A New Ethics of Consumption

Last week I visited Rhode Island's central landfill to do some research on recycling and composting. As I sat in an office overlooking the dump, I couldn't help but marvel at the endless stream of trucks filling the valley with what I like to call the by-products of bad design and carelessness. Bad design because almost nothing we buy is designed to be re-used at the end of its life, and carelessness because so much of what we discard could be re-used or recycled if only the items were placed in the proper bin. All this got me thinking about the ethics of consumption, and what it would mean to eliminate the concept of waste.

Being Less Bad is No Good
Under the current model of consumption it is very difficult to be an ethical consumer. One can essentially choose between "bad" and "less bad" products; organic and free trade labels help, but greenwashing has become an insidious problem, making it difficult to distinguish truly green advances from baseless claims. But even more importantly, for the conscious consumer consumption is a necessary evil at best, and a scourge on the Earth at worst. What we forget is that all living things consume, the only difference is that humans are the only life forms that actually deplete, destroy and pollute natural resources. That doesn't have to be the case. It's possible to manufacture products that are healthy for ecosystems, human society and the corporate bottom line.

Of course, there is already a name for this concept: cradle to cradle design. In their great book, Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things, William McDonough and Michael Braungart describe our current industrial/consumer system as Cradle to Grave: we pull things out of the "cradle" of nature, use them, and then discard them in the "grave" of landfills. Instead, they offer the idea of cradle to cradle, where products are designed to either be infinitely reused in closed industrial loops, or to safely biodegrade and replenish the soil. They have come up with a cradle to cradle certification for products as diverse as envelopes, office chairs and diapers.

A New Ethics of Consumption
What cradle to cradle offers us is a new ethics of consumption. We can try to be less bad but, as Mr. McDonough asks, "why not set out, right from the start, to create products and industrial systems that have only positive, regenerative impacts on the world? Why fine-tune a
damaging system when we can create a world of commerce that we can celebrate and unabashedly applaud?" Imagine walking into a store, and choosing products solely on their cost and functionality, rather than their environmental or social impacts. Imagine every car in a dealership is clean, quiet, efficient, and designed to be disassembled at the end of its life. Imagine a world in which landfills no longer exist, corporations make money while replenishing, cleansing and protecting natural resources, and consumers express their ethics with every purchase.

Such a world is not a fantasy, and will soon become a necessity. We just need the right policies and behavioral changes in place to incentivize designers to design with full life-cycles in mind and consumers to be conscious of what they do with everything from fridges to paper to batteries. For instance, companies could be made responsible for their products at the end of their life, forcing them to either cover the cost of safely discarding them or, if they are smart, to design them to be easily taken apart and made into new products. But that alone isn't enough. What we really need is a revolution in how we think about designing, manufacturing, selling, buying, consuming, using and discarding consumer goods.

The recent animated film Wall-E, about an Earth that has been overcome by garbage, is haunting because if one visits any landfill or slum today, one will see a landscape transformed by the excrement of our consumer society. The typical response to consumerism is either to accept it or to attempt to avoid it. Yet there is no reason why consumerism has to be bad. Unfortunately, we'll have to see a new ethics of design and policy making before we can see a new ethics of consumption.

Quote Via: ::Arashi.com

More on Cradle to Cradle
Dutch Town of Venlo Goes Cradle to Cradle
Four Aveda Ingredients Get Cradle to Cradle Certification
Umbrella Inside Out
The First Cradle to Cradle Certifications

More on William McDonough
William McDonough on Nuclear Power
Esquire: William McDonough Big Thinker of the Year
Sustainability + Functionality with WIlliam McDonough
Quote of the Day: William McDonough on the Triple Top Line

Comments

[leduck]

Planned obsolescence
We've created a throw-away society. It's unsustainable. We will change regardless of how we feel about it.

[Cathexis]

A new ethics of consumption sounds like a great idea. However, we're going to need a centralized coordination in order to be effective. For example, if govt provided a means so recycling was easier (and didn't "punish" people by allowing them to incur individual costs for doing Societal Good), more people would do it.

We need to drastically reconceptualize our lifestyles and a leadership role from Government is teh first step.

[UncleScum]

Uncle Scum believes that we will find a way to make our country green. We already are moving to put light bulbs powered by electricity and mercury into the homes of all our families so that we may all work togeather to clean up this beautiful planet. Uncle Scum believes if this planet goes green and follows my ways and my support, then we will achieve paradise on Earth.

Our actions are killing our home. It is not like Earth is magically in a magnectic field shift or that there may be too much oxygen creating global warming natrually, but our own carelessness for the enviroment. We need to take that large step and create electric powered or hydro powered vehicles for the sake of our enviroment. Uncle Scum says stop throwing away and start to pursway. Stop cutting down our beautiful trees to make toilet paper, fire wood, paper, and other things we can evolve away from. They tell me that nuclear power is the greenest way to go since it provides the most power so we may continue to live and find green solutions. But can we risk the plant exploding even though our own technology is so great that they tell me it will not happen? What if it does explode? What of the trees, animals, and our own air? Uncle Scum says we need a solution now, we need to think from all angles.

[markie1111]

ya, it's pathethic, how humans are sucked into the bottom line of coporate fascism. capitalism without social responsiblity is just that.... sad society we live in.