More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Ben Mankiewicz

Ben Mankiewicz

Posted: January 1, 2010 03:49 PM

Forget 16-0 -- The Colts Need to be Punished for Unsportsmanlike Conduct

What's Your Reaction:

The good people of Indianapolis appear disconsolate - crestfallen even - over Jim Caldwell and Bill Polian's decision to remove all the team's players who are good at football and replace them with players who are good at knitting. Of course, most of us don't live in Indianapolis.

Thank God.

It's fun to knock places like Indianapolis, where I've never actually been. It's like my dad used to say: If you can't criticize from a place of profound ignorance, why criticize at all?

Despite not caring even a little whether the Colts go 16-0, 15-1 or 4-12 with Mike Pagel under center, the decision to pull Peyton Manning and the rest of those starters was outrageous, unsportsmanlike and dangerous (not traveling to Yemen dangerous, but dangerous for the NFL).

The Colts pulled their starters against the New York Jets, who in week 16 were one of 73 AFC teams competing for two wild card spots. By conceding the game to the Jets - and make no mistake, playing Curtis Painter and friends against a top flight NFL defense is a concession - the Colts gave the Jets the game and a huge advantage in the wild card race. After the game, one the Jets likely would have lost had the Colts played it honorably, the Jets suddenly and shockingly controlled their own situation. Now, to reach the playoffs, all the Jets must do is beat the Cincinnati Bengals Sunday in a game where - unbelievably - the Bengals may also pull their starters to rest for the playoffs. (By the way, on a side note, any sentence including the words "Bengals" and "playoffs" will always make me laugh).

Among the other AFC wild card hopefuls competing with the Jets for the playoffs, the Colts earlier in the season beat Houston twice, Jacksonville twice, Miami once, Baltimore once and Denver once. It is completely unfair to those teams (and to Pittsburgh) for the Colts to lie down and quit. Whether the Colts go 16-0 or not is fodder for sports talk radio. But the integrity of competition is a serious issue for the NFL.

These teams - all 31 (32 if you count the Redskins as a team) - have an obligation, an understood contract, to play these games straight up when the playoffs are at stake. If the San Diego Chargers, locked in as the AFC's #2 seed, want to rest their starters and roll over for the Washington Redskins, a once proud franchise now soaked in owner Dan Snyder's rare combination of arrogance and ignorance, that's not a problem. But when the opponent is a playoff hopeful like the Jets, playing to win is vital to the sense of athletic fairness that all legitimate leagues need to protect.

The NFL and other leagues correctly treat gambling on games by its players as the greatest sin in sports. They do this because once fans start to doubt the honesty of the action on the field, we could leave for good. If you doubt me, spend one night at a Harness racing track, watch the lead jockey glance over his shoulder, see he's too far ahead and pull back on the reins. You'll never go back. The fix is in. It's like pro wrestling. Or playing on-line blackjack.

But as of now, the NFL is sitting idly by as the league plays its most meaningful games of the season in late December and early January while some of its best teams refuse even to try. The Colts were the lone offender last week, but expect the Bengals to join them this week, which if it happens, would make the Jets a wildly undeserving playoff team.

So how about this? The NFL steps in and appoints a panel comprised of a former coach, a former general manager and two former players. If they determine any team involved in a game against a team vying for the playoffs deliberately gives up (and again, playing Curtis Painter and backs-ups along the offensive and defensive lines is giving up), then penalize the offending team with a the loss of a first round draft choice.

And don't let the decision-makers in Indianapolis and Cincinnati off the hook by claiming they were resting players with injuries. It's week 16 and 17 - everybody is injured. Give my panel real teeth and if three out of four agree, Bam! Strip away a #1 pick.

If this forces stars like Peyton Manning to play and he gets hurt, so be it. It's actually a small price to pay to maintain the integrity of the game and the playoffs.

It's possible fans in Indy wouldn't swallow a Manning injury so easily, but who cares? It's just Indianapolis.

 
The good people of Indianapolis appear disconsolate - crestfallen even - over Jim Caldwell and Bill Polian's decision to remove all the team's players who are good at football and replace them with pl...
The good people of Indianapolis appear disconsolate - crestfallen even - over Jim Caldwell and Bill Polian's decision to remove all the team's players who are good at football and replace them with pl...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 92
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:13 AM on 01/05/2010
In the end, it doesn't make much difference to me, though I'd feel a little burnt if I traveled considerable distance and paid scalper's prices for tickets to see my favorite players perform. For the defenders of this tactic, it kind of blows a big hole in that, "one game at a time," and "not looking beyond this week's game," garbage that coaches and players throw at us on a weekly basis.
09:28 AM on 01/05/2010
Utter nonsense.

