More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Bill Chameides

GET UPDATES FROM Bill Chameides

What's in This Fracking Water?

Posted: 09/02/11 02:38 PM ET

News flash: Halliburton exec becomes (presumably) world's first fracking-fluid imbiber.

Don't Do This at Home, Boys and Girls

Yes, it's apparently true. As part of the publicity surrounding the introduction of Halliburton's new fracking fluid formula known as CleanStim, CEO Dave Lesar had one of his executives take a swig of the stuff in front of what must have been a stunned audience at a conference held by the Colorado Oil and Gas Association. The swigger's identity is unknown, as are his current whereabouts and condition. However, a Halliburton spokesperson categorically denied that said executive was later seen leaping a tall building in a single bound in the vicinity of company headquarters.

According to its literature, the CleanStim formulation is "made with ingredients sourced from the food industry." But there's an asterisk next to that description, kind of like those TV shows when someone does a stunt and then advises, "Don't do this at home, boys and girls." Even though, in Halliburton's words, "all the ingredients are acquired from food suppliers," and even though the stuff is presumably safe to drink at oil and gas confabs, "the CleanStim fluid system should not be considered edible."

After an Aperitif: The Ongoing Investigation into Fracking Fluid Ingredients

Will the production of a food-based fracking fluid help to rehabilitate the public's sagging opinion of hydraulic fracturing, a.k.a hydrofracking or fracking? It probably can't hurt. Much of the public's concern about the practice is centered around the ingredients used in the mix of fluids that the industry injects at high pressure and large volumes into shale gas wells during development, especially during the fracturing process that is critical to breaking up the rock to allow the shale gas to be pumped to the surface.

gas pad in the Marcellus Shale
A Marcellus Shale gas pad. As fracking becomes the industry standard to extract natural gas from shale rock, people want to know what chemicals are used in the process. Halliburton's new product seems aimed at assuring safety. But questions remain. (Photo: Duke University)


For the most part, we're in the dark when it comes to the ingredients used at individual well sites. But what little we do know suggests that the stuff is not made for even the occasional swig. The types of chemicals used include:

  • A friction reducer (KCl or petroleum distillate)
  • A biocide (glutaraldehyde)
  • An oxygen scavenger (ammonium bisulfide) or stabilizer (N,n-dimethyl formamide), to prevent corrosion of metal pipes
  • A surfactant
  • A scale inhibitor (ethylene glycol)
  • HCl acid to remove drilling-mud damage near the borehole
  • A breaker (sodium chloride -- a little salt never hurts)
  • A gel (guar gum or hydroxyethyl cellulose)
  • An iron controller (2-hydroxy 1, 2, 3-propanetricaboxylic acid)

Perhaps the most comprehensive list can be found in a report issued in April by the Democrats on the House Energy and Commerce Committee. The report details 750 chemicals used by 14 leading oil and gas service companies, but also notes that it is incomplete, because

In many instances, the oil and gas service companies were unable to provide the Committee with a complete chemical makeup of the hydraulic fracturing fluids they used. Between 2005 and 2009, the companies used 94 million gallons of 279 products that contained at least one chemical or component that the manufacturers deemed proprietary or a trade secret.

Some Disclosure Efforts Are Taking Root

However, things are changing. Five states -- Wyoming, Michigan, Texas, Pennsylvania and Arkansas -- have fracking-fluid disclosure rules on the books. And a few others, as well as Congress, have proposed rules that are awaiting legislative action.

Even companies are taking some steps at disclosing some information about their fracking chemicals. This industry website offers up a search tool that allows you to look up a given well in a given county in a given state.

However, such efforts are getting mixed reviews, and it's not clear if these moves toward transparency, filled as they are with a fair share of loopholes, are giving the public the information it is clamoring for. (See ThinkProgress's chart on the five states and what their regulations do and do not do.)

While there's no indication that Halliburton is about to release the recipe for its new, not-quite-food-based CleanStim fracking fluid, given the kinds of stuff that normally goes into such products, the development of CleanStim is almost certainly a positive step.

My former colleague Mark Brownstein, an attorney at Environmental Defense Fund, has his doubts, though. Or maybe it's guarded optimism. He was witness to the Halliburton fracking-fluid-drinking display and observed, "I wonder why, if they have this technology, it wouldn't become standard practice."

So, hurrah for Halliburton, maybe. And bottoms up, everyone.

This piece is cross-posted with TheGreenGrok.com, the blog by the dean of Duke's Nicholas School.

