iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Anneli Rufus

Anneli Rufus

Posted: June 1, 2009 12:27 PM

Lake Titicaca Is Full of Sh*t


No, really. It is.

Back in seventh-grade Spanish class, when they showed us educational films about South America and we first heard this lake's name, we laughed our heads off. Both halves of "Titicaca" were hilarious. Not to be all twelve-years-old about this, but according to Peruvian government scientists, these days the lake is living up to its name, at least the last half. I know -- gross!!

According to Peru's Environment Ministry, over 12 million cubic meters of raw sewage are dumped into Lake Titicaca every year.

A slide show in yesterday's El Comercio details the lake's current state and how it got this way. I've translated the captions (thanks again, middle-school Spanish), which explain that Titicaca, the world's highest navigable lake and one of Peru's most important tourist attractions, is "an ecosystem menaced by contamination. Because it is part of a closed basin with many rivers and tributaries flowing into it but not to the sea, contaminants that enter Titicaca have little chance of escaping."

The main source of pollution is the lakeshore city of Puno, population just over 100,000. Puno produces 100 metric tons of solid waste every day; much of it ends up in the lake, as does some 70 percent of Puno's untreated liquid waste. This comes not only from homes but also includes runoff from hospitals, factories, tanneries and slaughterhouses: "It carries a toxic cargo of organic materials which compose and produce methane. (Methane is cited as one of the precursors of global warming.)"

Titicaca's dire state was first detected in the 1980s, when its water began stinking and large numbers of fish floated to the surface, belly-up.

A sure sign that water is contaminated is "the parasitic plant known as the lemna gibba or green water lentil" -- it's a kind of duckweed -- "which grows in aquatic environments into which urban runoff is continually discharged. This plant reproduces with the rapidity of a plague. Within four days, a single 'lentil' produces ten shoots. It rapidly spreads across the water's surface, consuming oxygen and blocking sun rays. Without sunlight and oxygen, plants growing on the lakefloor die. The dead plants then create further contaminants." Fish and other wildlife also suffer.

Local industries provide further pollutants. Farm silos are one source, and gold miners wash truckloads of earth down perforated chutes. These chutes catch gold particles but send huge quantities of river water containing clay and infinitesimal metal bits back into the rivers, which then empty into the lake. Miners also continuously swirl silty water in pans containing mercury. The pans are emptied into the lake. According to El Comercio, an estimated 70 tons of liquid mercury contaminate the lake this way every year.

"Without sewage treatment facilities, this lake is doomed," a spokesman for Peru's Environment Ministry told reporters.

But sewage treatment facilities aren't in the foreseeable future: "For poor people living along Lake Titicaca's shores" and nearby, "the struggle to survive often takes precedence over protecting the environment."

Adios, lago.

(Because I'm a scavenger, and because I'm the coauthor of The Scavengers' Manifesto, people tend to expect me to be gross. Although I am not personally so gross, I think it's well worth scoping out some of the grossest things around the world as this can inform us, intrigue us, inspire us to change things, and/or at least freak us out.)

 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:05 AM on 06/02/2009
Wouldn't 70 tons of liquid mercury sink to the deepest part of the lake and be seperate from the water? If so, that should make clean-up easier because it should be sitting in a silver puddle at the bottom of the lake. Mercury is valuable, and if it could be sucked-out, it could be worth quite a bit of money. It seems like it would be easier to clean up the mercury than the solid waste. BTW, if this lake is being polluted to this extent by a town of 100,000 people, where is the waste from almost 7 Billion people (all humans) going? The oceans? If so, we are treating the oceans as a toilet and a food pantry at the same time. Disgusting! This is a great reason to stop overpopulating.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kwaut lizard
Reductio ad Absurdum
03:47 PM on 06/02/2009
Mercury can exist in liquid form based on its melting point, which is unusual for a metal at -38.87 º C. Mercury can also exist as a gaseous form based on that metals latent heat of vaporization, which for Mercury is 2.29 kJ/mo. But most importantly in this case is that Mercury can combine with organic molecules, from the excess decaying plant material, to create compounds like methylmercury. Methyl mercury, the most toxic form is formed by microorganisms from elemental mercury found in the environment. It is easily absorbed by the stomach into the body and accumulates with each step of the food chain. This toxic form of Mercury is responsible for organic mercury poisoning also called Minimata Bay Disease.

