iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Bill Cheney

Bill Cheney

Posted: August 12, 2010 10:57 AM

The banks are at it again: Putting their interests ahead of those of consumers and small business owners.

When Congress finally broke for its summer home-district work period this week, banks had not budged from stubbornly blocking a commonsense approach for creating more jobs: legislation that would give credit unions more authority to make business loans.

Never mind that improved business lending potential for credit unions would create more than 100,000 new jobs, and inject $10 billion into the economy, both at NO cost to taxpayers: The bankers are doing whatever they can to hold back this legislation.

You have to wonder what the bankers are thinking, especially since just last week the government reported the nation shed more than 130,000 jobs in July -- adding to the concern that more needs to be done to prevent the economic recovery from stalling.

Giving credit unions more business lending strength could be one key part of the response. Credit unions need the ability to raise their lending capacity to as much as 27.5 percent of assets, as proposed in legislation pending in Congress. Right now, credit unions are capped at 12.25 percent -- and while they have the money to lend, they're bumping up against that lower cap.

There is no public policy reason not to permit credit unions to do more lending to their members who own or want to start small-businesses. In fact, credit unions have proven for years they are capable of making these types of loans safely and soundly. During this "Great Recession," while bank business lending contracted, credit union business lending expanded.

Yet, the only ones who oppose expanding credit union business lending are banks -- and they are thwarting its consideration.

Unless Congress grants its permission, credit union business lending will have to slow down -- and that does nothing to help struggling small firms.

Credit unions were authorized under federal law more than 75 years ago in the crucible of the Great Depression. While our country today searches for solutions to boost the economy -- chiefly, by creating jobs -- now is when Congress ought to ignore the banks and turn again to credit unions, as a tool for helping small business.

If you own a small business, or if you want to start one, and you agree that credit unions should have more capacity to help you, call your senator and urge him or her to support Sen. Mark Udall's amendment to H.R. 5297, the Small Business Job and Credit Act of 2010.

Tell Congress to finish the job, frustrate the bankers -- and give credit unions the power to create more jobs for America.

 
The banks are at it again: Putting their interests ahead of those of consumers and small business owners. When Congress finally broke for its summer home-district work period this week, banks had not...
The banks are at it again: Putting their interests ahead of those of consumers and small business owners. When Congress finally broke for its summer home-district work period this week, banks had not...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 32
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
01:48 AM on 08/15/2010
I use to work for wachovia (Too Big too Fail) and anything to get this economy growing. In the short term it will help, but once you give a group of credit union bankers too much leeway, they too become corrupt. There needs to be some strings attached to the credit unions if they allow this to happen. Case in point. When Obama help save General Motors, they gave them money without any conditions, thus allowing General Motors to move their factories to Mexico, thus creating jobs in Mexico and not in the U.S..
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
The 14th Banker
11:29 AM on 08/14/2010
If Credit Unions can execute business lending successfully, they they should be allowed to do so. The 27% limit is reasonable for safety and soundness. Some Credit Unions would do it well and some would not. Give business a choice.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zrants
Through the Cracks Journalism
02:17 PM on 08/13/2010
There are two things we can do to support credit unions and increase lending to the under-served small business and consumer markets. Contact representatives in congress in support of the legislation and move money from the big banks into the credit unions and small banks. If the legislature doesn't free up some cash by changing the law, people can, by taking their money out of the big banks. That accomplishes another thing Congress can't seem to do, it scales the big banks back down in size and, If enough people move their money out of the big banks, their powers will diminish and Congress can quit bowing to their demands.
01:49 AM on 08/15/2010
Great post. yes, we all need to call!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
granto2
08:36 AM on 08/13/2010
i love my credit union, and will never do business with a traditional bank again. this legislation is a great idea
09:04 AM on 08/13/2010
Moveyourmoney.org is a great way for all folks to make their voices heard. Leave the big banks to stew in their juices.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rendy Bee Mulyono
Someone with constant stream of
07:12 AM on 08/13/2010
I AGREE!!!! Time to give these ungrateful banks some lending competition!
02:19 AM on 08/13/2010
Great idea. I started my career fresh out of college at the Santa Cruz Community Credit Union where I learned both personal and business lending. I see that they are stil providing the same services and has grown strong over 33 years time. http://www.scruzccu.org
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:37 AM on 08/13/2010
Is this not the same argument Wall Street used to expand into all those derivatives and other unfathomable financial shenanigans? OK, let them have a go at it, however first make sure they know if they loose their arse, the taxpayer is not going to bail them out. We don't need more "Too Big to Fail" companies in the financial community.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
myth buster
09:15 PM on 08/13/2010
Banks get huge by mergers and acquisitions, not organic growth. Since credit unions are limited by charter, there is no risk of a single credit union getting huge. The only systemic risk is that which is common to banks- cascading defaults.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:52 PM on 08/12/2010
Gotta say no to this one, Bill.

