iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Announcing HuffPost Green: Our New Eco-News and Opinion Section


When we picked June 4th as the launch day for HuffPost's new Green section, little did we know the Democratic nomination would be decided just the night before.

So today, as well as celebrating the culmination of a historic primary race, we here at HuffPost are also celebrating the kick-off of HuffPost Green.

Ever since we launched HuffPost, environmental issues have been a significant part of our focus -- indeed, part of our DNA. In fact, long before HuffPost was even a twinkle in our eye, I was championing, via the Detroit Project, the need to push the nation's energy policy in a more sustainable direction -- better both for our environment and our national security.

And our HuffPost community has made it clear that you are interested in learning about -- and talking about -- living in a more environmentally-friendly way.

So as we continue the Huffington Post's expansion, creating a go-to destination for the latest and most useful Green content was a logical next step.

HuffPost Green features up-to-the-minute news stories, blog posts, video, and community forums. The focus is on eco news and trends -- from the latest scientific findings and environmental legislation to the latest green lifestyle tips. The section will also feature advice on sustainable investing and highlight eco-friendly businesses such as renewable energy, green building, recycling and organics.

While bringing about real change is critically important -- we don't think going green has to be like taking your medicine. So don't expect any finger-wagging (well, not too much anyway). We're not interested in being greener-than-thou -- just greener today than yesterday. Our philosophy is pretty simple: it's not about some people doing everything, but everyone doing something to make the world a more sustainable and better place to live.

And to ensure that we are bringing you the smartest, freshest, and most useful green content, we have partnered with two of the world's premiere green media brands -- Discovery's popular sustainable-living website, TreeHugger.com, and Planet Green, Discovery's 24-hour eco-lifestyle television network.

TreeHugger will provide its blend of timely blog postings, video features, news items, and forums where users can interact. Planet Green will contribute highlights of its original green lifestyle programming -- content for people of all ages and backgrounds. And our editors will infuse this green mix with the usual HuffPost style and attitude.

So please click here to check it out. And, most importantly, send us any ideas you have for HuffPost Green, including any green news items you think our readers would like to see.

Follow Arianna Huffington on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ariannahuff

 
 
  • Comments
  • 124
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
10:57 PM on 06/07/2008
I decided some years back to consume less electricity. At that time, a 23 watt balasted flourescent bulb cost me $39.98 each. I bought 2. one for the kitchen [ceiling light] and one for the livingroom [light that stayed on all evening] There was no way I was going to recover the cost of the bulbs through savings in electricity, but I knew that if others did something similar.....much could be saved and we would not need ever more generating stations.
10:52 PM on 06/07/2008
It may very well turn out to be the most important addition to your site and our lives.
10:25 PM on 06/07/2008
it is time to reduce the pollution of our environment !!
Even though, the discussion whether global warming is caused by human activities is ongoing, it is a fact that human activities result in major environmental pollution.

Lets find solution and build the basis for a better future.
Lets fight the ignorance and change our behavior.
Lets work together for the sake of our kids
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
americanalien
Veteran Commenter
06:57 PM on 06/07/2008
Tips for a greener and cleaner world. Thanks Arianna.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Guitarsandmore
devoted father, community activist, musician, reti
01:32 PM on 06/07/2008
A green section in the Huffington post is just great news and I am very happy to see the Huffington Post make a move away from traditional format into a newer more modern format. A million thanks!
12:44 PM on 06/07/2008
Thanks, Arianna, for a fabulous HuffPo addition!
03:36 PM on 06/06/2008
Let's put our money where our mouths are! As states gamble on their votes being validated in order to change the hierarchy of early voting primaries, no one is talking about rearranging the primary calendar to reflect a green approach.

What if elections were held by starting in one corner of the country, and working around the country contiguously? This would be determined by estimating the least amount of mileage between all points needing to be covered. Put the idea of advancing transportation reforms within the confines of the campaign itself.

Roll out a couple of states a week, in six months it would be all done. The media would win, as they would have constant coverage unstead of BIG nights in which they get no sleep, and all of the states would get the same amount of attention. You could rotate the staring position of each election cycle, and come out with another variation where you start in the middle and work around.

