iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Angela Glover Blackwell

GET UPDATES FROM Angela Glover Blackwell

Stopping Cuts That "Knock the Legs Out" From Our Communities

Posted: 04/ 4/11 12:28 PM ET

Economists and policy analysts have already shown clearly that the drastic budget cuts proposed in the House will cost us hundreds of thousands of jobs and endanger the faltering economic recovery.

Beyond that, though, these myopic cuts threaten to knock the legs out from beneath many critical nonprofits and charities -- efforts that have long enjoyed enthusiastic bipartisan support.

Many of the cuts proposed so far target a wide array of programs that empower low-income people to climb out of poverty and serve their communities.

The House-passed budget eliminates the Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS) and the YouthBuild program. These are prime examples of precious entities that have created widespread opportunities for people who need them.

The Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS) sponsors AmeriCorps, VISTA, Service Learning, and Experience Corps. AmeriCorps members volunteer in such national treasures as City Year, Teach for America, Habitat for Humanity, Service and Conservation Corps and hundreds of other community-serving innovative programs that provide solutions for many of America's key problems.

The YouthBuild program -- sponsored by community-based organizations in nearly 300 of America's most disadvantaged urban and rural communities -- helps low-income young people rebuild their communities and their lives. While these young men and women study for their GED or high school diploma, they also are building affordable housing for their neighbors or retrofitting energy-inefficient buildings.

Since 1993, more than 100,000 YouthBuild students have produced over 20,000 affordable homes. More than nine of every 10 YouthBuild students had previously left high school without a diploma, so this experience offered them a rare and critical chance to get their lives back on track.

Together, all these programs -- from Americorps to Conservation Corps to YouthBuild -- cost taxpayers $1.1 billion, a paltry sum when you compare it to the lives helped and the communities improved.

But if you want numbers, we've got numbers.

Researchers have shown that every dollar spent on a YouthBuild student results in a return on investment of at least $7.80; and every dollar spent on a court-involved YouthBuild student results in a return of at least $10.90 (and up to $43.80) in taxes paid, crimes not committed, dependency overcome. The program's long-term savings are being ignored in favor of politically motivated cuts.

Eliminating these crucial service programs is the very definition of short-sighted. It would be a radical step backward, decimating community-based infrastructure that gives hope and opportunity to hundreds of thousands.

President Obama knows how important these programs are. In his budget, they get a boost.


Want to help? Call 855-US-SERVE to tell your senators to save YouthBuild, Americorps, Conservation Corps and the other crucial service programs. They form the foundation on which we build strong communities.


 
 
 

Follow Angela Glover Blackwell on Twitter: www.twitter.com/PolicyLink

 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
04:41 PM on 04/04/2011
I don't believe I've ever seen a blogging site requiring comment approval. What the *ell is this?
04:34 PM on 04/04/2011
Right.....so the feds should ignore supporting humanity then, right?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carl Caroli
I just don't understand people
01:58 PM on 04/04/2011
"Many of the cuts proposed so far target a wide array of programs that empower low-income people to climb out of poverty and serve their communities. "
The oligarchs and wealthy, complaining their taxes are too, high don't care about giving people a way to climb out of poverty. Profits over people. It's very simple.
01:40 PM on 04/04/2011
Yes sir. That federal War on Poverty thing has worked out so well over the last 45 years or so.
04:35 PM on 04/04/2011
Right.....so does that mean the federal war on poverty thing should just stop? Let it perpetuate, right?
09:17 PM on 04/04/2011
Poverty still exists. If this fact bothers us (and it should) we may be moved to action. My point was that our historic approaches appear to have been less than successful. Persons who decry the reduction in funding for classical programs may be mistaken, therefore. We may wish to rethink our approach in the light of new evidence.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:31 PM on 04/04/2011
"Many of the cuts proposed so far target a wide array of programs that empower low-income people to climb out of poverty and serve their communities. "

In light of the growing disparity in wealth - what evidence is there that these programs work?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
myth buster
01:25 PM on 04/04/2011
If by nonprofits, you mean Planned Parenthood, I hope and pray that it happens. They justly deserve this kneecapping and the one they'll get when we pass the Fair Tax.
mamalisa38
I love you Thomas and I miss you like crazy RIP
02:14 PM on 04/04/2011
Well, myth buster, I guess that means that you're against low income women getting breast exams, cancer screening and many other forms of health care that's provided by Planned Parenthood.

How kind of you.
04:38 PM on 04/04/2011
Isn't he just kind? Think he has O'Reilly's autographed book yet? I'd like to take his medical insurance and job away and see what happens to his opinion then.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
myth buster
02:24 AM on 04/06/2011
Planned Parenthood doesn't do breast exams.
02:18 AM on 04/05/2011
Yea, let low income women have more unwanted babies they can't afford.
Who cares if they can't support them.
Not my problem.

Why should the government help pay for birth control?
Not my problem.

YET!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ken derow
12:53 PM on 04/04/2011
The bad news is that the drastic budget cuts called for by the Repubs would entail great hardship and pain for lower income and middle income Americans, not so much, for the wealthy. The good news is, that the Repubs know that these drastic proposals will never be enacted into law. To be fair, the Repubs have dramatically altered the dialogue in Washington from what can we spend more money on to, how can we cut expenditures. For this, they should be lauded, this is a good thing. Before, real behavioral change can be effected, attitudes must change, and, they are changing, for both the Repubs AND the Dems. But, we must temper the fiery rhetoric and the demagoguery and phase in these budget reductions to minimize the downdraft on the economy. Worse than not immediately reaching budget nirvana would be to throw the economy back into a renewed recession.

Another recession would have a more negative impact on federal revenues than we would gain from slashing the budget too rapidly. Let us be forceful in the direction that we set, let's set a course for fiscal prudence, but, let's not be too rash. We must consider both parts of the equation, not just spending reduction, we must also allow for revenue enhancement. Additional taxes, at the least on the very wealthy, are a prerequisite to achieving long-run debt reduction, and, as important, to introduce a fundamental feeling of an equitable and fair pain to be shared by all.