So, yesterday, while court was not in session, Bert Fields, the
attorney for Brad Grey during the Shandling v. Grey lawsuit, made a
statement attacking Garry Shandling's testimony at the trial last week.
I think it's worth pointing out that although Mr. Shandling was under
oath when he made his statements, Mr. Fields was not when he issued his
statement about what actually went down between Mr. Shandling and Mr.
Grey back in the late 1990's. Perhaps, since Mr. Fields is on the
government's witness list, he'll have a chance to make the same
statement under oath at a later date and get a chance to explain how he
knew nothing about what Mr. Pellicano was doing for him during the
years the detective worked for him. The following is part of what Mr.
Fields had to say about the Shandling lawsuit. Mr. Fields said [Scroll down for Shandling's attorney's response
"To measure the validity of that lawsuit, Shandling sued for $100
million and settled for only $4 million. The actual settlement
agreement is available for anyone who wants to check. Although I felt
confident about Brad's winning the case, I considered this an excellent
It's somewhat surprising that Mr. Fields would take this moment to talk
about his confidence in winning the Shandling case and also the
so-called "excellent" settlement that he achieved against Shandling.
Even though Mr. Fields is an attorney and probably addicted to talking
about his respective court victories, the timing of this statement
seems a bit off. He was after all, named as a subject in the Pellicano
case and questioned by the government--although he has denied all
knowledge of Mr. Pellicano's illegal activities. The thing is, even
though most of the discovery produced by the government involves cases
litigated by Mr. Fields or members of his firm in which Mr. Pellicano
conducted illegal wiretaps of many of Mr. Fields' opponents, Mr. Fields
can't seem to keep quiet about his winning record or great settlements
or even about his wonderful, straight shooting, honest clients. I
don't know if Mr. Fields is aware of this, but over here at the
Pellicano trial, the prosecution just introduced documents sent to Mr.
Pellicano during the Shandling litigation that contained confidential
information about Mr. Shandling, his accountant, his assistant, his
friend, his friend's wife and Mr. Shandling's ex. And over here at the
Pellicano trial, Mr. Shandling just testified that he was harassed and
targeted by the former detective during his case against Mr. Grey.
Given the court proceedings so far and that the evidence that Mr.
Pellicano was purportedly working for Mr. Grey and Mr. Fields when he
came up with all this confidential information on Mr. Shandling, Mr.
Fields' confidence about winning this case doesn't really come as much
of a surprise. It seems that Mr. Fields definitely had everything
working in his favor when he went up against Mr. Shandling. You'd kind
of have put your money on him to win if you'd known everything that Mr.
Pellicano was doing on the case....
Frankly, what's really outrageous about Mr. Shandling's under oath
testimony is that Mr. Shandling would actually take this all so
personally and still be so upset about the fact that Mr. Pellicano,
while working for Mr. Grey and Mr. Fields, illegally dug into every
detail of his life and harassed the people he worked with as well as
his friends. I can see where Mr. Fields would think that Mr. Shandling
was bitter. Mr. Shandling did seem a bit overly sensitive that his
longtime manager, Mr. Grey had "triple dipped," done deals behind his
back and basically breached his trust in every way possible. What's
wrong with this guy? He's worked in Hollywood for a long time. He
should have known that someone would steal his money and that when
someone more powerful than you in Hollywood tells you to drop a
dispute, you should drop it. He got a settlement, didn't he? Why is
he still so bitter about the fact that he was publicly attacked and his
reputation smeared during this litigation? And, so what if Mr. Fields
is saying the same things about him now that he said back then? He
should have expected that Mr. Fields would play things exactly the same
way he did the first time around. I'm just glad that Mr. Fields still
has a lot of respect for Mr. Grey's integrity after all of this. Mr.
Grey did tell the F.B.I. that Mr. Fields was responsible for having
contact with Mr. Pellicano and that Mr. Fields was the one who
suggested that he hire Anthony in the Shandling case. So, it's good to
know that Mr. Fields didn't take any of that personally and he's not
As for today at trial, it's really been a battle of the computer
nerds--the F.B.I. computer geeks (technically known as guys that work
in the F.B.I.'s operational technology division) versus Anthony
Pellicano (technically known as an honorary computer geek via his
relationship with 100% computer geek and telesleuth developer, Kevin
Kachikian.) Today, Mr. Pellicano made some important strides forward.
