More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Andy Ostroy

Andy Ostroy

Posted: August 5, 2010 09:01 AM

California's controversial Proposition 8, which banned same-sex marriages, was overturned Wednesday by a U.S. district judge in San Francisco. The decision was a major victory for gay activists.


Prop 8, or California Marriage Protection Act, was a voter-approved ballot measure in the November 2008 elections. It reversed the prior California Supreme Court ruling that gay couples had a constitutional right to marry.

In his 130-page ruling, Chief US District Judge Vaughn Walker wrote: "The evidence shows that Prop. 8 does nothing more than enshrine in the California constitution, the notion that opposite sex couples are superior to same sex couples. Because California has no interest in discriminating against gay men and lesbians and because Prop. 8 prevents California from fulfilling its constitutional obligation to provide marriages on an equal basis, the court concludes the Prop. 8 is unconstitutional."

The suit was brought by plaintiffs Paul Katami and Jeff Zarrillo, a Burbank couple seeking to marry, and was argued by the legal team of Ted Olson and David Boies, bitter foes in the Gore v Bush battle of 2000.

As expected, gays from New York to California rejoiced over the decision, and were no doubt joined in celebration from the likes of Mark Foley, Larry Craig, Ted Haggard, Bob Allen and countless other closeted, formerly gay-bashing Washington conservatives humiliated in salacious gay-sex scandals. And while no seemingly heterosexual Republican politician currently serving could outwardly show his euphoria over the ban's reversal, we're certain it was a very different story for those in the GOP (Gay Ole Party) closet.

 

Follow Andy Ostroy on Twitter: www.twitter.com/AndyOstroy

 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:34 PM on 08/06/2010
Does not anyone realize that the judge in this case was appointed by Bush the Elder, and the timing of this decision less than 100 days before election day makes his motives, at best, questionable? Sorry, friends and neighbors, I don't think is the least bit encouraging to those who understand the politics of this...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:59 PM on 08/05/2010
The closet cases are livid! The heads of the FRC including Tony Perkins must be besides themselves. I wonder if they're trotting them out on Fox News.
02:52 PM on 08/05/2010
As a gay man living with a partner for 12 years I say with joy - What a great day it is today! In the end, tradition and the moral beliefs of one group are not enough a compelling enough reason to deny another group their civil rights.
Read this beautiful article written by TV host Rene Syler where she compares it with the struggles of her African American heritage. http://www.goodenoughmother.com/2010/08/proposition-8-good-enough-mothers-take/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Doug Watt
Not ready for 2012
05:17 PM on 08/05/2010
Excellent article, thanks!
02:07 PM on 08/05/2010
ur funny
10:09 AM on 08/05/2010
Clever, but my experience is that hard-core closet cases bitterly resent those who are out and not ashamed of their orientation.
photo
JohnFromCensornati
The End is near
12:15 PM on 08/05/2010
Agreed. They aren't rejoicing. They're seething.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
quisp65
10:07 AM on 08/05/2010
I was happy about the judge making the right decision and not allowing California to vote on what is protected in the Constitution, but at the same time I was sad inside because of what was going to be the politicization of this. There has been a whitewash of were the democrats stood during the civil rights era because there were lots more republicans voting for black civil rights than dems. With the gay marriage issue there are plenty of anti gay marriage folks in the democratic party just as there is also plenty of pro gay marriage in the republican party. I have known more "socially liberal" repubs in my life than socially conservative. It would be nice to celebrate this historical importance of this decision without the media putting their left wing spin on this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jobrien1950
fired up
10:21 AM on 08/05/2010
Times change, and I'm not so sure about your statistics, but regardless, the President who integrated the armed forces was Democrat (Truman); Johnson was a Democrat (civil rights), so regardless of party, it should be noted that as time progresses, hopefully, so does the country and the attitudes of its citizens.