iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Amb. Marc Ginsberg

Amb. Marc Ginsberg

Posted: January 4, 2010 01:11 PM

Dick Cheney's Role in Al Qaeda's Yemeni Resurgence

What's Your Reaction:

It is a well-known fact in Washington that then Vice President Cheney proudly micro-managed all things Gitmo (authorizing torture and determining detainee releases). And as he continues his hyper-partisan attacks on President Obama and the Democratic Party let it be clearly understood that Al Qaeda's resurgence in Yemen can, in no small part, be traced back to Dick Cheney himself.

In 2007, then Vice President Dick Cheney personally authorized the release of 11 Saudis from Guantanamo Bay, who then passed through a leaky Saudi halfway house terrorist rehabilitation program to rejoin Al Qaeda. Two of the 11 former detainees took the express jihadi underground railroad to rejoin Al Qaeda in Yemen.

In February, 2009, the New York Times reported that U.S. counterterrorism officials confirmed that one of the Cheney repats was Said Al-Shihri, who became the deputy leader of the Yemeni branch of Al Qaeda, and that he was suspected of being involved in a deadly attack on the U.S. embassy in Yemen in 2007. Shortly after the attack, Shihri appeared in an Al Sahab Al Qaeda video production along with another Cheney repat identified as Abu Hareth Muhammad al-Awfi, who also rejoined Al Qaeda in Yemen.

Based on a comprehensive review by the Defense Intelligence Agency 14% of the 530 Gitmo detainees released through Cheney's direct approval (74 to be exact) have either been identified as reengaging in terrorism or suspected of doing so.

So, let me get this straight. Cheney authorized the release of unrepentant hardened terrorists to his Saudi friends. Having cut their shackles from the Saudis, these escapees are now training and recruiting the likes of Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab and threatening to attack the U.S. embassy in Yemen, and Cheney has the chutzpah to accuse Democrats of being soft on terrorism!

At best, Cheney's 2007 authorization to transfer Gitmo detainees to Saudi Arabia represented a fawning leap of blind faith in Saudi assurances that these detainees were perfect guinea pigs for an unproven terror rehab program and would no longer pose a threat to them or to us. However, the alarming recidivism rate has had dire and direct consequences on American security.

At worst, Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula and its subchapter in Yemen should dispatch to Cheney a warm jihadi thank you note for playing such a direct role in their reconstitution, their resurgence, and their increasing danger to the U.S. homeland and our diplomats in Yemen.

Ordinarily, had Cheney kept reasonably quiet like his former boss instead of pretentiously anointing himself the sole defender of America's safety and security (as if every decision he made kept America safe), his decision to authorize the release of Al Qaeda operatives now back in the fight against the U.S. in Yemen and elsewhere would not have warranted a revisit -- just another footnote in the history of Cheney's imperfect logic where he is often wrong, but never in doubt.

However, in view of Cheney's willfully inaccurate partisan attacks he deserves to now be held accountable for the Yemeni Al Qaeda terror sanctuary he helped man through his own micromanagement of Gitmo detainees and misguided deference to his Halliburton buddies in Saudi Arabia. As a result, America is a whole lot less safe because of Mr. Cheney's own decisions.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 185
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:00 AM on 01/14/2010
It's time for a little misinformation program to spread the news that some of the released men were turned and were released to become US moles inside al Qaeda.
03:21 PM on 01/07/2010
I am glad there is someone who is connecting th dots. Has anyone wondered why Cheney did not go home to Wyoming or wherever state he comes from after the transition of power. I am very concerned about his still residing in the Washington D.C. area. Why does he want to be close to the seat of power? His frequent outburst about Obama's decisions? Why are crazy security decisions being made by the CIA, the FBI, militay security people who.

How loyal are some military personnel to Cheney? It just appears to me that there are far too many security leaks going on of late. Why is it that all of a sudden you have people in the military too stupid to think clearly and letting so many stupid mistakes happen.

My guess is that Cheney is at work? How he's doing it is anyone's guess. But he's knee deep in what is happening security wise at home and abroad. The push is to make Obama look like he is soft on national security. Who's watching Cheney? I recommend that people watch the movie, Seven Days in May, a movie that depicts the military plotting to take over the U.S. government; just replace the military with the Republican Party; partisan thinkers, you name it. Something is happening, though.

