More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Andrew Beaver

GET UPDATES FROM Andrew Beaver
 

Why Is the Human Rights Campaign Honoring Goldman Sachs?

Posted: 02/ 6/2012 2:33 pm

When the Human Rights Campaign, the nation's largest gay group and one that has done considerable good work, arrives in New York from D.C. to consort with a predatory company like Goldman Sachs, it creates an alchemy that suggests that the organization has seriously lost its way at a unique time in our country and the LGBT movement's history.

I'm talking about HRC's decision to honor Goldman Sachs with its 2011 Workplace Equality Innovation Award at the group's annual New York dinner this past Saturday, which inspired a protest by Occupy Wall Street' Queer Caucus.

In 2012, honoring a New York company for being good to its gay employees is like congratulating it for a passing second grade, since New York City has strong anti-discrimination laws protecting LGBT people, and most of New York's banking industry has policies protecting LGBT employees. Let's be clear: HRC honored Goldman for money and prestige on Wall Street.

HRC's willingness to whitewash the pasts of individuals and organizations in return for cold cash is nothing new. In some ways I don't fault the group's willingness to look these execs in the eye, take their money, and use it to promote LGBT equality. But this strategy has its limits. In honoring Goldman Sachs, HRC is incredibly tone-deaf to the enormous outrage nearly all Americans feel toward the banks and securities firms at the center of the economic meltdown.

What's most troubling is the message HRC sends to the millions of young people, kids as young as 9 or 10 years old up to recent college graduates, who are living proof that our dreams of equality can and will be realized. Every out gay person over the age of 30 has been fighting for the basic protections we desire for ourselves and future generations against being fired from jobs, thrown out of our homes, or being beaten simply because we are gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender. The result is that we helped create a progressive cultural environment where, increasingly, LGBT young people are openly expressing their true sexual identities as soon as their hearts and bodies reveal it.

But at the moment that this amazing generation is coming of age, it is forced to find its way in the midst of an economic crisis that will likely linger for a decade or more. Bankrupt state and local governments are raising tuition costs and laying off teachers. The federal government is forced to stop investing in higher education, green technologies, and university research and development. Companies are hunkered down and generating few new jobs. And at the center of the financial disasters that led to the global recession was Goldman Sachs and the financial ethos it represents and practices. Goldman Sachs promoted the U.S. mortgage bubble and then bet that this huge segment of the U.S. economy would fail, leaving hundreds of thousands of Americans unemployed.

Before anyone had even heard of the European debt crisis, Goldman advised the Greek government on how to cheat its way into the Eurozone, setting up a crisis that threatens to further depress the global economy. Goldman acted as a bookie for insurance giant AIG's mortgage-based gambling operation and then pocketed $13 billion of AIG's $182 billion government bailout.

Goldman Sachs' ethos delivers profit whether society fails or succeeds. Goldman couldn't care less where the money comes from. But it does take great care to assume zero responsibility for the wreckage it creates. One practice in particular captures the extraordinary personal greed Goldman is built upon. Every year the firm divides up its profits, transferring them out of the company into the hands of individuals in the form of grotesque executive bonuses and dividends for their ultra-rich shareholders and clients -- including Mitt Romney. Goldman Sachs' executives effectively disinvest the profits of their own company so that they can pocket the cash. Very few companies in America operate this way.

I'm not suggesting it is HRC's job to police the American economy, nor do I think an organization that represents the spectrum of LGBT opinion should become a mouthpiece for critiques of our economic system, but I do believe HRC should embrace fundamental progressive values, especially those that so directly impact a generation we encouraged to live by those values. In honoring Goldman Sachs, HRC is aligning itself with a company that has nearly bankrupted an entire future generation and would do it again. This past Saturday HRC sent the message of "do as I say, not as I do," and that is very sad.

 
When the Human Rights Campaign, the nation's largest gay group and one that has done considerable good work, arrives in New York from D.C. to consort with a predatory company like Goldman Sachs, it cr...
When the Human Rights Campaign, the nation's largest gay group and one that has done considerable good work, arrives in New York from D.C. to consort with a predatory company like Goldman Sachs, it cr...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 44
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
James Peron
05:50 PM on 02/07/2012
The question really is whether or not gay organizations should fight for the rights of gay people, or if they also must have a broader agenda that is unrelated to that issue. There are plenty of people who think gay rights should take second place in some broad, so-called progressive agenda. But this mentality regularly put gay rights on the back burner. In addition it falsely assumes that the gay community is of one political opinion on these broader issues. This strategy weakens the entire movement toward equality of rights of gay people. As such, I would argue that what is being suggested here is actually harmful to the gay community.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kimo32
I am at a loss for words....
10:00 AM on 02/07/2012
I just gave HRC a donation...it will be the last that they ever get from me.......God damn if they haven't sold out too!!!
09:00 AM on 02/07/2012
Goldman Sachs is considered one of the top most gay friendly companies in the world, not just New York. They have LGBT departments in many of their offices including of all places India. You walk through their administrative offices and see diversity statements and HRC logo's all over the place.
AliveInNYC
Actually in DC now but still fighting the fight
08:31 AM on 02/07/2012
This is the "Workplace Quality Innovation Award". It is not a referendum on Goldman Sachs and thier role in the financial crisis. I'm surely not defending Goldman Sachs in any way, but perhaps they go above and beyond when it comes to supporting the rights of their LGBT employees.

For those who say it's no big deal in New York, you are quite misinformed. The law is essentially useless. I know too many people who have filed claims with the city only to have them denied. This is especially true for transgender people who face extreme discrimination in the workforce.

