Yesterday's opinion section of the Wall Street Journal offered convincing proof that those who want a progressive financial policy and those who simply want to save capitalism are in agreement about the madness of the administration's Wall Street policies.
There, on the editorial page of the capitalist Bible, was a piece taking repeated shots at Wall Street darling Goldman Sachs. And, over on the opposite page, a two-fisted op-ed by former hedge-fund manager Andy Kessler in which he labels the government bailout of Wall Street "a dumb move" and "a bust."
I'm planning to shrink down today's Journal, laminate it, and hand it out anytime someone in the media starts analyzing the economy using the cobweb-covered, tried-and-untrue right vs. left framing.
You know that this way of looking at financial policy is dead and buried when Rupert Murdoch's pride and joy is publishing takes that I could happily have written myself.
Let's start with the editorial, "A Tale of Two Bailouts," which decries the fact that, thanks to the policies of Tim Geithner and Larry Summers, Goldman "enjoys the best of both worlds: outsize profits for its traders and shareholders and a taxpayer backstop should anything go wrong."
The piece is spiked with disdainful references to "the Goldmans of the world" and "the likes of Goldman, which apparently needs no help printing money," and takes issue with the way "we changed when we stepped in to save certain banks in the name of saving the system." It also dubs Goldman "Goldie Mac," saying: "Goldman will surely deny that its risk taking is subsidized by the taxpayer -- but then so did Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, right up to the bitter end."
Compare that to the laudatory language and quotes used by AP business writer Stephen Bernard in his story yesterday on Goldman's "stunning" profit report. Bernard calls the company "the king of post-meltdown Wall Street" and repeatedly quotes a financial analyst who anoints Goldman as "the best of the best," "in a class by themselves," and "the golden child of the market."
The Journal's take -- "We like profits as much as the next capitalist. But when those profits are supported by government guarantees or insured deposits, taxpayers have a special interest in how the companies conduct their business" -- is actually more in keeping with that of Robert Reich, who says that "Goldman's resurgence should send shivers down the backs of every hardworking American who has lost a large chunk of retirement savings in this economic debacle, as well as the millions who have lost their jobs.... Goldman's high-risk business model hasn't changed one bit from what it was before the implosion of Wall Street."
Then there is Kessler's op-ed, which mirrors much of HuffPost's take on the serial missteps made by Obama's senior economic team.
"We took the easy way out," he writes, "and, with the help of Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner's loose 'stress tests,' swept banking problems under the carpet. We waved off mark-to-market accounting and juiced bank stock prices to help them recapitalize, but all those toxic mortgage assets on bank balance sheets are still there as anchors on lending."
Kessler also refuses to buy into the "'green shoots' psychology" that has spread through much of the media -- and rejects the all-too-frequent conflation of the Wall Street economy and the real economy: "By not restructuring banks, by not getting bad loans off bank balance sheets, by not standing up to the massive increases in government debt crowding out private capital, the Fed and Treasury are holding back real economic growth."
There is much in the Wall Street Journal that I don't agree with but, when it comes to the failure of the administration to address and fundamentally reform what Kessler calls "the structural problems that got us into trouble in the first place," we are of the same mind. There is no daylight between a progressive position focused on the paramount need to get the real economy going and one based purely on what makes free markets work.
The editorial goes so far as to suggest imposing a tax (yes, the Wall Street Journal is proposing a tax!), an FDIC-style bailout tax to be precise, "for those in the too-big-to-fail camp."
We've reached the point where the only people defending the administration's Wall Street policies are the people benefiting from them -- or their good friends, Tim Geithner and Larry Summers.
Follow Arianna Huffington on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ariannahuff
Arianna Huffington: Whistling Past the Economic Graveyard: The Audacity of Misplaced Hope
The latest stock market bubble has undermined the urgent push for reform, which seems to have given way in Washington to a push to move on to other things and leave that little financial kerfuffle behind us. It puts a whole other spin on the audacity of hope. READ MORE Mission Shrink: We've Gone From Saving Wall Street in Order to Save Main Street to Just Saving Wall Street The problem continues to be the administration's habit of conflating the health of the Wall Street economy with the health of the real economy -- when, in fact, the two economies have become decoupled. READ MORE WATCH: Arianna Discusses Events in Iran, Obama's Agenda on Larry King Live WATCH: Arianna Discusses America's Response to Iran on The Situation Room
A Tale of Two Bailouts - WSJ.com
I have been in a CEO's office where the running of the company was the last thing on his mind; he only wanted to know the stock price every minute. Running a corporation should be a public trust; it has become a private gold rush.
Our economy will never heal as long as short term results drive executive compensation because the motivations of executives running our major business entities are out of wack. Greed is not always good!
You get your I told you so, though.
Simple as that...
Banks which accepted Federal bail out money just months ago are now posting big earnings as in billions! How can they go from imminent failure to now making billions of dollars? It is long been know that a good accountant can manipulate the facts, and on paper it probably looked like these banks were in trouble but in reality......they were fine. Manipulation of the facts......yes! While the rest of the middle class and the poor are struggling to turn this economy around the rich are seeing windfalls........at our expense! The American taxpayers are the ones which have bailed these banks out but we still cannot get loans we are facing outrageous credit card rates and seemingly the banks are no closer to being reined in than they were in January. And what are we seeing on capital hill, finger pointing, a big show called the "blame game". Well, I am for one not buying in to this distraction. Congress and the American people got duped into loaning these banks all this money and now we should demand it back with interest. Take that money and put it where it belongs. Helping the small businesses of America, the middle class as we struggle to once again see this country thrive.
Everyone is going to paid in deriatives and credit default swaps. They're on the hook for $5-6 trillion or more. Line up for your paycheck, your retirement funds, your charities given out in "funny money". No wonder we can't get any jobs these couple years. What a mess; be prepared for the next downward spiral.
It's already past time for us to fix the couple of early-on people role-assignment mistakes made, whip the Frosh back into line and get on with taking care of and getting done those things that just might salvage a future for our children and our children's children. It doesn't matter how much debt there is if there's no world left to pay back, duhhh! Just spend what needs to be spent and do what needs to be done in order to get the USA right again while preventing The BIG Meltdown, and the money will come pouring back in so fast you just may need to open a Credit Union to hold all of it!
It's simply time to get past alll this pussyfooting around and let's get on with it already! Y'all on the inside just want to keep thinking or believing we on the outside don't know the score. Well, we know what the score is alright. Unlike you, though, we were brought up with manners. So we've just been being polite.
However, I think it's only fair to let you know I've been noticing alot of my neighbors out sharping their axes and pitchforks lately.
Get the point?!!
End.