More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Bernard-Henri Lévy

Bernard-Henri Lévy

Posted: September 7, 2010 11:39 AM

News of Sakineh

What's Your Reaction:

No more direct news of Sakineh. Since her so-called confession, broadcast on television in mid-August, she has been in solitary confinement, in secret, with no contact with the outside world, no contact with her attorney, without visits from her family.

Threatened with stoning--and alone. The sentence hanging over her head, to be executed at any moment--and alone. Happy are those who, calm and filled with the confidence of strong minds, feel capable of telling us that the threat is past, that the Iranians will no longer dare, that there will be no execution. Her former attorney, Mostafaei, knows no such thing. Nor does her new attorney, Houtan Khian. Armin Arefi and I, at Le Règle du Jeu, are in the dark as well. Only one thing, in fact, is sure. The stoning has been suspended, not canceled. And our friends, the Iranian bloggers and human rights activists with whom we are in contact in Tehran, with whom we exchange information, all agree on one point: the evening of Friday, September 10th, the hour of the end of Ramadan, will be the hour of all dangers--starting at that hour, the worst will be, at any instant, possible.

News of Sakineh. Her son, Sajjad, is my source. His voice over the phone is deeply moving. His combat, as he describes it, is nothing short of tragic. This boy has lost his father, who was assassinated. He is trying to save his mother, accused of having been involved in this assassination. He himself, by speaking with me and wishing to have this conversation passed on by the international press, is obviously taking all kinds of risks. But for him, it's very clear. His mother is innocent. Absolutely and totally innocent. He did not have to "pardon" her, as all too hurried journalists reported, because she has committed no crime. He explains that the charges against her are so trumped up, so absurd, he does not even have to "defend" her. He is just a boy of 22, a ticket taker on the buses of Tabriz, the city where his mother awaits execution, who tells how, today, the very day of our conversation, the Iranian judges have gone so far as to break in to her attorney's office to steal the court case file so they will then be able to tamper and fiddle with it as suits them.

News of Sakineh. This time, it is Armine Arefi who speaks with Sajjad and then to the lawyer, Houtan Khian, and we at La Règle du Jeu, who spread their news. Sakineh seems to have been sentenced anew to 99 lashes. The whipping seems to have taken place at the beginning of last week, probably August 30th or 31st. Two of her fellow inmates, condemned to lighter sentences and released on Friday, September 3rd, testified to that effect before the act (the sentencing, and then the execution) was confirmed, respectively, by the judge at Tabriz prison and by a court employee. And why this new monstrosity? Because of a sordid story of a photo published in the British press of her, Sakineh, veil-less and bare-faced, which would be, in and of itself, an offense to Sharia law. I say a sordid story, for it is by no means certain that the photo is of her. Her son, Sajjad, is adamant and insists that it is not she in the photo. But such is this justice that one would qualify as grotesque were it not, first and foremost, barbarian. If it is not you, then it must be your sister. The lash, then, before the stones; the bloody, lacerated, mangled body before the face reduced to a pulp. The entire machine of State, the whole fanatic horde unleashed at the heels of this young Azeri of 43, nearly illiterate and, against her own will, fast becoming a symbol.

News of Sakineh. The wave of support that swells. The anger, the impotent rage, the horror in an increasing number of minds and hearts. Sajjad had written to Federico Lombardi, at the Secretariat of State of the Vatican. Following Nicolas Sarkozy's declaration that Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani is France's responsibility, I had issued an appeal to Spanish public opinion in the daily El Pais. Today, September 6th, the Vatican's "divisions" enter the battle. Spain has taken a stand at the highest level. In the United States, thanks, in particular, to the Huffington Post, the movement has spread to all sectors of opinion. And the petition of La Règle du Jeu has attracted nearly 100,000 signatures. What good is a petition? And are stones soluble in the ink of proper nouns? No, obviously. But Sakineh has nothing else. Sakineh has only the insurgent consciences of men and women of free countries to help her. Her son says it over and over again, "Without you, without these names, without these tens of thousands of net surfers who click on their PCs to express their solidarity, my mother would already be dead."

