More

Allison Kilkenny

Allison Kilkenny

Posted: September 29, 2009 09:14 AM

Nazipalooza

What's Your Reaction?

The cause du jour for the Republican Party is to make as many rapid-fire comparisons between the Democrats and the Nazis as humanly possible. There're the posters altered to make the President look like Hitler, Glenn Beck's use of Nazi imagery, and the GOP's tendency to parade around pliant Holocaust survivors, who are willing to lie and convince hapless boobs that they're seconds away from being loaded onto the trains headed to New Auschwitz, located -- somewhere -- probably in those FEMA camps Beck has been trying to warn us about.

Crazy, crazy stuff. Insulting and dangerous, too. Such propaganda is insulting to Holocaust survivors, some of whom are rightfully upset by the Obama-Hitler contrasting. "I saw Hitler's soldiers. I saw swastikas every day. To call Obama stupid, even criminal -- OK, that's politics. But Hitler? It's hurting to anyone no matter who is president," a Holocaust survivor told Times of the Internet.

Beyond being insulting, the comparisons are also dangerous. The Washington Independent's David Wiegel reports on this rising fear of fascism as demonstrated at the "How to Take Back America" conference in St. Louis that took place this past weekend. I highly recommend taking the whole bizarre journey yourself, but here are a few choice nuggets to wet your appetite for lunacy.

The article's protagonist is Kitty Werthmann, an 84-year-old native Austrian survivor of the Third Reich. Kitty was one of the keynote speakers at the conference.

"What would you suggest we do," asked one activist, "if we are asked to give up our guns?"

"Don't you dare give up your guns!" thundered Werthmann. "Never, never, never!"
"Give them back one bullet at a time!" called out another activist. The tense atmosphere melted a little bit; the room broke up with laughter.


Call the doctor. You see, Republicans are always very quick to say that liberals also altered posters of former President Bush to look like Hitler, and that liberals also drew comparisons between the Republicans and Nazis. Except, liberals were also called treasonous and threatened with arrest for doing harmless things like showing up to Bush's speeches dressed in anti-war t-shirts, or sporting anti-war bumper stickers on their cars. There were many of these kinds of stories. Meanwhile, those who show up to President Obama's rallies with loaded guns are called patriots.

For eight years, liberals protested the tyrannical actions of the Bush administration with relative restraint. I would actually argue that they did so with too much restraint. Liberals could have been more passionate and more organized. They could have walked out of school, and their jobs, and not come back until the wars ended. But they didn't. It has been said that organizing liberals is a bit like herding cats. The Democratic Party is an all-inclusive organization, which is a wonderful thing, but sometimes it leads to in fighting between the various factions and distracts from the ultimate goal.

Republicans have never had this problem. They're unified under the banner of beating "them," and the "them" this time around is President Obama. The media has criticized the tea bagger protests for being disorganized and scattered-brained, and while there are certainly a wide range of causes represented at these things, they all fall under the parent concern that Obama is a dangerous other, who wants to change America, and he must be stopped.

Back at the "How to Take Back America" conference, Lt. Gen. William Boykin, who gave the conference's opening speech said:

If you look at the classic model for moving to Marxism, you look at what every Marxist organization has done, they nationalize. They redistribute wealth. They restrict gun ownership. They then go out and suppress the opposition. And then, finally, they censor the media.

So we're actually dealing with Nazi Marxists, the rarest of beasts. Nevermind that Hitler actually hated Marxism and Communism because, coincidentally, he feared them -- those Jews who came up with the whole Marxist angle.

Stoking this irrational hatred for an amorphous enemy, the Marxist Communist Socialist Nazi President Obama, in an already frenzied, heavily armed mob, is obviously not a good thing. First, it eliminates the possibility of rational conversation about some critical issues like health care and the environment. Second, it's extremely dangerous and irresponsible. If people like Kitty and Beck keep telling people Obama wants to take their guns, and he's Hitler, and he's changing America, and also there may be FEMA camps, and his health care plan is actually death panels, one of their unstable listeners is going to snap.