The GOAL of an NFL season is to WIN THE SUPER BOWL.

It is NOT to win every single game - if putting ones best players at risk in the final weeks (when one is assured of the playoffs) significantly lowers ones chances of attaining that end.

ANYTHING that is done to increase ones chances of winning the SUPER BOWL is completely sportsmanlike - and rational.

Just as occasionally intentionally walking a great batter is perfectly legal, sportsmanlike, and rational.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:19 AM on 01/05/2010
The goal of an NFL team may be to win the Super Bowl, but the goal of any legitimate competitor is to win each and every competition. What does that say about the legitimacy of the NFL?

By the way, the goal in intentionally walking a batter is to win that game, not to set yourself up to win some World Series fantasy that may or may not ever come about.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paulied
04:10 PM on 01/04/2010
It is perfectly reasonable to rest your starters - not to mention not risking injury - when your #1 seed in the playoffs is assured. The Saints did the same thing. Imagine if Peyton Manning or Drew Brees were injured right before the playoffs.
01:21 PM on 01/04/2010
Given their decision, I truly hope the Colts get eliminated in their first game of the playoffs, just so it tastes all the more bitter that they gave up while they were ahead.

This isn't like the NHL, where there are dozens upon dozens of games. If some multi-multi-million dollar earning player or coach doesn't have the stones to put in 16 days of real work, then they don't deserve the chance to go the extra mile when it presents itself.
11:58 AM on 01/04/2010
Hindsight being generally better, and after the Patriots lost Welker to a knee injury at Houston, I and many others can see why they Colts (and Saints for that matter; they didn't even try at Carolina) decided to slack off. You gotta keep your players healthy. And it's better to win the Super Bowl with an 18-1 record than lose the Super Bowl with an 18-1 record. Ask the Pats.

I'm sure Indy fans will forgive and forget if their team makes it.

But the Jets, along with the Texans and Titans, are teams of the future.
10:19 AM on 01/04/2010
Maybe teams should be forced to sell tickets for their last four games separately from the first 12 games.
People would be able to determine if they wanted to waste their money on coming out to see the second and third string play before being fleeced out of their money.

Let the colts lay down. Just let them do it in an empty stadium.

My hope is that the Jets meet the Colts in the playoffs and eliminate the Colts. That would be a fitting reward for the Colts letting them in.
09:25 AM on 01/04/2010
Those who coach, do. Those who do not, criticize. And by the way, Wes Welker got hurt yesterday and won't be playing in the post season and I would be willing to bet that Belicheat is probably wishing now that he had sat him out.
08:59 AM on 01/04/2010
Jets beat Bengals, again, Pats beat Ravens(maybe), Colts beat Jets, Bolts Beat Pats, Bolts beat Colts.
Why? Momentum. The Coach should have not pulled players, it was demeaning. Also if he wanted to do that then he should have done it in the BEGINNING of the game.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
linton
Perseverance is one short race after another.
07:52 PM on 01/03/2010
As a fair-weather football fan I was also disappointed that the Colts were not interested in 16-0. The weather for the 16th game was very unfavorable and I would rather have my first team resting than fighting to stay unbeaten. Losing the 16th game in an attempt to be 16-0 might be a big letdown for the entire team. We saw what happened to Wes Walker of the Patriots, he is going to be out for a while. Nothing in life is guaranteed and like the Colts we all have to take our chances. I Hope the Colts win the SB but then,

“If wishes were horses
Beggars would ride:
If turnips were watches
I would wear one by my side”
06:53 PM on 01/03/2010
The Pittsburgh Steelers franchise has won 6 Super Bowls. Do you think it, or its fans for that matter, think that those 6 wins are less meaningful than they are because none of them came as part of a perfect season?

I don't think so, either.
06:39 PM on 01/03/2010
Steelers lost games to the Chiefs and Raiders. Shut up, Steelers.

