iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Bianca Jagger

Bianca Jagger

Posted: August 24, 2010 02:25 PM

Indian Minister of Environment and Forests, Jairam Ramesh's courageous decision saves the real Avatar

Today Indian Minister of Environment and Forests, Jairam Ramesh announced that he has rejected Vedanta's proposed bauxite mine in the Niyamgiri Mountain, Orissa, India. In addition, the clearance process for the expansion of the Lanjigarh refinery has been suspended. This represents a victory not only for the Dongria Kondh, but for indigenous and tribal people throughout the world.

Minister Ramesh declared that the government will issue a "show-cause notice" and take action against Vedanta. He stated,

"There has been a very serious violation of Environment Protection Act, Forest Conservation Act and the Forest Rights Act. There is no emotion, no politics, no prejudice ... I have taken the decision in a purely legal approach. That these laws are being violated."

Minister Ramesh's decision was based on the findings of a damning report released on August 16th, commissioned by India's Ministry of Environment and Forests.

The report by a four member expert committee headed by Dr NC Saxena, found that Vedanta, in active collusion with state officials, has violated the Forest Conservation Act, the Forest Rights Act, the Environment Protection Act (EPA), the Orissa Forest Act and the Rights of Primitive and Tribal Groups. The report argued that if the bauxite mine were allowed to proceed, it would 'seriously harm the livelihood of hundreds of families' and 'destroy one of the most sacred sites of the Kondh Primitive Tribal Groups.' Furthermore, the expansion of the Lanjigarh refinery was found to be illegal as Vedanta has unlawfully enclosed and occupied 26,123 hectares of Village Forest Lands within the refinery, and contravened the conditions of clearance under the EPA granted to the refinery.

The report concludes, "Since the company in question has repeatedly violated the law, allowing it further access to the proposed mining lease area at the cost of the rights of the Kutia and Dongria Kondh, will have serious consequences for the security and well being of the entire country."

For the past two years I have been supporting the Kondh's battle to save their livelihood, under the auspices of the Bianca Jagger Human Rights Foundation (BJHRF). During that period I have appealed to government officials in India, I have spearheaded a letter campaign to Chief Minister of Orissa Naveen Patnaik, I attended and spoke at two Vedanta AGMs in London in which I delivered an impassioned plea on behalf of the Kondh and an Amnesty International petition signed by 31,428 people and I have written several articles about the plight of the Kondh. Last April I visited the Kondh in Orissa. I was moved by their commitment and their unflinching determination to remain in Niyamgiri Mountain. Kuleska Patru one of the leaders of the Dongria Kondh told me, "We will not leave Niyamgiri. Without our mountain, our god, there is no life for us; we will resist the forced expulsion till death. Just as a fish cannot survive outside of water, the Kondh cannot survive without Niyamgiri."

My visit to the Kondh brought back memories of what I have witnessed in Nicaragua and throughout Latin America. The struggle of indigenous and tribal people versus corporations and states, over ancestral land rich in natural resources, is not a new issue; nor is it unique to India. Throughout history they have been oppressed and forcibly expelled from their ancestral land, their rights violated with impunity by governments that have put the interest of corporations above their survival. I have campaigned for human rights, social justice and environmental protection throughout the world for nearly thirty years. During that period I have seen first hand the devastating effects the irrational exploitation of our natural resources has had on the environment, communities and indigenous and tribal people.

At Vedanta's shareholders AGM on July 28th 2010, I asked chairman Anil Agarwal if he would accept the findings of the Saxena committee. Non- executive director, Naresh Chandra replied, "whatever the government of India decide, we will accept." I hope that Vedanta stands by this statement. The company has an appalling track record - it has shown no respect for human rights, the environment or for local communities. Until Vedanta adheres to Corporate and Social Responsibility and is willing to comply with OECD guidelines, and agrees to fully inform and consult local communities, I do not think the company should be allowed to mine.

