Possible "Plan B" for Iraq: bringing back a Saddam?

If you want to know what conservatives are thinking in the administration, it's always a good idea to check out.
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

If you want to know what conservatives are thinking in the administration, it's always a good idea to check out The Washington Times. Yesterday was no exception: in a provocative article designed to boost the hopes of those seeking a change of direction in Iraq (and, perhaps, GOP chances at the polls), the paper reported about James Baker's "Plan B" study group:

Leaks from a U.S. task force headed by former Secretary of State James A. Baker III are contributing to the widespread sense that the Bush administration is preparing for a "course correction" in the coming months.

The options cited most frequently in Washington include the partition of Iraq into three ethnic- or faith-based regions, and a phased withdrawal of U.S. troops, with some remaining in neighboring countries to deal with major threats. [Note to Huffington readers: When Democrats propose these ideas, they're called "cut and run."]

Another scenario is being discussed -- and taken seriously in Iraq -- by many of Iraq's leading political players, under which the U.S.-trained army would overthrow struggling Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and replace him with a strongman who would restore order while Washington looks the other way (emphasis added).

Who could such a strongman be? Saddam's tied up in a trial for his life, but it seems his ability to hold down ethnic violence while in power is looking like an appealing role model for a future leader of Iraq. It's not quite bringing democracy to the Iraqi people, but maybe he'll get the trains -- or the electricity -- to run on time.

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot