iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Amy Siskind

Amy Siskind

GET UPDATES FROM Amy Siskind

Top 10 Reasons Palin Should Run for President

Posted: 06/ 3/11 08:11 AM ET

1) Our country has yet to elect a woman president -- a national embarrassment! Almost every country in Europe and Latin America; along with India, Israel, New Zealand, Canada, China, Pakistan, Rwanda and many other countries have been led by a woman. The UN cites: "The achievement of democracy presupposes a genuine partnership between men and women..."; then goes on to rank the U.S. 75th for women's representation in government (great news, we're tied with Turkmenistan). It is time we move forward as a country and elect a woman president!

2) Left to their own devices, neither party will run a woman -- in 2008, Hillary was not only betrayed by the' Senate Boys Club', but the DNC allowed overt sexism to hurt her chances (acknowledged by Howard Dean after she dropped out). The GOP Establishment continually discourages Palin (and Bachmann) from running. For a women of either party to become president, she'll need to take a non-traditional, circuitous route. Since women are brought up to be 'good girls' the moxie and bravery to buck the system is rare. Palin has it.

3) A generation of girls will see politics as a possibility -- over the past decade, an alarming trend has developed on campus: college women are less likely to seek out positions of power. Not only avoiding politics, but also corporate America. One Ivy League woman told me her take-away freshman year on career paths for women was: "social work or medicine - you know, women need to help people."

4) Women's representation in leadership is moving backwards -- from congress to Fortune 500 management, the percentage of women in leadership roles is decreasing. We're moving backwards! The best way to move forward again is to get women who support other women into positions of power.

5) Palin 'walks the walk' on supporting and mentoring women -- no one has done more to dismantle the GOP's white-male construct than Palin. Her 2010 efforts helped deliver the country's first Latina governor (Martinez-NM), first Indian-American woman governor (Haley-SC) and many new and returning women candidates.

6) Standing up to sexism -- Palin has faced a steady barrage of sexism since 2008, including yesterday when a sign was posted on her bus referring to her as a media "whore." In fact, women in power are frequently referred to as "sluts, bitches and whores." Unambiguously, sexism hurts female candidates. Which is why it is so important for Palin to continue to stand up against and smack down the low-lives who perpetrate sexism and misogyny, by running despite them!

7) Women's voices (and faces) are evaporating -- increasingly, the decisions which determine the future of our country are made predominantly or exclusively by men. Although women make the bulk of consuming decisions, there is not a single woman in the federal budget negotiations or leading a major economic agency in the Obama Administration. Geez, NASA couldn't put one female astronaut on Shuttle Endeavor's final mission?

8) Teaching girls to take risks (and pick themselves up and try again) -- our culture pressures teach girls not to take risks. That they must be perfect and not make mistakes. As a result, as women we are under-represented in high-paying jobs and top-level management positions. Palin running for office again would send a powerful message to take risks, keep trying and never give up. Truly empowering.

9) Like so many of us, Palin is a working mom -- she understands the quandary facing today's women, and how we are put in a no win situation. She's been a victim of gender stereotyping from the moment she stepped into the national spotlight: how dare she be a working mother?! (here, here and here). She'll bring that understanding to office.

10) Palin made her own way -- she was not the beneficiary of her father and his cronies, her fraternity, or the boys' network. She worked hard and did well based on her own abilities, and never forgot where she came from. This gives her an implicit understanding of the battles that the marginalized and underrepresented (including women and girls) must wage to advance.

 

Follow Amy Siskind on Twitter: www.twitter.com/AmyTheNewAgenda

 
 
  • Comments
  • 289
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
11:23 AM on 06/08/2011
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Julia Bailey
04:06 AM on 06/05/2011
Electing a dumb women won't do much for the election of future women in this country, it will do harm.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MilesLong
Livin' the Dream
07:23 PM on 06/04/2011
Okay, let's look at this proposal from another side.

I want everyone to relax, to clear their minds and then do the following: Try to imagine how a President Palin would sound, and be received, addressing the G8, or the United Nations...

Miles "Exactly" Long
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
michiganms
11:25 AM on 06/04/2011
Amy, I have been a feminist since the early 1960s. Someone should not be elected to any office based on gender only -- that was the mistake McCain made in having Palin as a VP. He thought he would get the Hillary supporters, because Palin was also a female. It doesn't work that way. If Sarah was knowledgeable, smart, showed tenacity in sticking with a job when it got rough, set an example of being ethical and well spoken (instead of mean spirited), I could believe in some of what you say. Sarah is none of these things. I do not want Sarah to be the female representative of this country. She is no Margaret Thatcher, she is no Indira Gandi and the sad thing, she does not realize how lacking she is.
farleft1917
Nothing is new but only forgotten.
11:14 AM on 06/04/2011
The same argument was applied by feminists when Margaret Thatcher first ran. Her long rule as PM destroyed Britians manufacturing, brought permanent, generational, unemployment to the old industrial counties and there were riots of a kind rarely if ever seen in British History.
Thatcher did nothing for women in politics. No party since has had a woman as leader let alone PM.

