Portrait in Cynicism: Hillary Attacks Obama from Every Angle

Posted January 7, 2008 | 03:49 PM (EST)



stumbleupon :Portrait in Cynicism: Hillary Attacks Obama from Every Angle   digg: Portrait in Cynicism: Hillary Attacks Obama from Every Angle   reddit: Portrait in Cynicism: Hillary Attacks Obama from Every Angle   del.icio.us: Portrait in Cynicism: Hillary Attacks Obama from Every Angle

Hillary Clinton has apparently decided on which lines of attack to use against Barack Obama in New Hampshire: all of them.

When it started, Clinton's poll-tested candidacy came down to telling voters, "Whatever you like, that's what I am."

But it turns out that, so far, what voters like is Obama. So now her sputtering campaign strategy has shifted to telling voters, "Whatever you don't like, that's what Obama is."

Clinton and her surrogates are attacking from every direction, hoping something will stick.

The attacks are as varied as they are contemptible. Let's take a look at the dirty laundry list. Put on your galoshes, the mud is mighty thick.

1. Obama is too liberal. HuffPost's Tom Edsall reports: "Hillary's aides point to Obama's extremely progressive record as a community organizer, state senator and candidate for Congress, his alliances with 'left-wing' intellectuals in Chicago's Hyde Park community, and his liberal voting record on criminal defendants' rights as subjects for examination."

Dear God, not "left-wing intellectuals"! Aren't you grateful Hillary warned us in time? The last thing voters in a Democratic primary want is someone with a "liberal voting record." Apparently, Mark Penn is still advising the campaign.

2. Obama is too conservative. In a sleazy direct mail letter sent to New Hampshire voters, Clinton tried to twist Obama's record on abortion, saying he has been "unwilling to take a stand on choice."

Really? Tell that to Planned Parenthood and NARAL, both of which have given Obama 100 percent ratings for his support of abortion rights. I asked NARAL about this mailing. "We are fortunate to have such strong pro-choice candidates like Sens. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, as well as former Sen. John Edwards and Gov. Bill Richardson, running for president," Elizabeth Shipp, NARAL's political director emailed me. "We are confident that any one of these candidates would protect and defend a woman's right to choose, if elected president." *

3. Obama is soft on crime. Hillary's staffers, trying to play up the "too liberal" meme, pointed out that Obama had spoken out against mandatory minimum sentences for federal crimes, saying: "Mandatory minimums take too much discretion away from judges."

How dare he! Imagine a Democrat -- an African American Democrat, at that -- expressing dissatisfaction with the injustice of a system that disproportionately impacts young people of color. It's apostasy!

What makes this dunderheaded attack especially despicable is that Hillary has taken the exact same position on mandatory minimums. During this summer's debate at Morgan State University, moderated Tavis Smiley, Hillary had this to say about what needs to be done to mitigate the disproportionate number of African American serving prison time in America: "We have to go after mandatory minimums. You know, mandatory sentences for certain violent crimes may be appropriate, but it has been too widely used. And it is [having] now a discriminatory impact." Unbelievable. The hypocrisy is flabbergasting.

4. Obama lacks depth and specificity. You knew this one was coming. "On a lot of these issues it is hard to know where he stands, and people need to ask that," said Clinton on Friday. And on Good Morning America today, she trotted out a cobweb-covered one-liner from 1984: "As famously was said years ago, 'Where's the beef?'"

Perfect. Twenty-four years ago, Walter Mondale and the Democratic establishment used that zinger and that line of attack to go after Gary Hart. Mondale ended up being the nominee and carried just one state in the general election. Is that what Hillary thinks we should sign up for again?

5. Obama is a dreamer. That's right, Clinton is actually trying to convince voters that Obama is too positive, too optimistic, too inspirational. In a speech she called him "an untested man who offers false hope," and in Saturday's debate she said, "We don't need to be raising the false hopes of our country about what can be delivered."

Oh, yeah, that's the last thing we need, someone who actually seeks to inspire Americans to allow their reach to exceed their grasp. That's the problem with leaders like Lincoln, Kennedy, and Martin Luther King -- they just weren't realistic enough. King shouldn't have said, "I have a dream!," he should have said, "I have a realistic view of what we should settle for! We probably won't be able to pass the Civil Rights Act, but we might be able to pass a bill condemning segregated water fountains. You probably won't be able to sit at the front of the bus, but I might be able to get you to the middle."

This is who Hillary Clinton is, through and through. "I have always tried to strike a balance," she said in 2004. "I think you have to view the world as it is, not as you would wish it to be." That's a long, dispiriting way from Bobby Kennedy's "Some men see things as they are and ask, 'Why?' I dream of things that never were and ask, 'Why not?'"

6. Obama is too big a risk for America. That's right, Clinton is again taking a page from the Bush fearmongering playbook -- insinuating very bad things could happen if we don't elect her. "Look what happened in Great Britain," she said. "Tony Blair leaves, Gordon Brown comes in, the very next day, there are terrorist attacks... So you've got to be prepared on Day One with everything ready to go." It's a sequel to her husband's Roll the Dice -- which, in itself, was a sequel to the entire Bush/Cheney reelection campaign.

So the New Hampshire race is now officially too close to call, Hillary's hypocrisy running neck and neck with her cynicism. Be very afraid, indeed.

* UPDATE: Ted Miller from NARAL contacted me to tell me that they are calling 82,000 pro-choice Independent voters in New Hampshire with a message from NARAL president Nancy Keenan: "All the Democratic candidates running for president are pro-choice and will support and defend a woman's right to choose."