Am I the only one who has seen this multiple jet cavorting-across-the-country media circus as being totally OBSCENE in terms of how many fossil fuels have been expended? The hell with MIchigan wanting to go first.! We need to convince the Democratic Party to take the concept of a green primary season seriously and change the order in which states participate on this basis alone.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rivrgrrl
Our Constitution trumps your Bible.
04:15 PM on 06/07/2008
Good idea.

There is so much that could be done to reform campaigning. In Jan '09, we'll have a president who is amenable to instituting some needed changes.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
steamboat
10:12 AM on 06/06/2008
Like to get feedback and people's thought on the following, whether pro- or con-:

The voters of South Dakota on primary day approved a measure to build the first oil refinery in America in their state in over 30 years. It will create 4500 construction jobs and 1800 permanent plant jobs (in the $20-30 hr. range).......I'd again be interested in everybody's thoughts if there for or against this. Thank you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
steamboat
05:05 PM on 06/06/2008
PS: How come nobody has any thoughts (pro or con)
11:17 PM on 06/07/2008
Lithium batteries are produced....but at very high cost because the oil industry bought the patent and now demands an obscene royalty to produce it. Different Lithium batteries are experimented with now....."lithium ion" these must be kept out of the "Vultures" grip...or the electric car has no immediate future...that is....show it is better then a gasoline guzzling engine.......a monster from before 1900 when gasoline was the cheapest commodity on the market.
photo
SolarPowerGuy
Ph.D., Immunology; Solar power @ home; Green Party
05:21 PM on 06/06/2008
"Jobs" was one of the major rationales used to push dirty power plants into populated areas of California back in 1999-2000. It's blackmail, if you ask me.

Want jobs? How about maintaining windmills, solar photovoltaic arrays, and building batteries for the next generation of plug-in hybrid automobiles? How about retrofitting dams, for on-grid hydroelectric energy storage? How about These are far more productive and far-sighted uses for our labor.

Every effort should be made to avoid feeding more dollars into the maw of the Petroleum Monster. Unless we starve it, it will only live longer.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
steamboat
03:55 PM on 06/07/2008
Thanks for having the guts to go out on the limb and give me your feelings...I would agree if we actually did what you said...However, reality says that doesn't happen...Example: Detroit mgt. was tinkering with what you want. But the UAW feels it would cost assembly jobs and, therefore, wants production as usual. Also, say you want windmill farms in the midwest. Don't kid yourself, the IBEW will use its power with AFL-CIO to block it. Worrying about losing power plant jobs. Hey, I'm a retired power-plant worker (ComEd). So I know how things work....Love to hear your thoughts on this.
09:18 AM on 06/06/2008
Bless your heart for going green. People in positions of power and popularity like yourself are a must in spreading the word. Nice going baby!
02:05 PM on 06/05/2008
As one who helped produce The Environmental Handbook and the first Earth Day coverage on what is now PBS, I congratulate Ariana Huffington and Huffington Post.

I look forward to expanded posts, articles, and hopefully, data boxes that would simply post such things as the world's actual temperature, the world's estimated population today and one year ago, how many barrels of oil burned a day, average water use per capita in the Northern Hemisphere compared to the Southern Hemisphere,etc. etc. These don't take much space, but they can have much impact as people pick them up and use them in their own day to day thinking and conversation.

Again, I look forward to this section.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:32 PM on 06/05/2008
Those are excellent suggestions. I think educational articles that include hard data and scientific facts would be extremely helpful.

I recently attended a seminar at the Scripps Institute of Oceanography in honor of Dave Keeling, the man behind the "Keeling Curve", developed fifty years ago. I learnt that among the scientists, any doubts that Global Warming and climate change is not related to human activity was put to rest in the 1970s. There is no such serious doubt or debate on the matter since then. Based on hard data and evidence, scientists have determined, with over 90% certainty, that the current accelerated rate of warming is directly attributable to human activity. In climate science, over 90% certainty is about as certain as one gets. That Global Warming acceleration is caused by human activity is a scientific fact.

