Pellicano Trial: Closing Arguments Begin

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

Posted April 29, 2008 | 02:10 PM (EST)



Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

Prosecutor Daniel Saunders has begun his closing argument, starting off strongly with his statement that the Pellicano Investigative Agency was "nothing more than a criminal organization operated by a well connected, well paid thug." He then went on to give the jury a recitation of the number of witnesses and documents that the government has presented showing what happened to people that found themselves on the wrong side of the Pellicano agency. Mr. Saunders has been direct, strong and quite structured in his argument, seemingly quite compelling during the opening stages. However, he seemed to be dragged down by the sheer number of counts and the complexity of what these defendants are charged with doing. MORE LATER...

Read all the coverage from inside the Pellicano courtroom.

 
 

Comments
2
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

It is going to go away. Nothing has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Ergo, the dependents are not guilty. While they are not guilty, they are hardly innocent. The truth is of little importance.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:50 PM on 04/29/2008

There are people who really want this to go away, by technicality would be fine, so, brace yourself for more absurd and delusional comments from clumsy shills.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:00 PM on 04/29/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 
 

Related Tags
 

 Site  Web ask.com