"I'm like a shot a Levittown right in your ass, like a B-12 -- boom!"
Those were Jon Stewart's last words to Bill O'Reilly in his guest appearance on Monday night's O'Reilly Factor, in a virtuoso duel where comedy eviscerated farce.
The two highly rated cable stars squared off over one of the more inane controversies in a political season full of inane controversies -- whether the White House was wrong to invite the socially conscious rapper Common to perform at a poetry slam. If you haven't heard:
Basically, (some) conservatives said Common's music was vile because he questioned murder convictions and police authority. Also, he has been seen R.W.B -- rapping while black. Then, Liberals (and fact-checkers) retorted that Common is a conscious and even cuddly musician, with credentials that include recording a pro-life duet with Lauryn Hill and starring in Tina Fey's last movie. Plus, GOP administrations have hosted edgier musicians who have also questioned murder convictions and police authority.
So when O'Reilly doubled down on his hypocritical case and challenged Stewart to come debate the nontroversy, it was a no-brainer.
In two short segments, O'Reilly walked through his case, responded to factual charges of hypocrisy with some fairly sad parsing and then, when desperate, with rank "pettifogging," to use a term bandied by both men. Meanwhile, the Daily Show anchor's rebuttals were striking because, even in this casual mode on a minor item, he was more persuasive than the vast majority of people who are called on to represent a progressive view on TV.
Stewart really seized control of the terms of debate near the end of the first segment, when he asked whether O'Reilly would revoke Bono's White House guest pass, issued by several administrations, because of his song about Leonard Peltier. "It's the exact same thing: A guy convicted of killing a law enforcement official, no?" asked Stewart, adding "Boo-yah!" to emphasize the point. (He salted his rhetoric with rap slang throughout the debate.) And that's when O'Reilly started to melt. "Did Bono, did he actually come out and say that [Peltier] was innocent?" O'Reilly asked, groping for a distinction. "No, I think he was raising questions about it," O'Reilly offered. "Now who's pettifogging?," Stewart countered, "I can't even see you, through your pettifog!"
Stewart closed with a critique that is familiar to Fox's critics, but may be worthwhile for O'Reilly's audience to hear directly, noting that Fox operates a "selective outrage machine" that kicks into gear "only when it suits the narrative that suits them."
Ari Melber writes for The Nation magazine, where this was first published. He is on Facebook and Twitter.
Both interview segments are below:
Follow Ari Melber on Twitter: www.twitter.com/AriMelber
Howard Fineman: Carrying the Torch in a Digital Age
James Love: Justice and Assassination
Jon Stewart on The O'Reilly Factor Tonight | Indecision Forever ...
Jon Stewart Tells Bill O'Reilly: You're The 'Voice Of Sanity' At ...
'The Daily Show's' Jon Stewart and Fox News' Bill O'Reilly fling ...
No; this is simply another area at which the Fox network attempts to chip away at Obama's credibility to further their agenda. It is in this context (the "big" picture) through which this must be veiwed.
Stewart demonstrated that, when such things are looked at clearly and with facts, the vast majority (if not all) of things Fox brings up to demean our current President are absolutely inane.
With Fox it's pretty simple in this case, if you support someone that you think was wrongly accused and/or convicted then Hannity/O'Reilly will come after you. Yet when Stewart gave perfect examples (aside from what you call usual mocking way) of others that were convicted and got support i.e. Hurricane Carter, O'Reilly had a incredible chance at a rebuttal. He couldn't give a good one because facts are facts. Do you even know about Common?!
Jon, like him or not, made clear and accurate accounts BASED ON FACTS, NOT OPINIONS and basically said something very key to the conversation - if you're going to do something like this be consistent. Go after all of them and not just one. The same goes for you. Next time you want to support someone BASED ON THEIR OPINION i.e. O'Reilly, be consistent with your criticisms.
But no matter how many times Stewart said it, Bill keeps on parroting the other.
Also, Cuba! THERE'S YOUR PROOF!
That response leaves me going "what?" He went to Cuba to meet with someone who might've been wrongly convicted of a crime. What does that prove?
That guy...whew! John Stewart just sits there laughing at him. In a way, he's funny. But in another way, it's pitiful that so many people depend on him for their opinions and attitudes.
Which is why ad populum remains a logical fallacy.
Also, being on the right side of a) the truth and b) history? Never hurts your chances in a debate.
when Bush was President, why they voted a trillion dollars worth of tax cuts for the rich, why they voted in an unpaid prescription drug benefit and put two wars on the credit card all while saying "deficits don't matter"?
No more spin thank you!