Many women across America are livid at the news that President Obama once again is considering selling women out on reproductive health care to the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.
At issue is whether Obama will renege on the promise of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius that the package of preventive services available to American women under the Affordable Care Act will include all forms of prescription birth control, without a deductible or co-pay.
Because this opportunity will include the women (non-Catholic as well as Catholic) who work for institutions under Catholic auspices that employ non-Catholics, serve non-Catholics, have secular missions -- education, health care, social services -- and thrive on public taxpayer funds, the bishops are irate. They want no woman in their network of secularly oriented institutions to have access to coverage for birth control, and they are apoplectic about the very fair exemption that does exist, allowing them to refuse to provide this coverage to women working for a narrowly defined religious institution (like a church).
In fact, the women working in these nominally Catholic educational, health-related and social service entities are merely a subset of the total population of American women the bishops have targeted. They are lobbying HHS to deprive all American women of insurance coverage for "prescription contraceptives, sterilization and related patient education and counseling." They argue -- in arrogant defiance of the conclusions of the Institute of Medicine, the World Health Organization, the International College of OB-GYNs, and the American Public Health Association, among others -- that these are "not 'health' services."
It remains incomprehensible that these theoretically celibate male hierarchs -- so compromised by their blatant and naked disregard for the most basic laws of moral human interaction, for refusing to protect male and female children and adolescents from rape, sodomy and sexual abuse, decade after decade to the present day -- have the ear of anyone in power to make moral choices on behalf of anyone else, much less women.
When will America's politicians recognize that the men who run the Catholic Church have only the power that others in power are willing to grant them? Otherwise, the bishops' power is a figment of their own imaginations.
Catholics do not agree with them on the most basic moral issues -- from birth control to abortion, divorce to homosexuality -- acting in accordance with their own consciences, not the bishops' dictums. Non-Catholics, including those who work for nominally Catholic institutions, have no obligation to abide by the bishops' positions. When will our political leaders realize that they ought not to be listening either? When will Obama realize it?
If the President caves to the bishops on birth control coverage by broadening the religious institution's exemption from providing that coverage, he will not only be burdening access to a crucial primary care service for the millions of women who work for those Catholic institutions and the female students who attend them.
He will also be bowing to the demands of the representatives of an institution that is shot through with misogyny: a self-righteous and intractable commitment to silencing women, shutting them out of the highest positions of power, without voice on issues affecting their own most intimate lives, and a complete and total denial of women's most basic right to control their own bodies.
President Obama: Are these really the guys you want to be in bed with?
Follow Angela Bonavoglia on Twitter: www.twitter.com/angiebona
Anti-Catholic HHS Stacks Deck Against Church | Blogs | NCRegister ...
House to Hold Hearing on Anti-Catholic HHS ... - CatholicVote.org
Belmont Abbey, Catholic College Sued Department of Health and ...
HHS's birth-control rules intrude on Catholic values - The ...
Catholic college sues HHS over contraception mandate « The ...
On the other hand, I fear that there is nobody on the extreme right wing to whom Obama will not sell out.
If Obama capitulates on his own initiative, with no Congress to blame, I think we might as well assume that he is a closet theocrat. The fact that he would use this mandate for immediate political gain, only to backpedal unnecessarily - to embarrass and degrade us publicly - by giving the Catholic Church its pound of female flesh from America speaks loud and clear.
I won't buy any reference to "compromise" on this one, as it helps a foreign-based institution to re-structure this country's framework, subordinating physical health/survival rights of people (indisputably) to the insufficient, unconfirmed beliefs and inaccessible alien "visions" of some, otherwise physically unharmed.
My exercise of choice to prevent conception or to terminate a process within me, (and the president's defense of that OPTION and my right to narrate my own purpose), DOES NOT PERSECUTE a religion or violate another person's political freedom to believe and to choose differently.
Public money and law should HELP the broader public in its non-threatening variation. They should not reflect the discriminatory interests of power players, by content or by exemption.
(Sorry, my thoughts race ahead of my grammatical skills!)
To undercut my argument, I would just like to say that I am a heterodox Catholic. I don't see too much wrong with ABC other than the health risks.