iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Ann McLane Kuster

GET UPDATES FROM Ann McLane Kuster
 

War on Women Affects Us All

Posted: 05/ 1/2012 3:29 pm

This is an edited speech given by congressional candidate Ann McLane Kuster at the New Hampshire Women Unite rally on Saturday April 28.

Standing up for women right now could not be more important.

The Republicans here in Concord and down in Washington D.C. would have us believe that the War on Women is a phony war. Michele Bachmann and Fox News would have us believe that the whole thing is "political fiction."

But women -- and the men who love them -- know that this is not fiction. Whether we are talking about access to affordable birth control, feeling safe from violence in our homes, or being able to earn the same amount of money as our male counterparts, these are rights that all people deserve and they are being threatened.


And the War on Women is not just about women -- it's about putting the squeeze on the middle class.

In New Hampshire women earn only 78 cents for every dollar earned by a man, and women are increasingly carrying the financial burden to support their families. Most families rely on two incomes to make ends meet, and when a woman earns less we put working families at a huge disadvantage. Despite this, politicians and pundits on the right refuse to come out publicly in support of equal pay for women. Here in New Hampshire, Republicans are saying that the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act is nothing more than a "handout to trial lawyers."

And now Republicans in Congress are holding up passage of the Violence Against Women Act, an act that gives additional protection to victims of abuse as well as their children.

The extreme positions being advocated by the radical right will roll back the clock on women's rights and access to the wages and healthcare we need.

As many of you know, for the past 25 years as an adoption attorney, I have represented women -- from age 14 to 40, from students in junior high school to juniors in college, living in cars and living in prestigious neighborhoods -- who face unplanned pregnancy. Every time, I witnessed the courage, compassion and conviction that women across the country face every day.

Thanks to the United States Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade, women have the choice -- the personal, private and legal choice -- to decide their future.

There is more we can do. Thanks to health reform, women across the country with private insurance can get birth control without paying out of pocket. This lets women make the health care decisions that are right for them and puts every one of us in charge of our own reproductive health. I know firsthand how painful these choices are, and these are the steps that will prevent so many women from having to face this challenge. Unfortunately Republicans in Concord and in Washington, D.C. don't see it that way, and would rather make it more difficult for women to get access to birth control.

The War on Women is fundamentally about women and the men who love them, not about politics. This is about our grandmothers, our mothers, our sisters, sons and daughters, and the kind of life they all deserve.

It is not enough for us to stand up -- we need to push back. Women are 51% of active voters in New Hampshire, and this November we have to tell members of the far right here in Concord and in Washington that enough is enough.

We have to get involved, we have to be engaged, and most important of all we have to vote. It's true that things need to change -- and to quote Sweet Honey In The Rock, "we are the ones we've been waiting for."

Ann McLane Kuster is a Democratic congressional candidate for New Hampshire's Second District - www.kusterforcongress.com

 

Follow Ann McLane Kuster on Twitter: www.twitter.com/AnnMcLaneKuster

FOLLOW POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:38 PM on 05/03/2012
Excuse me, I have just tuned into this "War on Women" concept, and I am having difficulty seeing how this choice of terms is justified. Women who cannot leave the house in Afghanistan and must constantly fear men, that is a war that involves systematic terrorism of women's lives. Women are still free to live, we are marginalized and often not taken seriously, but we have the ability to change that (and will). There has got to be a more intelligent way of conveying this point instead of resorting to sensationalist, over-simplified rhetoric.
09:02 PM on 05/02/2012
During B. Obama's presidency of the USA didn't expand the international legal obligations in the humanitarian sphere and still participate only in three of nine main human rights instruments. Americans still didn't ratify the Convention on elimination of all forms of discrimination against women and the Convention of the United Nations on the rights of the child (only Somalis also didn't join it)
12:09 PM on 05/02/2012
Keep the ERA on the table, folks! Please sign and share, we only have until May 12th to get all the signatures we need! Help us make this go viral!

https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions#!/petition/endorse-hj-res-47-and-sj-res-39-legislation-remove-time-limit-ratifying-equal-rights-amendment/FwMxbpzr
06:42 PM on 05/01/2012
Women are a majority since as a group they outlive men, who die sooner of the 12 leading causes of death. Because men as a group are penalized by an earlier death, they are a minority that is also penalized by having less political importance.

Thus, Democrats, seeing women as more important as voters than men, are strategically waging a war on Republicans by accusing them of waging a war on women.

But Democrats wage a war on women, too -- an insidious one. They recklessly pander to women. They continually promise women something for nothing and disregard the business costs that hurt women as much as men.

An example of Obama's pandering is the Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. Obama signed it into law solely to repay feminists for upping female votes. While the President tells women the act will help close the gender wage gap, he won't tell them this:

No law yet has closed the wage gap — not the 1963 Equal Pay for Equal Work Act, not Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, not the 1978 Pregnancy Discrimination Act, not the 1991 amendments to Title VII, not affirmative action, not diversity, not the countless state and local laws and regulations, not the horde of overseers at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and not the Ledbetter Fair Pay Act.

Here's why: "Will the Ledbetter Act Help Women?" at http://malemattersusa.wordpress.com/2011/12/03/will-the-ledbetter-fair-pay-act-help-women/
06:33 PM on 05/01/2012
What about the war on men ? That had a terrible effect on children ! All the women I had in therapy had been mistreated or abused by their mother ! In the 15 + years in the divorce courts I don’t remember any women ever being concerned with child welfare; it was always about the Money.
We know that women are the perpetrators of domestic violence in more than 50% of the cases (UNH study) and girls that don’t have a positive relationship with their father have more frequent and more severe emotional problems.
And to the other comment about Lysistrata; using sex to get money, even from the government, is prostitution.
William Fortune
05:39 PM on 05/01/2012
I hve a solution to all of these women's issues. The same strategy used in Lysistrata can be employed to mobilize men to pressure our elected officials to make changes. It would work, I guarantee it.