NYR More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM American Library Association
 

Banned Or Challenged Classic Children's Books

Posted: 09/28/11 09:02 AM ET

Each year the American Library Association's (ALA) Office for Intellectual Freedom (OIF) receives hundreds of reports on book challenges, which are formal written requests to remove a book from a library or classroom because of an objection to the book's content. There were 346 recorded attempts to remove materials from libraries in 2010, and more than 11,000 attempts recorded since OIF began compiling information on book challenges in 1990.

The ALA will celebrate the freedom to read during Banned Books Week, Sept. 24 - Oct. 1, 2011, as thousands participate in a Virtual Read-Out and read aloud from their favorite challenged or banned book.

Below is a list of 10 popular children's classics and the reasons why attempts were made to remove them from circulation:

"A Wrinkle in Time" by Madeleine C. L'Engle
1  of  11
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
It was challenged in 1996, but retained by the Catawba County School Board in Newton, North Carolina. A parent requested the book be pulled from the school library because it allegedly undermines religious beliefs.
RATE IT!   |  
VOTE
Never read it
One of my favorites!
CURRENT TOP 5 PICK YOUR OWN TOP 5
USERS WHO VOTED
NEW! CREATE YOUR OWN SLIDESHOW

All information pulled from "Banned Books: Challenging our Freedom to Read, 2010 edition, by Robert P. Doyle. ISBN 0-8389-8279-4, a publication of the American Library Association.

 
Each year the American Library Association's (ALA) Office for Intellectual Freedom (OIF) receives hundreds of reports on book challenges, which are formal written requests to remove a book from a libr...
Each year the American Library Association's (ALA) Office for Intellectual Freedom (OIF) receives hundreds of reports on book challenges, which are formal written requests to remove a book from a libr...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 177
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
Skunkman
old & decrepit
07:45 PM on 10/02/2011
It is cruel to ask students in the United States of Mrka to think or to read things that lead them to think. Thinking is quite dangerous to the status quo, and parents have a "god"â„¢-given right to control their kids' educations, thinking, destinies, and beliefs (Sunday school, anyone?). Imagine the confusion if kids thought for themselves!! "Most people would rather die than think; in fact, they do so." (Bertrand Russell) Read kids you won't be sorry.

Mike
photo
Skunkman
old & decrepit
08:17 AM on 10/01/2011
Now what I want to know is why is it that the rape, incest, murder, and genocide in the Bible are OK for teens to read, but not Slaughterhouse-Five? It seems to me that Christians really do not read their storybooks, because if they did, they might be appalled by all the violence in the Bible. Then again, because they believe that particular book is the inerrant word of God, inspired and written by God, that such violence is OK and has the stamp of God’s approval.

The thing is, the Bible is a book full of mythical stories written and inspired by very errant humans, not a deity. These same humans were no better Kurt Vonnegut or Jackie Collins, except that Vonnegut and Collins are better writers.

Mike:
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
moderatorJanRyan
Senior Moderator
08:32 AM on 10/01/2011
Mike-I just fanned you. I have been meaning to do it for a while now but with how busy we are I never seemed to have had the time. I just wanted to let you know you seem like a gentle soul and a very nice person.Whenever I see your name pop up with a comment it always makes me smile:):):)
Jan
photo
Skunkman
old & decrepit
01:14 PM on 10/01/2011
Good afternoon moderatorJanRyan: ( already f&f) Short bio. :) I'm 81yrs old.
A decrepit old coot who left his right hand in Korea many years ago. I graduated
from UConn, GI Bill, & worked for Pratt & Whitney in the UK (Swindon) for 10
years There is plenty more & if by chance you suffer from insomnia some day I will
finish this boring story. :-) Thank you for the fan but it's really not necessary.
My posts have been awful lately. I blame it on Rush Limbaugh. :)

Have a terrific weekend. Faved.

Cheers,
Mike
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tunghoy
My other car is a TARDIS
12:21 AM on 10/03/2011
I agree with Jan. Your comment deserves a fan.
photo
Skunkman
old & decrepit
05:37 AM on 10/03/2011
Good morning Tunghoy:It looks like we are cyber friends.
You get fanned right back & faved too. Take care.

Fanned & faved

Mike.
photo
vaygollybum
just wondering
11:21 PM on 09/29/2011
Bet that most of these parents kids have Game Boyz that play "shoot um up bang bang" games.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dawn Castle
A liberal is your fellow American not your enemy.
07:07 PM on 09/29/2011
It's interesting to note that most of the complaints were in the 90's at the beginning of the extreme right wing influence.
02:35 PM on 09/29/2011
I have all those books and MORE in my home library! Any time I hear about a book being challenged or banned, I look for it so my kids will be able to read it and not be subject to the whims of parents who want to censor what books are in the public or school library where they're accessible to EVERYONE.

Amazon is a wonderful thing, and the used bookstore in town is a boon. Also, it's amazing what great literary works you can find at yard sales sometimes!
01:14 PM on 09/29/2011
The Brother's Grimm needed to be banned for filling small children's heads with foolish nonsense.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:33 PM on 10/02/2011
I disagree. Foolish nonsense is the best kind of nonsense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wardropper
Highly-detailed empty micro-bio
10:21 AM on 09/29/2011
Disney would be nothing without his evil witches and monsters.

