The Super Tuesday elections could answer the core political question that vexes Democrats.
Does the public rejection of Bush conservatism offer a rare opportunity for Democrats to run an outsider who can recruit new supporters and score a decisive victory?
Or have economic and foreign-policy woes stoked a malaise that favors no party, incumbent or opposition, and leaves voters gloomily deciding another tight presidential race?
In other words, is this a year when voters will bear down or lift up?
Hillary Rodham Clinton urges Democrats to make the responsible choice. Now is the time to rebuff feel-good symbolism in favor of experience and the "change we need," as her campaign motto intones.
Barack Obama tells Democrats it's not enough to cleanse the White House of a corrupt incumbent party that abused the rule of law.
To truly end this nasty stretch of American politics, the public must unite to upend Washington's entire partisan culture.Today their appeals will be tested for the general election.
The nomination contest is technically a delegate fight, but not all delegates are created equal.
Decent candidates must win their own states, for example, so Clinton practically begins with a 79-delegate edge, since her home turf of New York is bigger than Obama's in Illinois.
She is also well-positioned for 477 delegates in the other two largest states -- New Jersey and California -- so the media "expectations" run high for a Clinton delegate lead.
But primary victories there are not necessarily indicative of strength in the general election. After all, losing Democratic nominees routinely win New York and California by wide margins. In reality, the best indicators of the Democrats' general election prospects are tucked away in the remaining 18 states, each of which has fewer than 100 delegates a pop.
The true potential of Clinton's and Obama's candidacies faces the most consequential test in key swing states such as Missouri, Colorado and Arizona.
President Bush took Missouri by about 200,000 votes last cycle and won the other two by about 100,000 votes. Most Democrats want a nominee who can make up those gaps.
Clinton has proven to be a strong candidate when competing in a traditional Democratic electorate. Exit polls showed her victories were demographically deep in New Hampshire and Nevada.
While she may not have gotten much credit for rallying the base in the swing state of Nevada, the fact is that she clobbered Obama among Democrats by a solid 12 points. (He made up the rest of his support from independents.) Yet when turnout is up, Clinton goes down.
Obama won the two state contests with the highest record turnout: the Iowa caucuses and the South Carolina primary.
The youth vote tripled in both states, bolstering Obama's victories, and South Carolina saw higher participation in the Democratic primary than in its Republican counterpart for the first time since 1992. Those new voters came out of the woodwork of a red state to back Obama, who won every age group under 65.
If he can reproduce that kind of mobilization in the key, non-coastal states today, Democrats will know that the road to the White House is paved with post-partisanship.
After all, primary performance is still the most tangible trial run for determining who can mobilize voters for the general election. Polls and pundits are useless, as this season has already shown, and every candidate claims to be most "electable." Instead, it pays to look at who is already motivating new voters in the few states that matter. If they vote for you in a primary, they'll come back in November.
That's one reason why the only state that went from red to blue in the last presidential cycle was New Hampshire.
Democrats spent months finding and mobilizing new supporters there for a hotly contested primary, won by John F. Kerry, and they turned out again in November.
Bottom line: Tuesday's "delegate winner" could actually be the less electable candidate, if the winner's support comes from the coasts.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.