iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Amb. Marc Ginsberg

GET UPDATES FROM Amb. Marc Ginsberg
 

Unholy Alliance: Egypt's Military & The Muslim Brotherhood

Posted: 11/23/11 06:49 AM ET

Despite protestations of its purported political neutrality Egypt's besieged military leadership has been secretly funneling financial, food, and security support to Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood and its allied Salafist parties in the run up to next week's parliamentary elections.

The assistance takes the form of "walk around" money, clothing and food giveaways secretly funneled to the coffers of the Brotherhood's front party -- the Freedom and Justice Party, the Construction and Development Party, as well as to allied Salafist Parties, including Al Nour, Al-Asalah, Al-Fadilah, Al Islah and others -- in a bid to buy votes and provide Islamist parties a military supported upper hand in the upcoming parliamentary elections..

The military leadership has not only channeled financial support to the Islamists, it has also secretly collaborated with Salafists who have attacked Copts throughout Egypt in a show of support for more punitive discriminatory acts against Egypt's Coptic minority to curry further favor with Salafists.

Hundreds of Copts were attacked by unknown assailants en route to Cairo's Tahrir Square on November 18th the second night of demonstrations this month while security forces stood by. This latest attack comes in the wake of October's attack by the army which used live fire and drove military vehicles into a crowd of Copts protesting a rash of attacks on Copts and Coptic churches, killing 25 innocent protestors.

According to information obtained from a reliable European military intelligence source with whom I met in Turkey a few days ago, an emissary of The Supreme Council of Armed Forces (SCAF) met secretly with representatives of the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamist oriented political movements last April to establish local political "action committee" bank accounts to funnel an underground supply chain of financial and commodity support to local Islamist political organizations throughout Egypt outside the prying eyes of Cairo-based media. Hundreds of local Islamist political organization chapters throughout Egypt have been buying votes courtesy of military provided financial and food handouts.

While it is impossible to determine the exact extent of the financial, clothing and food transfers, I was told by a prominent Egyptian journalist who is trying to uncover the magnitude of the payouts that it amounts to "millions of dollars." The military is not the sole source of funds to Islamists parties, which are also receiving funds from Egyptian businessmen trying to buy favor with the likely winners of Egypt's parliamentary elections, and charitable donations from wealthy Saudis.

The SCAF's surreptitious political maneuvering favoring Islamists over more secular political movements is based on one simple equation -- the military is determined to prevent secularists from gaining a parliamentary majority which would likely impair its insatiable appetite for controlling Egypt's national budget and its own extensive business operations. It is determined to prevent a civilian government from interfering with its cherished prerogatives.

Moreover, the vast majority of Egypt's rank and file soldiers come from more rural, conservative parts of Egypt, where support for Islamic parties is most pronounced. The SCAF is betting that its considerable support for Islamists will translate into long term loyalty among Egypt's post revolutionary conscripts as an insurance policy against potential efforts to interfere with the military's jealously guarded prerogatives.

The outbreak of unrest throughout Cairo in recent days orchestrated largely by Egypt's more secular, liberal-oriented political supporters has clearly shocked the SCAF. Anger at Egypt's military rulers reached a boiling point when, in addition to delaying reforms and presidential elections, the SCAF-controlled constitution drafting committee (with a wink and nod from Islamist members of the drafting committee) unveiled a draft two weeks ago exempting the military and its budget from civilian oversight over the strenuous objections of secular political parties.

In fact, Field Marshal Tantawi's determination to press ahead with parliamentary elections next week as originally planned despite the violence and unrest throughout the country reflects, in part, the military leadership's fear that prolonging the parliamentary campaigning will reveal the extent of the SCAF's slush fund operations and its interference on behalf of Islamist parties.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 23
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
notmisaacm
Speaking truth to power
09:59 PM on 11/28/2011
The Islamic/Military alliance will deliver nothing that the brave Tahrir square protesters demanded, and nothing that the Egyptian people need. They are only carving up the carcass of what is left of Egypt, not building up anything new. With massive unemployment, coming water shortages and a young angry population, the Islamic/Military might be able to take (steal) this election, and prevent another, but they can't deliver what the people want. No jobs, no economic development, no freedom of expression, no technological advancement; nothing.
07:17 PM on 11/27/2011
Not to say that you're wrong, but you're sources don't have any legitimate facts? Why would the military risk their public image by issuing the 'Selmi' document in order to secure a secular state, followed by massive protest from the MB, then fund their election? Of course, if what you claim is true, then Egypt's revolution 2nd wave would make for a possible reason as to why. But still, not enough and almost illogical. Also, your statement: "orchestrated largely by Egypt's more secular, liberal-oriented political supporters has clearly shocked the SCAF", I would say is false. As someone who went to Tahrir time and time again this week, the Salafi presence was rather outstanding. Just because the MB's boycotted it does not mean it was led by secularists/liberals. Egyptian liberals were even accused of either siding with the military or not having a hard enough stance against them. I feel left with many unanswered questions after this article, especially since the article lacks any terminology along the lines of 'allegedly" or "supposed", it seems too final. Not to mention, that your analysis lacks any mention of the Selmi document, which leads me to believe that either you didn't do your homework, or you're trying to cause quite a scare.
01:22 PM on 11/27/2011
Reports now on the TV that the brotherhood are buying votes in the streets of Alexandria. The most disturbing part is they are buying votes with a 1kg bag of sugar, so thats 2lb of sugar for 1 vote. With this level the cost of buying yourself a seat in parliament is really quite cheap! This demonstrates the sorry level of poverty, and lack or education that the Mubarak regime has brought the country to, while he and his corrupt cronies stashed away millions and millions.
12:45 AM on 11/26/2011
After so many decades of US supported military dictatorship, the new democratic government of Egypt should immediately cancel the treaty with the zoreign entity and close the Suez canal to them. The Egyptian people have the right to have a democratic government that represent the will of the people, not the will of foreign entities.
11:25 PM on 11/25/2011
The US government should stop spending billions of our taxpayer's money to support the US military dictatorship of Egypt, and allow the Egyptian people to democratically overthrow the US military dictatorship of Egypt.
12:49 PM on 11/25/2011
Right after the elections in Egypt, the new Parliament should form a new government that will finally overthrow the US militari SCAF dictatorship of Egypy.
03:35 AM on 11/24/2011
The Cairo Spring was an indication that educated secular Egyptians have become a significant force in Egyptian politics. That's a very positive development, but they may not be large enough yet to out-vote the ignorant, religious masses. It's a lot like here in the US - only worse.

