iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Aubrey Sarvis

GET UPDATES FROM Aubrey Sarvis
 

Obama's Measured Path to DADT Repeal

Posted: 09/20/11 01:01 AM ET

No single individual or organization brought about the tremendous feat of dismantling "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" (DADT). In the best military tradition, repeal was a team accomplishment. As we celebrate this historic milestone, it's important to pause and consider the critical roles that so many played and remember that it took a remarkable campaign to pull this off and that the road to repeal was not always a smooth one - especially for President Obama.

When pushed on the issue of DADT in the spring of 2009, one of President Obama's senior aides bluntly told me, "You don't have the votes for repeal." Then, after months of careful deliberations and pressure from a wide range of interests, the President's team embarked upon a path that would make it extraordinarily difficult to get a successful repeal vote in 2010. They had solid reasons for the plan they decided on with the top military leadership, but I did not agree with their timeline.

Initially, the President did not call for Congress to repeal DADT outright as many of us had hoped; he didn't order the military to stop enforcing the law under emergency "stop-loss" powers; and he didn't want the courts to order the military to undo DADT. What he eventually proposed was far more ambitious and time consuming.

His two-pronged approach called, first, for Congress to pass a repeal process bill that would allow DADT to be killed; second, he wanted the military to literally pull the plug on DADT and bury it. The President would give then Secretary of Defense Robert Gates and Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) Chairman Admiral Michael Mullen the time they wanted to complete their mission. His was a high wire act with no safety net, and, many thought, with little chance of success in 2010, especially in a lame duck session of Congress. Failure would signal an inept White House and a major setback for repeal.

But the President got some help along the way from his friends in accelerating White House action, even when his team didn't necessarily welcome all of it.

Three impatient U.S. senators had become frustrated, afraid repeal might stall. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) grabbed on to repeal in 2009 and never let go. She joined forces with Senator Harry Reid (D-NV), the Democratic Leader, and Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC) Chairman Carl Levin (D-MI) to accelerate repeal.

And in the House, then Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), along with Congressman Steny Hoyer (D-MD) and then Congressman Patrick Murphy (D-PA), would pull together 192 House cosponsors for repeal. Their support, coupled with the loud and growing repeal forces, advocates, and LGBT bloggers, kept repeal alive when it looked bleak or on life support.

Jeh Johnson, DOD's General Counsel and President Obama's first appointee to the Pentagon, was the vital link for the White House and the Pentagon on repeal. Gates and Mullen and the cautious Johnson ensured the Obama team would be prepared for the Levin hearings. These three, along with scores of their Pentagon colleagues, had been preparing for months. It had fallen to the low key, dapper Johnson to be the bridge and honest broker between the White House and Pentagon on repeal. At the White House, Deputy Chief of Staff Jim Messina and a cadre of White House lawyers, labored with Johnson to orchestrate their forces to bring final closure.

It took nearly a year for the President's plan to jell. And it would be another painful year before the winning votes on Capitol Hill. And after that, another seven months would pass before Jeh Johnson would hand-deliver the signed Gates and Mullen certification to the White House for the President's signature and transmitted to Capitol Hill. All in all, not that long for a successful legislative and military operation, but inordinately protracted for advocates and especially long for gay and lesbian service members being discharged every day under DADT and for those serving in silence.

And make no mistake. The President directed his forces with precision, methodically insisting all options be examined and re-examined. He realized almost from the beginning that success would depend upon the military, that he would need Gates and Mullen and his senior commanders and the troops with him to bring about this change. And he also knew that would take time. He was determined not to be rushed. The last time this was rushed without a plan and military support the results had been disastrous. He would not make that mistake.

On February 2, 2010, Secretary Gates and Admiral Mullen stunned Capitol Hill by outlining before the Senate Armed Services Committee precisely what the President had tasked them to do. On that day, most knew repeal would happen. It was not a matter of if - it was just a matter of when and how. That turned out to be the final days of the lame duck session of Congress in 2010 when Senators Susan Collins (R-MA), Joe Lieberman (I-CT), and Reid, along with Pelosi and Hoyer, pushed a standalone repeal bill over the finish line.