News of Sakineh. My friend Bernard Kouchner* who hasn't changed all that much despite his ministerial functions, receives Mohammad Mostafaei, Sakineh's former attorney, whom I accompany. He reiterates France's commitment. He stresses the fact that, like Sarkozy, he will make the case of this young woman a personal affair. He asks questions, gathers information, enters into the details, tries fervently to understand: how to act? who to approach? Who, in fact, has the power to grant a pardon? How many times did he, Mostafaei, obtain pardons, before his forced exile? Answer: only the Supreme Guide, the Ayatollah Khamenei, has the power to grant a pardon. Answer: in the past six years, he, Mostafaei, has obtained ten pardons (and, apparently, three adamant refusals). We must save Sakineh. We must, by maintaining the pressure, even stepping it up, obtain clemency for Sakineh.

*Bernard Kouchner is France's Minister of Foreign Affairs.


 
No more direct news of Sakineh. Since her so-called confession, broadcast on television in mid-August, she has been in solitary confinement, in secret, with no contact with the outside world, no cont...
No more direct news of Sakineh. Since her so-called confession, broadcast on television in mid-August, she has been in solitary confinement, in secret, with no contact with the outside world, no cont...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 37
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:21 PM on 09/07/2010
Levy, I think after the 5 consecutive article you wrote on this subject, it would be proper for you pay a little attention to another woman case who is about to be exec.ted in the State of Virginia in the United States. Her name is Teresa Lewis and she is accused of masterminding the murder of her husband. One difference between her and Sakineh is she is mentally disabled. Can you bring yourself to criticize the government of Virginia as furiously as you have criticized the Iranian government? You may even be able to put the shame the governor of Virginia causing him to pardon the woman.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/07/teresa-lewis-execution-mentally-disabled-virginia_n_708103.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:56 AM on 09/08/2010
True. However, If all this forces Iran to remove stoning from law books, it's worth it,
09:55 PM on 09/07/2010
In all of your writings, I guess if you are such a great humanitarian, you should pay a little more attention to things like this which are much closer to your home:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/7987674/Europe-accuses-Nicolas-Sarkozy-of-Roma-gipsy-witch-hunt.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EvilBananaPt
09:16 PM on 09/07/2010
If people what to help this women you can call Iran embassy or consulate in your country. sometimes the line is busy or unavailable but if you keep trying eventually they will pick up. Iran is perfectly conscious that a Israeli or american attack has many chances of happening, especially if public opinion in the west is perceiving Iran has a state with no regards for human rights or justice so they do take serious this kind of pressure.

Here's the list of numbers (international codes and alternative numbers in brackets):

Australia (+61) 02 62907000 (ext.9)
Brazil: (61) 3242-5733 (3242-5124 / 3242-5874)
Canada: (613) 235 4726
Denmark: (+45) 3916 0071
Finland: (+358) 9 6845391
France: 01- 4069 7900 (4069 7971/ 4069 7914 / 4069 7916 / 4069 7966)
Germany: (+49) (0)30 84353399
Greece: (+30) 210 674 1436
India: (+91) 11- 332 9600 (332 9601 / 332 9602 / 332 0491)
Ireland: (+353) 1 288 5881 (288 0252 / 288 2967)
Italy: (+39) 06 863 28485 (8632 8486)
Japan: (+81) 3-3446-8011
Mexico: (+52) 55 - 91722691 / 91722672 / 91722699
New Zealand: (+64) 4 386 2976
Norway:(+47) 22 552 409
Portugal: (+ 351) 213 041 850
South Africa: (+27) 12 342 5881
Spain: (+ 34) 91 345 01 12 (91 345 0116 / 91 345 0652)
Turkey: (+90) 312- 468 2821
UK: (+ 44) (20) 7 225 3000 - switchboard** -- (20) 7 5810570 / (20) 72254219
USA: (+1) (202) 965-4990”
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EvilBananaPt
09:27 PM on 09/07/2010
If you can't see your country in the list, you can find a full list here: http://www.iranchamber.com/embassy/iran_embassy.php
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
savvy7
A closed mouth gathers no foot
06:08 PM on 09/07/2010
What does this Ayatollah Khameinei have against this poor woman? Not to even check to see if the picture is a likeness of Sakineh, before beating her makes any thinking person wonder what is behind his vendetta against her. How could anyone take his spiritual pronouncements seriously when he can't even keep a prisoner's alleged "crimes" straight.

