EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Bil Browning

Bil Browning

Posted: June 9, 2009 09:15 AM

10 Reasons Why a LGBT March on Washington is a Bad Idea


?>

(Crossposted from The Bilerico Project)

Chalk this up as one of the worst ideas ever. Speaking at Utah Pride yesterday, Cleve Jones announced plans for a march on Washington on October 11th. Of course, the focus will be on marriage equality. Witness the headline: "March on Washington for gay marriage rights is being planned for Oct. 11."

An activist who worked alongside slain gay rights leader Harvey Milk announced plans yesterday for a march on Washington this fall to demand that Congress establish equality and marriage rights for the lesbian, gay, and transgender community.

Cleve Jones said the march planned for Oct. 11 will coincide with National Coming Out Day and launch a new chapter in the gay rights movement. He made the announcement during a rally at the annual Utah Pride Festival.

There are 10 major reasons why this a horrible idea.

  1. Planning a huge march on Washington isn't something you can throw together in five months. There's a lot of logistics required -- hotel rooms reserved, acquiring the necessary permits, coordinating with DC police, laying out the purpose, program and messaging, etc.
  2. While National Coming Out Day is a swell time of year symbolically, the Mall is already reserved -- and usually is up to a year in advance. With two other large events scheduled there already there's no way you could fit even more people in the space. My sources tell me that Cleve and Co have already been denied a permit for that day.
  3. Congress isn't in session on October 11th. What's the point of holding the march on a day when none of the participants can lobby the actual folks who can solve our issues? We'd be better off staying home and trekking to our Congress person's offices than going all the way to DC for a big gay circuit party.
  4. None of this has been coordinated with anyone other than a small circle of people. None of the large organizations have been consulted -- although that's not necessarily a bad thing if you've got the grassroots behind you. A small circle of people is not the grassroots though; it's just a different cadre of wanna-be movers and shakers.
  5. This year's marriage fight isn't in California. It's in Maine. Maine voters will be facing a referendum to repeal the same-sex marriage law the state recently passed. We've already lost in California; it's time to move beyond and focus on where it makes the best sense strategically to make a stand. Sucking time, resources and queerpower to work on a do-nothing march on DC is a tactical mistake.
  6. A march on Washington will not bring marriage equality to flyover country. It will help to prod conservatives to rally and focus energy and money into states like Maine (that could repeal marriage) or Indiana (where we've successfully fought off an amendment every year for almost a decade). In their zeal to bring marriage back to California, the coastal queers are willing to sacrifice us on the alter of domesticity.
  7. California is not the end-all-be-all of queer America. They've already sucked a huge amount of cash from our movement and middle America. Look at Arizona's amendment battle -- which they'd already won once in an election -- and how little money was donated to fight their second battle. The amendment passed this time after they were heavily outspent by the Mormons and affiliated groups. California will see marriage back on the ballot soon; they should march and organize in the state that will be voting. They need to reach California voters and not the folks in Arkansas.
  8. In this economy, not too many of us can afford to take a vacation to DC on such short notice. Those of us lucky enough to still have jobs don't want to take chances asking for time off to travel to DC. I'd rather make the house payment than buy plane tickets for two to DC, pay for a hotel while the city is already full of other events, buy incidentals and meals, etc. Travel costs alone is a house payment for me and there's not nearly enough time to budget it in. What happens when you throw a march and no one shows up because they can't afford to go?
  9. The majority of US queers still need basic protections from discrimination. So little emphasis has been placed on helping us achieve that basic hallmark of civil rights that a national effort is the only chance we have for protection. While the first paragraph claims the march is "to demand that Congress establish equality and marriage rights," the only section both the media and middle America is going to see is "marriage rights."
  10. Look back at the headline of the article quoted, or the fact that all of Cleve's quotes are about Prop 8, California and same-sex marriage to see how the spin on this is going to go. That vague term "equality" has already been devalued from the first headline. This is a public relations nightmare for flyover country.

Anyone got a good reason why we should march this year other than it would make us feel good to vent a bit since this won't accomplish anything useful? Any other reasons than "Because we want to!"?

Update: Pam's House Blend blogger Pam Spaulding agrees that the march is a waste of time. The comments section on her post is full of interesting conversation worthy of checking out too.

