My Challenge to America: Don't Ignore Gore's Speech

Last Thursday Al Gore gave a speech, the full text of which can be read here, that challenged America to "to commit to producing 100 percent of our electricity from renewable energy and truly clean carbon-free sources within 10 years." It was a speech that should have inspired and excited Americans of all walks of life at least as much as, if not more than, President Kennedy's famous speech calling on America to put a man on the moon within a decade. Instead, Mr. Gore's idea has been met with a chorus of criticism, with the naysayers claiming that it would be too costly, too impractical, and too risky to attempt to meet such a goal.

Apollo and Gore's "Moon Shot"-- A Flawed Comparison
The comparisons between America's mission to the moon and Gore's "moon shot" proposal, while useful, are flawed. Both represent great challenges, yet it must be remembered that in 1961 we did not possess the technology to get to the moon; we do, however, have the technology to achieve 100% renewable energy. But perhaps more importantly, although the Apollo program was great for national pride and beating the Soviet Union, it was by no means essential to our nation. Switching to renewable energy, on the other hand, can not only dramatically reduce our greenhouse gas emissions, it can also help us regain our stature in the world, create jobs, rein in unpredictable energy costs, lower health care costs, get us off foreign oil (provided we also electrify our transportation system) and force American companies to innovate in ways that will be good for them and good for America.

Americans Are Waiting for Leadership
Another fact that the naysayers are forgetting is the extent to which Americans, especially young Americans, are eager and ready to take on a great challenge. An entire generation of scientists and engineers -- my father included -- sprang up in part because of the Apollo program. Today, as a 23 year old graduate student in Environmental Studies, I feel extremely excited about what we can accomplish in the coming years, provided that the right laws, policies and leadership are in place, and I'm not alone in that regard. At the same time, however, I am very worried that the voices of those that don't believe in American ingenuity and genius will drown out the ideas of the people actually working to solve seemingly intractable problems.

One such person is Amory Lovins, the co-founder of the Rocky Mountain Institute. A physicist by training, he has spent decades championing the cause of efficiency. In numerous white papers and articles, Lovins has explained how America can get off oil, at a profit, thanks to the wonder of energy efficiency. By combining Lovins' drastic, yet profitable, efficiency measures with the renewable energy entrepreneurship of people like T. Boone Pickens, there is no reason why we cannot meet the challenge at a cost that is manageable. After all, as Gore pointed out in his speech, the more oil we buy, the more the price goes up, while the more wind and solar we buy, the more the price comes down.

Cost is Not the Issue
Speaking of cost, when has money ever been an issue when America has set its mind to achieving something? How many people wondered if World War ll and the Apollo Program were cost-effective? We started a $2 trillion war with little or no substantive debate, and that war has provided zero return on investment, devalued our currency and standing in the world and led to tremendous loss of life. Yet It appears we will dismiss Gore's proposal off-hand, again without debate, because it is supposedly too costly! I am reminded of those that decry government regulation as detrimental to "the free market," except of course when the regulation benefits them. No, what it really comes down to is this: while energy companies can own and exploit oil fields and coal mines, no one owns the sun. As a result, in the coming renewable energy age, there will not be a handful of multinationals owning all the energy production. Instead, we will see a diversified, competitive, innovation-driven, job-creating energy economy (sounds like the free-market at its best, no?). And that is extremely threatening to vested interests.

If that's not enough, "The Alliance for Climate Protection, a bipartisan group [Gore] leads, estimates the cost of transforming the U.S. to clean electricity sources at $1.5 trillion to $3 trillion over 30 years in public and private money. But he says it would cost about as much to build greenhouse gas-polluting coal plants to satisfy current demand."

My Challenge to America
So here's my challenge to America. Don't pay attention to vested interests. Don't think great things can't be done. Don't listen to the old story that "it's too expensive and we can't do it." We can't afford to ignore this challenge. This is an unprecedented opportunity to involve the entire nation in a project worthy of our passion, energy, money and ideas. In the end, the Apollo Mission only directly involved NASA and the contractors that built the rockets and landers; beyond that, it was a "spectator sport." The end result of the Renewable Energy Mission won't be nearly as show-stopping as the image of a man walking on the face of the moon, but it will be equally transformative, and will allow--indeed require--the participation of Americans young and old, scientists and poets, lawmakers and lawyers, businessmen and women, idealists and pragmatists.

We need to have a serious debate, one that takes into consideration what's best for the country rather than what's best for politicians or large corporations. The result of that debate must be a mission to place, not one man on the moon, but a million wind turbines on American soil and waters, a hundred million solar arrays on American rooftops and hundreds of thousands of American workers in high-paying, rewarding green jobs.

