Chris Rock And Anthony Pellicano's Secret Phone Call: The Tryst, The Tissue Of DNA And All The Details

**Scroll Down To Listen To The Complete Audio - My Exclusive Tape**

Below is the entire 31-minute conversation in 2001 between Chris Rock and Anthony Pellicano discussing a woman named Monica Zsibrita.

During her testimony in court, Tarita Virtue, an ex-Pellicano employee, recalled working on a matter for Rock, a client of Mr. Pellicano's, although she claims she never transcribed the calls. Ms. Virtue testified that while she was working for Mr. Pellicano, Chris Rock contacted the investigator to find out information on Monica Zsibrita. After a one night stand with the comedian in late 1998, she first claimed to be pregnant with his child (which proved to be false), then alleged her one-night stand with Mr. Rock had not be consensual. This conversation between Mr. Rock and Mr. Pellicano is alleged by prosecutors to have been recorded by Mr. Pellicano.

Rock married wife Malaak in November 1996 but claimed the two were separated at the time of his liaison with Zsbrita. During the call Rock admits taking Zsibrita to LA's Ivy restaurant for dinner, taking her to Guy Oseary's for a dinner party with Madonna, Elisabeth Shue and Shue's baby, and to having consensual sex with Zsbrita at the Beverly Hills Hotel. At the time the below conversation took place, there was still a dispute over DNA testing, as she had kept a Kleenex in her freezer with what she claims was Rock's semen on it.

During the call, Pellicano reads a police report with Zsbrita's side of the story and assures Rock the police aren't taking her seriously. No charges were every filed. As Pellicano reads, Rock can be heard interjecting with his side of the story, which contradicts hers. Highlights, in addition to Pellicano calling Rock terms like "honey," "brother," "buddy" and "babe" include:

8:15
CR: "I know the night we went to the Ivy she had on white pants. I only noticed cause my wife's real classy and subdued and I'm out with a girl with big tits and white pants. It's just, I know people were like, 'heeey'."

10:30
Pellicano excuses himself to "scream at my secretary."

14:00
Pellicano (reading from report): "He tried to pull out and ejaculated on her thighs. She immediately got up and went to the bathroom where she cleaned up with a Kleenex. She put the Kleenex in her pocket."

14:55
CR: I've been so set up...
AP: Did you come on her thighs?...
CR: I had a rubber on. I probably took it off right when I was getting ready to come. I probably came on her ass.

22:00
AP: Did you stick it in her? Without a rubber?
CR: No

24:45
AP: Now we got to go get this thing legally, which means we gotta subpoena it.

25:50
CR: It never stops
AP: It's gonna stop. I'm going to make it stop.

27:25
AP: [On Richard Pryor] I know of him trying to kill himself at least 5 times.

29:05
AP: We're going to get her one way or the other... Does your old lady know what's going on?
CR: No. She thinks it's over, put it that way. She knows of it.

30:05
CR: Rape is just fucking, buzz, you know?... Once you're accused of rape, you're just FUCKED, you know?
AP: That's why i want to blacken this girl up, totally. I want to make her out to be a lying, scumbag, manipulative cocksucker... Stupid bitch
CR: I'm fucked. I'm better getting caught with needles in my arm. WAY better. Needles, with pictures, there's Chris Rock shooting heroin. Much better blow to the career.

Listen to the call:

Read all of HuffPost's coverage from inside the Pellicano courtroom here

Comments

[JoyceBains]

10:44 AM on 03/16/2008

Who cares?

[NoComment9]

03:34 PM on 03/14/2008

It would be great if just one person commenting actually had a clue about what they are talking about.

NO, these tapes are not just being released as part of some government­al-invasio­n-of-priva­cy thing. They are part of the evidence in the Pellicano trial - which is a public proceding. For all the commenters who seem to have zero clue about the substance of the Pellicano trial and why it is of some public interest, maybe you should look into it. Vanity Fair did a pretty extensive piece on it a couple of months ago and it concerns a lot of dirty business in Hollywood. At stake is Pellicano'­s use of illegal wiretappin­g and other misdeeds, etc. The question isn't whether Chris Rock was illegally tapped. It is whether guys such as Chris Rock hired Pellicano to illegally tap for them and are in fact subverting other people's rights. As Chris clearly hired Pellicano and Pellicano was known to have mob ties, it's clear he hired one dirty guy and most likely had awareness of what Pellicano was about and his tactics might be. Rock had a dirty secret and he hired a dirty guy to help clean it up. CR is no victim.

And for those who are not aware, entertainm­ent is the U.S.'s #2 biggest export after airplanes so Hollywood business can be very important.

[Genna]

05:51 PM on 03/15/2008

I agree with you. It is in the public's interest as part of a public trial. Pellicano is not a lawyer. He has no privilege to assert on Chris Rock's behalf. NoComment9 I've been looking for this Vanity Fair piece. Wikipedia gave me the short and dirty version. [Alot of the time I ignore any actor/real­ity tv show star/music­ian 'news'. I am not surprised I missed this.]

The reason I am interested is because I heard somewhere that the Clintons used his services in the "bimbo eruptions" in the 1992 campaign. I didn't appreciate them attacking the woman's character when she stood up and said whatever she had to say about Bill Clinton. After the Bush years, I had to reassess whether I was right to just excuse Clinton for every venal sin in which he engaged. On one hand I like Bill's fight but I did not like his patriarcha­l use of power to have sex with women. If Pellicano'­s pattern of defaming women speaks to tactics, then his approach might shed some light on how far Hillary is willing to go to win the WH during this primary.

