment reflects are specific studies that show that with the exception of some of the more severe mental illnesses, mental health professionals can see the same symptom set and come up with different diagnosis. There is poor consistency between professionals regarding DSM diagnoses. That being said, I totally agree with your conclusion.
07:44 AM on 05/12/2012
Any psychiatric labeling for which there is no useful psychiatric treatment (but only somatic treatment) is inherently bad for health - even when it is labeling rather than mislabeling.

An obvious example is the psychiatric disorder called gender dysphoria.

So why do we have psychiatric diagnoses that can only damage health and never improve health? Why?!
01:59 AM on 05/16/2012
By that notion, since there is no "useful" treatment for the common cold, should it also not be labeled in the medical literature?

In any case, what are the particular conditions for which there is no useful treatment? And why would naming them lead to health damage?

And if it does, where is the scientific research to prove your claim?
10:02 AM on 05/10/2012
Psychiatric "Mislabeling" Is Bad for Your Mental Health

"Mislabeled" is a misnomer, misdiagnosed is correct.‎

Harold A. Maio, retired mental health editor
02:09 AM on 05/16/2012
"Misdiagnosed" is a misnomer, too, until someone can actually prove, that a specific person was actually misdiagnosed. That, of course, requires a lot more thought (and insight) than a three line post on The Huffington Post. And as far as I can tell, it has not happened on The Huffington Post, yet.
05:19 AM on 05/10/2012
A fit waiting to happen, how it comes out?
Then ignored for a few generations, becomes dosed, incarcerated, blah blah blah.
Makes you go HMM, or try to avoid.
A lot were already self drugged and some had no one around to really talk to, or came out with their true needs of knowledge/ or very slow and drawn out to where it stopped.
There are some kids now making those leaps, but it seems fewer and less knowledgeable of what they really need, and fewer it seems that can acknowledge/ comprehend what to give.
Trying to avoid can turn ugly either way also.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
TheBlueCoyote
Random Opinion Generator
12:47 AM on 05/12/2012
Word Salad is a symptom.
05:04 AM on 05/10/2012
Stop and wonder how many diagnosed/ undiagnosed of these cases were around back in the 1950's-60's.
It wasn't that bad of a time, had some left over bitter depression people, but science was picking up, a lot of inventions created, kids played outside a lot more, went to see space, cowboy and monster movies, laid on the couch trying to push curfew till 11:00 to see the rest of that awesome movie, not
that many people trying to screw you out of life.
But had racism still, it was excepted as a natural, you had the man of the house, and the wife was expected to stay home cook, clean, wait on her kids and husband and maybe go to the beauty shop and grocery shopping.
Little of this affected the kids, unless they had really bad parents.
Older kids were really getting into music, dancing, going to drive-ins, driving, ect. ect.
Then started becoming adults, all this knowledge, some acted of roaring 20's- 60's/ 70's and others still in the 30's-60's.
More self aware of things around, and some just slowed to a stop, I imagine it happened many times through the years.
The old tighten and loosen, sometimes to much regarding age.
Everyone has their opinions, so where are the kids?
Kind of leaves you not understanding, acquiring grudges, not exceptable behavior in certain circles, to much don't care, depressed, anxious blah blah blah............and mostly wrong. ( continued)
10:43 PM on 05/09/2012
2/ imagine if you had three saying you were mad, and you went for a fourth, imagine four experts saying you had bi polar and all forcing you to take a poison that kept you sad mad and languid, with no known escape, or one saying three had it wrong. Id say it a very dangerous idea to give another psychiatrists mate an opportunity to back his mate up, and stitch you up at the same time wouldn't you? Sorry Allan but until psychiatry allows for their victims to have the right to at least put to a fair test, their coming away very carefully and slowly from these poisons with cognitive support, and encouragement to do that,away from a poison that to them, is exactly that, a poison, It can only be seen as a dominant abusive profession. Sadly it is the youth who are the main victims, the vulnerable and insecure, the ones who don't know if their mad sad bad or the whole three, who just mostly need to know their not , and all can and will be ok with a few certain awareness's and behavioral changes, which for the most and in the most will naturally come about with maturation anyway, the inbetweener victims, on their way to find out about themselves, and why the world and life is such a tricky place to survive in happily, and contented, without the right information, and behaviors in place and happening.
10:41 PM on 05/09/2012
Thanks Allan good article, Ive been waiting for the misdiagnosis article, try this schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, schizo affective disorder,and Psychosis, four different diagnosis, over ten years of forceful life destroying mind bending poisoning,and depressing oppressive low self esteem name calling, ending up with electrocution, because the drugs they force into the wrong people, and get this! that "STOP WORKING" because the victims or patients reach tolerance as they do with all psychotropics or any drugs for that matter, and in tying to to deal with this poisoned(xs2) mind state that they have caused, and have wrongly diagnosed, they add other mind bending poisons to try and fix their mistakes that are unfix able with poison that hallucinates their victims, and really flip them out, and so consequently bury their victim with electricity because their poison not only doesn't work but has apparently stopped working, which im sure was/is just as much to shut down the victim as much as the carer, ten years of despair and complaints, all shut down now. One thing i would never advise anyone is to get a second opinion, especially if your already incarcerated, first of all, can you imagine if psychiatrists went around disagreeing with each other, I cant, imagine if
photo
Judy75201
Ms. "No Limit" Knicker
09:17 PM on 05/09/2012
There is so much gray area in the diagnosing of the gray matter that I can't help but think the problem is created by the people who do the diagnosing, i.e., the money that is in it for them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
TheBlueCoyote
Random Opinion Generator
12:50 AM on 05/12/2012
I've known therapists who obviously got in the profession in an attempt to cure themselves.