More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
B.D. Gallof

B.D. Gallof

Posted: February 22, 2010 09:56 AM

US Hockey Win Was No Miracle, Just Hard Work and Clutch Goaltending

What's Your Reaction:

2010-02-22-usawins5.jpg


Some who do not have much hockey acumen, like some of the MSNBC announcers...where last night's game was buried as NBC went with pairs figure skating coveting the female audience over responsible sports coverage...will paint the US win over Canada as some David versus Goliath miracle win from some sort of mismatch.

Nothing would be further from the truth, as Brian Burke, the Team USA General Manager, gathered character players and youth to round out the US team to create something solid with an expressed purpose: to compete and perhaps beat talent laden teams.

So last night, hockey fans and one would gather, mostly men, watched Canada's best versus a team made to beat Canada.

This was no Miracle on Ice. This was far reaching planning and the results of this stretched ice canvas showed on the faces of fans who watched a barn burner on cable television which will reverberate through the next few days as Canada and their team convalesces and the US gets a bye into the Quarterfinals.

Brian Burke, who is mourning the loss of his youngest son a few weeks ago in a weather-related traffic accident, looks like a genius whose plan to grab clutch game difference-makers and mix them with some youth of hungry up-and-comers have suddenly stolen the limelight from Canada; the ordained country who has produced the most prolific players of the sport.

"Playing the tournament favorite in front of a rabid crowd: It's going to be a good test for our group", Burke told Craig Custance of the SportingNews and other reporters. "We've got some size, too. We've just got to try and get some line matchups the way we want them. We purposely brought some beef for that reason."

The US upended Canada in a close match that broke when one goalie could not keep up with the excellence of the other. Buffalo Sabres NHL and US 1st stringer Ryan Miller played like a god, as future NHL hall of famer NJ Devil's Martin Brodeur played as a mere man.

Fallible and burned, Brodeur seemed unable to stave off the kids as the Canadian defense collapsed under some savvy play by the skilled US forwards that were also mixed with those who had size.

This disparity was further exemplified as Brodeur made a grave miscalculation trying to chase a puck with US forwards blanketing him. Chris Drury, who is known for his clutch play in the past, ripped one through, separating the two teams and making Canadian fans suddenly realize that they were in dire straits.

Meanwhile, when the US defense collapsed under the weight of the tremendously talented Canadian forwards, Ryan Miller somehow kept the puck from going in.

Hockey fans will walk away from seeing Brodeur's off-kilter work as the difference, rather than Miller's stellar performance. Or they will not give the clutch work of Chris Drury, Jamie Langenbrunner or Ryan Kesler their due.

Fact is, this type of match-up could have swung either way, and it was the US who stood tall as Canada's invulnerability crumbled.

Hunger beat the lauded. Purpose beat what was merely on paper...the best.

Brian Burke's plan paid dividends, and it is the US who stands undefeated, while Canada heads down the pike to a potential showdown with Russia that will remove the loser from medal contention.

The US and Sweden, who is the reigning gold medalist in the last winter Olympics, sit pretty as they now await who will emerge from the rest of the pack in the quarterfinals. Russia, the Czech Republic, Canada and others will all fight it out to keep their medal hopes alive.

You can read more from BD and Olympic hockey coverage on HockeyIndependent.com.

For anyone looking for more Team USA hockey information, anyone who registers on Teamusa.org will have access to the latest info and will receive exclusive updates throughout the games.

2010-02-22-usawins6.jpg


 

Follow B.D. Gallof on Twitter: www.twitter.com/bdgallof

 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Garner
01:11 PM on 02/23/2010
The biggest issue for the Canadians seems to be chemistry. Yes Miller stood on his head, but give the US Team credit, they took advantage of sloppy defensive play by the canadians. I cant recall ever seeing 3 guys on the same team running into each other. That tells me they're not sure of what there doing.(You should never have 3 players for the same team occupying the same space, its poor hockey)! Sometimes an all star team has no chemistry, and they've struggled. You can't blame it all on goaltending. Sidney Crosby didn't do much.
01:05 PM on 02/23/2010
Brodeur's ridiculous hot dogging attempt to baseball bat the puck out of his end on the second US goal was unforgiveable at this level of play. He should have been pulled then, before his completely unnecessary sprawl for the puck that missed on the third US goal. Uh, Marty...that guy wearing the same uniform you were standing within easy reach of the puck was Chris Pronger. Former Hart trophy winner Chris Pronger. He can handle the puck better than you can if you just give him a chance.

The silver lining for Canada is that barring injury there is no way Brodeur gets another start and it is a good thing we find out now that Brodeur doesn't have what it takes any more rather than in the medal round. A great effort by the US team, but without Brodeur's two gift goals and the empty netter (a great effort by Kesler, but without Brodeur's earlier brain farts the net would not have been empty) they would have lost that game.
photo
FirstGame72
The Sleep of Reason Produces Monsters
08:02 AM on 02/23/2010
The reuslt of this game was far from a miracle or even completely unexpected. It was the equivalent of the worst NHL team beating the best team on the road. It happens a fair amount of the time and no hockey fan is shocked. Marty Brodeur has been playing poorly for weeks and should never have gotten the start in goal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
opprobrious
More speech. Less Flagging.
03:50 AM on 02/23/2010
The US gets full value for the win but I wouldn't recommend having Miller face 45 shots every game and expect the same results. The US faced a Canadian team who hadn't played all that well against the Swiss and didn't move their legs for 60 minutes against the US, especially in their own end. They need to move the puck around faster and shoot at the net even more. The US needs to continue what they're doing BUT they also need to press their opponents more. I DO like their forecheck but I'd like to see more shots on net.

Burke is a very good manager, no doubt, and he DOES know how to put the appropriate team together as he has proved on more than one occassion in the NHL. Both Russia and Canada look mortal and any one of six teams have a realistic shot at gold. This should be quite entertaining.
11:13 PM on 02/22/2010
Good article. The U.S. defeated Ontario in the under 18 World juniors, and defeated Canada again in the World Juniors in Saskatoon, both earlier this year. Both wins were the Championship match of the respective tournament! It is no surprise that the United States can compete with any country at any level in the game of hockey. 1980 was a long time ago.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Frank Smith
11:08 PM on 02/22/2010
Three pucks that had eyes off Rafalski's stick didn't hurt either.

And what's with the talk of the young USA team? Rafalski . . . Drury . . . Langenbrunner? Their average age is like 102. It looked like a really good mix out there to me and they're making plays at the net, something the Canadians (Czechs too) haven't done consistently this tournament.
12:04 PM on 02/22/2010
A few observations:

1. Timing. Whenever D was cycling the puck, D hesitated before passing to the other D -- don't do this because there is much less time than you think. Time compression (thinking time is moving slower than usual) can set in on anyone, and you just need to remind a player that there's not as much time as they think there is.

2. Defense. What is the deal with getting caught with 2 D behind the net? (for that matter, what's up with the "bumblebee" hockey when there was a cluster of US players within 10 feet of each other?). Also, what is going on with no D watching the back door? You guys tend to violate the number one rule: never let a player go between you and the goalie. Too many times you guys let players way too close to your goalie and put yourself at huge risk if their forwards get a pass from the corners. Another pattern observed for D was the problem with being so physical and trapping and pinning their forwards against the boards, and losing sight of puck control. Recall, you can do both - so trap and then focus on the puck. It doesn't do anyone any good if you pin a guy against the boards and the puck just sits there -- everyone on the team is supposed to be like a "schnauzer on brisket" on the puck.