Germain Greer asked all British women to vote for Margaret and nothing much good came of it. Thatcher hated women and loved fat male bankers. I lived through her decade plus and it was a living Hell if you were poor...oh wait...few care about the poor anymore: vote for Palin!
09:59 AM on 06/04/2011
There's a lot better qualified women than Palin or Bachmann in the GOP.
08:48 AM on 06/04/2011
Say all of this about Hillary Clinton or Nancy Pelosi or any of the other women qualified to be President and you might be on the right track. Sarah Palin is not qualified and does more damage to women than anything else.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
brt929
06:28 PM on 06/04/2011
Nancy Pelosi would make a great president. It is too bad she never considered it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sharin
severely liberal and proud of it
08:44 AM on 06/04/2011
these are the reasons? seriously? Being president of the US, basically leader of the free world, is NOT about sexism. It takes an intelligence level way beyond that of simple sarah. It takes a temerity that petty little sarah continually shows she has none of and it takes a commitment way beyond anything she is cable of sticking with.
You can't run this country on empty platitudes and GOP rhetoric. sarah has done more to diminish women's standing and perceived abilities than any other woman in politics at this time.
Go away sarah. Go away with your bs 10 reasons, Amy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:30 AM on 06/04/2011
" she understands the quandary facing today's women, and how we are put in a no win situation." No one believes that. Does she struggle to get food on the table. Does she miss out on fun things with people her own age because she has to stay with her kids? Does she work two jobs?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alafonse
It's definitely a crap-shoot.
07:08 AM on 06/04/2011
If you were looking for a woman to run for president, Sara and her co-hort Michelle are rather poor choices. Look instead for someone with a decent education who's not a radi-cal.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark Lindley
10:50 AM on 06/04/2011
Both Palin and Bachman are educated. I don't care for Palin but Bachman is not a radical.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
traceymarie
the President is black, deal with it
11:34 AM on 06/04/2011
the women(bachmann) claims to talk to god on a daily basis, rails against entitlements while she takes farm and "god clinic" entitlements yearly and you beieve she is not radical? rotflmao
06:02 PM on 06/05/2011
You mean, both of them have college degrees when you say educated? For those two, every time they speak they make a mockery of education.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
madisonlike60
opinion will not belie the truth
03:41 AM on 06/04/2011
I completely agree with the idea, it't the "vehicle" that won't drive. I almost thought you were trying to be sarcastic, by saying what the citizen from Alaska has done. Just ask the citizens who still live there. They'll tell you all about it.
IMHO, the citizen from Alaska gives ALL women a bad name. She is mean, petty, vindictive, greedy and intellectually incurious, just to name a few things.
Now, Madeline Albright, now you're talking Presidential.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Malby Lewis
03:27 AM on 06/04/2011
You missed #1: comic relief. And as a woman, I'm insulted by the notion that we need a woman President because other countries have done so. We need a good President, man or woman.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
starmanx
beam me up, Scotty
02:52 AM on 06/04/2011
You know the media is a total joke when they implicate themselves in this farce.
photo
GoldStarMom
Reading is Fundamentalism ... in Texas.
12:45 AM on 06/04/2011
Woman account for fully half of the population of our nation, why then do we not have equal -- or near equal -- representation as members of our local, state, and federal governments? Maybe that's what is needed to bring some measure of sanity back into our nation.

However, the author of the above article seems to think that ANY woman running for POTUS -- regardless of their suitability for the position -- is still better than no woman running for that office. Encouraging any female candidate to run for the office, just because of their gender, doesn't increase the chances of more women running. Instead, it fosters and encourages the false impression that no woman is qualified to be President.

We DO have several members of Congress, as well as Governors, Mayors, Judges, and other elected officials who are women. Surely at least some of them are much more qualified to fill the highest office in our nation, than Sarah Palin is.

The reasons often given as to why she shouldn't be President have NOTHING to do with her sex. If anything, she's getting confronted LESS often on her comments and actions simply because she IS a female. Were she a man, she'd have been laughed out of the political arena long before now.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
starmanx
beam me up, Scotty
01:02 AM on 06/04/2011
Hear! Hear!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
trekbette
Country Before Party!
12:23 AM on 06/04/2011
If she by some very large stretch of the imagination does become President, once she quits or is impeached, it will be decades or more before another woman is elected to the Office. Public opinion will blame her gender for the mess she leaves behind.

She could have easily spent just a little time each day preparing, studying... you know, maybe read the Constitution.

Speaking of the Constitution, comedians won't be making jokes about her for long after she is elected. She will have them arrested or harassed or worse. Her understanding of the First Amendment seems to be that it protects her from being insulted.