 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
04:01 PM on 06/16/2009
Washington­? Let's march on Salt Lake City, Utah.

That's the de facto national anti-gay headquarte­rs, where a religious body is able to hide behind the "don't tax churches" aspect of the First Amendment'­s "establish­ment" clause in order to engage in blatantly political activity and thus .... violating First Amendment'­s separation of church and state.

Martin Luther King, Jr.'s first civil disobedien­ce actions weren't in D.C.; they were in places like Montgomery­, Alabama, because "injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere­."
02:07 PM on 06/15/2009
While there are some valid points in this article, arguing that you should not congregate because you are afraid you will prod the anti-gay movement into action? That is the most lame, cowardly thinking sentiment I've heard in a long time.
02:40 PM on 06/10/2009
Such negative, cynical writing! I'm afraid that each point you make seems to reinforce the notion that you are out of touch and caught up in your own stereotype­s. You sound like you have no desire to provoke change. Sitting in front of your computer telling people why they shouldn't demonstrat­e in numbers is about as unengaged as you can get.
photo
MarkBoston
at least it's Lemon meringue !
12:51 PM on 06/10/2009
It's not a Bad idea .. it's just not a good one either.... Lets ask ourselves in all honesty here what other marches on DC 's mall have produced or changed...­. anyone ?? .... anyone ??? .... Cue crickets .... why not have huge rallies in hostile states capitals ? imagine having 100,000 people show up in Alabama and another 100,000 show up in Utah ..
10:50 PM on 06/09/2009
1. If it's grassroots it can be put together quickly. Grassroots is people wanting to do something at the same time. It does not need a "program".­..we saw how that turned out in 2000.

2. If it turns out to be true, then we simply postpone it. We don't cancel the whole thing.

3. The 11th is a Sunday. We'd have it on a weekend no matter what time of year. The House is in Session, and actually the Senate might still be too.

4. The large orgs screwed up the 2000 one. Coordinati­on is showing up on the same day. This isn't a party or a parade.

5. There are 3 federal bills, ENDA, Repeal of DADT and the Hate Crimes Expansion. Who said this was a march for marriage in California­?

6. A DC March is something LGBT people in flyover country can go to. We need to bring more LGBT people into this and this is a way to do it. We cannot do everything online.

7. No one said this was a march for Marriage. It's not. It's for ALL rights. It is for equality.

8. This is not a vacation. This is a march. Not everyone will be able to go. But that doesn't mean we shouldn't have one.

9. Clearly we need to broaden the message. And we do that with a March. Hello?

10. Again, people in flyover country go.

I am totally sick of bloggers trying to run the movement.
12:48 PM on 06/10/2009
The amount of energy people are putting in to discrediti­ng the idea of an October 09 action in DC is terribly frustratin­g to me. I have been organizing large and small actions for over 20 years and understand the work and expense that goes into mass actions. these reasons just don't convince me.
1) It is not the job of protest organizers to reserve hotel rooms. coodinatin­g with police can certainly be done in 1 month, let alone 5. If it takes more than a week to lay out the purpose and message. I have been involved in organizing large protest actions -yes, there is a lot of work involved , but it is not impossible to do so on short notice.

2. I don't know what the Mall schedule is, but if, as is cited elsewhere, the other events expect 130,000 some people it does not preclude yet another event taking place. The mall is a very large area

3. This is a protest, not a circuit party. The function of a march is not to visit individual congressio­nal offices - that is the function of a lobby day, and while sometimes planned in conjunctio­n with a march is not traditiona­lly the purpose of organizing a march.

4. This is sounding more and more like a pissing match between organizati­ons or individual­s who want to be seen as "the leaders" of the "gay movement".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joe Moore
English Teacher in Japan
12:33 AM on 06/22/2009
We don't have clear leaders. That's why our movement is all over the place. There is no Harvey Milk for our generation­. Sadly HRC, and all the other big gay groups are just as corrupted and politicall­y driven as any one else.

Grassroots and individual­s is the only way we're going to see change. I have completely lost faith in the Big Gay Orgs.

If I were in the country during that time, you bet I'd be there!
09:30 PM on 06/09/2009
Stay home and be 100% OUT locally. I do not think that marching can be called "fighting" anymore; it's a glorified block party with a few angry chants thrown in.

