More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Andrew Becker

Andrew Becker

GET UPDATES FROM Andrew Becker

Former Obama Immigration Official Roxana Bacon Blasts White House

Posted: 03/ 4/11 05:16 PM ET

UPDATE: Read the response from Department of Homeland Security spokesman Adam Fetcher below.

In a stinging rebuke of the White House, Washington politicians and federal agencies, a former Obama administration official slammed in a law journal the U.S. government for its inaction on immigration reform and tougher-than-ever enforcement.

With uncommon candor for a once-public official, Roxana Bacon, a former top counsel for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, says that the administration -- and her erstwhile employer -- has shied away from vision and practical leadership on immigration, because of indifference and timidity, respectively. She published her comments in the March issue of Arizona Attorney, the state bar's law journal.

"Having seen U.S. immigration from the 30,000-foot level, I know that D.C.'s collective ostriching is not a viable strategy," she writes. "The reasons -- demographic, national security and economic -- are all around us."

Bacon accuses the White House and Congress of neglecting immigration, blasts the administration's strategy of pushing hard-line enforcement ahead of reform legislation and scolds the Department of Homeland Security for the mishandling -- and renewed deportation -- of Haitians fleeing the earthquake-devastated country.

In an article titled "My Year of Living Dangerously," Bacon also calls Congress irresponsible and in want of leadership for not taking on the heavy task of fixing the nation's immigration system. As a result of the issue's neglect, she argues, the hope for change has been lost for many.

In particular, the longtime immigration attorney criticizes the U.S. Senate for voting down a more narrow bill, the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors Act, known as the DREAM Act, which would have paved a path toward citizenship for eligible undocumented young people.

"We need visionary thinking and incisive analysis grounded on economic truths to create the functioning immigration policy the nation needs," Bacon writes. "None of this is likely to come from this Congress, or from this Administration."

The former USCIS official calls on immigrant advocates, the courts and even states to prod the federal government into action and sort out the complications of immigration law while upholding fairness and constitutional rights.

Bacon, who came out of retirement at the request of the administration, resigned her chief counsel post last fall after serving for about a year. Her commentary offers a rare public critique from a former Obama administration official.

USCIS, the agency that handles legal immigration, came under fire last summer after the leak of a draft memo, co-authored by Bacon, on administrative fixes to immigration law.

Conservatives pounced on the memo, which was not adopted, as proof that the administration had plans for a back-door amnesty. Bacon dismissed the notion as "nuts" and said many of the concepts had been floated for years by the government.

Bacon is not the only former DHS official recently to call on Congress to take the reins on immigration. Tom Ridge, the first DHS secretary under President George W. Bush, said that reform critics need to "get over it."

Treading carefully around her friend, current DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano, and praising the cadre of attorneys that worked in her office, Bacon saves some of her harshest criticism for her former employer.

Without naming USCIS Director Alejandro Mayorkas, Bacon chides the agency and DHS for not upholding vows made starting about a year ago that deportations to Haiti would be suspended and requests by Haitians for immigration benefits and relief would be handled with a "generous and open heart."

"Well, somebody must have had a heart transplant, because very soon it was back to business as usual," she writes. "[I]n the middle of January, in the midst of a cholera epidemic, deportations to Haiti resumed. Daily, we send hard-working people to Dante's hell, and no leader in the Administration even seems embarrassed, much less angry or sad."

She paints USCIS, the "runt of the immigration litter" compared to sister agencies Customs and Border Protection and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, as timid, having stayed underground instead of issuing "visionary policy statements or practical field directives."

The other two agencies, in turn, "went into overdrive to detain more people, remove more people, and exercise less discretion than at any time in our nation's modern history," she writes. "Progressive became regressive, and the promised helping hand had a serious slap to it."

As far as the DREAM Act goes, Bacon asserts that to punish young people who have excelled but were brought to the country as infants or children by denying them the chance to legalize is "like jailing a one-year-old for not wearing a seatbelt."

