Rowling's Wide Stance

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

Author J.K. Rowling takes the initiative in declaring the sexual orientation of one of her beloved characters. This has shocked the fan fiction community, who for so long have assumed it was their right to make their own baseless and unfounded assumptions about fictional characters they had no part in creating.

2007-10-22-071022_potter_hp.jpg

To see more of August J. Pollak's cartoon "Some Guy With a Website," check out the archive.

 
Comments
15
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

Another comic strip's take on Dumbledore's outing:

http://shelfcheck.blogspot.com/2007/10/shelf-check-114.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:53 PM on 10/25/2007

I admire Rowling's courage. It was a brilliant move.

Fan fiction writers are leeches, nothing more. The author of the blog does an appropriate job in slamming them. Well done.

As for those who slam the series itself, one can only say: your idiocy is showing. Best hide it.

SMdM

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:41 AM on 10/24/2007

You, um, you do know most m/m fanfiction writers are female, right? Like, %95?

Then again, most of THEM are jumping for joy about all this.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:21 PM on 10/23/2007

The idea of "Batman on Robin action" (a shudder-inducing phrase for the "ick factor" alone) is certainly nothing new. In the 1940's, Dr. Fredric Wertham posited that notion in his book, "Seduction of the Innocent". And as a Star trek fan, I have heard of the Kirk-Spock fan fiction for years. I love the cartoon. I couldn't possibly care less about Dumbledore's sexuality. The fact that Rowling actually had to TELL us about it is an indication that it doesn't matter in the slightest. Which is what sexuality SHOULD be about. It is just one small part of a person.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:51 AM on 10/23/2007

Well,that's it. I was busy this week contemplating China's new direction and the possibility of Bush starting WW 111, but the importance of this news has pushed me over the edge.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:11 AM on 10/23/2007

So Dumb-Old-Bore is gay? Rowling is a lot smarter than people might think. Now that the series is over, she has to do something to keep the illusion going with a "secret" revelation. Harry Potter is the Beanie Babies of the literary world, made to be consumed, then when everybody has their fill, it's over. So Rowling tries to prolong her moment of fame for just a little longer. Yawn.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:48 PM on 10/22/2007

Dude, you have no idea what you're talking about: the Harry Potter fan community has been celebrating Dumbledore's gayness all week-end and writing Dumbledore/Grindlewald smut.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:46 PM on 10/22/2007

I already know of some right wingnuts who want to band all Harry Potter books from the library because JK Rowling promotes witchcraft instead of Christianity.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:21 PM on 10/22/2007

The "wide stance" title isn't right. If that term should even be applied to anyone beyond Larry Craig, it should be reserved as an insult for politicians whose level of denial becomes ridiculous, or, if you believe there's something that warrants insulting them, closeted gay people. But to just apply it to anything gay seems to imply that seediness, perversion, or general ridicule goes hand-in-hand with homosexuality when there are plenty of general epithets for gay people available already.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:26 AM on 10/22/2007
- August J. Pollak - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of August J. Pollak permalink

The title was a play on Rowling taking a stance on one of her character's sexual preferences- something usually restricted to the overly wild imaginations of fan fiction writers.

That sad, the cartoonist offers his thanks for setting a new record in being offended by his strip before even getting past the title.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:48 AM on 10/22/2007

I thought the cartoon itself was a funny insight, actually. The definition creep of "wide stance" into all-purpose synonym for gay was something I picked up on from HuffPo, which pointed it out when the New York Post quickly converted the term into something to be used generally for all those the paper had previously described as simply "limp-wristed" and "swishy."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:45 AM on 10/22/2007

Perhaps it should be "Rowling's Wild Stance"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:46 PM on 10/22/2007
photo

ROLMAO! I LOVED THAT SLAP IN THE FACE TO ALL THE NUT CASES.
GREAT!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:09 AM on 10/22/2007

Which nutcases: the extreme right or the fanboys?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:48 PM on 10/22/2007

I heard that Mitch McConnell has a thing for Dimbeldore, and Denny Hastert...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:53 AM on 10/22/2007
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect