More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Avraham Burg

Avraham Burg

Posted: April 1, 2010 07:02 PM

My Parent the President

What's Your Reaction:

Reading American politics through the Israeli and Jewish media is like looking at a solar eclipse through a very special filter; not a classical dark one but a very special and private one; rarely pink, often black, but always custom made, never off-the-shelf. Different than the rest of the onlookers are the Israelis: they all watch the democratic celebration of Mother US. We, on the other hand, are personally involved.

During election time in the US you couldn't avoid the feeling amongst us that every four years a few hundred millions of American voters are going to the ballot box in order to exercise their democratic right and elect the best president for....Israel. For months and weeks before election day, we Israelis and many Jews abroad, argue, debate and disagree with heat and emotion about my late Mom's, classical Jewish dilemma: Is this one good for the Jews or bad for the Jews.

So how is Obama doing? Is he good or bad for us? If you ask those who, like a robot, applauded Prime Minister Netanyahu at the AiPac convention last week -- he is bad, very bad. He's so bad that many here and overseas see him as a real threat, if not a concrete enemy, to Israel. For me. However, he is the best President of the time with the potential to be the best ever.

It has been a while since I suspended reading the world eventualities through the ancient, survivor mentality; through the locked and blocked keyhole of my mom. For me a good President for Israel is any President who is good for his people and good for the world. Israel is not, and should not be, a domain of itself. It should neither be an oasis nor an isolated island.

We are part of a larger family of nations and cannot behave as the only spoilt, though traumatized, child of this family. Whatever is good for humanity in general must be good for us as well. Speaking of children and family, the American president is a kind of a parent of the free world. Therefore, I expect him to behave like a good one. A good parent is one who knows and dares to say "No" to his child if or when needed. According to this George W. Bush was the worst president ever. As a parent of the world and the responsible adult of Israel -- he never said no. He was the most permissive and therefore the most damaging president ever. He allowed our governments to act and put to work policies and actions that pushed us away from reconciliation and further away from a potential peace accord. That's bad.

Now Obama is saying No to the whimsy Israeli child. No, mister Prime Minister, you cannot go on with the illusion. No, you cannot maintain peace lip-service and ongoing practical oppression and occupation. Not on my shift. From the place I am coming from, Mr. Netanyahu, the ancient Israelite call of liberty "Let My People Go" is still echoing, obligating and binding. This Biblical high subpoena is so universal and widely accepted that even you, the contemporary elected heir of Moses, must respect it.

I, as a Jew and Israeli, love the attitude of my current parent in Washington D.C. It is not nice, and not easy, but it is so right and so good. Finally I have somebody who really cares for me. Not in Jerusalem unfortunately, but luckily there in D.C. Happy Passover, dear President; please help my people go, from slavery to freedom, from war to peace. Because a Pharaoh you are not.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 90
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Daoud Kuttab
Former Ferris Professor of Journalism at Princeton
05:23 PM on 04/04/2010
So refreshing to hear Avrum's comments and his patience with people who are dwarfs in thinking compared to his vision. I hope you will continue your path seeking fairness, that can produce a just peace that will be good for Palestinians, for Israel and for Americans. President Obama is showing signs that he is willing to show Israelis tough love. Thank Avrum.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Avraham Burg
03:35 PM on 04/05/2010
Yah Rab el Alamin
I am so happy to find you here
all the best
avrum
photo
califlefty
Fighting back against the lies
04:41 PM on 04/04/2010
Well thank God you didn't use the Seder "four questions" analogy or we would have suffered a cliche explosion.
photo
CigarGod
What is your process?
03:08 PM on 04/04/2010
Thanks, Mr. Burg.
Very worthwhile and thoughtful piece.

I understand why the militant zionists are not happy about your post, but I don't understand why the peace advocates are unhappy.
The big picture is respectful peace.
I don't care that we will not agree 100% as we work toward that end.
photo
skialethia
αω vs military might
12:17 PM on 04/04/2010
That’s it? A man who fathoms his soul so brilliantly sums up his hopes simply as: “dear President; please help my people go, from slavery to freedom, from war to peace. Because a Pharaoh you are not."?