Faced with the choice of setting young adults up for failure or maximizing their contribution as DREAM Act candidates, she laments: "Remarkably, we opted for failure."


UPDATE:
DHS spokesman Adam Fetcher's emailed response to Roxana Bacon's statements on the department's actions regarding Haiti:

In the extended aftermath of the devastating earthquake in Haiti on Jan. 12, 2010, the Department of Homeland Security has remained fully committed to upholding our responsibility to assist individuals affected by this tragedy using tools available under the law.

Three days after the disaster, Secretary Napolitano announced the designation of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haitian nationals who were in the United States as of Jan. 12, 2010. This designation remains in effect through July 22, 2011, and currently more than 60,000 Haitian nationals with TPS reside in our country.

In addition to granting TPS, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has also made some temporary relief measures available to nationals of Haiti, as it relates to change or extension of nonimmigrant status, advance parole, employment authorization for F-1 students, processing of immigrant petitions for children of U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents, among others. As part of this, USCIS has granted more than 90 percent of all fee waiver requests for Haitians seeking these and other immigration benefits. We continue to consider any application for discretionary benefits on a case-by-case basis.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) resumed the removal of criminal aliens in coordination with the Government of Haiti and consistent with our domestic immigration enforcement priorities. ICE is legally required to repatriate criminal aliens to their country of origin or release them into U.S. communities if their repatriation is not reasonably foreseeable.

The moratorium on removals to Haiti therefore meant that ICE was legally required to release detained Haitian nationals into U.S. communities. Unfortunately, a significant number of the detained Haitian nationals had committed serious crimes and their release posed significant threats to the American public. As a result, after a year of suspended removals, the U.S. government made the difficult decision to restart removals of a limited group of Haitian nationals to ensure the safety of our local communities.

DHS is working closely with the Department of State and the Government of Haiti to ensure that the resumption of removals is conducted in a safe, humane manner with minimal disruption to ongoing rebuilding efforts. The resumption of repatriations of criminal aliens does not apply in any way to aliens with a pending TPS application, aliens who have been granted TPS, or aliens who are otherwise present in the United States in a lawful status.

The Department of Homeland Security continues to provide all appropriate humanitarian protections to individuals who found themselves here in the United States in this extraordinary situation, and will continue to approach each case consistent with the humanitarian response taken since the earthquake.

This story originally appeared on the Center for Investigative Reporting web site. To read more of CIR's immigration coverage, go here.

Andrew Becker covers immigration and the federal judiciary at the Center for Investigative Reporting, an independent nonprofit investigative news organization. His reporting has appeared in the Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, National Public Radio and New York Times.

 

Follow Andrew Becker on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ABeckerCIR

UPDATE: Read the response from Department of Homeland Security spokesman Adam Fetcher below. In a stinging rebuke of the White House, Washington politicians and federal agencies, a former Obama admin...
UPDATE: Read the response from Department of Homeland Security spokesman Adam Fetcher below. In a stinging rebuke of the White House, Washington politicians and federal agencies, a former Obama admin...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 188
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
09:06 AM on 03/10/2011
Regarding the Obama administration’s illegal immigration policies, which is pretty much the same as those of the last three previous presidencies, “fuzzy logic†seems to be the order of the day. The reality is that we have somewhere around 20 million people living in the United States illegally. They became outlaws the day they entered. Those who are working are breaking more laws by committing fraud. Additionally, since we have no way of screening these lawbreakers, we should not be surprised to find that 30% of all prison inmates are illegal aliens. Federal law requires that all illegal aliens be arrested, and deported. Yet the fuzzy logic is to ignore the law and look at the potential for increasing the tax base and political power. Even if amnesty were even remotely acceptable, the failure to stem the tide of this insidious invasion gives new definition to the term “fuzzy logicâ€.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matthew Kolken
Immigration Lawyer
03:08 PM on 03/08/2011
More individuals have been deported under Obama than at any other period of time. If voluntary departures are included, the number of people deported since Obama took office may be close to two million.