Unfortunately, incidents like this, aside from the manipulation of the courts, provide fuel for the right wing of this country to stir up fear against Islam. I don't see any demonstrations against Sakineh's stoning in the US, but I'm glad to see Europeans protesting her execution. My thoughts are with her.
02:43 PM on 09/07/2010
In 2006, Ashtiani was accused of involvement in her husband's slaying. She was acquitted on that charge but sentenced to 10 years in prison because the killing "disturbed the public order." A separate court then charged her with adultery. But on what grounds was she convicted? Ashtiani maintains that she was coerced into confessing. In addition, Iran's penal code permits judges to determine guilt based on their own "knowledge" if there is an absence of evidence. Three of the five judges deciding her case condemned her to death on that basis. Meanwhile, the man convicted of killing her husband is free after paying "blood money" to the dead man's family.

http://articles.latimes.com/2010/aug/21/opinion/la-ed-iran-20100821
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:54 AM on 09/08/2010
She wasn't acquitted. Charge was dropped in favour of maximum penalty for adultery.
02:00 PM on 09/07/2010
Can you explain to me clearly why you all believe that she was definitely not involved in the murder of her husband as Iran says?
Yes I'm sure their court system and due process is vastly inferior to ours but what exactly is the narrative that you are trying to put forward?
She was framed? For what purpose?

It seems to me that in America, if your husband gets murdered and you are believed to have had an affair with the person that killed him you would also stand a good chance of execution.
02:27 PM on 09/07/2010
And how many people in America are stoned for ANY offense?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:43 PM on 09/07/2010
stoned, shot, gas chamber, they all lead to one thing, death. your caught by the shiney ball.
09:59 PM on 09/07/2010
The stoning part is old story. She is to be executed by hanging. I am not a supporter of execution of anyone for any purpose. But if she was involved in gruesome killing of her husband she should be locked away for life.
02:49 PM on 09/07/2010
In 2006, Ashtiani was accused of involvement in her husband's slaying. She was acquitted on that charge but sentenced to 10 years in prison because the killing "disturbed the public order." A separate court then charged her with adultery. But on what grounds was she convicted? Ashtiani maintains that she was coerced into confessing. In addition, Iran's penal code permits judges to determine guilt based on their own "knowledge" if there is an absence of evidence. Three of the five judges deciding her case condemned her to death on that basis. Meanwhile, the man convicted of killing her husband is free after paying "blood money" to the dead man's family.

http://articles.latimes.com/2010/aug/21/opinion/la-ed-iran-20100821
06:24 PM on 09/07/2010
So is the man that you say really killed her husband the same man she had an affair with?
12:13 PM on 09/07/2010
How can any sane person support this regime being trusted with nuclear weapons?

If they want international respect and trust they should begin by showing that they are
evolved enough to handle whips and stones for "peaceful" purposes instead of brutal
punishments and horrific executions.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:46 PM on 09/07/2010
how could any sane person agree to have any nuclear capabilty, even in nuclear power? no nukes is good nukes... israel has a ton of nukes, they have killed americans, iran hasnt.
07:33 PM on 09/07/2010
Iran supports and funds Hamas. Hamas has killed Americans. Don't be so naive, please.