The one thing that makes CU's safer than banks is their low risk portfolio.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Anaxamenes
It's not how big your micro-bio is...
06:48 PM on 08/12/2010
That would be awesome! I loved my old credit union, I would totally go to them for a business loan to start a business. They remembered my name, even after I'd gone away to college and hadn't been in for a year.

Banks, if you don't want to loan out the money to get the economy going, then move over and let the credit unions do your job for you.
05:28 PM on 08/12/2010
As stated earlier, credit unions are owned by all their members, each has one vote. Unlike the banks who are owned by the shareholders mostly, who rule over everything economics.
If we are serious about fighting for the survival of the middle class, then we need to send a strong message to the big banks by moving our money to credit unions. I don't care what the bank regulators try to do, they can't fight us all.
There was a movement afoot back in February - remember ? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dave-adams/move-your-money-make-the_b_456573.html
04:44 PM on 08/12/2010
While I agree in principle with the premise, I'm wondering why Mr. Cheney is proposing a more than 100% increase in lending rates. The big banks are not going to sit by and let credit unions take that much business away. There's going to be a price to pay if such an increase is allowed. Here's the question sport fans; Guess who is going to have to pay that price? Yes, consumers!!! Be it higher fees, interest rates or credit union membership restrictions, somehow, some way consumers are going to take it in the pants. A few years ago credit unions were successful in beating back bank-sponsored legislation that would have severely restricted credit union membership. Furthermore, I don't think this cautious administration would ever fully support this. Mr. Cheney, I hope you're proposing 27.5% with the hope of getting 18 or 20%, but I feel that long time credit union members like myself would end up having to terminate membership due to the new restrictions that are sure to come if your proposal passes muster.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Anaxamenes
It's not how big your micro-bio is...
06:51 PM on 08/12/2010
Why would there need to be any added restrictions, this is simply allowing the credit union to loan up to 27% of it's assets instead of just 12%. That would mean, if every single one of their loans went belly up, they would still have 73% of their assets when the dust settled. That seems just fine to me and I'll bet it's a lot more than we require banks to keep on hand.
09:36 PM on 08/12/2010
Because that would be part of the deal made in Washington in order to get the increase in lending capacity passed. (Admittedly my assumption). The big banks are going to fight this just as they fought financial regulation. This represents a direct threat. There's going to be blood in the water, trust me.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:59 PM on 08/13/2010
so, because Big Banks are terrorizing us to get more money, the answer is to let them monopolize this market so they can have even more money and power? at what point do we simply say - NO, we don't work for you, you work for US - and tell them to charge whatever they want because we won't work with them

since our votes no longer count, we need to vote with our money. giving more of it to credit unions and less of it to banks is a great way to show the banks that we don't want what they sell, especially since they think their profits are sacrosanct, no matter how little they offer us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DebtNavigation
Attorney and Author
04:30 PM on 08/12/2010
George Bailey would work at a credit union. He wouldn't go near a TBTF bank.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rita R
Always asking why
08:19 AM on 08/13/2010
Or he'd work for the Grameen Bank. Both the credit union and Grameen Bank are based on the needs of the community and the bank members, versus multimillion dollar salaries for C level executives. What a concept!
unique
Animal lover forever
03:07 PM on 08/12/2010
I PUT ALL MY MONEY AND CHECKING INTO A CREDIT UNION AND BOY AM I GLAD I DID.

WHENI COME IN THE EMPLOYEES KNOW ME BY NAME, GREET ME, OFFER ME COFFEE,
AND TAKE CARE OF ME IN A QUICK TIMELY MANOR.

I HAVE NO HASSELS. I LOVE CREDIT UNIONS.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Anaxamenes
It's not how big your micro-bio is...
06:53 PM on 08/12/2010
The one thing I wish they would do, have more ATMs. If they could all get together and brand their ATMs with a logo so that no matter where you went, you could use any credit union ATM. They would advertise it as the CUA or something, the point being a universally recognized brand for a Credit Union ATM, they'd really sock it to the big banks.
photo
uniquindividual
I'm unique and so are you
03:02 PM on 08/12/2010
I joined a credit union two weeks ago, why it took me so long is a tribute to my laziness.
02:41 PM on 08/12/2010
we ( "the little people" ) need Lizzy Warren, Glass- Steagall as law and competition for banks. If the feds won't move on more lending for Credit Unions then we need state authority to do so even if it means a constitutional confrontation. I want my credit union funds to do the max for my community not enrich the Banksters and Wall Street crooks.
If Obama won't support this by telling Timmy G. and Larry S. to get out there and sell the idea then he needs to go in the next prez. elections - I'm one of those "professional lefties" that Gibbs and Rahm E. think they can take for granted - don't bet on it boys - I'll vote libertarian or green unless the Whitehouse starts to push a more liberal progressive agenda.
GTT Duxbury, MA