Obama's actions simply do not match his rhetoric.
08:51 PM on 03/07/2011
Roxana Bacon offers a insightful view and opinion regarding immigration. She was not only articulating right wing positions but, also, left and, to some extent centre positions regarding immigration enforcement, or its lack thereof. I particuliarly agree with her comment "the reasons...demographic, national security and, economic are all around us"....cogently state that we need to address the hotbutton issue of immigration reform......for OUR own good, as well as, showing some degree of understanding for those here illegally. That is not to say that the dream act is the answer. Quite frankly, a person cannot be allowed to stay here illegally. The Whitehouse and congress were elected to solve hard questions i.e. immigration enforcement and reform through "visionary policy statements or practical field directives."
photo
Rockwell
Recovering Reagan republican. 26 years sober.
07:03 PM on 03/07/2011
"Roxana Bacon says that the administration has shied away from vision and practical leadership on immigration, because of indifference and timidity."

I think she just summed up the Obama adminstration's basic reaction to everything. If it wasn't for Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi beating them with sticks and cattle prods, nothing would have been accomplished in the first 2 years.

I'm nearly 50 years old and I've never seen a more limp, pathetic, roll-over-and-rub-my-belly bunch of weaklings in the Oval office as these guys.

They could have risen to the crisis of our times and been heroes. Instead they are just sea weed drifting in the current. Pathetic.
06:48 AM on 03/08/2011
ROCKWELL.....I have finally absorbed the truth in your statement after many months of closely examining the lack of 'TRUE GRIT' and leadership from those in the Oval office.. It really disappoints me that this Administration didn't step up to the challenge and lead this country in a new direction.

I was so full of HOPE and willing to do my part and STAND UP and FIGHT for education reform...for immigration reform.....financial reform and everything else we needed to take a stand on to give this country back to its people. I've agonized over my feelings for over 1 year and have finally accepted the REALITY that hits me in the face everyday.

A team can only be as strong and as brave as its leader, nothing courageous has been born from this administration.
photo
Rockwell
Recovering Reagan republican. 26 years sober.
05:36 PM on 03/08/2011
If you look at my old posts I was blindly defending this administration right up until last November's election. I was getting frustrated but I made excuses. I held onto hope. But Obama's complete caving on the tax cuts for the uber rich was the last straw for me.

I don't expect this administration to win every fight. But I should would like to see them at least put up a fight once in awhile.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RBet
What was the question again?
07:59 PM on 03/06/2011
Given the sorry state of U.S. politics and the right's war on the country as it is currently constituted I am not surprised that her agency is taking a back seat.

Immigration reform needs to happen, and those brought to the country as children should be given their rights under law.

However, we appear to be battling a much more broad attack on civil society than she appears to recognize. One can't expect to win on immigration reform before insuring that those of us who have voting rights actually understand the issues and are willing to fight for them.

This makes me sad.
09:51 PM on 03/06/2011
The Dream act allowed ANY illegal to register and get a ten year amnesty with NO PROOF at all. The only time anything would be checked was at the end of ten years. So it was basically a mass amnesty for all illegals who could pass for under thirty. There were NO requirements for proving anything such as when the illegal came into the US or at what age. There was no requirement for even proving their ID. They could use whatever name they wanted. So a person under 50 could walk in and claim amnesty without questions after just having crossed the border. They would not even have to speak English since all the forms would be bilingual as would all the workers at the centers.