Of course, then Kitty and Beck will hide behind the same First Amendment rights many Republicans didn't grant liberals when they tried to protest Bush's illegal wars. This is the current state of things: Republicans protest health care for all. Democrats protest illegal wars. C'est la vie.

Cross-posted from Allison Kilkenny's blog. Also available on Facebook and Twitter.

Follow Allison Kilkenny on Twitter: www.twitter.com/allisonkilkenny

 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:57 PM on 10/14/2009
Are we honestly now supposed to pretend that we did not just go through 8 years of Bush being compared to Nazis, Hitler, and even Dark Lords of the Sith?

This is the type of hypocrisy that makes decent people want to have nothing to do with the political process.
08:51 AM on 09/30/2009
I have to agree, they should have used Benito instead.

Lke it or not, we do have some of the markings of fasc ism, especially in our economic system,and the control that the state exercises over the market, also the ultra-nationalism, and the various laws and taxes designed to modify behaviour, but that's the end of the simularities.

The fact is that we have had fasc ism in our government since Hoover first dictated to business not to lower their wages or fire their workers after the stock market crash, and I guess you all believed Hoover was a free-marketeer.
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
02:42 PM on 09/29/2009
I'd be perfectly content if Obama took away everyone's weapons.
02:54 PM on 09/29/2009
I find my steak knives to come in handy quite often for benign purposes. Thanks but no thanks.
11:45 AM on 09/30/2009
From my cold dead hands.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Barton Kunstler, Ph.D.
02:40 PM on 09/29/2009
Great article. Another disturbing aspect to the reactionaries' attempts to associate the President with Nazism: it makes it more difficult to point out the reactionaries' often overt fascist policies and attitudes. Even in writing this comment, I'm aware that some people might think, "Oh, he doesn't want Obama called a fascist but he's calling Republicans fascists!" Well, not all Republicans and I won't take much space to argue the case, but: Intolerance, questioning the patriotism of regime opponents, eroding civil liberties including habeas corpus, expanding police powers, establishing a state of perpetual war, stealing elections, appealing to the electorate's basest instincts, appealing to a primitive religiosity, and concentrating wealth and power in the hands of the military and large corporations, all indicate how close we came. The agenda - whether explicitly perceived as "fascist" or whether rolled out under the guise of old-fashioned patriotism - has a powerful legacy in the U.S. The best way to hide what you're doing is by accusing your opponents of doing it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:39 PM on 09/29/2009
Then by your logic those that accused Bush of being a fascist were in fact fascists themselves! http://semiskimmed.net/bushhitler.html

I don't believe Obama is looking to revive the thousand year plan any more than I suspect those that pilloried Bush believed that he was going to begin rounding up minorities. Both implemented or want(ed) to implement a program that was also undertaken by the Nazis or other fascist regime.
In modern society nothing is as odious as the Nazis and so that accusation will be hurled at politicians rightly or wrongly to paint them with the same brush and to associate that politician with the holocaust.
08:28 PM on 10/14/2009
Are we honestly now supposed to pretend that we did not just go through 8 years of Bush being compared to Nazis, Hitler, and even Dark Lords of the Sith?

This is the type of hypocrisy that makes decent people want to have nothing to do with the political process. It abounds on BOTH sides. Even in your statements...