Some will rightly quibble over how long it took Obama's White House to pull off this remarkable achievement and who should get credit for what, but one thing few can argue is that repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" would not have happened without a determined President Obama, the essential and unwavering buy-in and support from our military, and an awful lot of very good luck.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 93
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
relentless63
01:15 PM on 09/25/2011
A measured path that reaps rewards is to be hailed and congratulated. Good work, President Obama.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Osmona
Its GREAT to be alive and SANE.
04:21 PM on 09/20/2011
Thank YOU for giving credit where its due. President Obama DESERVES a whole of credit. He rarely gets credit for anything.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peddler
Peddler of Information
03:03 PM on 09/20/2011
The President has "opened Pandora's Box----------now the struggle begins!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
dragonlady620
My karma will run over your dogma
03:42 PM on 09/20/2011
The same thing was said when the armed forces were integrated. There were all kinds of dire predictions about the consequences. Guess what- didn't happen.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Milash
My microbio is fabulous
02:43 PM on 09/20/2011
It still amazes me that to this day, there are still people out there who are so toxically homophobic that they would deny citizens their right to a happy and productive life in all ways. Hopefully soon we will be celebrating the legalization of same sex marriage.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peddler
Peddler of Information
03:04 PM on 09/20/2011
You can't legislate "morality"!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Milash
My microbio is fabulous
03:21 PM on 09/20/2011
Tell that to the right wingers, conservatives, religious nuts and tea baggers, because that is exactly what they are trying to do.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
dragonlady620
My karma will run over your dogma
03:43 PM on 09/20/2011
Isn't that precisely what the right is trying to do?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:07 PM on 09/20/2011
There will always be those who believe homosexuality is wrong. This is based on science. There is no (natural) biologically designed sexual union between homosexuals. Pass all the laws you want and call people homophobes if that is your solution.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Milash
My microbio is fabulous
03:21 PM on 09/20/2011
I love it when wingers throw the word "science" in a post thinking that it will make it seem more palatable.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peddler
Peddler of Information
03:24 PM on 09/20/2011
You can't legislate "morality"----only behavior------and that is not science!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BILL1234
01:44 PM on 09/20/2011
Sad day for the military.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
exxman
Visualize Whirled Peas.
02:33 PM on 09/20/2011
Proud day for the military and the country.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BILL1234
02:41 PM on 09/20/2011
Based on What?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peddler
Peddler of Information
03:06 PM on 09/20/2011
You cannot legislate "morality"---you can only legislate "behavior"------and now your struggle begins!
ndtovent
Annoying wingnuts since 2001
03:00 PM on 09/20/2011
"Proud" day for the military. There, fixed it for ya.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PerryLogan
We don't want your guns; we just want your women.
01:01 PM on 09/20/2011
This is easy to disprove.

If the path to repeal DADT has been "measured," we would have felt confident about its passage the whole time.

But we didn't. We were in fact filled with doubt and confusion about what, if anything, Obama was going to do. The man is not a leader.
01:29 PM on 09/20/2011
Maybe he's not the kind leader you're used to. He's more subtle and nuanced in his leadership....very pragmatic. It might cause confusion and doubt for some people but I truly think he knows exactly what he's doing. His way of doing it just might not be "business as usual".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peddler
Peddler of Information
03:07 PM on 09/20/2011
You can't legislate "morality"---you can legislate "behavior."------now the struggle begins!
MThomasNC
Retired, Sassy, Senior Citizen
12:42 PM on 09/20/2011
I knew that this bill was on the track to achieve it's goal. What has surprised me is the lack of news on this accomplishment. What does that say about our media? What is their role in our society - to always promote 'bad news', dissension, spread lies and misinformation, promote ignorance, spread the he said she said.
Thanks to Mr Sarvis for doing a thorough job on the bill's timeline to passage and implementation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Osmona
Its GREAT to be alive and SANE.
04:27 PM on 09/20/2011
The media is in on the conspiracy with the GOP. NEVER, NEVER, NEVER write ANYTHING positive about anything the President has anything to do with. PERIOD. And you're right, this is HUGE accomplishment for the LGBT community, the DOJ, members of Congress who were involved and last but certainly not least President Obama.

Faved already a fan.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rightlygay
Already EQUAL
10:54 AM on 09/20/2011
...and no mention of the organization that actually won the law suit that put this on the fast track......Log Cabin Republicans !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
exxman
Visualize Whirled Peas.
02:35 PM on 09/20/2011
Huh? The repeal effort was underway long before the log cabin suit went to court.
ndtovent
Annoying wingnuts since 2001
02:58 PM on 09/20/2011
That's true, ex, but the lawsuit brought by the LCR was instrumental in moving it to the 'front burner' again, so to speak. No other organization had the courage or foresight to bring a suit specifically repealing DADT. It was really the most recent second prong of 3 pronged effort, so I agree that we should give credit where credit is due. IT prompted some of the key pols. to get off their butts. But you're correct in that the repeal effort started in 1994 when SLDN was founded.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cartograffer
10:49 AM on 09/20/2011
Chalk another one up for the good guys!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarkInEugene
A blasphemy a day keeps the deities away.
10:28 AM on 09/20/2011
One of the indirect consequences of the repeal of DADT is not immediately apparent. This move puts psychological pressure on the homophobic. The timing is appropriate, but there will be a great deal of confusion expressed by the right wing in this country.