The only connection to Obama is the hate these people have for him. People better wake up about this man. He is dangerous.
12:28 AM on 01/07/2010
Kurt Haskell must have made a mistake because a copy of AbdulMuttalab's international passport was posted online.
http://obamareport.blogspot.com/2010/01/abdulmutallabs-passport-surfaces.html
Another passenger told Haskell that he had seen a minor, apparently a Sudanese refuge, who looked nearly identical to AbdulMuttalab being accompanied on the airplane by a flight attendant - who was likely the well-dressed man that Haskell had seen. Since he was a minor, and was travelling alone, he was accompanied at all times by an airport employee. As a refugee he might not have had a passport. In any case, AbdulMuttalab clearly had a passport.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trubulmaker
10:50 PM on 01/06/2010
I think the author has relied upon a flawed assumption to reach a correct conclusion. That assumption is contained in the word "returned".... namely, that the released detainees "returned to the fight". There is no evidence they were IN the fight, before their detention... if there had been, it is unlikely that Cheney, of all people, would have authorized their release.

The logical inference that follows, however, does NOT favor Cheney, at all (rather, it is even worse): the Bush/Cheney policies of indefinite detention and "harsh interrogation methods" (what we'd call "torture" in ordinary English) MADE jihadis out of people who were probably not so disposed, before they were treated this way.

The difference is important, because if we assume these men "returned" to the fight, that argument will be used to justify continuation of the very policies that turned one out of five of those detained and then released to violence against us. Its pretty clear something must be done to prevent more of those we release from following this pattern, but that something should NOT be more of the same mindless, lawless practice that placed us in this dilemma in the first place.
08:32 PM on 01/07/2010
Mark Ginsberg's revelations about Cheney's attempted cover-ups of his own malfeasance is so important. How can we let the world know?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:58 PM on 01/05/2010
Marc Ginsberg.

You are now my newest BFF.

But does anyone pay any attention to you? I do hope so. I would like to see dick cheenee held responsible for his treasonous talk.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
gutenmorgen
a.k.a. crowsnest
06:25 PM on 01/05/2010
Once again the sheeples are fooled by Cheney's attack on a government whose war policies are essentially identical to those of the previous administration. Ginsburg is a useful lightning rod for Obama's asministration. Why is he wasting his energy on drivel when the real story is the criminal execution of ten males on December 27, 2009 in Afghanistan. That Mr. Ginsburg is the big story. It is Obama's My Lai. You know it but have chosen to remain silent.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OxamsRazor
President of a5MEDIA inc (http://www.a5media.ca),
05:56 PM on 01/05/2010
I'm sorry, but how incompetent does a government have to be -GOP or DEM- before we can find them guilty of will-full harm? I don't care what the conspiracy theorists say, but at some point all this stupidity begins to look more and more like the gov actually didn't mind being attacked or was setting themselves up for another attack.

I cannot believe all the intelligence failures that have occurred in the last 10 years are purely accidental. At some point gross negligence is as good as deliberate harm.
05:50 PM on 01/05/2010
Is a better learning for us here, that while WE put ANY energy into DEBATING Mr. Cheney's mis-statements, we are taking it off of MORE IMPORTANT ISSUES?

Shouldn't we be putting it into REAL ISSUES?

If we continue to do this, are we aiding and abetting him. (I know, me included!)

Would the best thing would be, if there is another media item about him, that there would be NO comments here???
04:28 PM on 01/05/2010
Amen. Cheney's behavior is disgraceful, both while at the helm and now from the back bench. He has harmed America and provoked our enemies. He needs to shut his mouth.
04:12 PM on 01/05/2010
How many years did the Liberals demand that the Gitmo detainees be released because they were innocent? When they were released we find out that maybe they should have been kept. Now we have the same situation the left still want more released and the result will be the same. These are terrorists and you are pointing out the fact that they were correctly detained and should never be released.

We can agree on that. Cheney made a mistake in releasing them on pressure from the left to do so.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kladinvt
04:25 PM on 01/05/2010
Cheney NEVER did anything that the left wanted, he only serves himself or his corporate overlords. Get real!
photo
TremoluxMan
Politics: BS on Steroids.
05:47 PM on 01/05/2010
You last statement is hysterical and needs no further comment from me. As to the rest: The only 'terrorists' that should have been released were those who were mistakenly picked up and detained. There were numbers of demonstrably innocent persons in custody that were denied release despite having been innocent of any infractions or terrorist activities. No one ever advocated a blanket release of all detainees.

Cheney never did anything Cheney didn't want to do. To assert he was 'forced by the left' is farcical on it's face.
04:09 PM on 01/05/2010
Wayne Madson is reporting that his intelligence sources describe the Chirstmas "crotch bomber" incident as a false flag operation carried out by the CIA, Mossad and RAW (Indian intelligence). This might explain the well dressed Indian looking man who got the perp a boarding pass without a passport as reported by American eye witness Kurt Haskell.

Evaluate other surpressed facts about the incident here:

http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner~y2010m1d2-US-lies-about-Flight-253-crotch-bomber-patsy-summary-of-the-evidence-Yemen-attack-implication
03:20 PM on 01/05/2010
As a postscript we will observe that George Soros holds millions more shares of HALLIBURTON than does Cheney, and this, back in the pivotal year of 2007, yet Ginsberg makes no mention of this odd fact.
01:04 PM on 01/06/2010
When was George Soros Vice President?
03:17 PM on 01/05/2010
Ginsberg is being intellectually dishonest. Odd in an ambassador.

To begin with, there was no evidence extant at the time of the releases that these were either '
'hardened'' nor ''unrepentant''. Indeed, a simple GOOGLE search bearing the words '' NGOS And Other Groups Pressure Bush White House To Release GTMO Detainees'' turns up thousands of hits, from vintage HUFFPO, to FIREDOGLAKE , DAILY KOS, and other leftist creatures, to Democrat members of Congress including Pelosi, Boxer, Sanchez,Kennedy, and Kerry,from the ACLU, to AMNESTY and the RED CROSS,from editorials from the New York Times, WaPo, San Francisco Chronicle, Boston Globe,NEWSWEAK, TIME, and Seattle Times ,all demanding prisoner releases all during and before the year of 2007.
Ginsberg cannot have it both ways, first insinuating that ''Cheney'' was ''responsible'' without examining his own role in demanding that more GTMO prisoners be released at the time of the Bush presidency.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Amb. Marc Ginsberg
06:15 PM on 01/05/2010
The Cheney transferees were considered dangerous enough to be placed in direct Saudi custody, who convinced Bush and Cheney they could deprogram these extremists our of their jihadi convictions. It was and is a valiant effort, but it only takes one escaped unrepentant jihadi to commit an act of terror. And I challenge you to locate any statement I made suggesting that any detainee be released from Gitmo. Good luck! Marc
01:42 PM on 01/05/2010
20 years ago, if I had told you that you would have to be seen naked by random airport employees before being allowed on an airplane, you would have said ABSURD. So, when I tell you now, that within the next 20 years, you will be required to have a rectal examination before being allowed to board any airplane, please think twice before calling me "absurd".

All of these new security procedures and requirements being forced upon us, all in the name of fighting terror, have nothing to do with fighting terror at all, it's all about conditioning the American population. More and more, we sit and watch as almost all of our constitutional rights being stripped away, but it's all for a good cause right, it's all about fighting terror and staying safe. The Patriot Act, warrant-less wiretapping, rendition, indefinite detention, TORTURE. These are all prohibited by the constitution, OUR CONSTITUTION. But as long as we're fighting terror. All media is controlled by a few corporations, so we only hear what we're permitted to hear, and we're all told to feel the way they want us to feel.

The problem is that we are allowing it to happen, we are allowing the conditioning to happen, as long as we can watch TV and check our email, we allow this.

We should all be ashamed.
03:01 PM on 01/05/2010
Sheeple are happy with bread and circuses
01:29 PM on 01/05/2010
Amb. Ginsberg finally exposed Cheney’s supposed spy factory at Gitmo, supposedly manufacturing “turned-Jihadis” to re-infiltrate. Cheney, the quarterback, could easily dominate our MrSoftee president-- the “UNABLE-decider” cheerleader made captain of the football team—until Bush’s Poppy disenabled Cheney during second term. But by then it was too late. Cheney was the Saudi’s man; they made him rich, controlling him with cash as they controlled many prominent Republicans. The Saudis and Israelis feared most the Sunni MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD (MB) which Iran’s leader Khomeini united with Shias into alQaeda. SaudiArabia and Israel feared MB and Saddam’s support for it because it was replacing crooked Arab nationalists like Arafat with dedicated mujahedins willing to die killing infidels. MB has political peaceful fronts in all Arab countries and in Israel HAMAS; it’s shahids would gladly die killing whom it considered enemies of Islam. Both
Israel and Cheney were duped by hardened captured mujeahedins pretending to switch sides. Instead of becoming our spies these became more dedicated mujahedins duping us. Cheney obeyed incompetent Saudis that made him rich and Israelis whose neocons helped him become VP, and screwed-up badly. Our Republican leaders, our corrupt Saudi allies and the ideologically blinded Israelis couldn’t understand mujahedin dedication to cause for they only know dedication to money. And so the war goes on.