Note: This is the first in a series of posts on extreme poverty that CBPP will do this week.
Living on less than $2 per person a day is one World Bank definition of poverty for developing nations. Unfortunately, this threshold is increasingly relevant to the United States, according to a new study from the National Poverty Center.
The number of U.S. households living on less than $2 per person per day -- which the study terms "extreme poverty" -- more than doubled between 1996 and 2011, from 636,000 to 1.46 million, the study finds (see graph). The number of children in extremely poor households also doubled, from 1.4 million to 2.8 million.
The figures are for cash income only, although the authors --the University of Michigan's H. Luke Shaefer and Harvard University's Kathryn Edin -- note that extreme poverty is up even when one counts non-cash benefits like SNAP (food stamps). We will discuss the connection between these findings and food and housing assistance in follow-up posts.
The report found that the rate of extreme poverty doubled for households overall but nearly tripled for female-headed households, which make up the bulk of the TANF caseload.
As we've explained, TANF's ability to reach poor families has eroded severely in the past decade and a half. Whereas, in 1996, TANF provided cash assistance to 68 families for every 100 poor families with children, by 2010 it provided cash assistance to only 27 families for every 100 families in poverty. Families that have reached welfare time limits are not eligible for any federal cash assistance, and many have serious mental or physical health issues that leave them jobless for long periods.
Also, the sharp decline in the value of TANF benefits over time means that many TANF recipients remain extremely poor. Benefits are below half of the poverty line in every state. For a family of three, benefits are only about $2 per person per day in Mississippi and Tennessee and only slightly more than $2 per person per day in Alabama and South Carolina, for example.
Co-author Edin is an authority on the ways in which extremely poor households scraped by day-to-day in the pre-welfare-reform era. Today, say Shaefer and Edin, "it is unclear how households with no cash income -- either from work, government programs, assets, friends, family members, or informal sources -- are getting by even if they do manage to claim some form of in-kind [i.e., non-cash] benefit."
Research has shown that poverty in childhood has a long and harmful reach. Even modest changes in family income for young children in poor families significantly affect their educational success -- and may have a big effect on their earnings as adults.
Follow Arloc Sherman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@centeronbudget