I'm going to get all kinds of flack, I know, from Israel’s apologists. I recognize some here and you wouldn't want me agreeing with you because in their eyes that’ll be the icing on their self-righteous cake. So I’ll have to disagree with you for your own good: It’s going to take a lot more to save your people than this President’s parenting.

Unfortunately, although I disagree with you, your credibility may suffer anyway once I'm through, but I must do what I believe is right.

"A prophet is without honor in his own land". He is a "prophet outcast", but take heart, a wise man once said: "No man can be fully accepted until he is totally rejected.”

Reading some of the vitriol directed your way, it reminds me at this time of Passover and Easter of the words of a famous Jew who's become a false prophet to some, a legitimate prophet to others and a Messiah to two billion. Right before he expired. rejected by his own people, He pronounced these words on their behalf: "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do."

They know not what they do...still.

You however bear the burden of knowing and thus you have my compassion.
12:32 PM on 04/04/2010
Skia..this is one of YOUR kind of Israeli Jews...an appeaser and a failed politician of the Israeli left!!! Why so mean to him?? I guess you're that way to ANY Israeli Jew!
photo
skialethia
αω vs military might
01:02 PM on 04/04/2010
You've just proven my point. You haven't the foggiest, have you?

Oh, woe is me! In the words of Hamlet to his mother: "I must be cruel only to be kind."
photo
califlefty
Fighting back against the lies
04:42 PM on 04/04/2010
shia's idea of parenting is apparently....the belt.
photo
skialethia
αω vs military might
08:14 PM on 04/04/2010
Wrong AGAIN. My idea of parenting a bully who disregards authority, in this case the rule of law is to start by suspending all "privileges".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JustMeInNY
Live and Learn.
08:52 AM on 04/04/2010
I'm going to try it one more time, see if this time this blogger isn't feeling too threatned and will put this post through. Here is what I said which was censored.

I don't disagree with nor agree with what this blogger wrote in his "masterpiece". People are entitled to an opinion. What I disagree with, is his attempt at painting Israel as if it's a child and America it's parent. Something very important that this blogger forgot in the midst of his attempt at venting back his anger and frustration over his issue with Knesset and the current Israeli administration. Israel is not a child, it's a sovereign nation, Israel's relationship with the United States is one of mutual interests, a mutually beneficial association. America has no business telling Israel what to do, just as Israel has no business telling the US what to do.

The paralel is weak
03:08 AM on 04/04/2010
America's interests are not the same as Israel's. This realization will save Israel--when the apron strings are cut, Israel will stand up on its' own without hiding behind the USA.

It is time for the nation of Israel to start acting like a nation in control, make some non violent decisions already.....stop, simply, reacting or for the most part, over reacting. It is an occupying nation in charge, it is counter intuitive for Israel and her supporters to be preoccupied with what Palestinians are giving up. They are occupied, they are already giving up their freedom by living under occupation.

Recognized nations have borders, where are Israel's?

Most nations, including Iran, have signed the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty. Only India, Pakistan and Israel have not. A nation in today's world, should sign the NPT and allow inspections. A sovereign nation should not hide under the cloak of ambiguity.

PM Netanyahu has stated that he wanted to stop taking aid from the USA. The time is right for a decrease of US taxpayer dollars sent to Israel. The USA could greatly benefit from the 10 million dollars it gives Israel each and every day.

The settlement program has received 33 million dollars of tax free donations from American Jews. It is time to tax donations given to foreign countries that support causes in opposition to the government of the USA. or maybe it should be illegal to donate to causes that oppose the foreign policies of the USA???
03:20 AM on 04/04/2010
This is the link to the article about PM Netanyahu pledging to stop taking aid from the USA.

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/03/23-11
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JustMeInNY
Live and Learn.
02:26 PM on 04/03/2010
First, proprs to Chaim for doing nice work in informing the reader of the background of the blogger of this "masterpiece".

Secondly, while I have no problem with anyone's outlook and them being vocal about it.
I object and I object strongly to the notion that Obama/Bush or any other president of the United States is somehow the parent of Israel. I would like to remind this blogger, that Israel is a sovereign nation, a full democratic nation, recognized by the rest of the world. America is Israel's ally and vise versa, the relationship of Israel and the US is one of common interests, a mutually beneficial association. Israel doesn't dictate to the United States about what it should or shouldn't do, nor should the United States dictate to Israel.

All foreign relations with all other countries are based on common interests and not parents and children.

I wont dispute the rest of the blogger's writing even though I feel strongly that the author was angry, and incredibly dishonest in his view and presentations of facts.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Avraham Burg
09:34 AM on 04/04/2010
In princip you are right. States are sovereign and should be totally independent and responsible for their own deeds. However, reality is a bit different. As much as USA is an entity of itself and for itself it has wider responsibility; The world. If the USA will withdraw backwards into isolationism the chaos will take over. Then the same chaos will know on your door but then it might be too late.
If you believe like me in a world of dialogue you must notice that a dialogue cannot happened when you are alone. Now the US is so powerful, innovative, omnipotent that we, the smaller nations look at it like the parent of the family.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JustMeInNY
Live and Learn.
09:51 AM on 04/04/2010
Mr.Burg, Please note, at no point have I advocated isolationsim. What I am stating is that Israel and the United States, have mutual interests, common interests, without those interests they wouldn't be allied. This is precisely why America isn't allied with the entire world. If US had no ideological or strategic interests with Israel, we wouldn't be having this discussion.