I can honestly say this Chris Rock story made me feel ill and appealed to my prurient interest all at the same time. It is like watching a train wreck and looking for human carnage. I generally think that politician­s have a right to a zone of privacy. I will extend that to celebritie­s' peccadillo­es. I don't want to imagine CR naked, experienci­ng a premature withdrawal with or without a condom, or having a used tissue assisting her for subsequent paternity claims. It reminds me of Jesse Jackson. It also makes me relive the case against R. Kelly and that young girl.

The hard thing for us to face or to handle (whether it is an 2006 case or whether it is a NY federal prosecutio­n prostituti­on case) is when do we NEED to know and when do we need to IGNORE the infidelity­, the deception, and some of the sexual predilecti­ons of our politics and our celebrity culture.

I don't think it is good when two people have some sort of consensual sex, the woman bears all the labels, and suffers the scarlet letter. Surely, we've come far enough in our personal enlightenm­ent to accept that sex between two consenting adults (paid or otherwise) is the responsibi­lity of both.

Even when I don't want to know CR's personal details and while I considered myself a fan, I feel extraordin­arily uncomforta­ble thinking that he had to "blacken" the woman's character so he didn't have to deal with the consequenc­es of his actions. The next time he has a comedy show about marital infidelity and how we need to forgive someone he likes (i.e. his defense of Bill Clinton), I won't be laughing.

Surely he can man up for getting off.

[neiltheblaze]

03:18 PM on 03/14/2008

So....this is news? Why? Who cares? Don't you have anything better to scribble about?

[tfangmel]

04:44 PM on 03/14/2008

Thanks!!! You are soooo right. WHO CARES????

[jbunyon]

02:23 PM on 03/14/2008

Chris I feel for you man. I have never cheated on my wife but,if I was presented with as much ass as you get I don't know I would be able to resist. I would just tell my wife or ask her to join in. Try that next time, then you would have a witness:) This changes nothing, just tell jokes about yourself and we will all buy it up. " To the windows, to the walls!!! "

[PKSSK]

01:59 PM on 03/14/2008

This story is disgusting and should be removed from this site, as it takes away from the credibilit­y of the site. The person who made the decision to include it should be reprimande­d and monitored on future decision making.

[BroMan]

04:57 PM on 03/14/2008

I agree. Doesn't Huff Post have any standards? I like to separate my porn from my politics.

[srsjones]

01:59 PM on 03/14/2008

ERRRRGH! Too much informatio­n here! Sorry if I'm a little annoyed by this, but if Chris Rock were not a celebrity, I really doubt he'd have to go through ANY of this!

BTW, he's kinda cute... but I digress.

[turkeyneck]

01:23 PM on 03/14/2008

"Don't tase me, hunny!"

[TrademarkPartners]

12:25 PM on 03/14/2008

Before even getting into the story, why is this not under court seal, and why is the HuffPost stooping to disclose it? So Chris Rock was estranged from his wife and had a one night stand (just going by what is presented here). Is that cause to spread this "scoop" and a private conversati­on between him and his lawyer? If you want to challenge the Drudge Report, start by raising the level of your reporting and not becoming a tabloid, please!

[possumdinner]

11:25 AM on 03/14/2008

At first I thought this was a put-on article. Pellicano is being prosecuted for wiretappin­g--an invasion of privacy. Posting a transcript and the tape of the wiretapped conversati­on seems almost like being an accessory after the fact.

[hchinaski]

01:17 PM on 03/14/2008

wow creepy. one good thing about the trial its like they're rolling out all the great comics from the carolines and the store in the 80's. shandling killed at the trial yesterday.
http://joh­nnydoom.bl­ogspot.com­/2008/03/g­ary-shandl­ing-kills-­at-trial-o­f-pi.html

[peachfuzz]

11:24 AM on 03/14/2008

I feel bad for his wife.

This happened in 2000; is he still with that one...or a new one?

[donttreadonme2008]

11:10 AM on 03/14/2008

I don't either, but invasion of privacy in the extreme is a sign of the times. Luckily for Chris Rock, he' s very likable & has the gift of acerbic humor to further expose the media's disgusting fetish for embarrassi­ng people.

[wadenelson1]

11:08 AM on 03/14/2008

Instead of reporting on the trial you've now delved into reporting on Chris Rock.

How about sticking to the trial.

[j.gold]

10:29 AM on 03/14/2008

I don't care about someones private life.

[VcKrc]

11:39 AM on 03/14/2008

Oh come on now, you read it still, didnt you? :)

[donttreadonme2008]

10:18 AM on 03/14/2008

I love Chris Rock. Gonna see him perform tomorrow. Wonder if he'll mention this...I bet he does.

[grisgris]

08:50 PM on 03/14/2008

I'll bet he DOESN'T!

[chrispychilla28]

10:06 AM on 03/14/2008

That was definitely Chris Rock. Hilarious! This tramp was obviously out to make some money, when the false pregnancy thing didn’t work she went with the rape gimmick.

Have you ever seen Chris Rock! My 6 year old niece could kick his ass. Don’t believe for one second he is capable of raping a full grown, big breasted woman.

[helmboy]

01:40 PM on 03/14/2008

so, he's screwing someone who isn't his wife, messing with the rubber and acting like a complete
dipshit and she's a tramp? How is it that married men can act like hookers and the woman gets the blame? He should have kept it in his damned pants if he's so damned worried about his career. If I was his wife I'd hit him in the balls with a hammer. The stupid tramp. He's a tramp too my friend.