Colts earned the right to start Adam Sandler at QB because they actually WON games mid-season. Steelers earned nothing and deserve no sympathy or consideration.
TonyOnly
Opportunity is a state of mind.
03:13 PM on 01/03/2010
I don't think the Colts will win the Superbowl even if they had gone 16 - 0. Historically, Manning has a problem with premature elimination. And, even though they're being touted as world beaters, only 4 of their previous 14 victories came against teams with a better than 500. record. They had a cupcake schedule.
12:57 PM on 01/03/2010
Mankiewicz' argument is ridiculous and shows that he knows nothing about sports. In any sport there are always bench warmers and starters. One of a coach's great difficulties is finding time during a season to give bench warmers a chance to get play time. In many ways, the only chance these 2d line players will ever see the field up close is when the team can afford to absorb the mistakes these inexperienced players are bound to make on the field. A game after playoffs are locked up is a perfect time to give them some field time.

Add to that the high risk of injury that goes with playing pro football and the decision was a perfectly sensible one. An injury to a key starter going into the playoffs would be a disaster for the Colts. I am not a Colts fan but I think the decision was clearly the right one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bayman
09:07 PM on 01/02/2010
The Colts lone objective is to win the Super Bowl. If they feel it's in their best interest to rest Manning, so be it. You can argue with the strategy, but you can't argue with their right to do it. They don't owe anyone else anything.
TonyOnly
Opportunity is a state of mind.
03:30 PM on 01/03/2010
If you pay your hard earned money to support your city's football team, and they had the chance to immortalize your city in the annals of NFL history by being only the 2nd team to ever complete a perfect Superbowl season, and they decided to just surrender the perfect season, would you be as willing to pay your money to support them next year?
06:39 PM on 01/03/2010
The last time I checked, the playoffs hadn't even started. So how do you know it would have been a perfect season? So many people have jumped to the happy ending to the Colt's season this year that they have failed to read all of the chapters leading up to the end. And some of those chapters haven't been written yet.

2 seasons ago the New England Patriots lost the Super Bowl to the New York Giants. The Patriots were 18-0 going into that game, yet failed at attaining the goal that I'm sure they set out to attain at the beginning of that season. That goal wasn't a perfect season. That goal was winning the Super Bowl.

The Colts' coach and ownership are keeping their eyes on the REAL prize. And they're right.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bayman
07:51 PM on 01/03/2010
NE went for the perfect season two years ago. Think they'd trade in that Week 17 win over NY for the Super Bowl?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:46 PM on 01/02/2010
To me, this ranks right up there with the Patriots and 1919 Black Sox cheating scandals. Deliberately throwing a game should be against the rules.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:53 PM on 01/02/2010
By the way, I could see the point of resting starters if Indy was facing the 0-16 Lions of a year ago. Yeah, in a game in which nothing is going to matter at all, I could see the point in maybe giving some starters a rest. But to do so in a game against a rival, a game in which who makes the playoffs, and who doesn't, matters; a game in which the playoff seeding is affected, I think they should be forced to go 100%. Make the Jets earn their way into the playoffs.
09:07 PM on 01/02/2010
Are you kidding. I question your sporting authority. The game was a throw away game for the Colts. It's always been up to the team, who they play and how long they play them. Why even have a head coach, GM, team president. We all seem to know so much better how to get a superbowl for the colts. Oh that's right most writers on this page don't care about the colts. Teams have sat starters in the final week or weeks for ever depending on their position and strategy. Grow up fans.
GO MOSS
GO BEL
GO TOM PATRIOTS TO WIN SUPERBOWL will beat Vikes by 1 td
06:43 PM on 01/03/2010
So the Colts should make up for games the Jets let get away earlier in the year? Remember, the Jets started out 3-0. The fact that the Jets were relying on the Colts to make the playoffs says far more about the Jets than it does about the Colts, who are just trying to maximize their chances of winning the Super Bowl.

That is the point, isn't it? To win the Super Bowl?
11:38 AM on 01/04/2010
Regarding the Patriots "cheating"... ANY team can try to steal the other team's signals. I mean, they are giving the signals right out in the open, for God's sake. You can bet all teams try to figure out what the other team's signals mean.

What teams CAN'T do is videotape those signals for later study, and that's where the Patriots got caught. You can write down what the signals were and when they happened, that's well within the rules. Just don't use a camera on the opposing teams sidelines. And most, if not all, teams, change those signals from week to week anyway.

Someone would have to have ZERO understanding of football to even suggest what the Patriots did resulted in a victory or some unfair advantage.

Regarding the Colts... you're suggesting that the replacement quarterback was deliberately trying to throw the game? That's a very serious charge.