Once more, this isn't a one sided relationship as you well know, this isn't about US being super generous and Israel taking without giving back.
12:43 PM on 04/04/2010
Your original blog was more than enough! Bibi does NOT need to suckle at America's teat like you advocate! Shame on you!
12:44 PM on 04/03/2010
I agree with those, strange is it not, that the U.S. should get out of the internal debates in other countries, and especially should not support one side or another with monetary means. This is especially the case since most Americans do not know that the U.S. supports several parties they do not know about, through intermediaries, a.o. Hamas via Israel, and the PLO, via Israel. and many others. We have, int4rnationally, terrorizing outlaws, who make good use of that opportunity to make some real good money for themselves off international donations, U.S. donations included. Not much, if anything, of those donations appear to go to the socalled *victims*, such as Palestinians. Fact is there are no Palestinians, no matter what they identify with, or what they feel, because not one of them was born in a country named Palestine, has a Palestinian passport, or Palestinian rights, even if they assert they do. They may be stateless, or hold other citizenships/nationalities/passports. Those who are REFUGEES, i.e. Stateless persons, should be mainstreamed where they are, and allowed to become legal residents, then citizens. They should be allowed to work - some are not allowed to work, for example, in Jordan - earn a living, start a business, vote, travel, etc. After sixty some years they have earned that right, especially since mos ofthem were born in those countries, such as Lebanon, Jordan, and Syria.
12:35 PM on 04/03/2010
Exceeded the word limit! So, continued. The same bloggers and commentposters who take one position on Israelis vs Arabs, as, of necessity that should be the position to begin with, hold very different positions where they, themselves are concerned. A blogger like Mr. Zogby, for example, who is an American citizen of Arab heritage and clings to that heritage, would probably have a few objections - and rightfully so - if Americans would say to him, *go back to where you came from, leave all your possessions and improvements behind, and scatt, little rat!*. He would get it immediately. Not so, if Israelis are concerned. The Arab/Israeli issue can not be resolved, because Arabs do not want it resolved. They want Israelis out. Although there were only half of the members present during the last conference in Libya, all of them voted not to recognize Israel - AGAIN. That means that no negotiations are possible or rational. Add to that the fact that Abu Mazen will not sspppeakk and is not even reelected after his term was up some time ago, it is clear that any negotiations with or without outside effort and mediation, are nothing other than a wajang show, complete with gamelan music. The public sees shadows moving around, hears voices, but the real puppeteers are out of sight, and their reasoning is hidden.
12:23 PM on 04/03/2010
I, too, have wondered about the connection Israelis feel to the American President; not only this one, negatively, or positively. Israel is not one of the States of the U.S. That said, as a mother, a grandmother, an sometime teacher, when children misbehave I always put ALL of them in time-out; not just one and that one all the time. I also was an immigrant, and as such know the difficulties of settling in a new country, a new culture, and having problems with those who feel that you should go back to where you came from. For Israelis, those who have always lived there, those who were born there, those who are remigrants and even immigrant, what plays out for the usual immigrant has become an International Issue. The posters on Huffpost who are in favor of the Arabs stick to one line of thought, i.e. *go back to where you came from and leave all the improvements and all your possessions behind (Salzman), and they will not allow the *immigrant* any rights to his own possessions, not even after he has become a citizen. There is nothing to negotiate about, and he Arab is always right. Nothing is to be asked of them, or expected of them, apparently they can not measure up to adult responsibilities. Then there are those who favor just the opposite line of thought. What is strange is that the positions of the liberals and the rightwingers is reversed.
12:55 PM on 04/04/2010
Great stuff..and thanks for callingb out Saltzman..with friends like him..Israel needs no enemies!!
11:13 AM on 04/03/2010
The "special relationship" between Israel and the U.S. is probably unprecedented in all of world history. Never before has so much in the way of blood, treasure, strategic interest and diplomatic standing been sacrificed by such a powerful nation for so little in return. The "quid" is billions of dollars a year in direct financial aid along with unconditional military and diplomatic support; the "pro quo" is endless American wars of intervention, costing hundreds of thousands, if not millions of lives and trillions of dollars, the enmity of an overwhelmingly preponderant portion of the Islamic world, stretching all the way from the straits of Gibraltar to the Pacific Ocean; the suborning of the American congress, industrial, military and diplomatic espionage carried out with impunity by the "beneficiary", and the loss of American stature and prestige in the face of a candid world.
Washington must have been divinely inspired when, in his farewell address, he warned his nation and its posterity against "entangling alliances" and "passionate attachments." The time is long past to sever this special relationship and return to a sane foreign policy based on the national interest, true international law and the concert of sovereign nations.
07:04 PM on 04/03/2010
Great post Mulegino, this relationship is completely baffling to people outside the USA, and very dangerous for all of us.
photo
piul05
Can I have a biscuit yet?
07:56 PM on 04/03/2010
Indeed.

It never ceases to amaze me that Israel is almost always at the center of every discussion about US foreign policy and that they expect US representatives to throw caution, common-sense and their oaths into the hair and spend their entire political career doing her bidding.

I can't think of any country where this happens; you don't have Lebanese, Syrian or Japanese descendants demanding it from Brazilian representatives; you don't have Italian descendants demanding it from the Argentinian MPs; or British descendants demanding from their Australian or New Zealand ones; you don't have the North Africans demanding it from Rashida Dati in France; you don't have the Indians demanding it from Parmjit Dhanda in the UK; you don't havepeople from Dutch heritage demanding it from South African representatives... got my gist.

So, why is it that, in the US this is a make-or-break-a-career issue?
photo
califlefty
Fighting back against the lies
04:48 PM on 04/04/2010
Your comment is woefully short on facts. Israel’s most impressive period of nation building was during a period when Israel received little to no aid from the US. Israel managed to build its national institutions and integrate millions of citizens. It was only after 1973 that the US realized that Israel was an asset and began investing accordingly.

What does the US get in return? During the cold war the US was facing Communist hegemony on three fronts, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East and had to invest vast sums and fight wars to counter the Soviets on two of those fronts, but no American soldier was lost in the ME (other then through acts of Arab terrorism). It was Israel that paid the price for keeping the Soviets out, the Six Day war, the War of Attrition and the Yom Kippur War were all proxy wars.

