BP employees will spend the next two days testing the latest well cap to stop the catastrophic Gulf of Mexico oil leak. This is the umpteenth time they have tried to stem the crude's spread.
It's also the perfect opportunity to explore how this company single-handedly disproved two of history's greatest philosophical minds: Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau.
Students of political philosophy know that Hobbes and Rousseau didn't exactly see eye to eye. Hobbes famously wrote that life for natural man was "nasty, brutish and short," for man was a monster who could only be tamed by civil society.
Rousseau, meanwhile, saw natural man as more childlike, although not necessarily innately good, and civil society as a restrictive force, an idea summed up in the 1762 treatise The Social Contract's opening line, "Man was born free, and he is everywhere in chains."
Despite their many disagreements, however, Hobbes and Rousseau both agree that natural man evolved, so to speak, because he had something other beasts did not: foresight. "[W]hereas there is no other felicity of beasts but the enjoying of their quotidian food, ease, and lusts, as having little or no foresight... man observes how one event has been produced by another, and remembers in them antecedence and consequence," declared Hobbes.
Rousseau too insisted that man, realizing his natural faculties were limited, harnessed the powers of deduction, and foresaw the need for cooperation: "Since men cannot create new forces, but merely combine and control those which already exist, the only way in which they can preserve themselves is by uniting their separate powers."
In order to preserve their self-interest, forward-thinking man could predict and avoid negative consequences, while finding reasonable conclusions for collective problems. Offshore drilling, and BP's particular handling of the Deepwater disaster, suggests otherwise.
For all of man's technological successes, we have not developed reliable methods with which to clean up disasters of our own creation, like the one still unfolding in the Gulf. If Rousseau and Hobbes's theories on foresight are to be believed, we humans would have to be far more responsible, meticulous and conscientious when it comes to embarking on projects such as offshore drilling. Clearly we have not been. Profits and the bottom line were valued above human and animal life. But, oddly, perhaps that does indeed prove Hobbes's brutish point:
Hobbes expands on foresight later in his 1651 masterpiece, Leviathan. Foresight is not simply the ability to map out the future. It's a complicated system for weighing benefits and pitfalls. "Because in deliberation the appetites and aversions are raised by foresight of the good and evil consequences and sequels of the actions whereof we deliberate, the good and evil effects thereof depends on the foresight of a long chain of consequences, of which very seldom any man is able to see to the end," he writes. "But for so far as a man sees, if the good in those consequences be greater than the evil, the whole chain is that which writers call apparent or seeming good."
The BP disaster, then, illustrates how a company put their own self-interest above potential harm, thus proving Hobbes's assertion that men are, in fact, quite beastly.
Some may argue that BP, and man in general, could not have foreseen the disaster, a hypothesis that supports Hobbes's belief that man could not see the end of all actions. But the past renders this argument moot: we have seen ecological disasters before, yet we continue to ignore experience and foresight, instead preferring to expand profits.
In that light, man does not read as a reasonable animal. We end up looking a lot like Hobbes' natural man, a creature who looks out only for number one, the rest of the world be damned.
Note: This piece also appeared at Death and Taxes magazine.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.