Those Crazy Liberals!

Posted January 16, 2008 | 08:23 PM (EST)



stumbleupon :Those Crazy Liberals!   digg: Those Crazy Liberals!   reddit: Those Crazy Liberals!   del.icio.us: Those Crazy Liberals!

Last night, two Dennis Kucinich supporters screamed during Jay Leno's Tonight Show. They rudely interrupted Jay's Bill Maher interview. The audience seemed confused, Bill and Jay seemed pissed.

In Bill's defense, the Loose Change crazies have been hounding him for years now, and periodically infiltrate his Real Time sound studio to shout their poorly synchronized slogans. So Bill's not that keen on people shouting crap at him, and he might have thought it was 9/11 conspiratorial nonsense. I'm assuming this because Bill Maher should know more than anyone the importance of free speech, and surely he doesn't believe the only people allowed to express their opinions are individuals with HBO talk shows.

The Kucinich supporters yelled two slogans: "Let Dennis debate! Stop censorship! Help save democracy!" and "GE, NBC, Put Impeachment on TV!"

Jay asked the audience if anyone could understand what they said, the crowd murmured, a few smatterings of "no," and the show moved on.

The entire interaction was about a minute long. It was awkward. I cringed through the whole thing.

Why do crazy liberals do things like that? I say liberals because you rarely see a suit-wearing Conservative hold up a sad, limp piece of cardboard during the Republican debates with a psychotically lettered message of: "MORE PRIVATIZATION!!!" scrawled across its face.

"TWO, FOUR, SIX, EIGHT!....KEEP DOING WHAT YOU'RE DOING! THINGS ARE GREAT FOR US RICH PEOPLE!"

This is uncommon because random acts of desperate protest are reserved for a repressed, voiceless minority. Except, in America, the silenced minority is actually the majority. Most of us are poor, can't afford health insurance, think the Iraq war is pointless, and would like to mend our country's world image.

With all that being said, why are people continually shocked by these random outbreaks? I'm shocked there's not MORE of them.

Maybe it's because the protests of the sixties, and all the hippy girls placing flowers in the barrels of soldiers' guns, are considered cliché because liberals are way too cool to protest now. To protest you have to be -- like, you know -- angry and shit. It's very uncool to scream passionately about something. It's disruptive and rude. It doesn't accomplish anything. We've heard all these reasons to shut up and sit down before.

And yet, people keep protesting. Their numbers are fewer now, but you still see them. They're the annoying hippies that get in the way of your daily routines. They're the 80 activists in Washington, who wore orange jumpsuits and black hoods outside the Supreme Court, protesting Guantanamo. Sometimes, they lay down in streets to block traffic, or they walk into St. Patrick's Cathedral and lay down in the aisles to symbolize the causalities of the AIDS epidemic as the ACT-UP members did in 1989. Sometimes they ride bikes, or paint their faces, or wear crazy outfits.

The point is: they keep resisting. They keep resisting even when most citizens give them the stink-eye when they cause traffic jams and make a lot of noise.

Why would any sane person publicly humiliate themselves like that? What force drives people to stand up and start screaming like they're on fire?

Sane people only scream when they feel they have no other outlet for their voices. Bill Maher and Jay Leno have a public stage from which they can voice their political views. Jay uses his stage for comedy (I'm using the loose definition of comedy,) and Bill uses his stage for comedy (real definition), political discussion, and to show off his balls of steel when he dismisses the existence of God.

Whoever these Dennis Kucinich supporters are, they clearly felt enough desperation to risk embarrassment and jail time in order to reach a mainstream audience about what they perceived as social injustice. That's not crazy. That's brave. That's braver than most of us will ever be during our measly little lives.

I propose this: those protesters didn't interrupt a late night talk show. That late night talk show interrupted what should be our collective outrage. We should all be so furious and outspoken. Instead, we all slowly blinked and stared glassy-eyed at the television and computer screens, our mouths opening and closing like grazing cows'.

Protesting is a healthy part of any democracy, and yet it is increasingly marginalized as a form of communication. Instead of carefully regulating media activity, the FCC and its soulless Harry Potter king, Kevin Martin, have opened the door to all kinds of insane mergers of already monstrously large corporations. Rupert Murdoch's NewsCorp recently absorbed The Wall Street Journal and the latest word from Wall Street is that the Sirius and XM merger is back on the table. All the while, more fringe voices are forced out or silenced by new uber-management at the helm of these giant corporations.

So as the public airwaves are bought and sold to huge conglomerates, the networks' voices become narrower and simultaneously louder as more mergers occur. They pump into the public one truth -- their truth -- and silence any form of protest.

This brings us back to little Dennis Kucinich. NBC is a major network owned by a multinational conglomerate, GE. When the higher-ups (several of who include contributors to other presidential candidates) decided Kucinich's voice was not essential to the debate, they nixed him several days AFTER telling Kucinich's people he met the requirements to debate.

Using insane doublespeak that would make Orwell vomit blood, NBC claimed Dennis Kucinich was violating THEIR first amendment rights by fighting, biting, and clawing his way onto their precious, pure network, and sullying everything with his liberal propaganda. To be fair, though, I hear Dennis is terrifying in real life. Brian Williams says his eyes glow red in the dark.

And so we arrive back at forms of protest. Forced off NBC's airwaves, Dennis appeared on DemocracyNow!, a daily independent news program hosted by Amy Goodman. Goodman showed footage of the NBC debate, and then periodically cut back to Kucinich so he had time to give his answers.

How sad is that? That's what Democracy is becoming in America...a fake debate. Goodman and Kucinich should be applauded for their form of stubborn protest, but everyone else: GE, NBC, and all participants of the fake Nevada debate, should feel ashamed and embarrassed for our supposed democracy.