More on Amory Lovins
Amory Lovins, Prophet of Radical Energy Efficiency
Video: Amory Lovins on Winning the Oil Endgame
Profitable Climate Protection
Beating the Energy Efficiency Paradox

More on Al Gore
Al Gore: New 'Moon Shot' Needed to Solve Climate Crisis
"A Generational Challenge to Repower America": Al Gore's Energy and Climate 'Moon Shot' Speech
Al Gore's New Slideshow: Uncle Sam is the Man with the Golden Arm
Al Gore Readies Sequel to "An Inconvenient Truth"
Al Gore Announces Big Climate Change Ad Campaign
Al Gore Earns 2007 Nobel Peace Prize Nomination

Comments

[BeeOplentee]

What speech?

[joebhed]

Wow, bullying up the big lie won't help folks.

I am an environmentalist and implemented the most comprehensive energy efficiency programs of ANY utility in the country.
Being an electric utility manager, I remain, an environmentalist AND.

If you saw Amory Lovins on Democracy Now recently, he showed clearly why a bunch of modern enviros ,like A Siegal posts, are WRONG for pushing more nuclear power, and he recognizes the need to continue to use coal.

Link here:
http://www.democracynow.org/2008/7/16/amory_lovins_expanding_nuclear_power_makes

No matter what Americans do, SHORT OF NATIONALIZATION AND BUYING OUT THE COAL INTERESTS, our coal will not stay in the ground.
It is a global commodity.
If we do not burn clean coal, somebody will burn dirty coal.
MORE CO2 from shipping MORE of our coal further around the world.

Every day that environmentalists push this rope called "no-coal" is another day without solving the problems of carbon capture and sequestration, or itsr equivalent.

Al Gore steals the headlines without offering rational solutions.

We should do as much renewable, solar and efficiency as we can right now.
But in ten years, some of the coal plants will still be running, and others will be awaiting the availability of CCS.

And, in the PUSH for electric cars, where do we expect to get all of that electricity?
Solar will not charge our batteries at night.
MORE base-load plants.
Either coal or nuclear. Or both.
Get it?

[Cathexis]

Tsk. I suggest you claims are false, constrained by premises you currently hold.

Coal is not inevitable; give the people a superior alternative and the coal WILL stay in the ground. Re: solar at night -- surely you are not suggesting that this is an insurmountable problem?!? Do you have so little faith in our innovation? Better storage and/or distribution seem to be two routes worth exploring.

Your logic about "if we don't do X someone else will" is flawed.

[elgrande]

This is the issue of our time. Politicians tend to dither over change, especially fundamental change like how we produce and consume energy. The private sector is and will be the leader in this transformation. Mr Gore, like the prophets of old, is sounding the warning and offering solutions. It is up to each of us to grasp the importance and adapt our thinking and our lifestyles to a new reality.

[mjt218]

You're right, Apollo was absolutely not necessary for our nation and it did nothing but create jobs and technical expertise, and it was about national pride. Al's challenge is to completely change the American way of life. It's not about national pride, its about sacrificing many things people take pride in for the greater good of the world (big cars, big houses, Tim the Tool Man Taylor "More Power" mentality). This is going to be a tough fight and rightfully so.

The problem is that this issue is divisive. People on the left are calling to cut certain industries, lifestyles and other things completely out of the picture. People on the right are clinging to the status quo. Yes, corporate leaders at Big Energy and at Big Oil do stand to loose big should Al's vision become reality. But everyday American's are in for it too. How many thousands upon thousands of blue collar workers work at Coal power plants or in coal mines? How about white collar engineers? Should 40 year old engineers at Coal Power Plants be excited about talk of shutting their plant down? Should they quit their job and retrain for a green economy job? That's a tough decision to make.

The left needs to calm down and realize that the issue is a bit more complicated than building a few wind farms and the right needs to be prodded into embracing the opportunity for new investments and industry.

[Tubby]

Sorry, sonnyboy, but you need to grow up. You still can't recognize a snakeoil salesman when he's right befor your eyes.

[gclum]

your trite comment illistrates your ignorance. even t. boone pickens the swiftboat oil guy recognizes the problem. http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/science/07/08/pickens.plan/index.html

you need to grow up sonnyboy. our country is in trouble. you are standing in the way.

[joebhed]

Enviro-Econ 101.

If you heard Amory Lovins in the link I posted above you would realize it is Mr. Pickens who is that snake-oil salesman.

Pickens' putsch is that we need to get off all this foreign oil because it is a threat to our national economy.

And, the way he proposes to get to that national security is through wind-powered electricity.

The problem is that America does NOT use either domestic or foreign oil to produce electricity.

Only some of the refinery sludge called Bunker-C Heavy Oil, and we produce about 2 percent of our electricity with that stuff.
We do that because it is cheaply available as a by-product of refining crude.

So, Mr. Pickens is either ignorant (NOT) or a bullcrap artist.

But he's a great salesman.

And if the bait-and-switch of foreign oil imports to wind power doesn't fit that bill, then I don't know what does.

Now, let's all invest in Mr. Pickens' great idea and build all the wind power in this country that we possibly can, as quickly as we possibly can.
Because THAT is the right thing to do.