More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Beau Dure

Beau Dure

Posted: May 20, 2010 05:25 PM

Why College Soccer Still Produces Pro Talent

What's Your Reaction:

College soccer is to American soccer what newspapers are to today's media. Fewer people are paying attention to it, top talent is being drained, and critics are lined up to shovel on the dirt.

Half of the 30 players in camp vying for 23 slots on the USA's World Cup roster, as shown in this compelling study of class and ethnicity at the blog Pitch Invasion, went to college but left early. Nine players -- including cornerstone players Landon Donovan, Tim Howard, Jozy Altidore and Michael Bradley -- didn't go at all.

And yet the college game persists, catering both to late bloomers and prospects who placed an emphasis on education. A handful of schools have produced a steady stream of MLS players. UCLA has 19 former players currently in MLS, Maryland 13, Wake Forest 12, Indiana 12 and North Carolina 11, according to Rick Lawes, the league's ace stat man.

Colorado's Wells Thompson, one of those Wake Forest alums on MLS rosters, describes an idyllic environment -- the main season in the fall, games in spring, playing with different teammates in the PDL summer league, then coming back to campus to play pickup games and take a class or two before the fall. Those extra classes help players graduate in December of their senior years so they can be ready for the MLS preseason in February.

"We'll be prepared to go to the league," Thompson says.

The backlash against college soccer stems from a couple of fundamental problems with the game as the NCAA defines it. Scholarships are among the toughest to get in any sport, with only 9.9 available for each Division I men's team. Women's teams are allowed 14 scholarships, giving a bit of ammunition to would-be Title IX reformers.

The scholarship numbers also limit the player pool. Partial scholarships may not be enough of an incentive for needy kids to go to college. Instead, the pool of players is more likely to live up to the clumsy stereotypes of American soccer as a game for wealthy suburbanites.

The NCAA also has loose substitution rules, a departure from the standard rules of allowing only a few substitutions through the game. A talented player can find waves of tough guys taking turns hacking at his ankles. Some of them find it difficult to lose these habits upon making the pro ranks, giving MLS a sad reputation as a "physical" league rather than a skillful one.

But as long as MLS remains "physical," a tag reinforced by some coaches' tendency to recruit foreign players who can match the Americans foul-for-foul, the college game is good preparation.

"I didn't come from a very physical style of soccer," Colorado forward and Harvard grad Andre Akpan says. "That was something I got used to in college soccer."

Akpan is part of a disappearing group of players who excel in international youth play -- in his case, a stellar run with the U.S. Under-20 team in 2007 -- and spend four years in college. Many of those players are tempted by -- if not pushed toward -- the pro ranks of MLS or Europe.

"I think everybody kind of knew that I wanted to stick it through," Akpan says. "There's always going to be people that talk and say what is he doing wasting his time there, but that's their decision."

More typical than Akpan are players that floated under the radar in their youth careers and developed into elite players in their college years. Clyde Simms, now the cornerstone of D.C. United's midfield, wasn't even thinking of post-college career until his coach at East Carolina pushed him toward a tryout with the Richmond Kickers, then playing in U.S. soccer's second professional tier.

Simms' talent wasn't truly discovered until an accident of labor negotiations. On the eve of a World Cup qualifier in 2005, the U.S. national team was at an impasse with the U.S. Soccer Federation. Not willing to forfeit a game and risk all sorts of Armageddon, U.S. Soccer called in a replacement team. When the labor dispute was resolved and the regular players came back into camp, Simms was asked to stick around. He signed with D.C. United shortly thereafter.

"I don't know if I would've been here if it wasn't for that strike," Simms says.

He says the regular players never begrudged his decision to come into camp as a replacement.

"The guys were great," Simms says. "All you need is that opportunity, and they understood that."

U.S. soccer pundits often wonder if there's a Lionel Messi lurking somewhere on an American street. That's a worthwhile search. But more likely is that there's another Clyde Simms or Wells Thompson lurking in high school, waiting for that opportunity.