Since I don't have all the facts, I'm not going to pass judgement on HRC of Goldman Sachs (Again, for their support of the LGBT community. This is not about their impact on the economy.) It's wrong and naive to automatically assume this is only about money.
03:01 AM on 02/07/2012
HRC fails again. Yet another example of why I don't drink the HRC kool aid.
roscoewpa
Dont Hate, Appreciate
02:22 AM on 02/07/2012
What baffels me and i dont understand is Goldman Sachs is ny based. New York has gay marriage and have strict laws against discrimination of the lgbt community. So are they being praised for following the law as about another million other bussinesses have to do ? Are they not any other companys more worthy of such a title? Im sure when it comes down to just following the law, they should raise the bar on who recieves the honor and who benefits the community in other ways. It appears that they a sucumbing to a money powerhouse. I much like looking for a good trait of a murder and rewarding them for one good trait.
02:21 AM on 02/07/2012
Why did the nobel organization give obama a peace prize?
Some questions don't have answers.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:44 AM on 02/07/2012
echoes of Komen. self-righteousness rarely empowers good decisions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Erin84
12:23 AM on 02/07/2012
They robbed the American taxpayers blind. They have former executives working in the government financial regulatory committees. They helped deregulate the banks, and played a principal role in destroying our economy. Then when America was hurting the most, they robbed us blind when their industry insiders in the government and the Congress people in their pockets gave them tax-payer bailout money. They can keep their support for same sex marriage. They are nothing short of evil. No, mrld20, that wasn't just a mistake, it was a cleverly-calculated heist.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Darr Sandberg
"What is essential is invisible to the eye" Sain
11:57 PM on 02/06/2012
If we insist that all of our allies be perfect

we will have no allies

not even ourselves.
Justin Werner
"And so it will make us mad."
07:13 AM on 02/07/2012
There's a big difference between insisting on perfection and insisting on not being associated with massive damage to our nation. I'm choosing the latter here, not the former.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Darr Sandberg
"What is essential is invisible to the eye" Sain
12:32 PM on 02/07/2012
You've missed the point, I believe. One can find a reason to criticize any of our allies, and anyone.

But appreciating the good that Goldman Sachs is doing does not prevent criticizing the wrong they do, and it enables positive reinforcement to lead to better policies over all.
11:11 PM on 02/06/2012
It's really much worse than this. When companies don't answer the HRC workplace survey (companies get hundreds of these per year and may have a policy not to answer *any* of them so as not to appear biased toward any particular group(s) by only answering some), the HRC makes up scores to assign to these companies based on "available information." They have wrongly given failing scores to many companies that *are* LGBT-friendly. I've written to Mr. Solmonese on the matter, but have been ignored. I no longer support HRC; it's too bad ... they do other good things for our community, and that is what they should stick to.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Moore
Teacher, German, Math, Pennsylvania
09:59 PM on 02/06/2012
To those who agree with the HRC decision to give an award to Goldman Sachs for their efforts at making their workplace environment more LGBT friendly, by all means, continue donating your time, money, and energy to the HRC. On the other hand, if you would prefer to donate your money and efforts to local charities and AIDS organizations, or to the community theater, or public radio, or any other organization that might provide benefits to the LGBT community without destroying entire neighborhoods in America, then by all means, stop sending your checks to HRC.
01:01 AM on 02/07/2012
I can respect that -but why does it have to be an "either/or" position. I do what I can, and I put a lot of thought into it... supporting both National and local causes. Many victories have been won through HRC, and they tend to keep many corporations in-line with True Equality.
Advocacy starts close to home -and support of ones local charities is a great way of reaching out! I'm so glad you brought the topic into the mix.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Moore
Teacher, German, Math, Pennsylvania
06:46 AM on 02/07/2012
I agree with your point; the HRC has fought many battles and won many victories in the name of the LGBT community. For that I am grateful. However, Goldman Sachs is not exactly a company that leaps to mind when supporting fairness and equality for all Americans, particularly those who are their customers. That said, you make a good point about it not needing to be either/or.
photo
ladameennoir
Child of the Reagan 80s
09:29 PM on 02/06/2012
Advice to idealistic gay rights activists, or activists of any kind: don't attach too many strings to who you accept money from. Generally the money is more important, especially if it's in an amount you're not likely to get somewhere else.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:54 PM on 02/06/2012
I gotta say, Lloyd Blankfein's support of Marriage Equality is excellent, especially as the Prop 8 decision is neigh. It doesn't make up for the foul stuff of Goldman Sachs, but I think it will make a difference to all those people who think all rich people are social conservatives...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mrld20
08:42 PM on 02/06/2012
LGBT doesn't mean communist pot smoking hippies... Most LGBT people are more than happy to have corporate support for marriage equality...

Has Goldman Sachs contributed to the current crisis? Yes but everyone makes mistakes... Starbucks, Nike just a few other powerhouses who support marriage equality... Sorry Andrew but most LGBT people take all forms of support... Queer radicalism is dead... We're mainstream which means we embrace corporate America...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Keith Cozart
Chaos reigns in Crowley's temple
09:19 PM on 02/06/2012
yes, but everyone makes mistakes!? are you kidding me with this ... They didn't just make the mistake, they helped to engineer it all .. yeah you can spread the blame around and rightfully so but don't try and pass them off as the nice innocent helpful bankers who just got caught up in the greed of everyone else losing their heads.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Priestess of Ryleh
10:37 PM on 02/06/2012
yea i have to agree that this seems more in the flavor of using their stance on LGBT rights to quell the masses who protest against them. their support for LGBT rights is the right thing... but it is not the only thing that the multi-nationals need to fix if they want people to stop protesting them... but hey having wall street regulate itself has been grand hasnt it? we're all better off then the previous generation because of conservative policies arent we?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
antaeus
Marriage Equality Is Here
10:20 PM on 02/06/2012
"Mainstream"? Unless you're 12, you might not see full equality in your lifetime.