Some of these people have been living in the closet without even knowing it and being their own worst enemy. I'm very glad the military took this step because it moves us closer to eliminating a self inflicted dysfunction that isn't good for anybody.
been2there
Facts have a liberal bias.
09:33 AM on 09/20/2011
While I found the timeline frustratingly slow, I am grateful that it has been done in a way that will make it hard to undo. Welcome to reality, US military!
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ThatsTheTheWayItIs
religion, ideology, partisanship are delusional
09:21 AM on 09/20/2011
Obama repealed DADT, had to extend tax cuts for the rich to get it done. Then Lt Dan Choi claimed Obama only did it after gay-rights advocates "held his feet to the fire". Question for Lt Choi: if gay-rights advocates were so powerful and motivated, why didn't this happen under Bush? Because Obama did it, not Lt Dan Choi, or any other protestors. The will of the majority decides here, protests do nothing if people don't agree with the premise. You don't convince people by acting up and shouting louder.

Hopefully this issue is over, and we can go back to shrinking our military, not adding to it. The last thing the US needs is more soldiers, gay or straight.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
code blue
I support the right to Keep and Bear Children
09:22 AM on 09/20/2011
Lt. Dan Choi embarrassed himself.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peddler
Peddler of Information
03:09 PM on 09/20/2011
If Lt. Choi believes that he has won---------his struggle is only beginning!
09:42 AM on 09/20/2011
Couldn't agree with your comments more but don't forget the larger narrative. For some reason it seems folks on both sides would rather criticize this president then even for a second give him one shred of credit for any accomplishment.

Getting Bin Laden, Obama begrudgingly got credit and when the WH tried to acknowledge the event (and did so respectfully in my opinion) he was accused of taking a victory lap. After the 2008 election progressives seemed to think the GOP was gone like the evil Sauron of Mordor and we could have all we wanted immediately. They ignored the sizable Blue Dog wing of the caucus and underestimated the lengths the GOP would go to reclaim power. All the while the GOP has gone way to the extremes in states like WI, OH, & FL the Dem base focuses more on Obama's mistakes then on what the other side is doing.

Obama has made his share of mistakes and by his recent actions of taking the fight to the GOP on taxes I'm confident he's starting to learn from them. The Democratic base liberals and progressives need to put away their dissatisfaction with Obama if not just until after the election, focus on the positives that have been accomplished and there is much and end the GOP's war on the middle class once and for all.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ThatsTheTheWayItIs
religion, ideology, partisanship are delusional
10:07 AM on 09/20/2011
Agree totally, and I'm always saying the same thing here. There is only one legit question anyone can ask: would we be better off with McCain / Palin? That was the choice. And the "I should have voted for Hillary" is also bogus. She voted for Iraq War, Obama was against it. We have no reason to think Hillary would have done any different or better.

People just like to complain. Kvetch, kvetch.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Osmona
Its GREAT to be alive and SANE.
04:32 PM on 09/20/2011
So true. I REALLY hope the "fair weather" voters will SNAP OUT OF IT or we will lose it ALL before we even get it.

F/F
photo
shawshank
The unseen ones prop up the visible world...
09:14 AM on 09/20/2011
For progressives and liberals, their first line of criticism of the President is that he extended the Bush tax cuts. DADT would never have passed if he didn't agree to the extension of said tax cuts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sally Tallywhacker
Godless, just like everyone else.
08:42 AM on 09/20/2011
It's sad that it (DADT) was in effect in the first place.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ThatsTheTheWayItIs
religion, ideology, partisanship are delusional
09:06 AM on 09/20/2011
Thank Bill Clinton.
photo
DoubleYellowLines
Left of the Right, and Right of the Left
09:35 AM on 09/20/2011
It was a better option than was done previously. Baby steps.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rowsdower
For extra fun, read my posts in Igniknokt's voice.
11:35 AM on 09/20/2011
Well, what DADT did was it gave gays some measure of protection for the first time ever. Prior to that, you could be investigated for being a homosexual and drummed out. Under DADT, gays could serve without fear of investigation, provided they kept their mouths shut. It was at least a stopgap measure while American society slowly came to realize that gay troops won't destroy our military any more than black troops did.

Was DADT appallingly insufficient? Yes. But was DADT a vast improvement over what preceded it? Yes. Hooray for DADT, now let's bury it once and for all.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peddler
Peddler of Information
03:15 PM on 09/20/2011
Does the passage of the civil rights laws still protect----or did it just cause racial hatred to go underground and remain hidden? Racial hatred, sad to say, is still alive and surfaces with many faces------DADT---you can't legislate morality------only behavior.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
dragonlady620
My karma will run over your dogma
01:17 PM on 09/21/2011
For that matter, not too long before DADT homosexuality was a court-martial offense. I have heard people criticize Clinton for being a "wimp" on this issue and settling for DADT. But anyone who was around then knows that it was a signficant step forward, and anything more than that would have been politically impossible at that time. It was actually pretty remarkable that Clinton was able to achieve that. This is a pretty good discussion: http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/html/military_race_comparison.html
DrReve
It's in the details.
01:23 AM on 09/20/2011
Great job!! OBAMA 2012!