As time goes on, the corrupt mismanagement of a religious-military alliance will make it increasingly clear that theocracy and military dictatorships are lousy ways to run a government. That's the lesson we learned in the West 360 years ago. The Muslim world is a little slow, but they'll get it eventually.

It would be great to see the beginning of the Islamic Enlightenment - coming soon to a planet near you?
08:39 AM on 11/24/2011
Theory that religious rules are bad ways to rule a country learned by the West and eventually will be learned in Middle east assumes that all religions are the same. Islam is different than others. It has an accurate constitution that charts an advanced way in every aspects of life.
1- Marriage vs adultery creates a society without AIDS, Sexual transmitted deseases or eligitimate chiltren.
2- Justice, equality, and brotherhood brings a society based on cooperation.
3- Two types of religious charities one is ratio of accummulated walth (not incom)called (Zakat), and one is unspecified amount called (Sadaqa).
4- Workers are respected and Allah loves the working hand and whoever sleeps after being tired from his work.
5- Developing and protecting natural resources is an obligation, even when you make abolution on a river, do not waste water.
6- Family relation, respect to parents, raising females without discrimination gurantees paradise.
7-The financial system in Islam is based on building equity for as many people not based on interest (Usuary and greed).
I know that you meant well, but you need to educate yourself as resorces are now available on the Internet. Look in the Index of the Quran then start reading then start writing.
12:16 PM on 11/27/2011
As an Egyptian and a Muslim, unfortunately your statements above are based on naivete and ignorance. The idea that Islamists will create a utopia just because they are Muslim or allegedly follow the Koran is ridiculous. Islam is no more perfect then any other religion and the people who will be in charge are just that: People. A system of government based on religion will always be doomed to fail. The only way forward is a system of gov that guarantees freedom and does not force individuals to accept religious doctrine. Until God comes down and says he would like to rule us himself, I would rather put my trust in a civilian government. Rabina Yustor and I hope it does not come to a theocracy
01:12 PM on 11/27/2011
Religious rules are not all the same, but if you take a good look at the bible the principles are pretty much the same.
Religion is a good thing in ernest, and the people who truly are religious in each aspect are generally good, whatever the religion.
However religious leaders throughout history have a pretty bad reputation of being greedy and manipulating religion to suit their own agendas, and doing it all in the name of their 'faith'.
Muslim leaders are no different in this respect.
Just to go over your other points:
point 1 - Are you really suggesting that no on in a muslim country has sex or produces a child out of marriage? and that no one contracts STD's? Really this is not the case, it is better hidden as it goes against principles, but it still exists, just because you do not behave in this way does not mean you can put your head in the sand and pretend it does not exist.
point 2 - yes fair enough, this is a principle in any country with a justice and social system, it does not always work but thats another story.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
June25
12:04 PM on 11/23/2011
So Gleen Becks predictions are correct the so called Arab Spring was just a springboard for the Muslim Brotherhood to put their values in place.It's always the second revolution that decides the fate of a country.
photo
checkmoot
We have met the enemy and he is us.
11:53 AM on 11/23/2011
""Moreover, the vast majority of Egypt's rank and file soldiers come from more rural, conservative parts of Egypt, where support for Islamic parties is most pronounced."

Isn't this also true of our soldiers, except you would say fundamentalist Christian parties ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DougDeWitt
progressive social-capitalist
11:35 AM on 11/23/2011
We, the People must be very careful not to lump non-violent Islamists in with radical Muslim fundamentalists, as there is a very wide difference. Young, idealistic believers in the beauty and peace of Islamic religious beliefs, and the moral imperatives of helping out those less fortunate than those more successful in life, find themselves at odds with the hate-mongering of the fundamentalists...

Very much like the difference between the peace and love taught by Jesus, and the Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr., vs. the hate-mongering and racial bigotry espoused by extremist Christian fundamentalists...

Don't start profiling everyone who follows the way of Islam, as killers of Coptic Christians, and vandals burning Coptic churches.

We need to heal, as a planetary people, a global society of families with common goals. Love the Benneton ad, the pope kissing an Islamic Imam. We need a lot more of that, and a lot less "Raising the Alarm", Mr. Ambassador...
10:55 AM on 11/23/2011
This is disturbing, but what should we do about it? I propose nothing.
photo
tallen
panem et circenses
09:55 AM on 11/23/2011
Egypt is on its way to becoming Iran Lite.
12:41 AM on 12/08/2011
Think again my dear. Iranians are more educated & civilized. We are going the Afghani way! After all, we inherited five thousand years of anger and slavery; there must be a way to vent!
09:46 AM on 11/23/2011
Given the current state of affairs in the "new and improved" Egypt, my sympathies are with women, gays and lesbians, Copts, rationalists, and freethinkers there. I think they may be in for quite a difficult time.
photo
Knightro829
Viva la Cleptocracia!!
09:05 AM on 11/23/2011
[citation needed]
08:00 AM on 11/23/2011
ah Marc . . . again . . why the unnamed source?