In September of 2013, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Montana) and Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp (R-Michigan) issued a joint statement calling for comprehensive reform of the U.S. tax code which they described as "broken." It is not broken. In fact, it is perhaps the most effective legislation ever passed by Congress.
Baucus and Camp's bipartisan mischaracterization stems from either not acknowledging or not understanding what tax law in our country is designed to do: perpetuate the magnification of wealth for those who already have it at the expense of those who will never get it. We absolutely do need to reform the U.S. tax code -- not because it is broken, but because it works.
The term "tax loophole" is another mischaracterization. It implies that taxes are fair, or meant to be fair, but that inadvertent inefficiencies exist which can be exploited by the wealthy to their own advantage. This language should stop. Tax law is structurally unfair, not as an unintended consequence, but by design, and is intentionally complex in order to mask its inherent structural inequality.
The U.S. tax code is sickening. Not metaphorically, but literally. According to the World Health Organization, and acknowledged by the Centers for Disease Control, "social determinants of health are mostly responsible for health inequities -- the unfair and avoidable differences in health status seen within and between countries." The fundamental social determinant of health in society is the economic gap between the rich and the poor. Countries that are more egalitarian have better health, while countries with wide income gaps between rich and poor have worse health. This is why, even though the United States is the wealthiest nation on earth, and spends more per capita on health care than any other country, the U.S. suffers the worst health of all wealthy developed nations. The health gap between the U.S. and other wealthy nations is so large that even if the U.S. completely cured heart disease or cancer, we still wouldn't be at the top of the list for health.
It makes sense, then, that the most effective means for establishing and maintaining health in the U.S. would be economic intervention, not medical intervention. Although medicine is often necessary once ill health has set in, it is more effective and efficient to keep people healthy in the first place.
I started Bradco Supply Company in a single warehouse in New Jersey in 1966, and built the company up to over 130 branches in 30 states, with sales peaking at $1.9 billion. I was inspired after attending a Clinton Global Initiative meeting to start Segal Family Foundation, an organization dedicated to improving the well-being of communities in Sub-Saharan Africa. A few years later, I started a second foundation, Focus for Health, which strives to ensure that all individuals have the information they need to make the best decisions about their health. I've been successful both in my business career and in my philanthropic endeavors, and I have a unique perspective when it comes to tax reform.
People talk about changing the tax code, but I don't think they've come up with any meaningful suggestions so far.
I agree with Warren Buffet -- the wealthy don't pay enough in taxes. I know from my situation that there are too many gimmicks that allow for someone like me to pay far less than the average working individual. I have two charitable foundations, and I think any income they generate should be taxed in the 5-10% area. Plus we should have to give away 10% of our equity.
What follows are a few of my economic prescriptions for reforming tax code that could get us some of the way back toward a more equitable and healthy society.
I feel strongly that you have to phase in changes and give advanced notice on them, but tax code changes must be instituted. Here are a few of my ideas:
- 1031 Exchange: This allows wealthy people to get out of paying capital gains tax on properties if they "exchange" their real estate for something similar. Some say this code creates jobs, but it seems to me that this only helps the rich get richer. My fix: give six months' notice, then completely stop this practice.
Long-term Capital Gains: It's too easy for the wealthy to benefit from this tax law. The really rich make most of their money through investments, and because they can afford to hold on for a year, they enjoy a much lower tax rate than they should. My fix: Long-term capital gains taxes should start at two years. While they're at it... they might want to start offering corporations a capital gains tax of 25% to 30%. This has the potential to generate needed funds. Depreciation and Accelerated Depreciation: The depreciation tax shield is another way to minimize taxable income. Because assets lose value over time, they can be written off as expenses (depreciation). If you want, you can legally say that these assets lose more value in the early years, allowing you to pay even less up front (accelerated depreciation). My fix: The depreciation rate is way too generous. It should be scaled back. Accelerated depreciation should be stopped completely. GRATS and the Gift Tax: These only help very wealthy people keep their money in the family. By shuffling money around, the very wealthy use the GRAT shelter to legally bypass paying estate and gift taxes. The gift tax itself is too light. Right now, a married couple can literally gift $28,000 a year to as many people as they want... without any taxes being paid at all. My fix: Phase down GRATS and then eliminate. Untaxed yearly gifts per couple should be limited to $100,000 total. It would be nice to phase down the current 5 million lifetime limit to 4 million. Grantor trusts should just stop. Social Security: I've been fighting the Social Security mess for a while now. I wrote to them in 2011 that I didn't need it, but they still won't stop sending me money. In this country, most people have the impression that the money they pay into social security belongs to them. In other countries, the general feeling is that it is the public's duty to take care of the needy. The American attitude towards poverty needs to change, but obviously that is very hard to do. Right now, Social Security tax is only paid up to an annual income of $118,500. Every dollar earned above that amount is not taxed. Why should people making over that amount be given a break? My fix: They should start at $150,000 at a reduced rate, and continue forever. And there should be a means test. People with income over $500,000 a year shouldn't be taking money from Social Security or Medicare. For those who want to, there should be an option to divert the money to charity. Give them four options to choose from -- veterans, poverty, etc. Too much of this money is going to people who don't want or need it.
I know these suggestions are not going to quickly balance the budget, but they're a start.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.