iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Azadeh Shahshahani
 
GET UPDATES FROM Daniel Altschuler
 

Let Children Learn -- In Alabama and Beyond

Posted: 11/09/2011 2:40 pm

True or false: No child in this country can be denied a public education. The answer is true, thanks to the Supreme Court's 1982 Plyler v. Doe decision, which held that schools could not exclude children based on their immigration status. This is settled law, but not for Alabama legislators, who passed an anti-immigrant law (HB 56) with a provision requiring elementary and secondary schools to determine students' and parents' citizenship status.

With a federal district court refusing to enjoin this provision, families with an undocumented family member are already keeping their children, including U.S. citizens, out of school. And, though an appellate court last month temporarily blocked the K-12 reporting requirement, the right to primary education access for all in our country remains in jeopardy.

This summer, civil and immigrant rights groups, religious institutions and the Department of Justice challenged HB 56 in federal court. Alabama's law contains many troubling provisions contained in anti-immigrant laws in other states, such as Arizona and Georgia, which were blocked by federal courts. But it goes much further, including the requirement in Section 28 that K-12 school officials determine their students' and parents' immigration status. Although the district court blocked certain sections of the law, it allowed this piece to stand.

As with Georgia's HB 87, proponents of HB 56 claim they are removing the drain on state resources. But, in truth, officials like Governor Robert Bentley are scapegoating immigrants for political gain at a time of economic insecurity. They have confessed their desire to expel undocumented immigrants from the state. HB 56 sponsor Micky Hammon asserted, "This [bill] attacks every aspect of an illegal immigrant's life... [T]his bill is designed to make it difficult for them to live here so they will deport themselves."

The law is so extreme that Wade Henderson, President and CEO of the Leadership Council on Civil and Human Rights, concluded that Alabama's "draconian initiative is so oppressive that Bull Connor himself would be impressed." Birmingham's former sheriff, you may recall, once used attack dogs and fire-hoses on African-American children.

Even those skeptical of immigration's well-documented economic benefits should be appalled by Alabama officials' willingness to target children. In addition to violating the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection clause, Section 28 is morally repugnant. It uses state power to keep immigrant children, who bear no responsibility for their status, out of school. Moreover, while so many Alabama public schools are failing, the law unconscionably redirects scarce education resources towards immigration policing.

Finally, as the Court held in Plyler, "It is difficult to understand precisely what the State hopes to achieve by promoting the creation and perpetuation of a subclass of illiterates within our boundaries, surely adding to the problems and costs of unemployment, welfare, and crime."

Sadly, HB 56 may reflect a larger national trend. In May, the Department of Justice issued a memo reaffirming the illegality of asking students about their immigration status. This followed illegal reporting requirements and efforts in other states to pass education provisions similar to HB 56. Recent reports by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) for instance, found that roughly 20 percent of New York and New Jersey public school districts requested information from students that would indicate their immigration status. Similar practices abound in Arizona, where fully half of school districts surveyed by the ACLU sought such information.

The Department of Justice was right to issue its memo, and to seek data from Alabama school districts in the wake of HB 56's passage to investigate potential violations of civil rights statutes which protect educational opportunities for schoolchildren. It must be even more vigilant about illegal school reporting policies across the country, which may rise as restrictionist officials seek to copy HB 56.

It is encouraging that the appellate court temporarily blocked the education provision of HB 56. But beating Section 28 in court, while essential, will not by itself ensure that all American children can go to school without fear. Legislators and education officials around the country must take heed: our classrooms are no place for the refrain, "Papers, please."

Daniel Altschuler has written extensively on immigration politics and holds a doctorate in Politics from the University of Oxford, where he studied as a Rhodes Scholar. Azadeh Shahshahani is National Security/Immigrants' Rights Project Director with the American Civil Liberties Union of Georgia.

A version of this article first appeared in the Fulton County Daily Report. Reprinted with permission from the October 28, 2011 issue of the Daily Report © 2011 ALM Media Properties, LLC. Further duplication without permission is prohibited. All rights reserved.

 
FOLLOW EDUCATION
 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:41 AM on 11/15/2011
"Let Children Learn -- In Alabama and Beyond"

Sure! Not a problem. So long as ALL of the money that is needed to educate these ILLEGAL ALIENS comes out of your pocket, so the American taxpayers can actually see their tax dollars put back to work for THEM.