And yet, I read posts here, and I listen to callers on radio and TV programs, of people playing scientists, oblivious to what is conclusively known, trying to substitute anecdotal accounts for scientific fact and political ideology for science.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
urweatherman
08:23 PM on 06/05/2008
Your statistic above is totally bogus. Not with certainty attributed to human activity. I am have been a meteorologist and climatologist for over 35 years, seen it all, studied it all and your assumption is incorrect. Think about this: The dinosaurs are not extinct because of their activity when they were here!
11:09 PM on 06/05/2008
Whaaa?
Here's 31,000 + scientists that say you are mistaken:
http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fpcomment/archive/2008/05/17/32-000-deniers.aspx
and here:
http://www.petitionproject.org/

And here's where you can read about how the blessed science of global warming needs a little fine tuning:
http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=525590

As for politics, here are the political views of David Suzuki the high priest of all things environmental in Canada:

"What I would challenge you to do is to put a lot of effort into trying to see whether there's a legal way of throwing our so-called leaders into jail because what they're doing is a criminal act." (not bowing in front of the alter of kyoto)

Imprisonment. Suspension of democracy, and free speech. Oh, it’s a brave new world isn’t it? The progressives don't appear to be so progressive anymore.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:02 PM on 06/05/2008
Excellent move Arianna.

In so far as all morality is fundamentally based on preservation, betterment and continuation of life, there is no higher morality than environmentalism. All religions pale in comparison. Morality, when associated with religion, is limited and parochial. It is primarily focused on preservation, betterment and continuation of humans, but not all humans, only those following a particular belief system. Even when it pretends to extend beyond that parochial realm – for example, “Love thy neighbor” and “Thou shalt not kill”, religious morality is limited to human life. Environmentalism, on the other hand, encompasses preservation, betterment and continuation of all life, and, therefore, is the highest level of morality.

Furthermore, because environmentalism transcends all political, religious , racial, ethnic and national boundaries, it can bring the world together.
09:39 PM on 06/07/2008
wow...so deep

where did this morality begin?
01:48 PM on 06/05/2008
Arianna, Congrats on your new HuffPost Green. It's a terrific idea. We learned on Monday that NASA's press office "marginalized or mischaracterized" studies on global warming between 2004 and 2006, the agency's Inspector General has reported. In its report, NASA's inspector general office called it "inappropriate political interference" by political appointees in NASA’s press office. The report detailed actions in which it said the NASA public affairs office unilaterally edited or downgraded press releases having to do with global warming or denied access to scientists. While the report did not directly accuse them of lying, it used more nuanced terms such as "mendacity" and "dissembling." In my book, mendacity means lying. I would like to recommend research and reporting as to those at NASA, the White House (including its general counsel's office) or elsewhere in Government, who have falsified, covered up or watered down reporting of global warming research for political reasons. The falsifying and skewing of the scientific evidence on global warming by the Bush Administration must be halted, as our scientific community and its credibility have been compromised. Global warming is a huge problem for us on Earth, and we need the cooperation of all nations to respond on this subject.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:10 PM on 06/05/2008
Excellent post. Political (or any other) "belief" should never be allowed to interfere with science. That's how the Dark Ages happened.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
urweatherman
08:24 PM on 06/05/2008
Please tell that to the other side...Its the liberals that are interfering with science to further their political agenda.....
01:17 PM on 06/05/2008
Thank you so much for setting up a Green Section. I am not surprised that the Huffington Post would do this because you all are on the cutting edge of all timely subjects.
I am a Realtor, and am, at this very moment of my life, studying to become a Green Realtor and an EcoBroker. Energy conservation, energy independence, working to save our very sick planet, is the direction that our society and world will take. Staying in denial will just postpone the inevitable; we owe it to our children and grandchildren to make this a better place for them to live in. Huffington Post will contribute so much by opening up this forum for open and free discussions.
Again, thank you Huffington Post...
12:58 PM on 06/05/2008
Its a great addition to your namesake Arianna, but for God's sake please ditch the creepy bright green borders on the Home page. It reminds me of a John McCain campaign stop at a BP station for some inexplicable reason.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
bigbenny
An old guy just trying to slide on by
01:58 PM on 06/05/2008
I'm with you. How about a forest green. This green is just to florescent for my tastes.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
marymansour
12:04 PM on 06/05/2008
Arriana, your website is the place to be these days. I admire your work and the accomplishments of this site. I absolutely live here from the time I awaken in the morning.