It went further, and granted the illegals more rights than LEGAL naturalized citizens since the illegals got an amnesty for one felony conviction. A legal US citizen who was foreign born could be deported for only one felony. Yet the illegals get a pass! This was simply a fraud and would NOT benefit only the best and brightest. Instead the best and brightest were being used as fronts for those crooks, uneducated, and illegal. If I were the kids who actually needed this, I woiuld be pissed off at the administration for having so many loopholes for others who do NOT deserve to be here at all.
12:43 AM on 03/07/2011
That's not true. The dream act had a number of requirements. For eligibility you had to prove:

* You were brought here as a child (under 15)
* Graduated from high school
* Must have lived here for at least 5 years
* Submit to a background check

And a lot more. These people basically have no future anywhere. They aren't legal here, but have lived most their lives here and no nothing else. Whereas the Dream act would have provided a path for them to contribute to our society and pay taxes and the like, now they basically have to live an illegal life here where everything they've known (family, friends, culture) happens to be, or get deported to a place they know nothing about. It's a tough situation for all, and people who paint it as a one-sided black-and-white issue are part of the problem.
Gasparilla
buy your local newspaper
07:52 AM on 03/07/2011
You're correct Randy. The lenght of time was years into the future and all you had to do was have an application in and you could not be deported. It also allowed mass waivers for family members to stay in the name of "family unity". The 1986 amensty was subject to massive fraud.
photo
alan2a
Actual Progressive
04:04 PM on 03/06/2011
OMG somebody is criticizing Obama for a lack of leadership and timidity. How about lying?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:58 PM on 03/06/2011
If Obama were serious about reforming anything, he would have dissolved DHS.
02:29 PM on 03/06/2011
NO amnesty for illegal aliens.
photo
alan2a
Actual Progressive
04:05 PM on 03/06/2011
Have you really seen those UFO's.
12:24 PM on 03/06/2011
I look at these comments and see the problem with America. Has no one studied our history of immigration into this country? We were established as a Land of Immigrants, where ALL people are created equal. We've only had Immigration laws for a little over 100 years. They started and continue to be restrictionist laws. First, they attacked the Chinese, with the Chinese Exclusion Act, then the Eastern and Southern European. Try studying the Immigration Act of 1924; many were restricted except for those from south of the border. Why? Because after Slavery, we needed workers to Nation Build.
Roxana Bacon is right! What we do need is Comprehensive Immigration Reform.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark Lindley
12:46 PM on 03/06/2011
Today our immigration policies do not discriminate based on race or nationality. In fact Latinos hold one of the highest quotas along with Asians. Today our immigration policies are only restrictive in the sense that it is based on numbers that best suits the interests of this country. We take in 1.5 million legal immigrants per year. More than any other country in the world.
Gasparilla
buy your local newspaper
07:21 AM on 03/06/2011
Her contention that the Dream Act was "narrowly focused" is untrue. It gave the Homeland Security director virtually unlimited power to issue blanket amnesty in the name of family unity, not just limited to those who fit the supposed guidelines.
10:59 PM on 03/05/2011
Maybe allowing hundreds of AK-47's into Mexico wasn't such a good plan for Eric Holder.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RBet
What was the question again?
08:02 PM on 03/06/2011
Please provide more than just this comment with nothing to back it up. I am interested as to the background of ALL US public officials but can take nothing away from this without original source material.
photo
applesNpears
Barack starplayer 24/7
09:52 PM on 03/05/2011
I see why she is FORMER immigration official.....
photo
ShowMeC6
Equal Justice, Not Social Justice....
06:44 PM on 03/05/2011
....oh, and workplace enforcement....
photo
ShowMeC6
Equal Justice, Not Social Justice....
06:43 PM on 03/05/2011
....Enforce, deport, and simplify the process for people willing to immigrate to our country LEGALLY not via border jumping or tunneling, expired visas, and anchor babies. Once the federal government has proven it can do this effectively and consistently then, and only then, do we consider things like the DREAM Act or amnesty....OUT!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RBet
What was the question again?
08:05 PM on 03/06/2011
If you're calling them "anchor babies" nothing will satisfy you. Birther's have been given the opportunity to disclaim their irrationality, using that kind of emotional language does nothing for your argument.
photo
ShowMeC6
Equal Justice, Not Social Justice....
08:26 PM on 03/06/2011
....'Anchor Baby' is not a term inspired by emotion but FACT surrounded by satire ; )
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]