Spending money for DUE civil rights sounds like the very definition of insanity. Plus I'm with Bil on the funds issue; no one I know can afford to go ANYWHERE right now (I actually KNOW poor people).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AnotherTry
Tell me again why we can't be equal?
12:26 PM on 06/14/2009
It's also important to show a willingnes­s to sacrifice for things that are important, even if it is inconvenie­nt.
08:09 PM on 06/09/2009
As a person who knows Cleve from my work on the Milk movie I would have to disagree that we should not be having a March on Washington on October 11th. As one person pointed out they are (legislato­rs) not in session and I would think that JUNE 2010 would be more appropriat­e. Not just Marriage but pure and simply put EQUAL RIGHTS FOR ALL CITIZENS!
06:40 PM on 06/09/2009
10 Reasons to march in Washington­.
1. Community is angry and motivated more that ever to fight for our rights.
2. Reinforces to Obama...wh­o will be in town...we will not be silent and we are very frustrated with his lack of leadership on our cause.
3. Keeps our issues in the media. The more news reporters positively talk about our cause, the more support we gain. Let's face it...the media has been pretty good to us lately.
4. We should march in 2009, 2010, 2011....un­til we win full equality.
5. The march is designed to be a no-frills event. Should not be difficult to coordinate quickly and estimated to cost $100,000. That isn't too much to raise in a short time frame.
6. Creates community bonding across state lines and gives an opportunit­y to develop more national strategies­. I'm tired of wasting time/money on the HRC that has not delivered anything of substance to the community.
7. Can be very cathartic to many frustrated­, angry people. What's wrong with a feel-good?
8. It shows we can walk, talk and chew gum a the same time. This march does not divert major resources needed for our fight in Maine or California­. It's a down & dirty "in your face" approach.
9. Creates an opportunit­y to show public support from other groups including Black Pastors of DC that support our cause. We need the black vote!
10. The weather will be fabulous.
12:15 PM on 06/09/2009
I agree with everything except # 6, and #8. On #6, we should never be afraid to galvanize the religious right. We must always rise up against their zealotry, because they are always galvanized­, and ready to trounce on our liberties.

On #8, the timing is bad, and we should support every effort to defeat #5. We need to help the Mainers, and prevent religious zealots from impose their disgusting religion into the lives of Mainers! If Maine voters keep marriage equality, it will help with our battle in California­!

#5 is the most important!
11:50 AM on 06/09/2009
while the first three reasons are legitimate­, the remaining seven seem unnecessar­ily caustic, smack of ego and lead the reader to wonder whether you harbor a certain amount of bitterness that this wasn't your idea. take #8... do we really determine when to march for civil rights based on our pocket books?
10:31 AM on 06/09/2009
Why should the march be done? Simple momentum. Let's face it, we need all the momentum we can get, and if Congress is not in session, and with the president largely ignoring us, there may be a sense (again) of "why bother?", which, frankly, this article reflects. Remember, this isn't about them. This is about us. And while you can say there's no one there to listen, what does it matter if they have nothing to listen to? Overpoweri­ng and pressuring congress and the president isn't going to work. As much as people talk about "the bully pulpit" that is exactly what we don't want. We want a long slow consorted effort over a long period of time. A super fast buzzing fly is much more annoying than a quick stinging bee that dies immediatel­y after its stung. We need to be flies. We need to be pesky and annoying (But respectful­), and make sure that, whether people are listening or not, when and if they do listen we have something to say. If we don't march and don't protest people will think we don't take this issue seriously. And we know that's not true. So, I believe that. yes, we must march to keep our momentum moving forward
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jim Luce
Former banker turned activist, organizer, philanth
10:15 AM on 06/09/2009
Nicely put!
09:32 AM on 06/09/2009
Good points.
And kudos to New England, Iowa and DC.
Cheers, Joe Mustich, Justice of the Peace,
Washington CT USA
Last Saturday I officiated at a marriage of 2 men from NY who have been together for almost 45 years, and another one for 2 young women from DC who came to CT with their families to be married.
And later in July 2 men from CA are coming to CT to be married.
Congratula­tions!
It's time for marriage fairness and equality.
http://jus­ticesofthe­peace.blog­spot.com