I applaud Minister Ramesh's decision and I hope that the Indian government's decision reflects a growing awareness and concern for tribal people across the country. The critical questions of development, displacement, and livelihood, have not been at the heart of the policies implemented by many of the Indian states. The Kondh are just one of the many tribes that have fallen victim to the so-called 'development' promoted by multinational corporations in India.

Historically development has been defined in relation to the western world's perception of progress, based on the Western model of economic growth fueled by mass industrialization. This model of development has been implemented throughout the world. Rather than improving the living standards of the majority of people, it has instead led to an expansion in social inequalities, and the concentration wealth in the hands of a few.

We must modify our model of development. Any development project must take into account the needs and aspirations of the local communities, indigenous and tribal people, and should benefit all sectors of society. Development needs to encompass principles of justice, democracy, accountability and respect for human rights and it must protect the environment. In order to achieve this, we need to re-evaluate our definition of progress, growth and development. We need a shift in our fundamental values. A new definition of development needs to move away from our obsession with profit and growth and instead, focus on sustainability.

As Dr Saxena stated in an interview on Face our Nation: 'We must not say no to development, but we can not have a model of development in which the rich gain and the poor lose.'

At this critical juncture in history it is vital that we set global standards of accountability for corporations, in order to put an end to the culture of impunity and double standards that pervade the international legal system. Multinational corporations, especially those amongst oil, gas, mining and chemical companies have caused some of the worst environmental disasters and human rights abuses happening in our world today. In their irrational pursuit for our planet's natural resources, they have destroyed ecosystems, wiped out precious biodiversity, fauna and flora, and endangered the livelihood of communities worldwide. Now, more than ever, we need to hold these companies to account, to stop their reckless exploitation of the environment and of indigenous and tribal people.

After today's announcement, Dongria Kondh tribal spokesperson Sitaram Kulesika said: "This is a great day for the Kondh. Mining would be the end of our existence and our god. We thank the Indian government." He added "The government must remain firm on this and ensure that no one is allowed to manipulate peoples' right for any company."

Minister Ramesh's announcement is a landmark victory for justice, human rights and the environment. I commend his leadership and I hope that his decision will set a precedent worldwide.

For more information you can read my other articles about the Kondh:

Undermining human rights

The Battle with Vedanta is not over yet

The Battle for Niyamgiri

Since we can't buy our planet back

 

Follow Bianca Jagger on Twitter: www.twitter.com/BiancaJagger

 
 
  • Comments
  • 58
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
moonflowerjewelry
Buy American made, no excuses.
06:08 PM on 08/29/2010
If a people wish to have their spiritual place left intact and their government represents their interests, this is one special day indeed.
12:14 PM on 08/29/2010
Wow! Some good news.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Balzac
11:41 AM on 08/29/2010
Glad to know this one has turned out well.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WalterRetlaw
05:08 AM on 08/29/2010
Had Europe not been connected to the Eurasian supercontinent, and had the spread of ideas not flowed freely from East to West, our own society would still be stuck in the Stone Age, and our children would still face a 25% (or lower) survival rate. Disease would still be rampant and our way of life would be primitive and steeped in superstition. Holding people down in such a condition is not at all laudable. It's criminal in my opinion. Yes, there is something to be said against the corporate world destroying local small-market economies, but that is a completely separate discussion. Not all cultures were created equal, and that's a matter of fact. Race and culture are not the same thing. One can adopt and learn a new culture, but one cannot change their race. That basic premise has seemed to confuse many people and blurred the lines of morality. Certain people will fight for the right of primitive peoples to live in squalor and pestilence, while at the same time engaging in activities such as torture and child rape, all in the name of "culture". Regardless of what people may say, there are many advantages to advancing past the Dark Ages, and the luxuries of modern life (i.e. prevention of disease, and upholding basic human rights) should not be withheld from certain societies based on the archaic ideas of tradition and superstition.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
moonflowerjewelry
Buy American made, no excuses.
06:02 PM on 08/29/2010
Many indigenous peoples don't live in squalor and disease UNTIL they meet with "their betters" who bring "industry and progress" and enslave them in a mine, a sweatshop, a brothel...
If a culture wishes to be left alone to worship as it suits them, if they do not want their mountain, their desert, their forest turned into a puddle of sludge, that should be honored. Indigenous peoples are not children to be saved from themselves. It is not "criminal" to let them choose for themselves what sort of life and dignity they should be afforded.
01:16 AM on 08/29/2010
Here we go plunging the world towards the weakening or even dismantling of nation states. And this at a time when nation states are failing in many parts of the world for a variety of reasons. We have here another celebrity backing a goal which, on the surface, seems laudable, but in reality is anything but. One wonders if the author intends to also "free" the indigenous peoples of the United States thereby leading to the dismemberment of the United States. And would she also be willing to do the same for Wales? Surely both of these countries must cease to exist. The result will be chaos, war, and later, feudalism. One also wonders who the indigenous Gangic peoples really are anyway. How does one know for certain?
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
02:18 PM on 08/25/2010
It's authentic progress when governments respect indigenous rights.
DoesItMatter
empty micro bio
02:16 PM on 08/26/2010
Who are the indigenous people in India?
08:04 AM on 08/29/2010
There is some dispute about this. But I think the majority of scholars say the Dravidians (the Aryans came later). They also make up the large percentage of the what used to be called the 'untouchables' of the caste system.

