iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Anya Kamenetz

Anya Kamenetz

Posted: October 7, 2010 01:52 PM

UPDATE: A new news article published on 10/7 gives details: The UMW's president is now proposing an additional up to 15.5% increase for 2010-2011, on top of an 8.2% increase announced in May, for a total 25% increase over last year, but it's not a done deal yet.

As federal stimulus money runs out, students at public colleges and universities around the country are facing another wave of crushing tuition increases -- "cost shifting" is a term employed by Jane Wellman at the Delta Cost Project to describe what happens when public institutions respond to declines in public funding by raising tuition rather than seriously cutting costs.

At the University of Mary Washington, a public liberal arts institution in Virginia, an unusually bright and articulate student got in touch with me via Twitter to ask for my help in drawing attention to the 25% tuition increase just proposed there. I am familiar with UMW because it's the home of Jim Groom, coiner of the term "Edupunk," and originator of UMW Blogs, an open-source publishing platform for professors and students. Unfortunately, as innovative as these ideas are, they haven't yet crossed the line into saving students real cash.

Ryley Trahan is a sophomore double major in Political Science and English. He also studies Education.

How are you paying for school? Do you have a job?

Well fortunately for me, my dad was a contractor for the Department of Education tracking student loans for a long time (which is actually how I became interested in all this in the first place). Because he was so knowledgeable on the subject of student debt he invested in VPEP (which is the Virginia 529 program) when I was a kid, so that covers my tuition. But to cover my other costs I do have a job. I work as a swim coach, and in the winter I am planning on getting a job as as substitute teacher.

When did UMW announce this tuition increase? What reasons are they giving?

I heard about the tuition increase in the school paper on Sept. 23. According to that article the Virginia state government has cut funding by $5.7 million since 2007. According to our president tuition has to go up 9% if we want to balance the budget and even more if we want to "advance the institution." That is the part that really frustrates me, because it never seems that colleges understand how the business world works. If you find yourself with less money to deliver your product, you don't just up your prices, you cut your costs. But instead the institution is currently renovating two dorms, and is planning to demolish one to rebuild another right on top of it, do the same to the dining hall, as well as build a new parking garage and a performing arts center ). As if that weren't enough, they've also started building a new building at the Master's campus in Stafford and are starting to build a third campus. So the reasons they're giving for the increase seems to be slightly different than the actual reasons.

What are you and other students doing about it? What are you planning on 10/14?

The rally, "Speak Up or Pay Up," has two main ideas behind it. The first is to explain to the student body and the administration that tuition hikes are not the answer to everything. While it has become the prevailing trend in higher education to just continuously build things to attract new students, we feel that UMW does not need to take part in that rat race. The school is only 4,000 undergrads, and that is part of why we all like it so much. The new president wants to build it up with our tuition money, to eventually attract more students. Our main goal is to make it perfectly clear that we will only accept campus improvement projects if the money already exists to back it, and that we will only accept tuition increases if the money is obviously going to go towards improving out education.

The second part of our plan for 10/14 is to convince the UMW BOV to adopt a new policy: that all tuition increases will only be applied to students who are not enrolled or awaiting acceptance into the school. The theory behind this is that students should be aware of all financial obligations when they commit to spending four years at the institution. Again though, we want the BOV to increase tuition only when there is a direct correlation between what we are spending and the education we get out of it.

Anything else you have to say about the fight for affordable education?
One of the most interesting statistics I discovered when I was doing the math to prepare for "Speak Up or Pay Up" was the actual effects of the tuition increase. Clark Howard on CNN recently ran a story saying that, in order for students to keep their debt manageable, the total debt they owe for the four years of their education should be less than the expected starting salary with their degree. Right now, UMW tuition for four years is less than the expected starting salary from a liberal arts institution. After the 25% increase however, the cost of four years of tuition is greater than expected salary -- and that's to say nothing about room & board.

Colleges need to become more focused on what they actually exist for: educating students and getting them jobs in their field of choice. Until schools start doing this, and stop building new Athletic Centers and $16 million apartment complexes to attract more students, to get more money, to build more things, the system will be broken.

 
 
 

Follow Anya Kamenetz on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Anya1anya

 
 
  • Comments
  • 4
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:29 PM on 10/12/2010
Tuition increases are never easy and as both a faculty member at UMW, and a parent of four kids, I share his concerns. As I tell my students when studying an argument in class, be sure to understand its context before jumping in. It is easy for a college to justify increases by pointing to national trends. For UMW, it is easy to point out how much lower tuition is than our peer institutions. It is also important to point out that the building projects referred to are NOT paid for with tuition dollars (they are funded by state and borrowed funds). These are all important, but they do not tell the entire story. In my opinion, the need for a tuition increase is out of our hands, and is the result of dwindling state support for higher education, and the need to remain competitive with other schools. UMW cannot make any additional cuts without jeopardizing the quality of our academic programs or student services; any tuition increase will directly benefit the students’ educational experience.

A college campus is an exciting place to work. We explore new ideas, debate controversial topics, and help our students develop the skill sets they will need to succeed out in the ‘real world.’ Ryley’s efforts to bring attention to what is inevitably a controversial move are not only welcomed, but should be celebrated. This is a discussion, however, that not only needs to occur on college campuses, but in state legislatures, as well.
04:51 PM on 10/12/2010
Construction of the new buildings may be funded by private/state dollars, but maintenance and utility costs for them will certainly be past to us. Additionally it is ridiculous for the school to assert that the tuition increase will benefit the students. The biggest cost to the school right now? AACSB. And how many students at UMW right now will benefit from that?

If UMW were to cut your pay, how would it impact your family? Most likely, you would cut expenses that you would have otherwise enjoyed. The school needs to do the same thing. The state is unable to give UMW money right now because of the recession, but that does not mean Virginia families are any more financially viable. The responsible thing to do is for the college to delay what is costing them the most money until they have the money to spend. Forcing the students to make up the difference is blood from a stone, and is a violation of the trust that should exist between institution and student. And the impacts of it would be a mountain of student debt for us to climb.
10:25 AM on 10/09/2010
I don't think here is any expected starting salary for a liberal ars major.Sad,but true
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
One more Thing
06:53 AM on 10/10/2010
That's the price one pays for knowledge in place of superstitution!