Change.gov had its first big failure last week, though you might have missed it with all the bigger news happening around the world.
Any uproar from Obama supporters about the failure was quickly preempted, as it happens, by a constructive assist from a charter member of the MSM. I did a brief run-down of the events, which may already be familiar to avid Huffpo readers, for the "Noted" section of next week's Nation magazine:
Robert Gibbs, Obama's chief spokesman and a seasoned press operative, knows how to maneuver around prickly issues. So when the most popular question on Change.gov asked whether Obama would appoint a special prosecutor to "independently investigate the gravest crimes of the Bush administration, including torture and warrantless wiretapping"--besting 76,000 other questions submitted in recent weeks by citizens--Gibbs simply ignored it. Instead, he recorded a YouTube video tackling other popular questions. Then Obama aides posted a note on January 9 inaccurately categorizing the special prosecutor question as "previously answered." That gambit was the first obvious failure at Change.gov, Obama's admirable attempt to create a portal for more open and transparent government.
It is striking that Obama's aides, who helped win the election by harnessing new media, believed they could just spin away from their online interlocutors. Instead, the move backfired immediately. Bob Fertik, the activist who submitted the question, campaigned for it; and progressive websites, including thenation.com, blasted the dodge. Within a day, MSNBC's Keith Olbermann picked up the story. A day later, Obama was compelled to answer the question in an interview with ABC's George Stephanopoulos, who quoted it and pressed Obama with two follow-ups. Obama's answer, which prioritized moving "forward" but did not rule out a special prosecutor, made the front page of the January 12 New York Times.
By blatantly ducking a tough question, Gibbs set off a reaction that forced Obama to answer it. With transparent government and vigilant reporting, important questions can actually trickle up.
|
Obama's This Week Interview: Discusses Economy, Closing Guantanamo, Gaza Crisis
***CHECK BACK FOR VIDEO*** George Stephanopoulos interviewed President-elect Barack Obama on ABC's This Week, and Obama addressed the challenges his administration will face when he...
|
|
Obama Leaves Door Open To Investigating Bush, But Wants To "Look Forward"
Responding to the most popular inquiry on the "Open for Questions" feature of his website, Barack Obama said on Sunday that he is "evaluating" whether...
|
|
Memo to Obama: Moving Forward Doesn't Mean You Can't Also Look Back
Will Obama's promise to protect and defend the Constitution include an investigation into the assaults on it perpetrated by members of the Bush administration?
|
|
|
Obama on Torture: Don't Stop Thinking About Tomorrow
This answer tracks the language of many torture apologists (and advocates) in Washington, who posit a choice between protecting the country today and second-guessing the past.
|
|
Maybe, Going Forward, We Should Just Let Bernie Madoff Off?
I understand it's smart for Obama to hold his cards close on torture and war crimes prosecutions, but the reason that's being given for not pursuing them makes little sense.
|
|
Two Questions
Two questions we should demand Congress ask of Eric Holder before confirming him. The same two questions Mukasey refused to answer.
|
|
Another Good Reason for Not Prosecuting the "Bushies"
There is almost no possibility that prosecutions against members of the Bush administration for violating civil liberties and human rights could succeed. A fairly selected jury would almost certainly acquit.
|
|
Holder Can't Prosecute Bush Abuses Too Many Democrats Aided and Abetted Them
Holder is seemingly willing to let bygones be bygones when it comes to prosecuting Bush's crew because it would pry open the Democrats dirty but hardly unknown secret.
|