Those American states ought to know that.

If you bring your children up not knowing that there are bad things in the world, you are preparing them for shocks in the future from which they may never recover.

These stories are a painless way of preparing them for adulthood.
11:10 PM on 09/28/2011
You know, I'm surprised there's no mention of challenges to Lois Lowry's THE GIVER. It's a book that troubles me, for the fact that Jonas takes his clothes off (I don't recall exactly whether its was complete nudity or just above-the-waist) to be body-massaged by The Giver. I'm sure it's no problem for most kids, but kids who are already being sexually abused or groomed for abuse could see it as an endorsement of adults body-massaging young children. I know this might be rare, but I can see it as posing a problem with precisely the kids who are already most vulnerable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
O K Ali
Wash your hands, seriously.
09:46 PM on 09/28/2011
I guess this book missed the cut. LOL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIBqd1kxoQk
06:51 PM on 09/28/2011
Honestly, I feel like these book-banners are sort of like cardboard bogeyman cut-outs in some kind of puppet show for children. People bring them out, and everyone boos and hisses and congratulates themselves on how morally superior they are to those who want to ban books, but they're just toys. They're pretty easy to knock over.

Almost nobody is actually in favor of banning books, and the ones who are are almost never successful. They have basically no political power. It's just a form of easy grace to congratulate yourself on how much more enlightened and open-minded you are than a book-banner.
photo
ghostrider57
Unable to find reality.sys Universe halted
07:37 PM on 09/28/2011
You're partially right. But you are also a little naive.

There are many communities across the country where the book banners have got their way. And not just with books for children. Many librarians have been forced by the so called town fathers and mothers to pull books from their shelves.
09:53 AM on 09/29/2011
Like which ones? And where? And are these "many communities" in places amazon doesn't ship to? I checked all the books on the list, and they're all available used for less than a dollar. Most of them you can get for $0.01. That's not counting the ones that are in the public domain, and can be downloaded for free anywhere. This is not a serious issue.
12:31 PM on 09/29/2011
Besides, have you ever heard of this thing called "interlibrary loan"?

Seriously, though. Have you considered the fact that people today have easier access to more books than anyone else in history? Just twenty years ago, I never would have imagined how many books I'd be able to get my hands on. When I was growing up, we had one bookstore in town. It was a little Waldenbooks in a sort of strip mall, with, like, five aisles of mass market paperbacks. And neither our school nor public libraries were really anything to write home about. Now, you can name the most obscure book you can think of, and I can have it on my doorstep in less than a week (much less time than I'd have to wait for a book at the library, if someone else checked it out).

But here you are complaining because some library somewhere doesn't carry every book everybody wants. Do you think it's possible that you're scraping the bottom of the "righteous outrage" barrel here? Maybe just a little bit?
08:50 PM on 09/28/2011
The thing is, they never call it banning books. They always couch it in other terms.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dennissinned
Progressive but not a Democrat.
01:29 PM on 09/28/2011
Is America really the land of the free and the brave when you have to ban so many books just because one person finds them objectionable?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Bourbon
02:27 PM on 09/28/2011
NONE of these books are banned. They are all freely available from your local bookseller, or online at amazon.com
07:15 PM on 09/28/2011
Only if you have the money to buy them. I grew up in a large family with little money, and we all made great use of the local library. If a book wasn't there, I didn't know it existed.
01:18 PM on 09/28/2011
Pretty funny that they tried to ban The Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe, considering that the whole series is basically about Christianity
02:15 PM on 09/28/2011
Not everybody who wants to ban a book is a Christian fundamentalist.
04:29 PM on 09/28/2011
True enough, but those who want a book banned because it deals with "mysticism" usually are
niko73
Dem belly full but we hungry
01:04 PM on 09/28/2011
Whether it’s bible thumpers wanting to ban A Wrinkle in Time or liberals wanting to ban Hansel and Gretel, it’s the same to me. It’s all sickening intolerance and needs to be forcefully rejected by open-minded Americans.

What about *gasp* doing your job as a parent and discussing these issues with your kids while they read the book? Nah, these so called “parents†would rather avoid these situations and shelter their children from anything that might challenge their parents’ black and white worldview. I truly feel sorry for these children.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Bourbon
02:07 PM on 09/28/2011
Or "gasp!', not reading a book that offends you and leaving the rest of us alone?
01:04 PM on 09/28/2011
The only thing you are preventing when you ban a book is knowledge.
01:02 PM on 09/28/2011
The book I remember most from childhood is "The Five Chinese Brothers." I understand it has also been the cause of conflict in some circles. Prompted by this article I just re-read the story, which lead me to controversy about it. The story caused me no harm as a child, and during today's re-read I saw nothing that would cause harm to a young reader. Are we "bubblelizing" our children to much?
03:53 PM on 09/28/2011
I think the illustrations of the Chinese brothers themselves might have something to do with it. Although that book was pretty gruesome, if you really think about it. I always liked it too, though.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
O K Ali
Wash your hands, seriously.
09:43 PM on 09/28/2011
"It is only fair," said the judge. I remember that line to this day.