 
 
 

Follow Beau Dure on Twitter: www.twitter.com/duresport

 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
Kalie
Left of Center
12:39 PM on 06/03/2010
Playing at the teen club level, my son, who is not a wealthy suburbanite, but a suburbanite who is using up his college money to play at the highest club level, there are some teams with skill. However, when some of these teams start losing, the players try to "take out" the guys beating them. At a game the other night, I heard parents saying "take em out" and it makes me very sad because they should know better. People are violent these days. The unfortunate truth is that if you teach your children that violence is okay, it will come back to bite you eventually. It is difficult to reign in a runaway train.

Also, in the English system, I dont think they pay much attention to HS grades and dont attend college at all if they are good footballers. In the US, we have to worry about both. We have to excel at our studies and at soccer. In our HS, you cant be on the team if you are not passing 5 classes consistently.

Sure you can try out for an academy. And they will chew you up and spit you out the minute they find a better recruit or if you arent playing well. Its extremely political. Why give up your studies for that?
10:35 PM on 05/23/2010
College soccer has long been known for its long ball, thuggish style of play with little creativity and flourish. The problem with it is not the players but the coaches who are coaching to the lowest denominator of physical play with little attention to individual talent or development. College soccer is part of rugby, part soccer. Yet it remains the ideal for all youth soccer players to aspire to and that is its real failing. Until the game in the U.S. can recognize and develop a player with individual talent, one who wants to go at another player with the ball, one who can be tough but subtle in their game, it will not change. And it won't because despite all the leagues, all the coaching, the players themselves simply do not play enough on their own, in the sandlots, on the streets, and in their own backyards to produce a player, a kid the caliber of a Lionel Messi.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:44 PM on 05/21/2010
With its faults, the one reason I hope college soccer flourishes, with changes to the insane substitution rules, is that it keeps players playing at a relatively high competitive level past high school. Lots of athletes develop later than others and don't get noticed until well after highschool. Look at NBA players from smaller schools that weren't judged good enough for a D1 power. If college soccer develops, it can become an important asset for US soccer. It will be a place where players can keep developing after high school if they are not immediately tabbed as having star ability.
10:26 PM on 05/20/2010
The problem in not the talent, it's the coaching. The majority of US College coaches are not experienced in a global soccer sense. Except for the younger ones, they still follow the old English/Scottish notion of soccer which even the English and Scottish don't use anymore. To prepare players for the world game, they need worldly coaches. As for youth talent in the US, we also need to distinguish between player/athletes and soccer players. If you really want to create top-level pro soccer players, they need to be trained as such. I'm a tenured university prof and retired professional referee. Assuming that granting a player a scholarship to play soccer so that they can be prepared for a pro career in naive. Let those who really want to study play intramural soccer; for those who really want to become pro footballers, give them proper training through national federations or pro teams...
03:26 AM on 05/23/2010
jpse is right but doesn't go far enough. Almost all soccer coaches in the States haven't a clue as to how to properly develop young players let alone college-aged ones. Learning quality coaching skills is a sophisticated endeavor. Instead, here it's all about winning at all costs and at all ages. Why? So coaches can make a case for larger salaries or attract more donors' contributions to the club or school. It's also so the commercialization of youth sports can continue to grow unabated at the expense of young players' development. What a shame. We're a country of 300+ million and should be well on our way to producing a goodly number of world-class players. If we had college coaches who knew what they were doing then perhaps some would emerge from the schools. Rebuild the youth development coaching system in the States from the youngest ages on up. Then we'll see solid results in both the colleges and the academies in the next generation or two of players.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
cplKlyde
05:42 PM on 05/20/2010
You want to see how physical the MLS is find a tape of Saturday's Crew/Chivas game.
How physical was it?
It was so physical I thought a hockey game was going to break. out.

(by physical I mean dirty)