More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Bil Browning

Bil Browning

Posted: June 22, 2010 05:41 PM

CNN's Gay In America: Stereotypes Abound & Bigger Picture Ignored

What's Your Reaction:

I had a chance to preview CNN's first episode of their new Gay in America series: Gary & Tony Have A Baby. Unlike the multi-hour Black In America extravaganzas, the network has cnn-logo.jpgseveral one hour shows planned to look inside the queer community. BIA host Soledad O'Brien also helms this documentary.

When the press kit arrived, I didn't bother to read the letter or description. The title spoke for itself: two gay guys are having a baby. I wasn't impressed; as a starter topic it's about as original as a documentary on pride. My partner, Jerame, however, was excited that the news network was focusing on our community and really wanted to watch it.

Before we popped it into the player, he chastised me for being so pessimistic about the show. As the DVD started to play, I looked at Jerame and made a few predictions. Not only did I nail every one, but the documentary goes so far beyond the usual mass media dreck that GLAAD should issue an action alert about it for perpetuating gay stereotypes.

Here were the predictions I made for Gary & Tony Have a Baby without looking at any of the press materials:

  • The couple would most likely be white although there was a small possibility that one would be black. They definitely wouldn't both be non-white.
  • They'll be in their mid 30s to early 40s.
  • They would be upper middle class.
  • They would live in a gay ghetto. Most likely New York City, Washington DC, or San Francisco.
  • They would both be "gay masculine": that slightly effeminate masculinity always portrayed in the media. No nellies need apply.
  • They would be married.
  • They would have a surrogate child instead of adopting or through heterosexual sex.

A Checklist for Stereotypes

Call me jaded, but mass media docunews reports tend to fall along two different lines - either they're the fawning "Gay Is Good!" tug-at-the-heartstrings shows or they're the "Think of the Children!" exposés that try to titillate and shock viewers into feeling disapproval and disgust. Gary & Tony definitely falls into the former category.

Gary Spino and Tony Brown are New York City activists in their 40s. The couple married in Canada and, in the course of one hour, spend a small fortune on a surrogate mother, an egg donor, legal fees, travel costs, and medical bills.

I'm not naive enough to think that an arch homophobe would tune into a CNN special report, see a piece on gay dads and suddenly join the local PFLAG chapter. The people who will tune in will either be queer themselves or already sufficiently friendly to the community. For the most part, they're preaching to the choir and no minds will be changed by this puff piece.

If the audience is the LGBT community itself, then the piece soundly fails since it highlights a tale so preposterously stereotypical that it doesn't resonate with the majority of American queers. It's gay parenting pablum masquerading behind an assimilationist ideal.

One of the men donated sperm to a lesbian couple and has a biological daughter. The show's one highlight of how complicated LGBT life can be to navigate was when they talked about his "other family." It respectfully pointed out that the little girl had two parents - her moms - and made that distinction in a forthright manner that modeled respect for other families.

Life Is Gritty and Messy

Being queer in America is hardly an easy proposition. We're a diverse and contrary group of people because we encompass every ethnic group, religious belief, and political party. While there were a few mutterings when CNN announced they would do Gay In America as a multi-part series instead of one multi-hour show, this is the only realistic way to look at our community in any meaningful way.

Gary & Tony Have A Baby is hardly gritty and compelling television news reporting. It is so far removed from the average viewer's reality, that it was foreign even to this gay man. The majority of American queers don't spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to form a family.

The show's accompanying press packet says, "These days one of the most radical things a gay person can do is form a traditional family - and that's precisely what they want." The traditional queer family, however, doesn't look a lot like Gary and Tony's.

"Soledad O'Brien follows Gary and Tony on their struggle to have a baby that has a biological and legal connection to both of them," the release says. "But all the medical miracles and legal maneuvering can't guarantee the approval of the people around them... or even a baby."

(Not Your Average) Gay In America

In the 2000 census, 55% of same-sex couple households reported having at least one child under the age of 18 living in the home. This includes families of all sorts, but the bulk of them did not conceive their child through expensive medical procedures only available to a privileged few.

Continuing the myths that all gay men are wealthy, white and self-obsessed does nothing to validate the thousands of gay fathers around the nation who struggle with more pressing issues than picking among the dozens of prospective egg donors. Where are the fathers who had children with wives they love(d), the men who had children as a desperate attempt at proving their heterosexuality, the adoptive fathers, foster fathers, step fathers, or grandfathers?

Where are the lesbian and transgender parents? What about class, race and religious issues that surround parenting? How about issues like child support, custody cases, and how a judge's personal prejudices can influence their decisions?

