Brad Grey, the head of Paramount Pictures, arrived in court this morning with his posse of at lest five lawyers to testify in the Pellicano trial. The government went really soft on Mr. Grey with Mr. Lally deferentially asking him a series of questions about two lawsuits--the Garry Shandling matter and a lawsuit filed by screenwriter Bo Zenga in connection with "Scary Movie." Mr. Grey testified that shortly after he and his firm resigned from representing Garry Shandling, a lawsuit was filed against him and his then management company, Brillstein Grey. He told the jury that his lawyer, Bert Fields, and Greenberg Glusker were charged with the task of overseeing the lawsuit. "Mr Bert Fields, one of the great legal minds, was overseeing the lawsuit," said Mr. Grey of his former lawyer, who was a subject in the investigation into Mr. Pellicano's alleged wiretapping and allegedly illegal use of law enforcement data bases. Mr. Grey said that Mr. Fields had "hired Pellicano in the past. My understanding was never having been through any litigation, Mr. Fields brought him [Mr. Pellicano] in as a matter of course." He noted that since Mr. Fields had used the services of Mr. Pellicano in the past and "was very comfortable with him, so was I comfortable with him."

Looking cool and collected, Mr. Grey took every opportunity to let the jury know that he had no knowledge of any illegal activity of Mr. Pellicano's and was unaware that any illegal information gathered by Mr. Pellicano was used at court. When pressed by Lally if he knew for sure that Mr. Fields or his law firm didn't use any of Mr. Pellicano's allegedly illegal wiretaps or look-ups in their lawsuits against either Mr. Shandling or Mr. Zenga, Mr. Grey could only say that he wasn't aware that they did.

Mr. Pellicano declined to cross Brad Grey. The interesting thing was even as Mr. Grey praised Mr. Fields as one of the brightest legal minds in the country, he laid the entire Pellicano mess in Mr. Fields' lap, professing that it was the law firm that had all the day-to-day dealings with Mr. Fields. And, said Mr. Grey, it was his lawyer and not him, who read Mr. Pellicano's reports.

After Mr Grey gave his testimony, which really consisted of him saying "Bert Fields, Bert Fields, Bert Fields," Gregory Dovel took the stand to testify. Mr. Dovel, who represented Mr. Zenga in his lawsuit against Mr. Grey, has spent the last hour testifying that many of his conversations with his client, Bo Zenga, were wiretapped by Mr. Pellicano. After reviewing a number of documents containing notes about Mr. Dovel and Mr. Zenga, Mr. Dovel identified those notes as being summaries of conversations he had with his client concerning settlement, deposition witnesses, document and "conversations subject to the attorney client privelege." Read more coverage from the Pellicano trial

 
 

Comments
12
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- Hopalongpoppyseed See Profile I'm a Fan of Hopalongpoppyseed permalink

There have been several articles here about this Pellicano business and since the name means absolutely nothing to me, I have clicked on these articles and browsed them. I have never once felt anything but frustration and boredom. The articles have struck me as convoluted and of no relevance to anything of any interest. So I ask this question sincerely; in simple terms what is this about and why should I give a rat's patootie?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:19 PM on 03/23/2008
- diamndpeace See Profile I'm a Fan of diamndpeace permalink

So, it looks like a shovel will split the one snake indiscreet enough to sun itself on a rock. But before you get sold on how boring that might be, consider there may be a huge ball of snakes hidden under that rock. And it might all get flipped.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:11 PM on 03/24/2008
- Hopalongpoppyseed See Profile I'm a Fan of Hopalongpoppyseed permalink

I'll be sure to bring my mongoose.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:38 PM on 03/25/2008
- Hopalongpoppyseed See Profile I'm a Fan of Hopalongpoppyseed permalink

Damn, You da man (or not) ! I am mysteriousized by your magical metapoor. It's all clear as the mud now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:51 AM on 03/25/2008
- cobraxus See Profile I'm a Fan of cobraxus permalink

has anyone else noticed that Entertainment Tonight(which is owned by Paramount)has virtually everyday featured stories on Elliot Spitzer but not one on Pellicano?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:21 AM on 03/22/2008
- diamndpeace See Profile I'm a Fan of diamndpeace permalink

Add to that the LA Times and Variety seem to be under a lot of pressure from the show business big shots they serve to make this case disappear, a case that cuts to the heart of a common skeazy Hollywood practice of making problems go away.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:26 PM on 03/24/2008
- wakupmagy See Profile I'm a Fan of wakupmagy permalink

Ms. Weiner--
In your next post could you confirm if it is true that Ken Starr is on the witness list--and, if so, why?
Thank you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:49 PM on 03/20/2008
- ahopeweiner See Profile I'm a Fan of ahopeweiner permalink

Yes, Mr. Starr is on the witness list. If the government does in fact call him, I believe it would be in connection with Mr. Pellicano's investigation of Sylvester Stallone.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:32 PM on 03/21/2008
- wakupmagy See Profile I'm a Fan of wakupmagy permalink

Thank you.

I thought it might be as a result of the rumors and reports that the Clinton White House used Pellicano to attack Monica Lewinsky.

The Stallone connection is puzzling . . . but intriguing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:17 AM on 03/23/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 
 

Bloggers Index›
Read All Posts by
Allison Hope Weiner›