He managed to publish something for the first time--that means he was
finally able to get a document shown to the jury. (He's been having a
little trouble with that...he must have studied over the weekend.)
And, he also managed by completely confuse and befuddle the F.B.I.
expert's on cross-examination. He used a Columbo technique--pretending
to be stupid and humble while eliciting important testimony. "I'm
getting a little confused with what you're saying," he told F.B.I.
computer expert Hart. "Maybe it's my fault," he said with false
humility. He then pressed on, trying to get the F.B.I. witness to
admit that he'd altered all the data in the computers and that Mr.
Pellicano was in fact smarter than all of them. And then when the
agent finally seemed at his weakest, staring blankly in Mr. Pellicano's
direction, the former private eye to the stars went in for the kill.
"So, you never actually did that," he said, after asking the agent
about a non-existent report. "No, I didn't," the agent answered.
"That answers my question," Mr. Pellicano said confidently, grabbing
his papers from the podium, and walking back to his seat as if the
F.B.I. agent's last confused answer had just tanked the government's
Mr. David Boies represented Mr. Shandling in his lawsuit against Mr. Grey and is based
out of Washington, D.C. Mr. Boies responds to Bert Fields' statement about the Garry Shandling
lawsuit, Brad Grey and Mr. Shandling's court testimony in the Pellicano
trial. Mr. Boies noted that Mr. Fields' comment "mistates what the
settlement provides. Let me put it this way, the primary object of the
lawsuit was to recover the share in Gary Shandling's shows that Brad
Grey held and which Shandling claimed had been improperly
misappropriated. That objective was achieved by the settlement. The
money that Mr. Fields refers to--$4 million--was in addition to the
other more important elements of the settlement. One of things that
makes Bert a popular lawyer, he's very aggressive on asserting things
on behalf of his clients and attacking their opponents.
After hearing Mr. Fields' entire statement, Mr. Boies continued, "Gary
Shandling did not bring the indictment against Mr. Pellicano. He did
not bring that lawsuit. He did not volunteer to testify at it and he
testified under oath. Everything he said in the testimony was accurate
and supported by the evidence. Mr. Shandling did not select the
questions that he answered. He merely responded truthfully to questions
that were asked. I think it is regrettable that the dispute between
between Mr. Shandling and Mr. Grey which we all hoped had been resolved
continues to be the subject of public comment. I know that Gary
Shandling would rather be being funny than testifying in court or
responding to ill-considered attacks."
Former Anthony Pellicano employee, Lily LeMasters took the stand before
noon today. She set a new trend in witness attire, sporting a leopard
print blouse with a small square on the back, featuring an actual
leopard. She paired the animal print with brown pants and a black
Chanel bag and looked trim, attractive and petrified as she entered the
courtroom. She was admonished several times by the Judge to speak up
and then, Mr. Lally took over on direct, eliciting testimony about Mr.
Pellicano's practice of wiretapping. Lily LeMasters established that
she'd had a romantic relationship with Mr. Pellicano for over a year
and that she'd also socialized with Mark Arneson, the former LAPD
sergeant charged with wiretapping and conspiracy. Ms. LeMasters
testified in great detail how Mr. Arneson often came to the office,
both in uniform and civil attire, and met with Mr. Pellicano about
providing the former detective with DMV and criminal history
information. She said that she often saw Mr. Arneson arrive in the
office with a manilla envelope and when he left, Mr. Pellicano gave her
criminal histories and DMV records for many of their clients or people
of interest to their clients. She also noted that Mr. Pellicano
instructed her not to record phone calls from Mr. Arneson on her phone
log and to follow the procedure with Ray Turner, a man she identified
as providing information to Mr. Pellicano from the phone company.
Read all HuffPost's reports from inside the Pellicano courtroom