http://mb-soft.com/believe/txo/untoucha.htm
billstewart
Not a micro-biologist
01:41 PM on 08/29/2010
India's a large diverse place. There are still many indigenous groups that haven't been absorbed into the majority cultures, and have been living in their villages for centuries.
photo
Tribal Knowledge
Be bold and mighty forces will come to your aid!
11:26 AM on 08/25/2010
Thank you for your work, on behalf of all the people.

This is excellent news, and is a testament to the fact that people of all walks can, finally, find and act on enlightenment.
10:17 AM on 08/25/2010
'I did this..I did that..then I did this too..'

Waaaay too many 'I's used - at the end of the day, it's all about you, isn't it?

I especially love the 'we must modify our model of development' line, from someone who's clearly benefited from the old one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
observingstupiditydaily
Nice to be important,but more important to be nice
11:26 AM on 08/25/2010
Exactly!
DoesItMatter
empty micro bio
02:19 PM on 08/26/2010
LoL....An example of how a person transposes a set of ideas and labels from one continent to another without paying much attention to the changed reality. Yes there are lessons to be learned that can be used elsewhere. But, some of the NGOs and activists apply pretty much the Western standards/labels on others. I can understand the term "indigenous" in the American context - be it the South or North America. But in the Indian context?

>>>>My visit to the Kondh brought back memories of what I have witnessed in Nicaragua and >>>>throughout Latin America. The struggle of indigenous and tribal people versus corporations and >>>>states, over ancestral land rich in natural resources, is not a new issue; nor is it unique to India.
02:36 PM on 08/26/2010
Excellent point!
08:07 AM on 08/29/2010
"I can understand the term "indigenous" in the American context - be it the South or North America. But in the Indian context?"

Notwithstanding Jagger's many "I's", India may actually have 'indiginous' people. Scholars have some debate but most would say the Dravidians were there first. Can't be an accident that these mostly darker-skinned people also make up the majority of what used to be called the 'untouchables'.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:06 AM on 08/25/2010
I never thought this one would go their way, rather good news that.
03:33 AM on 08/25/2010
This is good. Now, let's see if the proposal would work.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LarBear
11:57 PM on 08/24/2010
If asked, what/ where is Nature, most people will point to outdoors, or say Nature surrounds us... When did Mankind become separated from Nature... What part of holistic Nature is not a part of our embodiment? The sun? The atmosphere? The ocean? Trees? Birds? (grinning) Bees?

Has Mankind actually left Earth? We took Earth with us to the Moon and to the Space Station... NOT, just the equipment, but air, food and water...