Comments for this post are now closed

 

Comments
1037
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

Hint sample
View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (35 pages total)

hilary is an attack dog. she wants attacks on iran idictated by lieberman for israel. she has diminished her own charater and is in pocket of insurance companies

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:23 PM on 01/13/2008

Its was really irksome in the NH debate when Richardson made the dumbass comment that he had been in negotiations less hostile. Or whatever the useless quote was. Intimating that Obama was involved in attacking, when it was 100% Hillary. I see it in the press as well. She attacks, if he responds then he is attacking hPoor Hillary That Has Given So Much To This Country. Bullshit.

This kind of manipulation lends itself to so many ingrained racial divide issues. Black men should never talk to a white women and god knows he should never confront a white women. Imagine for a moment if Obama started to hit her hard with her past moral ambiguities and scandals. I believe that the media would have him arrested.

She is a master at setting herself up as the helpless victim of men and has been doing it all her life to get what she wants. She was the victim of a bunch of Republican men that blocked her health care bill. She was the victim of the man that ran against her for the Senate seat, couldn't make a ripple until she cried Poor Me Victim. She was the victim of her husband's continual abuse and humiliation and received an out pouring of heartfelt support for it. Until she won NH she as the Victom of all the bad advise her male advisors were giving her. Now its Obama victimizing her.

I truly wish more women would see this manipulation for what it is and what it means. It makes us all look very bad and weak. I want a woman in the WH, but not a woman that plays the Poor Me Victim card. Disgusting.

Can you lead the world if your world view is that you are a Victim?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 PM on 01/13/2008

I pasted part of a report of respite legislation that Hillary submitted and got passed with the help of others, but I have not seen it posted.
It was 2003 when I was caring for a dying Alzheimer spouse and I saw the need and asked HRC to look at the problem. She looked at it and tried to help. This is the kind of lady she is and one of the reasons I support her.
I hope the pasted article is put on here for all to see.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:16 PM on 01/13/2008

History has been overtly generous to the Clintons in what it perceives they have done for the poor.
Federal Minimum Wage Bush one-April 1991 $4.25
Clinton-October 1996 $4.75 Clinton-September 1997 $5.15 You don't close the gap between the rich and poor with a .90 raise/hr over 8 years!!!
"The income gap actually grew more during the Democratic Clinton administration than it has during the Bush administration. According to U.S. Census data, the share of income for the wealthiest 5 percent rose from 18.6 percent in 1992 to 22.1 percent in 2000. That"s a jump of almost 19 percent."
Furthermore, capital gains tax was only 20 percent during the Clinton Presidency. That means the super rich only paid 20 percent on their income from the stock market. Actual wage earners would pay up to 38 percent. Most CEO get paid through stock so they only pay 15% tax now and 20 % back then.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:39 PM on 01/13/2008

One of the major issues I have with Hillary Clinton is that she used Barack Obama's childhood essays against him -- and, as I have previously claimed, I lost some faith in her knowing that she could easily resort to such desperate and juvenile methods.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:16 PM on 01/13/2008

I've actually had it with both of these clowns. Edwards is the only viable candidate who offers REAL change to the status quo. This is why the corporate media and DLC-type Democrats keep calling him a "loser" and saying he doesn't stand a chance. Remember, these are the primaries and Edwards has only one or two fewer delegates than either Obama or Clinton. If neither Obama nor Clinton goes into the convention with a majority of delegates, then Edwards has a lot of clout in fashioning the Democratic platform.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:11 PM on 01/13/2008

Clinton adviser: "If you have a social need, you're with Hillary. If you want Obama to be your imaginary hip black friend and you're young and you have no social needs, then he's cool."

January 10, 2008
http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,2238148,00.html

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:03 PM on 01/13/2008

More dirty tricks. I wake up this morning to learn that Hillary is blaming the Obama camp for calling her and Bill to task for their cheap, thinly veiled racist code attacks in the NH primary. I'll say it once again, her little tearing up act was nothing other than a code sent out to protect the "weak little white woman from the big black Obama." Bils statement about "fairytale" and calling Obama "that kid" was nothing other than telling calling Obama "boy" and letting black folks know "to stay in their place." How Hillary is asking Obama not to be divisive. What??? (1) Obama did not start the divisiveness, the Clinton camp did. (2) Obama did not point out what she was doing; African-Americans, unfortunately for the Clintons, are not sheep, they are capable of seeing what is going on. I was one of the first people to point it out on this blog, and I am an EDWARDS supporter. It is really pitiful. Hillary has no platform (she just takes from Obama and Edwards). In her desperation to win she will do whatever it takes.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:50 PM on 01/13/2008

Hmm. Obama understands the regular people but by his own words, he has pushed his personal budget to the max to move into a million dollar home. Does anyone actually believe he is going to do much of anything except increase his own status ?

Haven't we had enough "spend and worry later" economics in this country the past 8 years ? Before everyone launches him into the heavens as the brightest star, I hope taking a deep breath and a rest from the bandwagon brings some reality to this entire campaign.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:49 PM on 01/13/2008

I was waffling on which Dem to vote for...but the more negative attacks on Hillary, the more I edge toward casting my vote for her. Keep it up, Hufpost , Progressive Daily Beacon, et al. You'll get her elected yet!!!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:36 PM on 01/13/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (35 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in


 
 
Bloggers Index›
Read All Posts by
Arianna Huffington›
 

 Site  Web ask.com