Today US military aid to Israel is earmarked for spending IN THE US, supporting US industries and creating jobs for Americans and Israel’s foreign currency reserves are invested in US government bonds, in other words, at this time Israelis are financing America’s debts. Americans don't support Israel because of the strength of any lobby; rather because both countries have shared values. Israel has earned American support the hard way and is in fact America's best friend. People who still speak about US economic pressure on Israel are completely disconnected from reality.
photo
tallen
panem et circenses
10:59 AM on 04/03/2010
What is painfully obvious is that yet again, only Israel is asked/forced to make concessions, while the palestinians escape any requirements at all.

This is the same recipe for disaster that the Israeli unilateral withdrawal from Gaza was.

Time and time again, the Israelis make concessions, and the palestinians use their newfound position to wage attacks.

It's time for Obama to make some demands of the palestinians such as:

1) A public announcement of a change in the palestinian "charter" calling for the destruction of Israel combined with the palestinian parliament ratifying the changes.
2) A public announcement by the palestinians that they accept UN 181 and recognize Israel as a sovereign state.
3) An end to palestinian state media incitement to violence.
4) A radical and immediate change in palestinian school curriculum and texts that teach "martydom", hatred, and that there is no such country as Israel.

It is also time for Obama to apply equal pressure to all the surrounding arab states, particularly those still officially in a state of war with israel to end their war and establish diplomatic relations with Israel,

Until Israel sees at least a semblance of balance in Obama's approach, they will not be inclined to make the same unilateral concessions that have failed in the past.
10:56 AM on 04/03/2010
Would any Israel-basher please tell us what the Arabs are willing to give up for peace! Other than hollow rhetoric,that is! The Right of Return? Putting down their weapons? ALL of Jerusalem as their capital?? Ending insighting their population to hate Jews? Falsehoods in their schoolbooks? Voting by Hamas and the PLO , in public, to accept Israel's existence? A vote by the P.A. to do the same? So far they have agreed to NONE of these!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Talab
I tot i taw a putty tat
02:31 AM on 04/04/2010
Why does the victum of an invasion have to give up anything for "Peace" from its attacker Thats like asking a mugging victum to pay his mugger not to hit him again
12:46 PM on 04/04/2010
That's because,by charter, the P.A.,Hamas, and the PLO all seek Israel's destruction..and they want the Right of Return...which ends Israel as a Jewish entity! Your analogy is a failed one...like most of your posts!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:09 AM on 04/03/2010
It's hard to understand how Israel-bashing was read into this post. I see enlightenment and humour.

I also especially like the Mom references.

Good job.

And may Passover bring us all freedom and joy!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JustMeInNY
Live and Learn.
02:28 PM on 04/03/2010
Unfortunately I never see humor when a Jew expresses anti Jewish sentiments. It is always dishearteining and makes me think about how many of the modern day Jews forgot what the Jews went through.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Avraham Burg
02:40 PM on 04/03/2010
You certenly have a point. There is a saying: only a jew can be an antisemite... because he knows why...
10:24 AM on 04/04/2010
Typical Firster.

A Jew disagrees with Israel's policies and they are "anti-Jewish". Why didn't you say what you really wanted to?
09:02 AM on 04/03/2010
Amazing how the usual Israeli-bashers side with Burg, while the Israeli supporters are posing the truth about him!!! HP never would on its own!
12:55 PM on 04/03/2010
The Israel bashers are convinced they are right, Chaim. They fail to see that their position only applies to jews and Israelis, who, they feel *should go back to where they came from*. As an immigrant I have heard the same views here in the U.S. from those who are not favorably inclined towards immigrants, especially not of certain ethnicities. And even if they are immigrants themselves, say in the U.S., they are of opinion that their situation is totally different. Same thing applies to the hordes of Arabs in Europe. Unfortunately for them, many Europeans, always open societies, welcoming newcomers, are starting to see matters differently, exactly because of their belligerence, and ultra Rightwingers, like Geert Wilders, who I, for example, earlier would not have given the time of day, find now more adherents. If Arabs hold on to their positions vs others, including Israelis, hey should be prepared to go back to where they came from also, i.e. the ME. Equal monks, equal outfits.