OK, the onus is on me to make the connection credible. But first, let's get a couple of definitions out of the way:
Smart Grid: This is complicated, but before it gets to us, the electricity we unconsciously draw from outlets often travels across hundreds of miles of rickety suspension bridges of overloaded and aged wires, monitored by overworked and aged utility workers. This unfortunate situation is part of what causes blackouts, brownouts, and other problems that are making our electrical infrastructure less than optimal, or at least, less reliable than we'd like it to be in the US of A. The somewhat esoteric-sounding term "Smart Grid" refers to a high-tech solution to these woes: by layering modern computer and internet technology on top of the current electrical system we can greatly improve its efficiency, flexibility and reliability. We can also pave the way for new, cleaner energy sources like solar and wind power.
Smart Grid Cyber Security: But because our approach to improving the current grid includes computer and Internet technologies, at the same time we're making it better, we're making it easier for cyber criminals and other bad guys to break in and cause big trouble. In order to ensure that the new Smart Grid is reliable and dependable, we've got to add the same types of modern computer security protections that currently do a good job of protecting our online financial transactions as well as our telecommunications networks.
OK, got that? Now here we go. I put it to you that if you consider yourself a friend of the Earth, then you have good reason to be a Smart Grid security advocate. You find this less than intuitive...a bit simplistic? Well, try thinking of it as another application of biotech -- a technological solution to a biological problem. Here's how it works in six easy pieces:
While there are many different pressures on the environment, two of the most significant come out of smokestacks and tailpipes. No matter which side of the climate change debate you're on, there's been little disagreement that the ways we've generated electricity and powered our cars have taken a toll on our bodies and the natural environment in the forms of toxic gases and particulate emissions.
That's changing with the arrival of grid-scale wind and solar renewables, their smaller, geographically distributed siblings cropping up on and around homes and small businesses, and electric and hybrid electric vehicles. While it's going to take a while for these technologies to mature and displace fossil fuels as our primary energy sources, there's a prerequisite project of enormous importance that's underway right now.
According to EcoAlign and Russell Research [hyperlink: http://www.govtech.com/gt/765687], as recently as a few months ago, only 30 percent of Americans recognized the term Smart Grid. Heck, one-third of young Americans can't pinpoint Louisiana on a map and nearly half are unable to locate Mississippi.
Yet for the past several years utilities around the country have been rolling out new high-tech meters, updating and interconnecting their computer systems, and deploying additional high voltage lines to improve the efficiency and reliability of the grid, as well as to help move wind and solar energy captured in rural places to cities where we find most of the demand.
It almost goes without saying, but just to make sure we're on the same page, even in the windiest parts of the country, wind speed varies widely in the course of each day. Why is that? Go ask a meteorologist. And all of the sunniest spots in the lower 48 experience at least eight sunless hours every 24. Yet the demand for electrical power never stops, and that's why thousands of coal, natural gas and nuclear power plants are kept running around the clock, lighting our lights, powering our appliances, charging our cell phones, and trashing our environment in ways too numerous to mention.
Renewable energy is an attractive alternative, but there's a rub. A wind farm that's generating enough electricity to power part of a large city one minute can suddenly lose almost its entire output when the wind dies down, and to keep our energy-intensive world from grinding to a halt, the grid needs to be smart and flexible enough to rapidly bring in power from other sources and locations. So as the affordability of renewable technologies gets better every year and wind and solar farms spring up around the country, the challenge of their intermittent natures becomes more pressing. Absent the Smart Grid and other planned improvements, the current grid will keep us from taking full advantage of clean energy from the wind and sun.
What's more, you don't have to dig too deep on the Internet to find some people (must be part of the 30 percent) are quite worried about the Smart Grid's susceptibility to cyber attack. They seem sure that malicious hackers both within and outside our borders are ready to pounce on Smart Grid computer systems and networks, turn off generators, blow up substations and scramble Smart Meters by the millions. Yet that's precisely why a huge number of industry and government organizations and coalitions are working on security standards and technologies to hasten the arrival of a Smart Grid that's as secure as possible, and that responds to computer and other threats hundreds of times faster than what we have today.
