AFL-CIO Survey Turns Politics of Health Care Reform Upside Down

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

Posted April 11, 2008 | 11:47 AM (EST)



Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

Despite all the hubbub about health care, the secret belief in the Washington punditry has long been that real health care reform in America is a political non-starter. They know that nearly all voters are insured, and they believe insured voters fear health care reform more than they desire it.

Now we know otherwise, thanks to the more than 26,000 people who told us so.

Our informants were the vast and varied respondents to a health care survey launched by the AFL-CIO and our community affiliate, Working America, to better map the landscape of the health care crisis in America and to provide that information to candidates running for public office in 2008. You can find the survey results at www.aflcio.org.

Most of those who took the survey are insured and employed. Most are college graduates. More than half are union members. Almost all of them believe the health care system is broken and needs fundamental change, and they are planning to vote about it in November.

The news here is the demographics. These are the people who, it would seem, would have the best access to high-quality health care.

But it turns out that having insurance is no guarantee of getting the care you need at a price you can afford. More than half of people in insured families say their insurance does not cover all the care they need at a price they can afford. Despite having insurance, they report not being able to afford prescription drugs, follow-up care and even preventive care, which are either not covered or covered insufficiently.

Take Marie, from Madison, Wis., one of 7,500 people who wrote in to the survey with their own compelling stories. "What would you do if you had to choose between food or medicine," she asks. "Because of rising health care costs, that is a question that is frequently asked in my home. I work full time and have health care through my employer, but only a percentage is paid by them...I recently needed medication for an ailment, but did not get the medicine--I couldn't. What would I choose? I choose my children and what they need, whether it be food or medicine. I am the one who will go without before they suffer."

Chances are, Marie will vote, and it is voters like her who will turn the conventional wisdom about the politics of health care reform on its head.

That old saw about health care reform as a political sinkhole was born in the early 1990s when attempts at reform were met with scare tactics by the insurance and pharmaceutical industries. With misleading advertising and lobbying, they convinced Americans with insurance that change would be worse for them than the status quo.

The belief in political circles became that only the uninsured care about health care reform. The uninsured generally don't turn out to vote in large numbers. In this scenario, there is no political payoff for trying to make things better, so no one tried.

Fast forward to today. Forty-seven million people in this country have no health insurance, which effectively means no health care. But, as our survey shows, the misery and fear runs further and deeper than only those who have no health insurance.

One-third of college graduates report they or a family member skipped medical care because of cost. People who buy their own insurance in the private market--the place Sen. John McCain would like to push all of us--are more likely than those with employer-provided health care to report that critical needs are not covered or not affordable.

Fully half of our survey respondents say they or a family member have been stuck in a job they would have preferred to leave to keep health care. For many, the only raises they've gotten in years have been eaten entirely by increases in health costs.
This affects employers, too, who have to compete in a world market with companies based in countries providing health care. Health care has become such a burdensome cost that many employers are helping to lead the charge for change.

Note to political consultants: These dissatisfied health care survey respondents are voters. In fact, 97 percent say they plan to vote this November. Dissatisfaction spans generations. Seventy-four percent of those aged 18-29 who took the survey count health care as a very important voting issue, as do 80 percent of those aged 50-64.

That means, of course, political candidates today have no choice but to address the issue of health care reform. The presidential candidates are all doing so, although McCain's plan to tax employee health benefits barely rates a mention. For candidates up and down the ticket, the question now is only how far they are willing to go and--our unsolicited advice is they had best go all the way, if they want to be elected, that is.

And once in office, they had better stand their ground and fight for real, comprehensive health care reform that reins in the outrageous health costs in America and expands access to care to all. If not, they'll be held accountable. Enough already. In America, no one should go without health care, and no one should be held hostage by health care costs.

