Recently a Chicago Tribune reporter asked me how consumers could get the most bang for their "green" buck. Specifically, which changes in household practices, she wanted to know, would reap the biggest reward for consumers in terms of reduced global warming pollution. The Green Grok team has come up with some simple, perhaps surprising tips to cut carbon emissions.
The average U.S. household is responsible for about 132,000 pounds of carbon dioxide (CO2) each year. Of that total about 53,000 lbs. are emitted directly from the electricity we use, the gasoline we pump, and so forth, while the rest is embedded in the goods and services we use.
It's important to note that the numbers used here are for an averaged composite U.S. household and that they may differ considerably from your household. A number of web sites can help you calculate your family's carbon footprint, but bear in mind that usually these so-called carbon calculators estimate your direct emissions only and do not include the embedded emissions.
In general, our carbon footprint is a factor of where and how we live, work, drive, fly, and play. We'll see here that you do have some control over your own carbon footprint -- maybe more than you think. Let's look at how choices at home, on the road, and at the grocery store can all lower your carbon footprint and fight global warming.
There are a myriad of ways to reduce your carbon footprint around the house -- and why not do them? Often those energy savings translate into money savings as well. Here are a few tips and the annual savings they'll net in terms of carbon emissions.
These numbers suggest that the clear winner at home is using compact fluorescent bulbs. It is by far the easiest way households can have a big impact on their home energy use. After all replacing 20 light bulbs is a lot easier than installing a solar water heater and yet it has a similar carbon savings. So if you are going to do one thing, do this.
Driving has such a large carbon footprint that by cutting back on the miles we drive, households can easily lower their carbon footprints. Reducing the miles driven by 10 or 20 miles a week -- one errand for many of us -- can have a big impact. And even more important, when you shop for your next new car, pick one with the best fuel efficiency in the car class that you need.
Surprisingly, changing your diet to one that includes less meat and relies more on local produce is one of the most effective ways to lower your carbon footprint. Cutting back on meat has other benefits as well.Now, cutting out meat is a hard choice, I know, because I eat meat too. But even so, a little restraint can go a long way. By dropping meat and dairy from your menu for just one day a week and buying local foods, you can trim your footprint by about 2,330 lbs. of CO2. Switching things up when it comes to meals starts at the grocery store -- to eat low-carbon foods, you have to buy low-carbon foods. Take a look at this video for some tips on how to do this
If going vegetarian is just not your cup of tea, here's another way to look at things that can make a big difference.
If your family were to change just 20 light bulbs and drive 20 fewer miles each week (in a 25 mpg car), you could lower your direct carbon emissions by 5,330 lbs. That'd be lowering your family's direct carbon emissions footprint by 10 percent.
If you are really serious and do everything we've suggested above, you could reduce your total carbon footprint by almost 20 percent. That's huge, and when done en masse, we could start to make a dent in our global warming pollution.
But even if we all really changed things up like many of us are starting to, it wouldn't be enough to get us to the 80 percent cut in emissions by 2050 -- the amount that many scientists believe is necessary to avoid the more dangerous consequences of climate change.
More fundamental changes in our economy and energy infrastructure are going to be needed. That is why, in addition to lowering our carbon footprint, many of my colleagues and I are calling for major policy changes on the national level. Staying informed about our country's need to lead on this issue is critical to tackling the problem.
Let us know which steps you and your family are taking to lower your carbon footprint this summer. Leave us a comment or send us a video response on youtube.
Numbers are based on average U.S. household. Home and transportation figures include direct emissions only. Food savings include both direct and indirect life-cycle emissions. All greenhouse gas savings are on an annual basis. Average all-electric household spends $1,300 on home energy. Average kWh produces 1.32 lbs. of CO2. Average therm produces 12 lbs. of CO2. *Driving statistics are based on the average American who drives 13,000 miles annually in a car rated at 25 mpg. Burning 1 gallon of gas produces 20 lbs. of CO2. Average kWh costs $0.10.
Dr. Bill Chameides is the dean of Duke University's Nicholas School of the Environment. He blogs regularly at www.thegreengrok.com.
Follow Bill Chameides on Twitter: www.twitter.com/theGreenGrok
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
I'm thrilled to see food included in this article. Many people focus on cars and light bulbs but the food system accounts for 1/3 of global greenhouse gas emissions.
We developed a calculator and tips to help people become aware of the contribution their food choices are making www.eatlowcarbon.org.
Lying in a darkened room all day, priceless.
I had already done some of the easy things, such as installing compact fluorescent light bulbs everywhere except where lights are rarely used, such as the utility room. When I changed jobs I chose a house 4 blocks from work and put in a front-loading washer (and usually wash in cold water). When I bought a new car I chose one of the most efficient non-hybrid models available. So what was next?
I had resisted changing my electric supply to renewable sources, because it was going to cost significantly more. Today I found a supplier of 100% renewable (from new wind and low-impact hydro) at a rate scarcely a cent higher than my local utility's rate - and because of the way taxes and miscellaneous charges are figured in New York, the actual difference will be less.
The carbon impact of this isn't as great as it might be in other locations, because part of our regular electric supply in New York, about 16%, is already from (old) hydro and part is nuclear. I've lived in other places where as much as 88% was from coal or gas.
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with