After being roundly criticized for ignoring LGBT issues in their Black In America series and thereby perpetuating the myth that being gay is a "white problem," CNN's Gay In America has only served to continue a dangerous mythology that doesn't actually look at gay parenting as much as it does one couple's quest to have their perfect child.

The show would have been better served by weaving a variety of LGBT parents into the mix instead of focusing so exclusively on this one couple.

This is not "Gay In America." It's "Gay In Gary & Tony's World."

The show airs Thursday night at 8pm Eastern.

(Crossposted from my home blog, Bilerico Project. Come visit me there to see why both the Washington Post and the Advocate named us one of the top 10 LGBT political blogs in the nation. Image via Boondoggle)

 

Follow Bil Browning on Twitter: www.twitter.com/bilerico

 
 
  • Comments
  • 34
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
Thatgirl122
Spinsta @ Large
11:20 AM on 06/25/2010
These guys have been gay activists for years. What have they been demonstrating for? Equal Rights--including the right to have a marriage and family equal to heterosexual marriage rights. Is heterosexual marriage a stereotype?

Why are they living in a gay ghetto? They live in a neighborhood where their relationship and their family are not judged as savagely as they would be in their hometowns.

Why are they in their late 40s? Because it took a long time until their relationship was legally recognized somewhere on the planet. Because it can take that long for the blessing of a bequest and/or building personal wealth (free of student loans) finally pays off. Because it took a long time for even this much tolerance of their relationship to be the norm anywhere.

Until there is marriage and family equality in the USA, couples who want to be together and have a family are going to continue to feel like they need to live in gayborhoods so their children can grow up in a safe environment. They are going to continue to be denied the opportunity to foster or adopt children.

So their story, in all its "predictability" is a product of the society and legal system we currently have in this country.

BTW: I am sure the guys who bullied them in grade and high school would be surprised to hear someone thinks they aren't nellies.
12:57 AM on 06/25/2010
I just watched the show. You were wrong about #2 and #3. The show said they are in their late 40s, so they aren't in their mid 30s to early 40s. The size and condition of their apartment and the fact that one of them is an office manager means they are not upper-middle-class. The surrogacy was expensive, but they were able to afford it because of a bequest, not because they are independently wealthy or because they have high incomes.
10:34 PM on 06/24/2010
One more thing: Mr. Browning writes that CNN would have "been better served by weaving a variety of LGBT parents into the mix instead of focusing so exclusively on this one couple." Well, I can only assume CNN wants people to watch their network, and writers know that focusing on one story will draw an audience better than a bunch of vignettes. Readers or viewers really only care about a story's subject if they get to know then in some depth.
10:30 PM on 06/24/2010
I don't know anything about how CNN went about putting together this show and I know even less about Mr. Browning, but I wonder how easy -- or difficult -- it would have been for CNN to find another couple. Many of the people Mr. Browning would rather see belong to demographics that are pretty distrustful of the mainstream media, and often with good reason. I have worked in newspapers for more than three decades and finding the right people to tell stories is not always easy, even with CNN's resources.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wilburinla
Looking for the Brightest Star
05:15 PM on 06/24/2010
Ugh. Bil Browning's criticism of CNN's special on these two men wanting to have a baby is tedious, stereotypical, cliched and expected. True to the maxim that no good deed shall go unpunished, Browning is just one of those sad bitter harpies that will never be satisfied. This was these two guys' story. CNN never said this show is representative of the whole gay community.

It was an attempt to show two fairly normal guys living in NYC trying to make a family. Does he think it would have been more effective if the putative parents were two multi-cultural drag queens, two leather bears, or two black lesbians in wheelchairs disabled from the wars in the Middle East? Just exactly whose story would have satisfied this guy.

And although not the norm, I know several straight couples who have spent close to a hundred thousand dollars in an attempt to conceive. Not everyone can, but those that can afford it go that route. Those that can't go other routes.