 
 

Comments
11
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

It is true that people want and need a universal health care system. Just today an news article described the plight of those insured who have to pay for their medicines.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/14/us/14drug.html
Kaiser Permanete, which as you may recall in the Nixon Tape in Sicko, was formed with the intent of collecting premiums but not providing services in order to make a profit. Changing the co-pays payed by the insured from a fixed rate to a percentage, (Tier 4 they call it.), has raised the cost of drugs 15 times. They say they did this in response to employers who felt they were paying to high an expense for employee health insurance. We need a non-profit, nationally run, single-payer health care system.
http://www.singlepayerhealth.org
Many people would naturally support single-payer if they only knew what it was. The health plans of both of the Democratic candidates call for Americans to invest in private insurance. However, more than $500 billion (yes that's half a trillion dollars) is spent annually just to pay for the billing process involved in the private health care industry. That is 31 percent of all American health care cost. We need to take HMOs completely out of the picture.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:29 AM on 04/15/2008

"there is no political payoff for trying to make things better, so no one tried."
That statement is at the core of what is wrong with our government, from the city level up to the White House. We must hold them accountable, at every level, in every office, to do what is right and responsible, not what is just politically expedient.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:26 PM on 04/11/2008

"they believe insured voters fear health care reform more than they desire it." ???

That depends upon what the changes are. NONE of these candidates are offering a plan that would improve our situation. What we want and need is FREE health care paid for by taxes, just like the other modern societies in the world have.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 PM on 04/11/2008

Marlyn, I have news for you. FREE healthcare does not exist, neither do FREE lunches. The other modern societies in the world have universal healthcare, and the insured, the whole working population, DOES either pay an insurance premium, or is taxed. The premium (or tax) one pays, however, is much lower than in the U.S., AND insurance can not be cancelled, people can not be refused employment because of illness, disability, or RISK. Doctors and healthcare institutions must get paid, and they will NOT work for free. Hillary has a good plan, similar to the plan they use a.o. in The Netherlands. Healthcare will be free for Indigents, and THAT healthcare is paid for out of taxes. We already have that now in the U.S.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:33 PM on 04/11/2008

This is abolutely the will of the people. Obama's plan is useless. McCain's plan is a joke.

Regardless of who wins, they MUST endorse Hillary's plan.

That is obvious.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:28 PM on 04/11/2008

Hillary has a plan to enrich the insurance companies while doing NOTHING to improve the quality or availability of actual health care. Obama's plan is also useless but at least it doesn't force people to send money to the cruel and crooked insurance companies. McCain of course, being a Republican, has no plan. He believes that only rich people deserve to live. There will be no leadership on this issue from any of the presidential candidates. And until Americans learn the difference between health insurance and health care we cant even have a conversation about it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:55 PM on 04/11/2008

The "obvious" ain't necessarily so. Clinton's plan would do nothing for the "Marie" in the story, who (technically) has coverage. It would, on the other hand, force people to buy the kind of fraudulent coverage that is exploiting Marie. And if you think that regulations or the existence of a government-sponsored alternative will prevent this abuse, forget it - those things will be negotiated away in the triangulation process.

As I see it, Clinton's current proposal, like the one she offered in 1994, is designed to protect the private insurance industry, by heading off meaningful reform (i.e. single-payer) while still pretending to "do something."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:29 PM on 04/11/2008

AnninCA makes me laugh.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:47 PM on 04/11/2008

You may laugh your little booty off, Marlyn. But many people who do not know what they are talking about laugh insanely. My doctors will not treat me if they do not get paid. They can not do that. They have families to support, overhead to pay for their practices, and more of that stuff. YOU may be laughing, but they are not laughing. Like the patients they serve they too can no longer do this insanity which passes for healthcare in the U.S. Becoming a doctor takes a long time and much effort and it costs a lot of money that must be paid off. But, what would YOU know about that? AnninCA is right. Hillary's Plan is The One. Obama and McCain have no plan.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:39 PM on 04/11/2008

The only people that don't have trouble with our health care system are those that we see on TV that keep telling the rest of us that there is no problem. Elected officials, High Profile Pundits and TV Anchors probably have not trouble. All the rest of us are in a world of hurt.

How about if we wipe out the Free Insurance for life for elected officials, that might spur them to make some changes?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 PM on 04/11/2008

"...How about if we wipe out the Free Insurance for life for elected officials, that might spur them to make some changes?..." Nahhhh, they'll just raise their salaries and pensions to cover the delta.

Want to get *honest* elected officials? End private contributions to campaigns. All that is is legalzed bribery.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:39 PM on 04/11/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 
 

Related Tags
 

 Site  Web ask.com