You've probably seen the heartbreaking stories on the nightly news:
A terminally ill child faces the prospect of death because she can't get the heart transplant she so desperately needs. A retiree with liver disease languishes for years on a waiting list as others ahead of him get new organs. A college student in need of a new kidney puts his life on hold to endure dialysis five days a week.
Patients and their families are often outraged that they must wait months or even years for life-saving transplants. I too live in a state of outrage. And here's why: Every single day in one of the richest countries on Earth, an average of 18 people die because there aren't enough hearts or lungs or livers to go around.
It's a problem of simple math. More than 100,000 patients are on the waiting list for solid organ transplants, but in 2011 there were just 28,465 transplants completed.
And the shortage is only worsening as the numbers of available organs continues to drop, both from living and deceased donors. This alarming trend has emerged even as demand rises sharply. Every 10 minutes in this country, another name is added to the national organ transplant waiting list.
How would you solve this problem?
Some would say give the organ to the person who needs it most -- in other words, someone who might die within days or hours without a transplant. Others would argue that we must invoke a war-time triage system that requires doctors to prioritize patients who might have the best chances for survival and a superior quality of life after an organ transplant.
If only it were that simple.
This is not a one-size-fits-all situation. Many variables challenge our ability to match ideal donors and recipients. These include blood types, anatomy, organ size, and other illnesses or injuries that may be present in the donor and/or the recipient.
And even if these variables line up, other troubling ethical questions arise. What if the person who needs the organ faces a low chance of surviving the surgery or recovering fully? Do we perform the transplant anyway?
What if the recipient of a new kidney is 76 years old and suffering from heart disease? What if the next person in line is 16 and otherwise healthy? Who gets the organ?
What if the patient's medical record indicates that the patient routinely forgets to take her medication or misses crucial check-ups? Does that mean the patient wouldn't be a good steward of the donated organ? Perhaps the patient needs a new liver because of cirrhosis brought on by a lifetime of alcohol abuse. What if he refuses to stop drinking? Do we still give him the liver -- even if it means that other patients face potential death while waiting for another organ to become available?
Unfortunately, I know the tragedies -- and the dilemmas -- that lie behind these kinds of decisions. As a surgeon and the director of a large comprehensive organ transplant center, I struggle with them every day I come to the office.
The irony here, of course, is that solid organ transplants have become so successful at prolonging life. Patients can walk out of the hospital with a new heart and enjoy years of productive living. Our success as surgeons and medical institutions, however, has wrought its own unintended consequence: Transplants are now so culturally accepted that the public tends to think they're easy to pull off. Nothing could be further from the truth.
If I had my way, everyone who needs a lifesaving organ transplant would get one tomorrow. And here there is hope: An initiative launched just this month by Facebook to increase the numbers of organ donors has produced encouraging results. Donor registries across the country reported a dramatic increase in online donor designations in the days after the social media giant announced its campaign.
You can help, too, by signing up to become an organ donor yourself. Two easy ways to accomplish that are by taking advantage of the Facebook effort to connect potential donors to the official registry in their region, or by registering as an organ donor when you get a driver's license in states where that is an available tool for registration. Making that commitment and discussing it openly with family and friends is the most important step toward increasing our ability to provide healthy organs to those is desperate need.
In the meantime, those of us who grapple with this special kind of heartbreak every day will make the tough decisions so that the precious resource of transplantable organs is distributed thoughtfully, carefully and fairly.
One thing we know for sure: Every name on that waiting list is a person who is dear to someone. Every patient is worthy and sympathy alone will not light the path for wise choices when the number of patients in need of a life-saving organ transplant exceeds the number of organs that are available. The most immediate and durable solution to this inequity depends upon our decision as individuals to willingly bestow upon our fellow man the ultimate gift of life through organ donation.
For more by Andrew S. Klein, M.D., MBA, click here.
For more healthy living health news, click here.
Victoria Comella: Facebook Organ Donor Tool: "Like"
Hina P. Ansari: Our Organ Donation Journey: Life Begins and Ends With a Breath
Eric Yaverbaum: Facebook's Campaign: Click a Button and Save a Life
Ann Lopez: A Call to Arms for Organ Donation
You're dead. You don't need them. If you have a religious objection, you can opt out, no problem. If don't have a reason to opt out, your death saves one or many lives.
Who would not want such an act as their final legacy?
Yes, I am an organ donor and I just hope they go to patients that need them not because of years of unhealthy living habits.
Of course if you have a child who might need an organ you want to keep that relationship with your child because of the unthinkable pain of losing your child.
Still, I would like to see the statistics as to 1) the longetivity of those who get these transplants, and 2) the quality of life thereafter.
And I would like it broken down into age groups.
Without getting into too much detail let me say I find the whole thing ghoulish to an extent.
And also very materialistic, as though this body isn't merely a sheath, like a set of old clothes, that simply must be discarded at some point.
The whole industry proceeds with a cultural bias in my opinion.
Also, just on a practical level, if you say you will donate your organs in the midst of a life threatening illness, wouldn't you be suspicious that there would be an incentive NOT to keep you alive?
Your concerns are the concerns of many, but some of them also promote some of the myths surrounding organ donation and transplant – particularly your last concern. Unlike what is shown on too many television representations involving transplant – internal and external hospital guidelines and regulations do not permit physicians and medical personal involved with transplantation to mix with those involved in saving your life. Their moral and ethical personal codes should not allow them to do what you’re suggesting – but there are also regulatory codes that prohibit them from being involved in trauma and other care where there could be a perceived conflict of interest, and lead to the suspicion you’re suggesting. When you show up in critical (or any) condition in an Emergency Room – the only priority of the people taking care of you is to save your life and bring you back to health. When they do not, they have failed – and in my experience, they take that very personally. They are not thinking, “HMMmm, there’s a beautiful little girl upstairs who needs a heart…” Because, unlike TV, that’s simply not the way that organ donation allocation works.
As for statistics: there are huge amounts of statistics available at, among other places, the UNOS/OPTN website at http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/data/ Much of what you’re asking for is readily available – and, they take requests for more specific data. The process is very transparent.
Continued…
Continued…
As I have indicated, I would like to see studies or statistics of survival rates after transplants. Also how many of these operations have to be performed again and at what intervals? And are there evaluations of the quality of life after these operations?
There is a lot of mumbling about how the elderly and terminally ill suck up too much medical attention and too many medical resources.
I am cynical and suspicious. I wonder if transplants are a good use of our resources if escalating medical costs are as unsustainable as we are told.
These operations must be very profitable and though I suspect could offer a lot of false promise,
I can see where doctors and hospitals would be motivated to perform them, just as they way over test and over perform various procedures for profit.
They rent those expensive hi-tech machines and have to use them after all.
Anyone who wants to donate their organs to other donors can do so by joining LifeSharers at www.lifesharers.org. Membership is free, there is no age limit, and no one is excluded due to any pre-existing medical condition.
Giving organs first to registered organ donors will also make the organ allocation system fairer. People who aren't willing to donate their own organs should go to the back of the transplant waiting list as long as their is an organ shortage.
Dave Undis
Executive Director
LifeSharers