As the song goes, "the toe bone's connected to the foot bone, the foot bone's connected to the ankle bone, etc." In this case, as our well being is inextricably linked to the health of the planet, so are both linked to our ability to remake our electrical grid while keeping it secure, sow new farms with abundant clean energy resources, retire coal plants by the hundreds and gasoline-powered automobiles by the millions -- and keep the whole enterprise safe from those who might seek to disrupt it. If we can acknowledge and understand the connections between these seemingly disparate tasks, we can confidently bring about the energy transformation upon which so much depends.
We need to stop building inflexible "base load" nukes and coal plants.
Far better to use the on site fuel cells for both on demand flexible electricity and co generation of heat.
The Variability of Solar and wind even at 50% of total load, is far less than variability of the demand for electricity.
Rooftop solar REDUCES grid load during peak electrical demand in southern areas.
All distributed generation lowers grid load, and increase grid efficiency by average of 7%.
What we need is a standardized, cheap grid connection local generators to feed in.
The grid probably should be in public hands, it's the freeway for electricity.
secondly, we are not interested in Big Wind, Big Solar and a "Supergrid" connecting even more remote power to load centers. we want to SHAVE PEAK and use existing transmission and the built environment, not re-centralize resources that are inherently ubiquitous. this will require effective STORAGE solutions more than smart grid solutions, but they are not mutually exclusive.
In other words, no, we are not interested in another Robber Baron era combined with a new level of Big Brother watching our every electron. We want independence from Chevron Solar and Sempra as much as from Massey Coal and BP oil. We are over the Big Energy paradigm, so think globally, install locally!
Why does energy scale and location have to be so either-or, yes-no, us-them? Both. Big wind and solar farms AND micro, distributed renewables. We need all the relevant solutions chipping in to make a total solution.
Sheila is right to be skeptical of the abuses that might accompany Robber Baron and Big Energy setups, but we shouldn't let those potential abuses keep us from creating a total solution. We are at the fortunate point of creating the foundations of these systems; we should focus on creating a grid that is attractive to ratepayers and utilities, that uses the very nature of smart grid to create a robust, transparent system. It is not us versus them. It is us.
one of the biggest offenders, but not the biggest yet, is the ongoing privacy violation by our current internet moguls (see Google), which foreshadow the Big Brother future of smart grids if they are not entirely within ratepayer control. Attaching sensors to every one of our appliances and outlets and thermostats to see where we are, when we are around, what we like to do, and having the option of manipulating all of that should terrify anyone with any foresight at all.
nobody is saying that AT THE GRID LEVEL, utilities should not be permitted to balance loads better. it's something they already do, and should get better at, as WE install solar on our properties and feed into the grid, but there is NO WAY we can support Big Energy micromanaging anything beyond the meter. none.
there is plenty more to say about how the utilities have been screwing us both over the past several decades, and more recently by gutting every bill that might offer us any measure of energy independence, plus see PG & E spending $45 million to stop community power while their infrastructure rots and then kills
A smart grid may not be of much help as the sunspot cycle is moving toward a projected high level of dangerous activity.
As that occurs, increasing solar storms increasingly threaten to knock out the power grid.
Earth was fortunately missed by a huge solar flare last week.
More than 130 million Americans could be without electricity - recovery may take several years. The impact on water supplies, places of employment and everything else that depends on the Grid could be catastrophic.
See www.aesopinstitute.org for some additional information and a proposed program to minimize the impact.
Decentralized, renewable, reliable power must become an urgent priority.
Rooftop solar is one excellent option. A few hybrid cars have been privately modified to become emergency power plants for homes.
A number of huge transformers are at risk. They take 18 months to build and are almost all different.
If we meet this challenge it will move use toward greater energy independence.
Dependency on Grid power may prove to be a major mistake. One severe solar storm impacting earth is all it would take to prove that point.
Time to look at better alternatives.
Get solar panels they are economical now.
As people use less energy the power companies raise prices.
Foxes killed by park service on the beach!
Piping Plovers and road less areas over people!!!
http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=593797982139
I believe it really all comes down to the consumer realizing a real benefit, and when the consumer realizes. If consumers realize that there are some real benefits to a Smart Grid (lower bills perhaps being most important), then they will probably be willing to accept some (inevitable) glitches in security. If they do not realize any benefits before they start seeing security issues (and the issues do not necessarily have to be real-theoretical may be enough), then they may kill the Smart Grid before it has a chance to mature.