Sewerage is usually treated in municipal sewerage treatment plants in most developed countries. These water processing and cleaning factories are where bacteria or and chemicals are used to break sewerage down into its constituents parts, separating them from water which is then released. Both the bacteria and metals that come out of our bodies are concentrated and therefore much more toxic than when they went into our bodies. Many countries do not have this luxury of treating sewerage before it is released. Dead zones are appearing in lakes, seas and oceans worldwide mainly from untreated sewerage and fertilizer runoff. So yes, we are dumping crap, industrial waste, garbage, just about anything you can think of, right on our biggest source of food.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kwaut lizard
Reductio ad Absurdum
03:47 PM on 06/02/2009
Lake Titicaca has a lake surface area of 8372 km2 (3232 sq mi) with an average depth of 107 m (351 ft) and is located at an altitude of 3827 meters (12628 feet). The bottom of the lake is deep soft sediments or soft muds and plant material, furthermore the bottom of the lake is not shaped like a cone but is irregular. This should give you some idea of how expensive it would be to try and collect 70 tonnes of liquid mercury out of that lake. Mercury costs about US$0.36 per gram so this times 1,000 grams in a kilogram, times 1,000 kilograms in a tonne, times 70 tonnes equals US$25,200,000. Considering Mercury is cheap and very available, no one is going to spend the time and money to take it out of Lake Titicaca.

If you are very young and have not had the opportunity to learn these things yet, you are asking very smart questions. If you are an adult, you really should pay more attention in school. You are smart enough to ask these questions and you appear to have a computer, use them to feed your brain some knowledge.
10:54 PM on 06/01/2009
The organism in the lake is not Lemma gibba. It is Lemna gibba. Lemma is derived from Gk. lemma = rind or husk, + -a, a feminine singular Latinized suffix denoting "one," or in the case, "organism." The specific epithet, gibba is derived from L. gibba (fem.) = humped. Thus Lemma gibba would mean "humped husk. The Greek word Lemna = the plant, "water starwort." Thus Lemna gibba mean "humped water-starwort."
11:49 PM on 06/01/2009
better to be humped than not, that's my motto
08:21 AM on 06/02/2009
the article does read lemna gibba. did you miss that?
04:37 PM on 06/01/2009
Geeze...I just returned from Lake Titicaca where I visited Puno and boated for several days to many of the islands including the floating reeds. I did witness the green cover of the water lentil in the shallow and quite bay of Puno but otherwise thought it was beautiful and pristine. How little did I know;

Local people in Peru told me Titi stood for the wonderful women of Peru and caca stood for the Bolivians.
Local people in Bolivia told me Titi stood for the wonderful women of Bolivia and caca stood for the Peruvians.
03:57 PM on 06/01/2009
This is really bad......................by the way "Titicaca" is quechua/aymara and its means sun and rock.
04:49 PM on 06/01/2009
You said "Titi-caca"!

LOLz!
03:29 PM on 06/02/2009
Bad yes, but Titicaca itself is NOT closed. The outlet is the Desaguadero River at the Peru/Bolivia border flowing through Lago Uru Uru , the saline Lago Poopó and finally to the Salar de Coipasa which is the closed basin. So many of contaminants that enter Titicaca do escape, if not to the sea.

That being said, I've observed the lemna gibba getting worse in the last 20 years, and though some improvements have been made in the last 5 years or so, Puno desperately needs better sewage treatment. And the industries upriver? You got it right, everything goes downstream.