1.Intolerance? Like the intolerance from the left of the MAJORITY of Americans' Christian ideals?
2.Questioning patriotism? Guess the left NEVER does that.
3.Eroding civil liberties? I didn't know TERRORISTS had the same rights as American CITIZENS.
4.Perpetual war? Reasonable people can disagree on whether these wars have been necessary.
5.Stealing elections? Really?
6.Appealing to base instincts? Sure, and the left calling all opposition "racist," must be an appeal to "reason."
7. Primitive religiosity? See number one.
8. Concentrating wealth in the military? Uh, that's called DEFENSE SPENDING, and it won WWII.
9.Concentrating wealth in corporations? Corporations create jobs, BUT, I think we can agree that there needs to be regulations that force corporations that try to save money by going overseas to KEEP JOBS IN AMERICA.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PartTimeRoadie
02:15 PM on 09/29/2009
My favorite:

"This isn't the change I voted for!" -- Spoken frequently by those who didnt vote for Obama...


It also amazes me the people screaming about how this is a democracy, and 'they' have no right to take the country away from 'them'. Completely oblivious to the fact that there was an election last year, and they were resoundingly SPANKED.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Guitarsandmore
devoted father, community activist, musician, reti
01:40 PM on 09/29/2009
The key to organizing is to find three, four, five, causes that everyone can relate to. Gay Rights while important and noteworthy is not something everyone will respond to because they have no vested interest to do so. Only about 1 - 10% of the population is gay and so that is a losing issue that will lose you elections.

Health Care effects everyone, gay , straight, black, white, red, yellow, man, woman, child. Thus the health Care reform debate and progressives strongly advocate health care reform with a strong public option being debated right now.

Re regulating financial markets has got to be the number two issue right now because banks are out of control running wild and gambling away your tax dollars while they piss all over you. The derivatives are like fantasy football for Wall Street, you make up teams and make up names and then throw in stats from real players and place bets on their future performance. Its insane.

Green economy, Renewable energy, energy independence, all interconnected and inter related are number three issue right not. Stop Climate change, stop sending money to countries that sponsor terror, and become independent to control the costs of fuel and stabilize the economy. This is an enormous issue.

I think Obama is on top of these issues but he needs to hear from you.
01:22 PM on 09/29/2009
It is impossible to be a fascist and a communist all at the same time. These terms represent different philosophies. But what is more important is the fact that if Obama intended to fully embrace either of these political constructs, he would have, no doubt, taken the steps necessary to silence those who protest him and his administration. So, I guess the right wing has nothing serious to be worried about except that Obama will be a successful President and they, the Republicans, Conservatives, and the like will be out of power for a long time.
12:57 PM on 09/29/2009
I think part of the problem is that these people literally think they are "saving" us and that we will thank them later. It's a bit like arguing with religious nuts. There's all that zeal (and these folks will always, always vote, unlike laissez-faire progressives) because they think they are literally saving our souls.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Guitarsandmore
devoted father, community activist, musician, reti
01:30 PM on 09/29/2009
There are no laissez-faire progressives. Laissez-faire is a philosophy that says let the market place determine the course we take and keep the government out of everything, deregulate everything. We now know this course of action does not work.

Progressives say let's have the government impose rules and regulations to control the greedy bastards that are running financial markets. Consumer protection laws will protect the consumer from banks that want to charge 30% interest and more for loaning money. Progressives say lets take down ponzi schemes like the one Bernnie Madoff created. Progressives say let's cap executive pay. Progressives want higher taxes for the rich and lower taxes for the not so rich. We need to re regulate Wall Street.
05:07 PM on 09/29/2009
In the universe where Obama is a nazi-commie,

why can't there be a laissez-faire progressive?
12:49 PM on 09/29/2009
We Americans have always had a history of Know-Nothing-ism, of anti-intellectualism, of authoritarianism, of scare tactics (Red Scare after WWI, HUAC anti-communist McCarthyist hysteria after WWII, "slave revolts" scare to "justify" slavery, on and on ad nauseam). The ownership and operation of the national economy being essentially concentrated in the hands of very few, the REST of the population needs to be distracted, confused, frightened, deliberately misled and controlled so as not to be able to think clearly about the situation in which they find themselves.
11:27 AM on 09/29/2009
"Liberals could have been more passionate and more organized."

That pretty much sums up the current state of the whole progressive "movement."