Mankind currently functions as if our Holistic (environment) Nature (embodiment) is a hostile thing outside us to be exploited for money... What is our "lessor" bodies response to polluting it? Cancer? Dis-ease?

Though our Holistic Nature embodiment, I. E., air, earth, oceans, is far larger, at what point is the results the same? How long can WE continue to dump Garbage into our Greater Embodiment, Holistic Nature, before Life on Earth, the Holistic US, pays the price? Have WE already done to much of dumping "out there"???

How much radioactive material can we deposit into our Greater "out there" Embodiment and at what Cost? What results?

Because Corporations can flow Money into the Campaigns of those, WE the People, the Constitutional Government of the USA, Elect, does that alter the results of Polluting our lesser, or greater, Holistic Embodiment???
Does calling someone an Environmentalist, or wacko, alter the results?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WalterRetlaw
05:24 AM on 08/29/2010
Human beings, no matter what structures we build, or chemicals and resources we extract from the earth, are a part of nature. Just as honey bees make honey and beeswax, our mixing of chemicals and elements to create is no less natural than that of any other creature on earth. Garbage, and even radioactive chemicals, are of this earth. These things do not come from outer space. Everything we humans create is made from organic materials. In terms of geologic time, nothing we produce will last forever, not even nuclear waste. The idea that we are somehow separated from the natural world is completely and utterly false. Our skyscrapers are just as natural as beehives, and our garbage is no less natural than the waste produced by any other creature. The only difference is we've been able to harness certain forces, such as fire, and have larger brains than other creatures. But contrary to popular belief, intelligence always implies a dark side. Our inclination towards aggression is just as natural as any other emotion, such as love. Look at any other animal, and especially intelligent animals, such as chimpanzees and dolphins, and you'll find that they all possess a morbid dark side that is unsettling at first glance. Point being, we humans, and what we create, be it cities or weapons of war, are no less natural than that of any other being. All the ingredients we use to create are of this earth, and we too are animals.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LarBear
02:46 PM on 08/29/2010
WalterRetlaw...

I, agree with much of what you said...

However....... Refined uranium, is not raw uranium... Exploding uranium in a Bomb, or dirty bomb is NOT natural... Nuclear Power plants do not exist naturally...

Range free chickens are not the same as close cooped chickens and a billion count salmonela recall... Nature does NOT feed livestock, livestock byproducts and spread mad cow... Miners died for Greed... Tunneling is natural... Lack of Safety was NOT a Failure to do, but a product of Greed...

Startle is a natural response... FEAR is a learned re-action.... FEAR also spawns Hate, Greed, Envy and more, another learned re-action, not a Natural response...

I, doubt whether Organized Religion would exist without teaching/ learning to FEAR...

I, believe WE have become so mentally separated from Nature, our Normal is un-natural... Observing the Animal Kingdom as a whole, I, see NO indication WAR is Natural...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andra Claudia Garcia
Avant-Garde Journalist
10:39 PM on 08/24/2010
Companies stop raping our land!
10:34 PM on 08/24/2010
It was quite a few years ago that Canada hosted a world wide coming together about genetic altered foods, seeds, and processes. NPR broadcast the high points of the day. It was a shame to hear what was happening in the poorer countries like India. What ADM and Montsano were up to was just becoming known to the US...modifying foods & seeds and the soil which the foods were grown in. I remember how I felt that day...helpless and angry. But what really made me angry was the fact that the United States of America refused to come to the gathering. That really made an impact on me that I haven't forgotten. I also don't eat tomatoes now.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
SayNOtoGOP
Project Manager, Sustainable Energy
10:31 PM on 08/24/2010
A very big win for humanity and the planet. Maybe it can be the beginning of wins for us "little" people.
09:53 PM on 08/24/2010
Good news, indeed. Thanks for getting the word out. Thanks for all your work for human rights and for the environment too, Ms. Jagger. 8-)