As long as you can pull this off, I doubt you'd run into much resistance. But as long as the ILLEGAL ALIENS are sucking off of the American Taxpayers, you have no place whatsoever to make such a foolish statement.
photo
azlegalcitizen
INDEPENDENT
04:30 PM on 11/13/2011
Some folks, ( American libs) can't see sunsami coming as they stand on the shore, awaiting the flood of destruction. Those same people don't acknowledge the coming tsunami of anti-illegal legislation and punishments for the millions of unwanted illegals in our land.
10:27 AM on 11/13/2011
"The law is so extreme that Wade Henderson, President and CEO of the Leadership Council on Civil and Human Rights, concluded that Alabama's "draconian initiative is so oppressive..." - Wade's opinion is worth exactly squat.
photo
free speech isnt free
A bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy
12:15 PM on 11/12/2011
Every time the economy worsens, people WANT to find an easy answer to their problems.
This country has a long history of blaming minorities when it is convenient.
Blacks, Italians, Irish, Muslims, latino’s. This time the difference is one political party and a full time “news” channel exploits this fear.
“People are out of work. Blame yourself”—candidate Herman Cain
“Self reliance means, if anyone will not work, neither should he eat.” Michelle Bachmann
"The American people believe English should be the official language of the government....We should replace bilingual education with immersion in English so people learn the common language of the country and they learn the language of prosperity, not the language of living in a ghetto." Newt Gingrich
"I have two grandchildren – Maggie is 11, Robert is 9. I am convinced that if we do not decisively win the struggle over the nature of America, by the time they're my age they will be in a secular atheist country, potentially one dominated by radical Islamists and with no understanding of what it once meant to be an American." –GOP presidential candidate Newt Gingrich in March 2011
photo
azlegalcitizen
INDEPENDENT
04:35 PM on 11/13/2011
The tag name minorities is incorrect, they are illegal alien's kids or illegals themselves. Simple honesty is certainly lacking on this site. Guess the libs will never learn the difference between illegal and legal citizens.
photo
free speech isnt free
A bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy
06:50 PM on 11/14/2011
Fact:
This country has a history of discrimination against minorities.
The laws adopted by Alabama affect all minorities in Alabama schools a FACT you don't want to admit Mr. Duplicity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlairCase
12:01 PM on 11/12/2011
Federal courts have put on hold a portion of Alabama's law that requires schools to report the number, but not the names, of students whose immigration status is in question. However, the U.S. Justice Department has asked Alabama schools to submit a list of students that include the students' names, national origin and English Language Learner status. Undocumented immigrants know they will receive a visit from truant officers if their children do not show up for school. Some Alabama school districts are reporting increases rather than decreases in Hispanic enrollment.
06:03 PM on 11/11/2011
FACT CHECK
Alabama has not passed ANY anti immigration laws. It has, with the full support of the residents of that state enacted anti ILLEGAL immigration laws.

HB 56 has NO provision for denying access to public education for the children of illegal immigrants. It simply asks them to verify their legal status when registering their children. It is not a constitutional violation of civil rights to ask anyone if they are in fact breaking the law? Parents are already required to furnish proof of age, residency and immunization at registration. This is the exact same thing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vivicca Whitsett
Actor, Comedian, Host, Activist
04:53 PM on 11/11/2011
Lets be clear - it's an anti-ILLEGAL immigration law. If you are in this country illegally, you and your children are not eligible for a free education. Do not pass go -- go straight to deportation. smh
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hrpmap
Retired man still active..
03:19 PM on 11/11/2011
Anti immigrant law?? Excuse me! Anti Illegal Alien law!!!!
photo
iuriggs6
Sure thing. Shoot, Timmy.
10:07 AM on 11/11/2011
I am still amazed that so called "journalists" still skew the facts. They write "This is settled law, but not for Alabama legislators, who passed an anti-immigrant law (HB 56)" .

It is not an anti-immigrant law, as these two would like for you to think. It is an anti-illegal immigrant law. Big difference. Sadly though, I am not surprised.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Viper1st
multi quasi faceted
09:39 AM on 11/11/2011
Diminished States income revenues have caused 46 of 50 States to slash Education Funding to School Districts in which to balance their 2011-12 States' Budgets

10% of the Nations Teachers have been laid-off, programs cut & users fees have occurred.

The U.S. Economy can no longer sustain the FREE K-12 Education to 850,000+ illegal children of the 11.2 million illegals in the USA ~ Annually, at a cost to the U.S. Taxpayer of over $8 billion, Annually

1982 SCOTUS mandated K-12 Education, via Plyler v. Doe, need to be revisited. U.S. Citizen Students and the entire U.S. Education is in pearl

"Guest Commentary: Public education and illegal immigrants"

http://www.denverpost.com/ci_17595084
10:30 AM on 11/10/2011
This law does not prevent anyone from getting an education. It requires certain information be provided, just like any legal resident is required to provide certain information for enrollment. Nothing prevents these children from getting an education besides the parents refusing to provide that information. Furthemore the Alabama bill is not anti-immigration, it is anti-illegal. And the federal government cannot force a state to do business with illegals.
photo
spytheweb
Black Democrat
11:55 PM on 11/10/2011
Some college students are taking a school/state to court in Florida so they can pay in state tuition. But to get in state tuition certain documents have to be provided by their parents such as tax returns and etc. Because their parents are illegal they can not provide these documents. They think because they were born here of illegal parents that somehow washes their parents sins away. As US citizens they think they can do what ever they want. Now the parents become the anchor to drag them down. The gift that keeps on giving.
10:11 PM on 11/09/2011
For many years in this country slavery was established law but through conflict and resolution we as a nation were able to change that law. Many are beginning to feel that the 14th Amendment (birthright citizenship extended to the offspring of undocumented aliens) and by extension the results from Plyler vs. Doe ought to be revisited and corrected. Any nation that fails to protect itself will find itself of the ash heap of history sooner than later.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nasknit
Freedom isn't free.
09:06 PM on 11/09/2011
Maybe you folks are unaware, but most school districts require copies of birth certificates & other documentation, that shows the student Lives in the District! They do this to American Students, too! People have been known to falsify information, in order to get their children into Successful school districts. As for my viewpoint, I say E-verify EVERY Job! E-verify before one cent of US Entitlement money is paid out! Self-deportation will save OUR country untold Billions of dollars. Why does every country in the world have the right to secure their borders, except the USA?
10:31 AM on 11/10/2011
I 100% agree with you. E-verify everytax dollar provided in benefits. They should let people like us write the law. Remove the language referring to illegals. Make is a state resource security bill requiring you be a state and US resident verifiable by E-verify to receive benefits. Just do not reference immigration and it is not an immigration bill and the DOJ will have a hard time stating it has any authority over the state law protecting its resources.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vivicca Whitsett
Actor, Comedian, Host, Activist
04:56 PM on 11/11/2011
F&F