Comments for this post are now closed


Comments
72
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

Hint sample
View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)

I lost a lot of respect for Dennis Kucinich when he cut his deal with Obama in Iowa. Obama is clearly not a progressive and to throw his support like that to those of us who had given him money.

Nonetheless and despite that sad affair, I retain confidence that Mr. Kucinich might yet focus attention on the impeachment process with Congressman Wexler. It is up to Mr. Kucinich to determine the validity of his candidacy but I hope that his supporters not run amok with rage because in so doing so they only serve to discredit both themselves and Mr. Kucinich.

And why is it that Bill Maher is suddenly the one in the middle of all these hecklers?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:02 PM on 01/20/2008

This is why I'm a staunch supporter of Democracy Now and Dennis Kucinich. When this issue came out so many opined that bcause DK will not WIN the election his participation doens't matter. Like hell it doesn't.

The DN "debate" highlighted the similarities of the three frontrunners.As potentially history making that they are these guys and gal are status quo.

Kucinich isn't a crazy nor are we who support him. His normal and rational and healthy views were stressed when the candidates were asked if they support the mandatory military recruitment on college campuses in which the schools stand to loose govt funding if recruitment is not allowed.

All three candidates said yes. However the follow-up question was why are ivy leagues schools exempt? yale, columbia, harvard etc...no answer.Dennis of course would ban this recruitment effort on all campuses.THis is waht recruitment offices are for.

It is a volunteer army fueled by desperation and many are loosing life and limb and not getting the education they want because of it.

Thanks for writing about this.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:11 PM on 01/20/2008

Want to talk about and applaud stubborn protesting? Mike Gravel and his alternative debates.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:52 AM on 01/20/2008

Wow .... thank you. You made me cry.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 AM on 01/19/2008

Well said, Allison. Now, I was gaining some respect for John Edwards with his increasingly strong stances against corporate America, but why then didn't he take a chance in the debate to mention GE/NBC's exclusion of a candidate for obvious corporate interests? Could it be because it's all talk and no substance? I guess he did vote for Yucca twice and for the war. My second favorite has been Obama, at least he's a bit more honest about his more centrist position... but if Edwards had shown some balls and stood for his claims he might have overcome Obama in my opinion. There he goes about "entreched corporate interests" and they choking stronghold on America... well? Are you afraid to truly debate Kucinich on your plans and voting record or WTF????????

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:54 PM on 01/18/2008

It's astounding to me that between the three of them....Clinton Edwards and Obama must spend about a zillion dollars a day on "handlers"............

Between all those wizards none could see what a great "bounce" was available by simply standing up and insisting (Oh! so Publicly...of course)....on the inclusion of Kucinich.


They are trolling for DEMOCRATIC primary voters after all....MOST of whom respect Kucinich's message.....close to ALL of whom dislike seeing him silenced..... and FEW of whom are actually going to vote for him!

How such collective wizardry could MISS seeing a chance to gain political points,....and DO THE RIGHT THING,.... with no risk or downside at all is well beyond me........................TM

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:30 AM on 01/18/2008

Fascism isn't so bad...

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:04 PM on 01/17/2008

As Sen.John Edwards has pointed out there are two Americas. Group number one has a nice steady income, and maybe some savings, at least a 401K. They have a home, that is nice and warm all winter long. When they buy groceries, they just pick out what they want, not what happens to be on sale.If they get sick they just go to the doctor, and their health insurance company pays for it.If they need a prescription they just go get it, it might be covered too. When they buy gas, they just pull into the closest gas station and fill it up.Of course they live in the nicest neighborhoods, with the best schools and their kids are going to college. . . And then there are the rest of us!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:12 PM on 01/17/2008

Why do "those crazy liberals" do it?

My guess is: Because they find themselves living in an irrational world that is far, far from what logic and basic humanity would indicate shoudl exist, and they find themselves marginalized by numbers and lack of power.

Which is more "sane," in such a situation ... to flail out wildly, just to do *something* ... or to "silently scream" and continue on, supporting the status quo through passivity?

Sure, their actions have little chance of achieving any constructive results. But at least they're DOING something. And if enough people start speaking out, instead of silently screaming, maybe we'll all realize that most of us feel the same way and it is only a 20-30% minority of the country who have bitched and moaned until everyone thought *they* were the majority.

And, at a minimum, the "crazy liberals" are speaking out. Fifty years from now, when the rest of the world is looking at US history and clucking "How could the US citizens *allow* such things to come to pass?!? What happened to *Democracy*?!?" ... there will be a record of pockets of "crazy liberals" that will have proven we weren't all Radical- Right-controled authoritarian sheep.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 PM on 01/17/2008

Hold on. Hold on.
Sure there and not anti war songs on the Clear Channel. But I found a great one on a web site. If there was one thing we learned from the protest, it was that whoever yelled the loudest factor.
Just like the hippie dancers of the 60's , all you saw from the anti war protest in New York were the few that caused a little show.You did not see the thousands of middle class moms and pops. That is thanks to corporate media.
Let's concentrate our efforts one at a time . Media first. Maybe it is true that it is time for a little civil, er uh ,dis rest(sp). Let's just point it in the right direction and not who and what the Corporate media tells us it is going to be.
I have a dream that all the graffiti writers from high school water tower painters to gangs, would start painting the national debt and DOWN WITH THE WTO on public sign from California to Wahington. Heck farmers and union members also. ( Please make it a game not to get caught) Let's start a world wide revolution.
Some times one voice at a time works.
Is it going to happen, I doubt it, Thanks Clinton for signing that media consolidation bill.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:37 AM on 01/17/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in


Bloggers Index›
Read All Posts by
Allison Kilkenny›
 

 Site  Web ask.com