As a gay man, I think Bil Browning needs to get a life
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
starkweather444
02:52 PM on 06/24/2010
You people are never happy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wilburinla
Looking for the Brightest Star
05:24 PM on 06/24/2010
Exactly. And as a gay man, I can with all honestly say that there is just no pleasing some people in the gay community. I can see why some organizations don't even want to try. It's damned if you do and damned if you don't. Why bother?
02:39 PM on 06/24/2010
The CNN Web site seems to get the bigger picture, with an article about a African-American gay couple raising adopted kids, and an article on race as it relates to acceptance of homosexuality.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/LIVING/06/24/ia.gay.couples.family/
http://www.cnn.com/2010/LIVING/06/23/ia.gay.acceptance/
photo
SouthJerseySteve
Progressive isn't a dirty word.
11:26 AM on 06/24/2010
I have my DVR set to record this show and I will watch it with an open mind. However, after seeing some of the "previews" that CNN showed last couple of nights, I'm expecting all types of stereotypes (white, rich, NYC couple, etc.).
10:48 AM on 06/24/2010
We have an appt later today with a lesbian couple approved by DHS for foster care (we're looking for some weekend respite for a behavioral high-risk child so we might occasionally get some semblance of a life as custodial grandparents). THAT would make an interesting report.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thinkingwomanmillstone
I'm nervous. My life is under a Micro-bioscope.
08:00 AM on 06/24/2010
The selection of Soledad O'Brien as the host/narrator was enough to tell me it was not a real news story.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Bil Browning
10:24 AM on 06/24/2010
I actually like Soledad - and her reporting style. She was the best part of this episode.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:57 PM on 06/23/2010
In vitro fertilization and surrogate motherhood should be banned by law, as should any form of gay marriage or civil union.
08:44 AM on 06/24/2010
Give a rational argument to back that statement up. Think of it like the 5 paragraph persuasive essays you likely had to write in middle school.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
jennysez
10:24 AM on 06/24/2010
hateful
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bernie Keating
06:17 PM on 06/23/2010
Excellent article. CNN is trying to shoehorn gay families into a template the same way they would like to believe that every straight family is the Cleaver family.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Bil Browning
10:27 AM on 06/24/2010
Thanks, Bernie.
photo
ez duz it
οὐκ ἔστιν θεός
03:22 PM on 06/23/2010
Hi, Mr. Browning:

I wish it were possible for me to have seen the CNN documentary. I’ll have to experience it vicariously through you.

Stereotypes were milked to surfeit in the sitcom, “Will & Grace.” For me, the first season was delightful. The writing was fun and witty. Gay men were not framed in a malevolent light, but were nearly-real humans the average person could identify with. Admittedly, after what seemed to be the thirtieth or fortieth season – the stereotyping became unbearable. The “straight” Gay, the narcissistic “slutty” Gay, the pretty-yet-naïve hag and the funny-drunk-to-oblivion hag became more than I could handle. What bothered me the most is that all the principal characters were unable to grow or develop a healthy, enduring relationship with…anyone.

If CNN focuses on a staid, middle-class Gay couple who have children they adore, tell bedtime stories to, cajole to finish homework…correctly, and put bandages on skinned elbows, who cares? I say, “Why not!” It’s high time the average American heterosexual mom or dad – who isn’t as steeped in my Gay life as I am – sees a family almost exactly like their family except for one very minor difference.

All my best to you:
ez
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Bil Browning
10:24 AM on 06/24/2010
Thanks for commenting. My best to you too.
02:38 PM on 06/23/2010
Aside from being legally married and living in a gay ghetto, your list describes about 80% of the gay male couples I know. We are people, too, and our stories are as worthy of telling as anyone else's. If there were lots of shows about this topic I could see being disappointed about another one that uses a white, upper-middle-class couple, but there are not a lot of shows about this topic.

I don't expect a show about a couple adopting a baby to be representative of a subculture comprising multiple sub-subcultures. It's one couple's experience. I think anyone watching it will get that.

Now I have to wait until tomorrow to determine whether I spoke too soon. :-)
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Bil Browning
10:23 AM on 06/24/2010
Actually, it doesn't accurately portray your friends, Jim. They say in the docureport that only about 1000 gay men have had surrogate babies. That's the entire nation. They simply can't afford it.
02:51 PM on 06/24/2010
I have two friends who are spending $150K to go through this process now. (One of them is not white, btw.) So it may reflect at least them! But I look forward to seeing the show. Perhaps I'll agree with you 100% afterward.

I'm adopted myself and, perhaps ironically, that made me very interested in having a biological child because I wanted to feel a biological connection to some other human. Once I met some of my birth mother's family, that went away. I have no children, but would gladly adopt if my partner were interested.

BTW, as I mentioned in another comment, in the past two days CNN has posted two articles addressing issues you mentioned. I wonder whether they were responding to you.
01:47 PM on 06/23/2010
How are two men who want to raise a child, become fathers, self-obsessed?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Bil Browning
10:22 AM on 06/24/2010
They call themselves "self-obsessed" when they talk about deciding between adoption and surrogacy. They decide that it's more important to have a child genetically related to one of them. They also bring up the cost factor - $110k just for the egg - as a reason why they are "self-obsessed."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jdaddy1951
10:49 AM on 06/24/2010
Most gay or straight parents, especially of a new child, become kind of "self-obsessed," or at least obsessed with their lives as they realize that everything is going to revolve around the child's needs. It's normal bonding --- whether it's while a biological mother is carrying a child or whether an adoptive parent is making plans to bring the child into his or her home. Now, I admit not to having seen the episode as you have, Bill, but from what has been described, it sounds like pretty normal parenting attitudes developing.