 

Follow Bill Chameides on Twitter: www.twitter.com/TheGreenGrok

 
 
  • Comments
  • 21
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
thebigbike
ran away to be a cowboy
11:42 PM on 09/05/2011
so... do you suppose the swig was at the same concentration of chemicals as used in actual fracturing? or say diluted, like 1/1000 or more? howbout the stomach pump waiting behind the scenes?

gosh I hate to be so cynical.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:20 PM on 09/05/2011
Yeah and P.T. Barnum had a range of terrific stunts to amaze the suckers- er,people. One born every minute you know.
04:27 PM on 09/05/2011
Assume that fracking always uses a toxic fluid that always makes the drinking water unusable in the area being drilled. Aren't these people being paid a lot of money for drilling rights? Certainly more than enough to buy water? Water costs $4 a case of 24 12 oz bottles at Walmart. From what I have read, people are getting paid about $12,000 an acre for drilling rights in Marcellus Shale (PA).
01:47 PM on 09/05/2011
Some day a Democrat is going to say "we need full disclosure on this stuff." Thye conservative will reply "That extra regulatory burden will cost jobs." And someday a Democrat will say "I don't care." And THEN the dynamic will change.
10:33 AM on 09/05/2011
Speaking of lies and corruption I hope people realize that Dick Cheney made sure that Halliburton and the other companies fracking all over America courtesy of corrupt governors are not subject to environmental laws.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robert horwitz
10:30 AM on 09/05/2011
Say if this stuff is so great for us why don't the energy companies market the stuff on the shelves of our local grocery stores. Sure it's a natural. Market it as an energy drink. I even have come up with a name for it. "Frack You".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Arion
08:50 AM on 09/05/2011
The big danger with fracking is not pollution from the frack water chemicals, though even with current fairly good control requirements, it's still a concern. However the really big problem is aquifer pollution from escaping methane. In other words, it is the migration of gas from the wells into the household water supply that can render a home or even a neighborhood unlivable. This can happen through either casing failure or faulting in the layers between the well and the water table. Once it happens, it's irreversible. it's this - not the frack chemicals - that has ruined some communities in Pennsylvania.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:23 PM on 09/05/2011
EXCELLENT point! Thanks!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
clearasmud
De Tocqueville and Marx were both right
09:48 AM on 09/04/2011
So why didn't the CEO drink it. Ordering one of his underlings to drink it hardly proves anything, except that the executive in question is expendable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andman0121
08:46 AM on 09/04/2011
Swig an entire gallon for all I care, fracking is harmful to the environment and displaces thousands of rurual families.
07:40 AM on 09/04/2011
An absurd stunt using a fluid that is probably unrealistic and not being used now. They claim that fracking is safe now, so they should drink the fluid they're using now; unless of course they want to accept liability for all claims against them from families living downstream from fracking sites.

as an analogy, I could easily drink a swig of a currently used engine fuel that is almost entirely environmental. There are cars that run on vegetable oil on the road (www.greasecar.com) today, yet somehow the auto industry hasn't moved to making cars that run on it. Thus, just because Halliburton can make a safe fracking fluid doesn't at all mean they will ever intend to use it. It's nothing more than a cheap publicity stunt.
photo
farmilyman
everything is illusion
10:26 PM on 09/03/2011
I just don't trust Halliburton for some reason
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
drkazmd65
Mom Taught me - Question Everything - Thanks Mom!
01:04 AM on 09/04/2011
I wonder why you would get that feeling regarding a 'fine' American company (now partially headquartered in Dubai) and formerly headed by or 'most honorable' Former VP Cheney?

Obviously you have trust issues,....

:D
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tutorintoledo
Conservative AND Liberal. Depends on the issue!
09:28 PM on 09/03/2011
:) If KFC can have a secret recipe, why not Haliburton? If the liberals want to prove it is dangerous - let THEM drink it. Can't be worse the than koolaid. ;)
11:14 AM on 09/04/2011
Fracking liquid may be safe, but that doesn't mean fracking is safe. Would you want to be able to set your drinking water on fire like this guy? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U01EK76Sy4A
08:06 PM on 09/03/2011
Fracking is great. We can produce enough energy to supply our own needs. Most people get their water from rivers which are already treated through filtering plants. Those who get them from groundwater are generally being paid a lot of money from drillling rights - more then anough to buy water which isn't necessary if the well is drilled properly since the drinking water is very shallow compared to the oil/gas
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
barkingcat
Woof?
08:56 AM on 09/04/2011
Up until about 40 years ago, most of the towns near where we live were piping their raw sewage directly into the local lakes and rivers. It was certainly cheaper than cleaning it before disposing of it into the watershed.

Plus, we figured that as long as we cleaned the stuff before drinking it, everything would be okay.

Well, for us, at least -- we didn't much care for anything or anyone beyond that.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Bill Chameides
04:53 PM on 10/19/2011
mjk0259: 1. Treatment does not remove all contaminants (e. g., radioactive material); 2. What about the folks who are not being paid whose well water is contaminated?
photo
castlerider
"A man's home is his castle"
04:17 PM on 09/03/2011
These disclosures are extremely important, and these petroleum companies fear them because they feel it's their right to break the law at will, since they're supplying us with the stuff we can't do without, or so they would also like to believe.
01:21 PM on 09/03/2011
The fracking fluid is actually oobleck.
photo
joebaggadonuts
Civilization: Evolutionary pathway of choice.
02:20 PM on 09/03/2011
interesting reference, thanks.